NFL Picks Against the Spread: Week 20, 2022

NFL Picks (Preseason 2022): 7-5 (+$645)
NFL Picks (Week 1, 2022): 10-6 (+$1,165)
NFL Picks (Week 2, 2022): 7-8-1 (+$1,050)
NFL Picks (Week 3, 2022): 11-4-1 (+$2,825)
NFL Picks (Week 4, 2022): 10-5-1 (+$1,305)
NFL Picks (Week 5, 2022): 6-10 (-$2,625)
NFL Picks (Week 6, 2022): 7-7 (-$1,620)
NFL Picks (Week 7, 2022): 4-10 (-$2,255)
NFL Picks (Week 8, 2022): 7-8 (-$640)
NFL Picks (Week 9, 2022): 7-4-2 (+$170)
NFL Picks (Week 10, 2022): 7-7 (+$1,460)
NFL Picks (Week 11, 2022): 5-7-2 (-$350)
NFL Picks (Week 12, 2022): 12-4 (+$2,005)
NFL Picks (Week 13, 2022): 6-9 (+$75)
NFL Picks (Week 14, 2022): 8-5 (+$1,075)
NFL Picks (Week 15, 2022): 10-5-1 (+$675)
NFL Picks (Week 16, 2022): 7-9 (+$220)
NFL Picks (Week 17, 2022): 7-8 (+$80)
NFL Picks (Week 18, 2022): 10-6 (+$460)
NFL Picks (Week 19, 2022): 2-4 (-$830)

2022 NFL Picks: 150-131-8 (+$4,890)
2021 NFL Picks: 153-141-2 (+$210)
NFL Picks (2020): 138-124-7 (+$9,350)
NFL Picks (2019): 148-128-9 (+$1,200)
NFL Picks (2018): 140-134-12 (+$845)
NFL Picks (2017): 137-147-10 (-$4,300)
NFL Picks (2016): 148-127-10 (+$780)
NFL Picks (2015): 133-138-10 (-$3,215)
NFL Picks (2014): 143-133-7 (-$1,885)
NFL Picks (2013): 144-131-8 (+$7,825)
NFL Picks (2012): 130-145-8 (-$7,445)
NFL Picks (2011): 137-133-12 (-$1,335)
NFL Picks (2010): 144-131-8 (+$5,880)
NFL Picks (2009): 151-124-9 (+$4,235)
NFL Picks (2008): 136-125-6 (+$6,105)
NFL Picks (2007): 162-135-10 (+$3,585)
If you don’t quite understand the line, total or anything else, go to my Sports Betting FAQ.

Vegas betting action updated Jan. 20, 9:50 p.m. Follow @walterfootball for updates.

Go to Week 20 NFL Picks – Sunday Games

Jacksonville Jaguars (9-8) at Kansas City Chiefs (14-3)
Line: Chiefs by 9.5. Total: 53.
Saturday, Jan. 21, 4:35 ET

The Matchup. Edge: None.

Week 19 Analysis: Well, that sucked. We were having a winning week heading into Monday night… I’ll continue to break down all the 3+ unit picks each week:

Giants, 4 units (win): This was a bittersweet victory. It was nice to win money, obviously, but it’s sad that we won’t get to fade the Vikings again this year.

Buccaneers, 8 units (loss): I like to get ahead of the market, which is something we did a lot this year. The Steelers, for example, were a great bet for us when T.J. Watt returned. I thought the Buccaneers looked great Monday night because they’d have their entire offensive line intact for the first time all year. The sharps agreed with this assessment early in the week, as they bet the Buccaneers down from +3 to +2.5. Apparently, we were completely wrong about the health of the offensive line mattering. Tom Brady must not have read the injury report because he played scared the entire night, releasing passes quickly when there was no pass rush, looking like he was too terrified to take a hit. Mike Evans, meanwhile, looked like he didn’t give a f**k when he quit on some routes, and then the defense also gave up once they saw their leaders putting forth no effort. It was a completely pathetic display. If the Buccaneers were going to mail it in, they should have at least given the Panthers or Saints a crack at beating the Cowboys. I apologize for this loss, but I truly thought we had the right side when factoring in the health of Tampa’s offensive line. I did not anticipate Brady and Evans throwing in the towel.

Before I begin, I should note that we have some new features, including WalterFootball Premium. We’ve gotten lots of complaints about the ads over the years, but there hasn’t been anything I can do about them because I’ve needed the ad revenue to pay my employees and the hosting. This is an alternative way to view the site. For $7.99 per month, you won’t get any ads. You’ll also have access to a premium chat on Discord where I’ll be every day to answer any questions. If you want to support the site, besides telling others about it, signing up for WalterFootball Premium would be a great way to do so! KANSAS CITY OFFENSE: Patrick Mahomes may win MVP, so it has to be discouraging for the Jaguars to know that he had one of the best games of the year against their defense back in Week 10. Mahomes was nearly flawless in that game, going 26-of-35 for 331 yards, four touchdowns and an interception. He did this without JuJu Smith-Schuster, who suffered a concussion in the first half.

I don’t know what could have changed in the past 10 weeks to alter this result. The Jaguars’ ranking against the pass has improved since that loss to Kansas City, but they’ve played against lots of sketchy offenses down the stretch, including the Titans twice, Texans, Ravens, and Jets. The explosive offenses they battled, like the Lions and Cowboys, scored at least 34 against them.

The Jaguars are solid against the run, but that won’t matter in this matchup. What’s important is that the Jaguars are incredibly weak to tight ends, as Gerald Everett and Donald Parham discovered Saturday night. This obviously bodes very poorly against Travis Kelce.

JACKSONVILLE OFFENSE: The Jaguars won’t be able to stop the Chiefs on most occasions, so they’ll need to outscore them in a shootout to defeat them. They will obviously not be able to do that if Trevor Lawrence opens the game with four interceptions again. Andy Reid won’t have the same sort of late-game meltdown that Brandon Staley was guilty of on Saturday night.

Lawrence had a slow start to the aforementioned Week 10 meeting between these teams, though he generated some good garbage-time numbers. He ended up 29-of-40 for 259 yards and two touchdowns. However, that was before he found a rhythm with Evan Engram and Zay Jones. The Chiefs are also not very good when it comes to defending tight ends, so Engram figures to have a strong performance.

Travis Etienne might have some success as well, though it’s worth noting that he couldn’t find any running room in the previous matchup. The Chiefs were woeful against the rush earlier in the year, but have since improved in that regard.

RECAP: I bet the Jaguars +9.5 in that Week 10 matchup, but was burned by a half point, with Kansas City winning by 10. That said, the Jaguars were a missed chip-shot field goal away from covering, so I don’t know if I had the wrong side.

Perhaps I haven’t learned my lesson, but I’m going to show some conviction by siding with the Jaguars once again. I like them for a couple of reasons. First, I believe this spread is too high. I made this line Kansas City -6.5, which makes sense because the Chiefs probably should have won by seven last time, and the Jaguars are better now than they were in Week 10. My projected spread includes the Chiefs’ bye, as I would have made the line -6 under normal circumstances.

Second, the Chiefs have struggled to put a complete game together this year. Even in their cover against the Raiders in the regular-season finale, they scored just seven points in the second half. Whether it’s the first or second half, the Chiefs have a habit of floundering during a portion of each game, which is why they’ve struggled to cover high spreads all year. When favored by 9.5 or more this year, they’ve won by 3, 10, 16, 6, 14, and 3. If they cover, they barely get there.

I don’t think this is a slam-dunk pick because of my concerns regarding Jacksonville’s pass defense, but I’m willing to bet a few units that the Jaguars will remain within striking distance once again. At the very least, we’ll have a solid back-door opportunity with Lawrence firing passes late in the game to all of his talented weapons.

Our Week 20 NFL Picks will be posted all day Tuesday. Follow @walterfootball for updates.

THURSDAY THOUGHTS: There is no injury news to report, but there’s plenty of sharp action coming in on Jacksonville.

SATURDAY NOTES: There was sharp money on the Jaguars earlier in the week, but other pro money has come in on the Chiefs. This line has risen to -9.5, so perhaps we’ll get a nice +10 prior to kickoff. While I’m betting on the Jaguars in this game, I’m going to bet the Chiefs to win the Super Bowl at 3.25/1 odds as a hedge for my bet on the Jacksonville ticket. I have the Jaguars at 125/1 to win the Super Bowl, so I’ll be rooting for them to win outright.

FINAL THOUGHTS: The sharps were early on the Jaguars and late on the Chiefs, so they’re split on this game. I was hoping to get a viable +10, but I don’t see anything better than -124 vig on that number, and I’m not paying for that. The best line is +9.5 -108 at FanDuel.

The Motivation. Edge: None.
No edge found.

The Spread. Edge: Jaguars.

WalterFootball.com Calculated Spread: Chiefs -6.5.
Westgate Advance Point Spread: N/A.
Computer Model: Chiefs -10.
DVOA Spread: .

The Vegas. Edge: None.
Equal action.

Percentage of money on Jacksonville: 59% (586,000 bets)

The Trends. Edge: Chiefs.

Jaguars are 55-100 ATS against non-divisional opponents since 2008.

Patrick Mahomes is 69-18 SU, 46-40 ATS (35-28 ATS when not favored by double digits.)

Andy Reid is 18-10 ATS off a bye.

Opening Line: Chiefs -9.

Opening Total: 52.

Weather: Cloudy, 37 degrees. Light wind.

Week 20 NFL Pick: Chiefs 27, Jaguars 20
Jaguars +9.5 -108 (3 Units) – FanDuel — Correct; +$300
Under 53 (0 Units) — Correct; $0
Chiefs 27, Jaguars 20

New York Giants (9-7-1) at Philadelphia Eagles (14-3)
Line: Eagles by 7.5. Total: 48.
Saturday, Jan. 21, 8:15 ET

The Matchup. Edge: Eagles.

VEGAS UPDATE: I’ll be posting how the Vegas sportsbooks have done the previous week in this spot. The highest-bet sides were 34-42 in 2020 and 48-37 in 2021. The highest bet sides are now 31-35-1 this year.

Here are the teams getting the most bets last week:

49ers -10

Bengals -8.5

Bills -10.5

The public was off to a nice start with the 49ers cover, but had a bloody Sunday with Cincinnati and Buffalo both failing to beat the number.

Here are the teams getting the most bets this week:

Bengals +4.5

49ers -3.5

I can’t say I’m surprised by either of these, especially Cincinnati, given how bad Buffalo looked against Miami.

HATE MAIL: This week I will be posting a compilation of all the hate mail I received from Vikings fans this year so we can drink their salty tears together.

This was in regard to my NFL Power Rankings:

I’d like to note that I never placed the Vikings in the top seven. Any publication that put the Vikings atop their power rankings should have their power rankings licenses revoked.

This is also from the power rankings. This guy wrote an essay on why I was wrong about correctly listing the Vikings as overrated:

Yes, I dropped a team after they were outgained by 220 yards by a third-string quarterback. My advice to anyone obsessed with team records is to stop watching ESPN. Team records are the siren song of the clueless ESPN viewer.

Speaking of clueless ESPN viewers:

Imagine thinking that the Vikings were better than the Bills. I couldn’t imagine being that uninformed.

Here’s another:

I hate Tron. I hate Tron so much I play Obsidian Charmaw in my main deck. F**k you, Tron.

My favorite story about Rodney Dangerfield is that he faked chest pains to get out of a 2-hour parade. He wanted the parade to stop, but they told him they couldn’t do it unless there was a medical emergency. Five minutes later, he grabbed his chest and called for an ambulance.

These were all great, but the Salty Viking Fan of the Year belongs to Richard Benjamin:

What are the odds that Richard Benjamin reaches out to me and admits that he was wrong? Less than the probability of me becoming the next Queen of England, maybe?

PHILADELPHIA OFFENSE: The Eagles sputtered on this side of the ball at the end of the year. Jalen Hurts’ injury is obviously part of the reason for that occurring, but that’s not nearly the only reason the Eagles struggled to score in their final two games, as Gardner Minshew led Philadelphia to 34 points in a shootout in Dallas. Furthermore, Hurts returned in the finale, and the Eagles scored just 22 points in that contest, albeit with a vanilla game plan.

Hurts’ absence was only part of the problem, with the other major factor being Lane Johnson’s injury. Johnson is arguably the top right tackle in the NFL, which would explain why the Eagles have not played up to their potential without him. Thus, there are two major questions entering this game: Is Hurts 100 percent? And will Johnson be able to play? As of this writing, the Eagles haven’t practiced yet, but given that Hurts had an extra week to heal, it seems likely that he’ll be back to full strength. As for Johnson, he said he would be on the field for this game. He could suffer a setback in practice, but hearing him say this was encouraging.

If Hurts and Johnson are ready to go, the Eagles shouldn’t have any issues moving the chains on the Giants. They scored 48 points against New York in Week 14, and there’s no reason to expect this result to be any different, as long as Hurts and Johnson are fine. The Giants have a miserable defense that is ranked low in every regard, save for pressure rate. If Johnson is on the field, this pressure rate will be meaningless because Philadelphia’s elite offensive line will keep Hurts shielded well.

NEW YORK OFFENSE: The Eagles won that Week 14 matchup by the score of 48-22. And yet, that result isn’t even indicative of how lopsided that affair was. Seven of the Giants’ 22 points came via a blocked punt, and then the rest of the production occurred in garbage time. The Eagles outgained the Giants, 437-304, and they averaged 1.7 more yards per play.

Those who watched the Giants upset the Vikings might be wondering how Daniel Jones and Saquon Barkley will be stopped, but the Eagles accomplished this feat in Week 14. Jones and Barkley took advantage of the Vikings’ miserable defense, but navigating through Philadelphia’s elite stop unit will be much more challenging. Jones will face tons of pressure from a unit that led the NFL in sacks, while his receivers will be smothered by Philadelphia’s dual shutdown cornerbacks. Jones will scramble for some first downs, but the Eagles have better personnel than the Vikings to contain that aspect of the Giants’ offense.

As for Barkley, he would have enjoyed a favorable matchup in the middle of the season when the Eagles sported a leaky run defense. That has since changed because Jordan Davis returned from injury. The Eagles clamped down on the run late in the year, so Barkley won’t be nearly as productive this week.

RECAP: My pick will obviously depend on the statuses of Hurts and Johnson. Assuming they’re both 100 percent, I love the Eagles.

This spread is too low if Hurts and Johnson are healthy. The Eagles were -7 in New York back in Week 14, so they should be favored by at least 10 in this contest. Yet, this line is only -7.5 because of some recent results. People have forgotten how dominant the Eagles can be when they’re fully motivated. These same people may not realize that the Giants are overrated. The Giants aren’t very far removed from getting blown out by the Lions, Cowboys and Eagles, and also tying the Redskins. They rank 22nd in net adjusted EPA despite their record. The reason for this is that their miserable defense is 30th.

With that in mind, I plan on betting the Eagles accordingly. I’ll change things up if we get negative news on Hurts and Johnson, but I see no reason why Philadelphia couldn’t win this game easily.

THURSDAY THOUGHTS: Lane Johnson has been limited in practice both Tuesday and Wednesday. Jalen Hurts, meanwhile, hasn’t even been on the injury report! The Eagles look good for a considerable wager, but let’s see what happens in the coming days.

SATURDAY NOTES: Lane Johnson will play, while Jalen Hurts was never on the injury report. The sharps, as a result, are on the Eagles. I’ll be betting three units on Philadelphia.

FINAL THOUGHTS: F**king Jamal Agnew. Anyway, the sharps were on the Eagles at -7, but not so much at -7.5 or -8. I still love the Eagles with Jalen Hurts and Lane Johnson returning. The best line is -7.5 -110 at BetMGM.

The Motivation. Edge: .
No edge found.

The Spread. Edge: Eagles.

WalterFootball.com Calculated Spread: Eagles -10.
Westgate Advance Point Spread: N/A.
Computer Model: Eagles -9.
DVOA Spread: .

The Vegas. Edge: None.
Equal action.

Percentage of money on New York: 57% (698,000 bets)

The Trends. Edge: Eagles.

History: Eagles have won 25 the last 30 meetings.

Opening Line: Eagles -7.5.

Opening Total: 47.

Weather: Cloudy, 39 degrees. Light wind.

Week 20 NFL Pick: Eagles 34, Giants 17
Eagles -7.5 (3 Units) – BetMGM — Correct; +$300
Over 48 (0 Units) — Incorrect; $0
Eagles 38, Giants 7

Week 20 NFL Picks – Sunday Games
Bengals at Bills, Cowboys at 49ers

Prop/Teaser/Parlay Picks
A list of some of my favorite team/player prop picks this week
(Offense & defensive ROY picks to be counted whenver winners are announced.) Picks carried over on a week-to-week basis will be in black.

Prop/teaser/parlay picks posted in Week 20 NFL Picks – Sunday Games

2024 NFL Mock Draft - April 23

NFL Power Rankings - Feb. 22

Fantasy Football Rankings - Feb. 19

NFL Picks - Feb. 12

SUB MENU

Note: For legality purposes, this Web site does not promote or advocate gambling. This is solely for entertainment purposes only.

Last Week's NFL Picks Against The Spread (Week 18, 2023): 10-6 (-$415)
Last Week's 2-3 Unit NFL Picks (Week 18, 2023): 3-1 (+$460)
Last Week's 4-5 Unit NFL Picks (Week 18, 2023): 1-1 (-$40)
Last Week Over-Under (Week 18, 2023): 7-9 ($0)
Last Week's Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks (Week 18, 2023): -$15

2023 NFL Picks of the Month: 1-4, 20.0% (-$2,480)

2023 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 137-135-7, 50.4% (-$7,735)
2023 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 43-38-3, 53.1% (+$520)
2023 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 28-27-1, 50.9% (-$3,110)
2023 Season Over-Under: 139-128-3, 52.1% (+$100)
2023 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$1,630

1999 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 27-41-3 (39.7%)
2000 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 128-123-8 (51.0%)
2001 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 127-122-7 (51.0%)
2002 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 123-136-7 (47.5%)
2003 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 146-126-8 (53.7%)
2004 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 157-123-8 (56.1%)
2005 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 156-126-11 (55.3%)
2006 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 151-135-9 (52.8%)
2007 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 162-135-10, 54.5% (+$3,585)
2008 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 148-140-7, 51.4% (+$6,105)
2009 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 151-124-9, 54.9% (+$4,235)
2010 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 144-131-8, 52.4% (+$5,880)
2011 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 137-133-12, 50.7% (-$1,335)
2012 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 130-145-8, 47.3% (-$7,445)
2013 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 144-131-8, 52.4% (+$7,825)
2014 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 143-133-7, 51.8% (-$1,885)
2015 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 134-138-12, 49.3% (-$3,215)
2016 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 148-127-10, 53.8% (+$780)
2017 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 137-140-8, 49.5% (-$4,300)
2018 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 140-134-14, 51.3% (+$845)
2019 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 149-128-9, 53.6% (+$1,200)
2020 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 138-124-7, 52.7% (+$9,350)
2021 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 153-141-2, 51.9% (+$210)
2022 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 154-134-8, 53.5% (+$9,860)

2002 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 41-49-2 (45.6%)
2003 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 52-51-2 (50.5%)
2004 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 65-44-3 (59.6%)
2005 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 77-61-1 (55.8%)
2006 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 65-61-4 (51.6%)
2007 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 83-59-5, 58.5% (+$4,110)
2008 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 44-57-3, 43.6% (-$3,510)
2009 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 49-35-3, 58.3% (+$2,260)
2010 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 51-38-4, 57.3% (+$3,180)
2011 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 44-51-3, 46.3% (-$2,715)
2012 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 45-50-2, 47.4% (-$2,130)
2013 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 38-42, 47.5% (-$2,890)
2015 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 47-44-1, 51.6% (-$820)
2016 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 42-35-3, 54.5% (+$475)
2017 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 32-40-3, 43.8% (-$2,395)
2018 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 52-41-2, 55.9% (+$2,670)
2019 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 44-36-2, 55.0% (+$655)
2020 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 47-43-3, 52.2% (-$1,965)
2021 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 50-50, 50.0% (-$1,570)
2022 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 56-44-2, 56.0% (+$1,860)

2002 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 11-12 (47.8%)
2003 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 16-13-1 (55.2%)
2004 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 18-11 (62.1%)
2005 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 25-22-1 (53.2%)
2006 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 21-29-1 (42.0%)
2007 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 35-30-2, 53.8% (+$420)
2008 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 39-26-2, 60.0% (+$4,055)
2009 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 29-26, 52.7% (+$330)
2010 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 32-22, 59.3% (+$4,790)
2011 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 14-14, 50.0% (-$1,260)
2012 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 14-21, 40.0% (-$3,650)
2013 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 17-9-3, 65.4% (+$2,970)
2015 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 17-16-2, 51.5% (-$1,120)
2016 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 21-22-5, 48.8% (-$1,465)
2017 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 20-22-1, 47.6% (-$1,595)
2018 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 27-32-1, 45.8% (-$4,735)
2019 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 37-27-2, 57.8% (+$2,185)
2020 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 37-22-1, 62.7% (+$5,515)
2021 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 32-32-1, 50.0% (-$725)
2022 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 41-30-1, 57.8% (+$3,725)

2001 Season Over-Under: 3-2 (60.0%)
2002 Season Over-Under: 121-91-3 (57.1%)
2003 Season Over-Under: 126-132-2 (48.8%)
2004 Season Over-Under: 139-124-4 (52.9%)
2005 Season Over-Under: 117-145-4 (44.7%)
2006 Season Over-Under: 129-132-5 (49.4%)
2007 Season Over-Under: 136-145-3, 48.4% (-$1,900)
2008 Season Over-Under: 137-125-6, 52.3% (+$860)
2009 Season Over-Under: 128-135-4, 48.7% (-$3,195)
2010 Season Over-Under: 128-135-5, 48.7% (-$5)
2011 Season Over-Under: 131-131-5, 50.0% (+$135)
2012 Season Over-Under: 125-121-5, 50.8% (+$30)
2013 Season Over-Under: 132-130-5, 50.4% (-$340)
2015 Season Over-Under: 143-119-5, 54.6% ($0)
2016 Season Over-Under: 123-141-1, 46.6% (+$95)
2017 Season Over-Under: 136-139-2, 49.5% (+$640)
2018 Season Over-Under: 118-128-3, 48.0% (-$225)
2019 Season Over-Under: 126-133-4, 48.6% (-$50)
2020 Season Over-Under: 141-122-6, 53.6% ($0)
2021 Season Over-Under: 132-151-3, 46.6% ($0)
2022 Season Over-Under: 133-149-2, 47.2% (-$225)

2007 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$1,035
2008 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$1,775
2009 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$865
2010 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$200
2011 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$590
2012 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$1,685
2013 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$2,245
2015 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$855
2016 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$275
2017 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$510
2018 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$1,495
2019 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$1,715
2020 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$4,975
2021 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$3,455
2022 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$5,720

2006 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-3 (50%)
2007 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-3, 50.0% (-$400)
2008 NFL Picks of the Month: 6-1, 85.7% (+$3,720)
2009 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-2, 60.0% (+$640)
2010 NFL Picks of the Month: 2-4, 33.3% (-$1,810)
2011 NFL Picks of the Month: 5-2, 71.4% (+$1,870)
2012 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-2, 60.0% (+$560)
2013 NFL Picks of the Month: 6-0, 100% (+$3,900)
2014 NFL Picks of the Month: 2-4, 33.3% (-$1,350)
2015 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-3, 50.0% (-$100)
2016 NFL Picks of the Month: 5-1, 83.3% (+$2,780)
2017 NFL Picks of the Month: 4-2, 66.7% (+$1,040)
2018 NFL Picks of the Month: 4-3, 57.1% (-$640)
2019 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-3-1, 50.0% (-$625)
2020 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-2, 60.0% (+$665)
2021 NFL Picks of the Month: 2-3, 40.0% (-$920)
2022 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-4, 42.9% (-$1,615)

Career NFL Picks Against The Spread: 3,420-3,152-195, 52.1% (+$21,170)
Career 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 1,106-983-56 (52.9%)
Career 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 549-485-25 (53.1%)
Career Over-Under: 2,853-2,829-74 (50.3%)
Career Second-Half NFL Picks: 23-16-1 (59.0%)
Career NFL Picks of the Month: 46-34-1 (57.5t%)

My Team-by-Team ATS Record
This section shows how well I do when picking each team this year. The purpose is to see how well I read each team. Pushes are not displayed. Winning/losing streak in parentheses.

Cowboys: 8-9	Bears: 11-4	Bucs: 6-11	49ers: 10-7
Eagles: 7-7	Lions: 9-8	Falcons: 8-9	Cardinals: 8-9
Giants: 7-9	Packers: 5-12	Panthers: 8-9	Rams: 8-9
Redskins: 14-3	Vikings: 6-9	Saints: 10-7	Seahawks: 7-9

Bills: 9-7	Bengals: 12-5	Colts: 7-10	Broncos: 9-6
Dolphins: 6-11	Browns: 11-5	Jaguars: 13-4	Chargers: 8-9
Jets: 8-9	Ravens: 11-6	Texans: 5-12	Chiefs: 5-10
Patriots: 7-9	Steelers: 11-6	Titans: 9-8	Raiders: 6-9

Divisional: 50-35 (2011-22: 558-526)	2x Game Edge: 36-24 (2011-22: 363-361)	2x Motivation Edge: 32-36 (2011-22: 478-405)	2x Spread Edge: 41-40 (2011-22: 197-168)
2x Vegas Edge: 41-38 (2011-22: 407-406)	2x Trend Edge: 15-13 (2011-22: 306-279)	Double Edge: 17-13 (2011-22: 190-172)	Triple Edge: 1-1 (2011-22: 32-36)