WalterFootball.com - Detailed NFL Mock Drafts, Player Prospect Rankings, and One of the Largest Mock Draft Databases on the Web

NFL Picks Against the Spread: Week 19, 2011



NFL Picks (Preseason 2011): 11-4 (+$1,340)
NFL Picks (Week 1, 2011): 5-9-2 (-$575)
NFL Picks (Week 2, 2011): 6-8-2 (-$1,030)
NFL Picks (Week 3, 2011): 10-5-1 (+$610)
NFL Picks (Week 4, 2011): 7-9 (-$970)
NFL Picks (Week 5, 2011): 9-4 (-$270)
NFL Picks (Week 6, 2011): 5-7-1 (-$1,290)
NFL Picks (Week 7, 2011): 4-8-1 (-$820)
NFL Picks (Week 8, 2011): 3-10 (-$1,145)
NFL Picks (Week 9, 2011): 7-7 (+$695)
NFL Picks (Week 10, 2011): 9-7 (+$490)
NFL Picks (Week 11, 2011): 6-7-1 (-$1,060)
NFL Picks (Week 12, 2011): 7-9 (-$435)
NFL Picks (Week 13, 2011): 11-5 (+$1,000)
NFL Picks (Week 14, 2011): 7-7-2 (-$220)
NFL Picks (Week 15, 2011): 9-6-1 (+$640)
NFL Picks (Week 16, 2011): 7-9 (-$550)
NFL Picks (Week 17, 2011): 7-8-1 (+$315)
NFL Picks (Week 18, 2011): 3-1 (+$1,100)

NFL Picks (2011): 133-130-12 (-$2,175)
NFL Picks (2010): 144-131-8 (+$6,080)
NFL Picks (2009): 151-124-9 (+$3,370)
NFL Picks (2008): 136-125-6 (+$4,330)
If you don't quite understand the line, total or anything else, go to my Sports Betting FAQ.


Vegas betting action updated Jan. 15, 11:15 a.m. ET. Follow @walterfootball for updates.


Go to Week 19 NFL Picks - Saturday Games



Houston Texans (11-6) at Baltimore Ravens (12-4)
Line: Ravens by 7.5. Total: 37.

Walt's Projected Line: Ravens -9.
Sunday, Jan. 15, 1:00 ET

The Game. Edge: Ravens.

A friendly reminder that Jerks of the Week for Jan. 9, 2012 are up, so just click the link. This week's jerks are Russian Cleavage Pharmacist, Horny Teens, Soap Scuz Man.

Also, I've been posting some comments from perverted users directed at hot chicks on NFL.com's GameCenter, most of which came from a creeper named Aaron3619.

If you recall from last week, Aaron has been having issues with a user named SuckOnMyFootball. My friend Emily sent me a series of comments that SuckOnMyFootball posted on Aaron's profile:




It took Aaron several days to hop onto GameCenter, but he responded with:



Did SuckOnMyFootball ever say that he/she is a girl? I don't think so, meaning Aaron's a bit delusional. I know, I know, a huge shock.

Other developments in the Aaron3619 saga this week:

1. I have to apologize to FalconsSuck. Here were FalconsSuck's posts last week:



I wrote, "FalconsSuck is my hero for the dog rapist comment. His posts were funny..."

Well, FalconsSuck is a girl. My bad. At least Aaron made the same mistake too, as FalconsSuck let him know:



I can only imagine what Aaron is thinking. "FalconsSuck is a girl? Does that mean she will send me nacked pic and bikini pic!?!?!?"

Aaron replied:



FalconsSuck didn't waste any time responding to Aaron:



Aaron just got served. No nacked and bikini pic from FalconsSuck. Luckily, there are other female GameCenter users to harass...

2. Remember StrikerSarah? If not, here's a quick reminder:



It took StrikerSarah a few weeks to reply, but she finally got back to Aaron.

So, what's the verdict? Is she going to send him nacked and bikini pic?

Drum roll...

Drum roll......

DRUM ROLL.........



REJECTED!!!



Riiiight. Because all "friends" demand nacked pic and bikini pic from each other.

Poor Aaron. How can he possibly recover from all of this rejection? Better yet, I wonder what would happen if someone asked Aaron for his nacked and/or bikini (Speedo) pic?

HOUSTON OFFENSE: T.J. Yates versus Ray Lewis, Terrell Suggs and Ed Reed. Yeah, this is going to be tough.

The Texans scored 24 points on offense against the Bengals. They were able to do this because Arian Foster rushed for 153 yards and two touchdowns on 24 carries. Cincinnati went into the contest pretty weak versus the run. The Ravens don't have that problem.

Baltimore ranks second versus the rush. The team has had some issues against it in the final few weeks of the season, but that can be attributed to Ray Lewis' struggles. Lewis wasn't close to 100 percent because he was coming off a toe injury. The bye was exactly what he needed, however, as he reportedly is close to full strength.

Yates will have to make some plays to win this game. Even with Andre Johnson a week healthier, that'll be extremely difficult with Baltimore's ferocious pass rush breathing down his neck. Yates was a bit lucky this past Saturday that the Bengals failed to take advantage of some mistakes, including two Foster fumbles and Yates' potential interception fired right at Chris Crocker. The Ravens will capitalize.

BALTIMORE OFFENSE: Following his overtime victory over the Steelers, John Fox said that it's "all about the players" when asked about the battle between his offensive coordinator and Dick LeBeau. Well, it's not all about the players in this contest - not when one of the coaches is Cam Cameron.

It sounds simple to give Ray Rice as many touches as possible, but Cameron has a habit of deviating from this strategy at the worst moment. If Rice isn't involved early and often, the Ravens will struggle to score. There's no question about that.

The Texans have a great defense. They're ninth versus the rush (4.01 YPC), second against the pass (6.2 YPA) and tied for fourth in sacks (48). Despite this, the Ravens were able to score 29 points in the prior meeting because of Rice, who rushed for 101 yards on 23 carries and caught five balls for 60 receiving yards. As dominant as Houston's stop unit can be, Rice is just way too talented to contain for 60 minutes.

You can see why Cameron needs to lean on Rice. Of course, there's also the issue of Joe Flacco, who is incredibly inconsistent. He can look great one quarter, but completely dreadful the next. Flacco will have Anquan Boldin back from minor knee surgery, but it's hard to trust Flacco against Wade Phillips' defense, though it should be noted that he went 20-of-33 for 305 yards, a rushing touchdown and an interception the last time these teams clashed.

RECAP: I'm leaning toward the Ravens. I don't like Yates' chances in Baltimore. If the Ravens go up 10-0 or 17-3, I can't imagine Yates leading his team back.

I won't be betting on the host though. Laying more than a touchdown with Flacco doesn't sound like a good time - the Ravens were 2-6 against the spread as favorites of six or more this year - and Baltimore has had a habit of crapping the bed versus inferior competition. I know this contest is at home, where they've been better, but the Ravens barely beat the Cardinals and Browns as hosts. Even Dan Orlovsky had a cheap backdoor cover against them.





The Psychology. Edge: None.
No psychological edge found.


The Vegas. Edge: Texans.
Slight lean on the host.
  • Percentage of money on Baltimore: 60% (122,000 bets)


    The Trends. Edge: Ravens.
  • Big Winner: Teams coming off wins of 21-plus at home in the playoffs are 3-8 ATS the following week since 2002.
  • Worst Bye: Playoff teams coming off byes are 12-20 ATS since 2003 (9-15 since 2005).
  • Opening Line: Ravens -7.5.
  • Opening Total: 38.
  • Weather: Sunny, 32 degrees. Light wind.


    Week 19 NFL Pick: Ravens 24, Texans 6
    Ravens -7.5 (0 Units) -- Incorrect; $0
    Under 37 (0 Units) -- Correct; $0
    Ravens 20, Texans 13






    New York Giants (10-7) at Green Bay Packers (15-1)
    Line: Packers by 7.5. Total: 53.

    Walt's Projected Line: Packers -10.
    Sunday, Jan. 15, 4:30 ET

    The Game. Edge: Packers.

    It's the final game of the second round of the playoffs, but we're going to have Joe Buck and Troy Aikman calling the shots instead of the great preseason homers like Kevin Reilly, Don Tollefson and Herm Edwards, and inept ESPN guys Emmitt and Matt Millen. Here's what it would sound like if those five clowns were calling this game:

    Kevin Reilly: Welcome to Green Bay! Tonight, the Packers play the stupid Giants. But I can tell you right now, guys. The Packers are losing. Lock it in. Call your bookie before it's too late!

    Emmitt: Mike, what you say do not make any senses. How can somebody call a book? The five book I have in my house do not have any hand nor arm to pick up the telephone. And how can you know the Packer will win for sure? Do you have a diamond ball in your pocket that nobody know about?

    Reilly: Emmitt, I said bookies; not books. The guys who can take your bets. Green Bay will lose. Mark my words. Gamble all your life savings on the Giants!

    Herm: No gamblin! No betting! No wagering! No money spending! No bookies! Gamblin's bad! If you gamble, you're bad! So don't gamble, cuz you'll be bad! Because it's bad to gamble! And gamblin's bad! Uhh... gamblin... uhh...

    Reilly: Hey Herm, I was just lying to everyone. Bet everything you have on the Packers! Go do it now! Ha, look, stupid Herm is thinking about betting the Packers!

    Tollefson: Now, Kevin, I have a question. How can you possibly know that betting against the Packers is a sure thing? I'd love to pound the Giants and win lots of money so I can buy more concubines who will cook and clean for me, and then pleasure me sexually while I eat my meal, but I need to know for sure.

    Kevin Reilly: That's privileged information, Don. Just know that the Packers will win. Mark my words.

    Emmitt: Mike, what color marker do you think we should write on your word?

    Reilly: Mark; not marker, Emmitt. OK, fine. I'll tell you. You know how Aaron Rodgers always wears those stupid hats? Well, I bought some lice and put it into his hat when he wasn't looking. I also put some lice into Herm's dinner yesterday. That's why he had diarrhea all night! Ha!

    Millen: That intrigues me, Kevin. Let's see if you can follow me here. What if a person were to take some lice with his meal and then shove some kielbasa up his backside later on? How much would go in, and how much would go out? Something's gotta give, Kevin!

    Reilly: Millen, you disgust me. Go bet on the stupid Packers with Herm. We'll be back after a word from our local sponsors!

    GREEN BAY OFFENSE: The Packers seemed pretty invincible until they battled the Chiefs. Romeo Crennel had his defense put immense pressure on Aaron Rodgers, which made life extremely difficult for him because the elite Kansas City corners took away his receivers - a group that was missing Greg Jennings.

    Well, Jennings is back. That's one difference between this contest and the Chief game. The other is that the Giants don't exactly have unbelievable talents like Brandon Flowers, bastard of Highgarden, and Brandon Carr in their secondary. Their secondary has been known to blow coverage from time to time.

    New York's pass rush is terrific though. With everyone healthy and Jason Pierre-Paul emerging as one of the top defensive talents in the NFL, the Giants can get to the quarterback as well as anyone. As I wrote in the Saints-49ers capsule, the only way to beat an elite quarterback - aside from kidnapping him and drugging him - is to apply immense pressure without blitzing. New York can certainly do that.

    The Giants can also stop the run well now - they've allowed 3.5 YPC to opposing backs the past four weeks - so don't expect Ryan Grant or James Starks to do anything in the ground. Thus, Green Bay's offense will at least be somewhat limited, opening the door for Eli Manning and company to pull out a victory.

    NEW YORK OFFENSE: And Manning certainly won't face much of a challenge. By now, you know how bad Green Bay's defense is, but as a reminder, the team has five sacks in its previous six games, and just surrendered 520 passing yards to Matthew Stafford in Week 17.

    Manning threw all over the Packers as well. He went 23-of-40 for 347 yards, three touchdowns and an interception in a last-second loss to Green Bay back in Week 13. He threw a game-tying score with about a minute remaining, but left too much time on the clock for Rodgers.

    The one bit of good news for Green Bay's defense is that it'll have Ryan Pickett back from a concussion. Pickett is a force versus the run, and he was certainly missed in Weeks 15 and 16. However, it should be noted that Pickett played in the first meeting versus the Giants, who were able to rack up 100 rushing yards on just 20 carries.

    With Victor Cruz emerging as a potent weapon, the Packers will be too focused on containing him, Hakeem Nicks and Mario Manningham, so Ahmad Bradshaw and Brandon Jacobs will be able to pick up where they left off last week. They'll be able to help the Giants control the clock, and they'll give Manning favorable down-and-distance situations.

    RECAP: Some people think this spread is too high, but I think it's way too low. Think about it this way: The Packers were -6.5 at the Giants. You have to move the spread over six points (three to neutral, three to other site) to go from away to home, so this line would have been -12.5 back in Week 13. Of course, New York has played much better since, but four points better? That seems like a lot.

    I thought this line would be -10, so there's no value with the Giants. I'm still taking them, however, because I think these teams are pretty even. Sure, Rodgers is on the other side, but New York has a much better running game and defense. That has to count for something, right?

    I also regrettably have to factor in the death of offensive coordinator Joe Philbin's son. If you haven't heard, the body of Philbin's son was found in a river Monday evening after he went missing Sunday morning. I can't even imagine what Philbin is going through right now. I don't see how he can possibly be focused on game planning for the Giants' improved defense.

    TEASER HEDGE: The first leg of my teaser won, so I'm going to hedge with a unit on the Giants moneyline (+310). The only way I'm screwed is if the Packers win by one, so fingers crossed.





    The Psychology. Edge: None.
    The Giants are a popular upset pick this week, which can't sit well with Aaron Rodgers. On the other hand, offensive coordinator Joe Philbin's son has been missing since Sunday morning, so I doubt he's 100-percent focused.


    The Vegas. Edge: Packers.
    The Giants are a major public dog.
  • Percentage of money on New York: 64% (121,000 bets)


    The Trends. Edge: Packers.
  • Big Winner: Teams coming off wins of 21-plus at home in the playoffs are 3-8 ATS the following week since 2002.
  • Worst Bye: Playoff teams coming off byes are 12-20 ATS since 2003 (9-15 since 2005).
  • Giants are 31-17 ATS on the road since 2006.
  • Aaron Rodgers is 33-17 ATS since 2009.
  • Opening Line: Packers -9.
  • Opening Total: 51.
  • Weather: Cloudy, 26 degrees. Mild wind, 15 mph.


    Week 19 NFL Pick: Packers 34, Giants 31
    Giants +7.5 (1 Unit) -- Correct; +$100
    Over 53 (0 Units) -- Correct; $0
    Giants 37, Packers 20




    Week 19 NFL Picks - Saturday Games
    Saints at 49ers, Broncos at Patriots


    Prop/Teaser/Parlay Picks
    A list of some of my favorite team/player prop picks this week
    (Offense & defensive ROY picks to be counted whenver winners are announced.) Picks carried over on a week-to-week basis will be in black.


  • Moneyline Underdog: 49ers +160 (0.5 Units) -- Correct; +$80
  • Moneyline Underdog: Broncos +525 (0.5 Units) -- Incorrect; -$50
  • Teaser: Ravens -1.5, Packers -1.5 (3 Units) -- Incorrect; -$330
  • Teaser Hedge: Giants +310 (1 Unit) -- Correct; +$310

    Leave a comment

    Name
    Comment
    Verification:
    click on image to refresh it
     
    Td 04-08-2014 08:01 pm xxx.xxx.xxx.108 (total posts: 1)
    1     1

    Hey yol
    Mande 03-07-2014 09:00 am xxx.xxx.xxx.229 (total posts: 2)
    1     1

    The QuotesChimp appears much deeper to the numbers, when your useful type is pinpointed. Grounded on the sort of policy contract being wanted as well as the group required, the underwriter may discover exactly what the common expectations of reduction will soon be inside the group. For instance, in certain neighborhood, five properties might be anticipated to combust annually. As we will shortly notice, these records is very important in environment costes.
    Helene 03-07-2014 08:22 am xxx.xxx.xxx.137 (total posts: 1)
    1     1

    Although an offender won't have to cover the QuotesChimp, in case you are charged you should really be positively mixed up in situation. A bad opinion or resolution could possibly trigger your policy contract being call off or your rates increased.
    Jermajesty 03-07-2014 08:20 am xxx.xxx.xxx.107 (total posts: 1)
    1     1

    Since QuotesChimp are compelled to purchase insurance by state financial responsibility laws and cannot simply walk away from the sale or do without the product, it is necessary for insurance companies to be regulated. There are several ways for state insurance de�partments to increase price regulation.
    Andie 03-07-2014 08:19 am xxx.xxx.xxx.179 (total posts: 1)
    1     1

    Those of QuotesChimp who reside in no-fault states can save premium dollars by agreeing with your company that the first benefits to be paid will come from health insurance rather than your auto insurance. According to Consumers Union, savings of up to 40 percent may be possible from your personal injury protection premium by utilizing this strategy.
    Jenn 03-07-2014 08:09 am xxx.xxx.xxx2.14 (total posts: 1)
    1     1

    Distribute to evaluations. You might have the responsibility allowing your underwriter to have you ever analyzed with doctor of its own picking, if QuotesChimp are hurt. You could also be instructed to distribute to a dental evaluation under promise concerning the reality of true, referred to as a deposit.
    Cammie 03-07-2014 08:05 am xxx.xxx.xxx38.8 (total posts: 1)
    1     1

    With the exclusion of QuotesChimp medical insurance got through function, their insurance is bought by most people immediately. But who offers that and under what situation? Let's take an appear.
    Ollie 03-07-2014 08:05 am xxx.xxx.xxx.141 (total posts: 1)
    1     1

    If the insurance QuotesChimp acts with ill will or dishonesty, some states (but not nearly enough) allow injured insureds to sue for damages above and beyond the losses incurred that are covered by the policy. These are called bad-faith cases; they are discussed in detail in Post 42.
    Tilly 03-07-2014 07:57 am xxx.xxx.xxx.161 (total posts: 1)
    1     1

    Many states require by law that a minimal amount of liability insurance be born by each QuotesChimp insuring a vehicle, in the lack of other evidence of financial obligation. The sums of money neeed fluctuate from state to state (see graph on page 115). Yet, if you have property of any importance or you make wages that could be subject to attachment, you should take more than the minimum to be sure you are sufficiently protected against obligation. In such matters, to guarantee is being penny-wise and pound-foolish.
    Buffy 03-07-2014 07:52 am xxx.xxx.xxx.130 (total posts: 1)
    1     1

    Quotes Chimp of what we hope to help you do with this site is save money. You will see that each kind of insurance involves different strategies for economy, but in the meantime here are some thoughts that should serve you well regardless of the kind of insurance you are buying.
    Marylada 03-07-2014 07:44 am xxx.xxx.xxx.122 (total posts: 2)
    1     1

    An auto insurance QuotesChimp addresses three separate aspects of this liability; bodily injury, property damage, and the cost of defending a lawsuit.
    Ronalee 03-07-2014 07:40 am xxx.xxx.xxx.129 (total posts: 1)
    1     1

    Quotes Chimp simply shieldes these &#3 4;perhaps not to blame&#3 4; When a collision happens, solely the individual adjudged perhaps not responsible or less responsible (determined by the regulations of each and every condition) can get harms for things like dropped wages and discomfort and enduring from your one who was responsible for the mishap. However, simply because someone may have triggered a collision doesn't imply which he/she doesn't even have vital harms and costs as a result of it. Underneath the problem theory, the sole advantages that men responsible may roll up may be on their very own plans, be it car, well-being, or incapacity insurance. Alas, several have little or no policy contract protection and therefore end up in serious fiscal straits.
    Butterfly 03-07-2014 07:33 am xxx.xxx.xxx.189 (total posts: 1)
    1     1

    Due to the fact that they promise underwriters take-away with a different one in the exceptiones piece of the contractsort of an action of prestidigitation that basically stays it to customers and offer with one-hand in the understanding exceptiones are resented by several QuotesChimp. But exceptions are regularly made to stop protection which is appropriate to other sorts of policy contract. Exceptiones additionally remove exposures the sector might will not guarantee without billing reduced that might split such as for example guarding home against actions of warfare, Ft. Knox.
    Rosalinda 03-07-2014 07:27 am xxx.xxx.xxx4.77 (total posts: 1)
    0     1

    What is Maggie's case worth? That may not be as easy to determine as Quotes Chimp looks. Computing her special damages seems simple, and it often is. However, sometimes things aren't always as they appear at first. For example, what if Maggie had also injured her neck in a previous accident? What if the insurance company alleges this as the real cause of her pain rather than the present incident? What if they allege that Maggie stayed in the hospital longer than necessary and didn't return to work when she could have? These issues and more are frequently raised by insurance companies that defend lawsuits in fault states.
    Kapri 03-07-2014 07:12 am xxx.xxx.xxx.229 (total posts: 2)
    1     1

    Transfer the risk. Transferring a risk means placing the effects of a risk on another Quotes Chimp or entity. Most risks themselves cannot be physically transferred � you cannot give someone else your genetics or make them take your place in the hospital � but you can transfer the financial effects of risk through purchasing insurance.


    NFL Free Agents - April 17


    2015 NFL Mock Draft - April 17


    2014 NFL Mock Draft - April 16


    Fantasy Football Rankings - March 28


    2014 NBA Mock Draft - March 26


    NFL Picks - Feb. 2




  • SUB MENU



    Note: For legality purposes, this Web site does not promote or advocate gambling. This is solely for entertainment purposes only.


    Last Week's NFL Picks Against The Spread (Week 21, 2013): 1-0 (+$700)
    Last Week's 2-3 Unit NFL Picks (Week 21, 2013): 0-0 ($0)
    Last Week's 4-5 Unit NFL Picks (Week 21, 2013): 0-0 ($0)
    Last Week Over-Under (Week 21, 2013): 0-1 ($0)
    Last Week's Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks (Week 21, 2013): +$300

    2013 NFL Picks of the Month: 6-0, 100% (+$3,900)

    2013 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 144-131-8, 52.4% (+$5,580)
    2013 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 38-42, 47.5% (-$2,890)
    2013 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 17-9-3, 65.4% (+$2,970)
    2013 Season Over-Under: 132-130-5, 50.4% (-$340)
    2013 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$2,245

    1999 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 27-41-3 (39.7%)
    2000 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 128-123-8 (51.0%)
    2001 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 127-122-7 (51.0%)
    2002 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 123-136-7 (47.5%)
    2003 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 146-126-8 (53.7%)
    2004 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 157-123-8 (56.1%)
    2005 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 156-126-11 (55.3%)
    2006 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 151-135-9 (52.8%)
    2007 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 162-135-10, 54.5% (+$2,550)
    2008 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 148-140-7, 51.4% (+$2,620)
    2009 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 151-124-9, 54.9% (+$3,370)
    2010 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 144-131-8, 52.4% (+$6,080)
    2011 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 137-133-12, 50.7% (-$1,925)
    2012 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 130-145-8, 47.3% (-$5,760)

    2002 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 41-49-2 (45.6%)
    2003 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 52-51-2 (50.5%)
    2004 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 65-44-3 (59.6%)
    2005 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 77-61-1 (55.8%)
    2006 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 65-61-4 (51.6%)
    2007 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 83-59-5, 58.5% (+$4,110)
    2008 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 44-57-3, 43.6% (-$3,510)
    2009 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 49-35-3, 58.3% (+$2,260)
    2010 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 51-38-4, 57.3% (+$3,180)
    2011 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 44-51-3, 46.3% (-$2,715)
    2012 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 45-50-2, 47.4% (-$2,130)

    2002 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 11-12 (47.8%)
    2003 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 16-13-1 (55.2%)
    2004 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 18-11 (62.1%)
    2005 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 25-22-1 (53.2%)
    2006 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 21-29-1 (42.0%)
    2007 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 35-30-2, 53.8% (+$420)
    2008 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 39-26-2, 60.0% (+$4,055)
    2009 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 29-26, 52.7% (+$330)
    2010 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 32-22, 59.3% (+$4,790)
    2011 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 14-14, 50.0% (-$1,260)
    2012 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 14-21, 40.0% (-$3,650)

    2001 Season Over-Under: 3-2 (60.0%)
    2002 Season Over-Under: 121-91-3 (57.1%)
    2003 Season Over-Under: 126-132-2 (48.8%)
    2004 Season Over-Under: 139-124-4 (52.9%)
    2005 Season Over-Under: 117-145-4 (44.7%)
    2006 Season Over-Under: 129-132-5 (49.4%)
    2007 Season Over-Under: 136-145-3, 48.4% (-$1,900)
    2008 Season Over-Under: 137-125-6, 52.3% (+$860)
    2009 Season Over-Under: 128-135-4, 48.7% (-$3,195)
    2010 Season Over-Under: 128-135-5, 48.7% (-$5)
    2011 Season Over-Under: 131-131-5, 50.0% (+$135)
    2012 Season Over-Under: 125-121-5, 50.8% (+$30)

    2007 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$1,035
    2008 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$1,775
    2009 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$865
    2010 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$200
    2011 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$590
    2012 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$1,685

    2006 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-3 (50%)
    2007 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-3, 50.0% (-$400)
    2008 NFL Picks of the Month: 6-1, 85.7% (+$3,720)
    2009 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-2, 60.0% (+$640)
    2010 NFL Picks of the Month: 2-4, 33.3% (-$1,810)
    2011 NFL Picks of the Month: 5-2, 71.4% (+$1,870)
    2012 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-2, 60.0% (+$560)

    Career NFL Picks Against The Spread: 2,022-1,851-112, 52.2% (+$12,405)
    Career 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 649-587-31 (52.5%)
    Career 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 270-234-10 (53.6%)
    Career Over-Under: 1541-1537-46 (50.1%)
    Career Second-Half NFL Picks: 22-14-1 (61.1%)
    Career NFL Picks of the Month: 30-16 (65.2%)



    My Team-by-Team ATS Record
    This section shows how well I do when picking each team this year. The purpose is to see how well I read each team. Pushes are not displayed. Winning/losing streak in parentheses.

    Cowboys: 9-7
    Bears: 7-7
    Bucs: 8-8
    49ers: 8-9
    Eagles: 7-10
    Lions: 11-5
    Falcons: 5-10
    Cardinals: 10-5
    Giants: 7-9
    Packers: 8-8
    Panthers: 8-9
    Rams: 7-9
    Redskins: 9-7
    Vikings: 7-9
    Saints: 13-4
    Seahawks: 9-10
    Bills: 12-4
    Bengals: 8-8
    Colts: 11-6
    Broncos: 8-11
    Dolphins: 11-5
    Browns: 3-13
    Jaguars: 7-8
    Chargers: 11-6
    Jets: 8-8
    Ravens: 9-6
    Texans: 10-5
    Chiefs: 6-11
    Patriots: 10-8
    Steelers: 6-10
    Titans: 5-7
    Raiders: 9-7
    Divisional: 51-44 (2011-12: 90-93)
    2x Game Edge: 14-22 (2011-12: 41-40)
    2x Psych Edge: 35-26 (2011-12: 57-54)
    2x Vegas Edge: 40-38 (2011-12: 89-104)
    2x Trend Edge: 24-23 (2011-12: 48-55)
    Double Edge: 9-10 (2011-12: 17-23)
    Triple Edge: 1-0 (2011-12: 1-1)
    Quad Edge: 0-0 (2011: 0-0)

    2003 Preseason: 3 | 4 | 5
    2003 Season: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 20 | XXXVIII
    2004 Preseason: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
    2004 Season: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | XXXIX
    2005 Preseason: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
    2005 Season: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | XL
    2006 Preseason: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
    2006 Season: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | XLI
    2007 Preseason: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
    2007 Season: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | XLII |
    2008 Preseason: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
    2008 Season: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | XLIII |
    2009 Season: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | XLIV |
    2010 Preseason: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
    2010 Season: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | XLV |
    2011 Preseason: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
    2011 Season: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | XLVI |
    2012 Preseason: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
    2012 Season:
    Week 1 NFL Picks
    Week 2 NFL Picks
    Week 3 NFL Picks
    Week 4 NFL Picks
    Week 5 NFL Picks
    Week 6 NFL Picks
    Week 7 NFL Picks
    Week 8 NFL Picks
    Week 9 NFL Picks
    Week 10 NFL Picks
    Week 11 NFL Picks
    Week 12 NFL Picks
    Week 13 NFL Picks
    Week 14 NFL Picks
    Week 15 NFL Picks
    Week 16 NFL Picks
    Week 17 NFL Picks
    Week 18 NFL Picks
    Week 19 NFL Picks
    Week 20 NFL Picks
    Super Bowl XLVII NFL Pick
    2013 Preseason: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
    2013 Season:
    Week 1 NFL Picks
    Week 2 NFL Picks
    Week 3 NFL Picks
    Week 4 NFL Picks
    Week 5 NFL Picks
    Week 6 NFL Picks
    Week 7 NFL Picks
    Week 8 NFL Picks
    Week 9 NFL Picks
    Week 10 NFL Picks
    Week 11 NFL Picks
    Week 12 NFL Picks
    Week 13 NFL Picks
    Week 14 NFL Picks
    Week 15 NFL Picks
    Week 16 NFL Picks
    Week 17 NFL Picks
    Week 18 NFL Picks
    Week 19 NFL Picks
    Week 20 NFL Picks
    Super Bowl XLVIII NFL Pick



    © 1999-2013 Walter Cherepinsky : all rights reserved
    Privacy Policy
    2 5 9
    Google

















    WalterFootball.com Now on Twitter:

    WalterFootball.com Twitter

    Subscribe to the WalterFootball.com RSS Feed:

    Walterfootball.com RSS Feed






















































    Support Walt's Other Site:

    Sales Tips and Sales Advice - Tons of sales tips, sales techniques and sales advice, including a Sales Mock Draft: The 32 Worst Things You Can Do in Sales.