NFL Picks Against the Spread: Week 18, 2012

NFL Picks (Preseason 2012): 6-9-1 (-$1,440)
NFL Picks (Week 1, 2012): 3-13 (-$2,250)
NFL Picks (Week 2, 2012): 8-7-1 (+$430)
NFL Picks (Week 3, 2012): 7-9 (+$70)
NFL Picks (Week 4, 2012): 7-8 (+$640)
NFL Picks (Week 5, 2012): 7-7 (-$340)
NFL Picks (Week 6, 2012): 9-5 (+$1,670)
NFL Picks (Week 7, 2012): 7-5-1 (+$420)
NFL Picks (Week 8, 2012): 6-8 (-$450)
NFL Picks (Week 9, 2012): 8-6 (+$240)
NFL Picks (Week 10, 2012): 8-6 (+$730)
NFL Picks (Week 11, 2012): 6-7-1 (+$110)
NFL Picks (Week 12, 2012): 5-9-2 (-$1,080)
NFL Picks (Week 13, 2012): 8-7-1 (-$420)
NFL Picks (Week 14, 2012): 8-8 (-$1,110)
NFL Picks (Week 15, 2012): 5-11 (-$1,480)
NFL Picks (Week 16, 2012): 11-5 (+$410)
NFL Picks (Week 17, 2012): 7-9 (-$1,150)

NFL Picks (2012): 126-139-7 (-$5,000)
NFL Picks (2011): 137-133-12 (-$1,925)
NFL Picks (2010): 144-131-8 (+$6,080)
NFL Picks (2009): 151-124-9 (+$3,370)
NFL Picks (2008): 136-125-6 (+$4,330)
If you don’t quite understand the line, total or anything else, go to my Sports Betting FAQ.

Vegas betting action updated Jan. 6, 11:20 p.m. ET. Follow @walterfootball for updates.

Go to Week 18 NFL Picks – Saturday Games

Indianapolis Colts (11-5) at Baltimore Ravens (10-6)
Line: Ravens by 7. Total: 47.
Walt’s Projected Line: Ravens -6.
Sunday, Jan. 6, 1:00 ET
Discuss Playoff Games, Talk Trash

The Game. Edge: Ravens.

Week 18 NFL Picks will be posted all day Wednesday, per the new schedule. I’ve received mix reaction to this, so voice your opinion via e-mail or in the comment box below. Follow me @walterfootball for updates.

Jerks of the Week for Dec. 31, 2012 is up, so just click the link. This week’s jerks are the Lexus December to Remember commercials.

It’s time for some Migelini Madness! NFL.com sucks. They no longer have their regular GameCenter chat format; they installed a Facebook chat app instead, which really blows. This means that we won’t be hearing from our favorite idiots anymore. No more pervy Aaron3619. No more stupid Migelini. No more childish Taton. No more insane Farim.

Well, I’m taking a stand against this via two methods. First, I have hundreds of unused GameCenter comments saved up, so I have enough to survive for a few more years. Second, I plan on re-creating our favorite GameCenter characters and having them troll the Facebook posters in the app. I made a Migelini account and my girlfriend, Awesome Girl Who Loves Football, who was once harassed by Aaron3619, is the new Aaron. Feel free to re-create other ones!

As you can see here, Mario is not worried about the 49ers because of their injured quarterback:

Mario is all about making sure people have their facts straight this week:

If you’ve wondering what Mario thought about the possible suspension to Richard Sherman, here it is:

Want an NFC West preview for next year? Mario’s got it covered:

As for other trollers, I was very excited to see a D’Squarius Green Jr:

Love the Marty Millen insult there. Oh, and here’s Bill Romanowski, who now apparently works in a prison:

INDIANAPOLIS OFFENSE: The big news heading into this contest is that Ray Lewis announced that he will retire after this season. Lewis will be back in the lineup after tearing his triceps, which will be both good and bad. The positive to Lewis’ return is that he’ll be an on-field leader and will put all of his teammates in the right position because he’s so great with the mental aspect of football. The negative is that Lewis was a big liability in run support even before he suffered an injury. Lewis won’t be at 100 percent, so the Colts would be wise to attack him.

Vick Ballard has enjoyed some quality outings late in the season, including a 105-yard performance at Houston back in Week 15. The Ravens’ issues in terms of stopping the rush are well-documented, so while Ballard should still play well and approach the 100-yard plateau, they’re lucky they don’t have to battle a running back like Adrian Peterson, or even Marshawn Lynch or Alfred Morris.

Of course, Indianapolis moves the chains primarily through the air. Andrew Luck, who is already deadly when it comes to converting third-down attempts, hasn’t turned the ball over in the past three weeks. He somehow was careful with the football this past week against the Texans even though he was constantly pressured. Protecting him will be key, so it’s good news for the Colts that the Ravens are just tied for 15th in sacks (37).

BALTIMORE OFFENSE: I already mentioned that the Ravens are not particularly good against the run, but they’re like, well, the 2000 Baltimore Ravens compared to the Colts in that department. Indianapolis is ranked dead last versus the rush over the past four weeks (5.91 YPC), highlighted by the 350-plus rushing yards it surrendered to Kansas City in Week 16. The Chiefs became just the fifth team to gain 350 yards or more on the ground since 1989 – though they still managed to lose because Brady Quinn was so inept.

The Ravens will definitely run the football. Cam Cameron’s not the offensive coordinator anymore; otherwise he’d have Joe Flacco attempt 50 passes and call for several ineffective end-arounds. Baltimore named Jim Caldwell as a replacement for Cameron specifically so he would find a way to give Ray Rice the football. Rice is essentially coming off a week of rest, so his legs will be fresh to expose Indianapolis more effectively than he normally would.

Unlike the Chiefs, the Ravens have the aerial attack to prevail in the event that they gain 350 rushing yards on the ground. Well, maybe. It’s difficult to tell which Flacco we’ll get. When Flacco is on, he’s incredibly good. Just ask the Giants. But when he’s off, anyone can beat the Ravens. Just ask Charlie Batch. With Vontae Davis healthy again, the Colts have a decent enough aerial defense to contain Flacco.

RECAP: The Colts have played out of their minds for their embattled head coach, and will continue to perform above their talent level until they meet a playoff opponent that is simply unbeatable for them. And despite what Michael Lombardi said on Bill Simmons’ BS Report, Indianapolis can absolutely defeat Baltimore. Here’s why, in addition to the Chuckstrong reasoning:

1. I just don’t think the Ravens are that good. I received lots of hate mail over the year for keeping them out of the top 10 of my NFL Power Rankings, but I felt as though that was completely justified.

The Ravens have just one convincing win since Week 2 – its 33-14 destruction of the reeling Giants. They beat the Patriots, but should have lost the game for various reasons. They could have easily fallen to the Chiefs and Cowboys after that. They were blown out by the Texans. They struggled with Cleveland after the bye. They needed a miracle to slay the Chargers. They lost to Charlie Batch and nearly went down to Byron Leftwich, who broke his ribs. And then they were obliterated by the Broncos at home.

2. Chuck Pagano gives the Colts an edge – but not just spiritually. He, as well as a handful of his players, were in Baltimore last year. They know the Ravens’ schemes, coaching and personnel inside and out. Pagano will be able to create a great game plan to thwart his former team.

3. Baltimore, meanwhile, did itself a great disservice by resting its players this past Sunday. Forum member mdb researched it, and teams resting their starters are 5-15 against the spread in their first playoff game.

I like the Colts to not only cover; but to win straight up. This is my top pick this week.

FINAL THOUGHTS: There’s too much being made about Ray Lewis’ announced retirement. His teammates already knew this, but it was just announced to the media. I still love the Colts.

The Psychology. Edge: Colts.

Chuck Pagano and many of his players are familiar with the Ravens. Baltimore just rested its starters.

The Vegas. Edge: Ravens.
Tons of action on the Colts early on.

Percentage of money on Indianapolis: 62% (143,000 bets)

The Trends. Edge: None.

Opening Line: Ravens -6.5.

Opening Total: 46.

Weather: Partly cloudy, 46 degrees. Light wind.

Week 18 NFL Pick: Colts 20, Ravens 18
Colts +7 (4 Units) — Incorrect; -$440
Under 47 (0 Units) — Correct; $0
Ravens 24, Colts 9

Seattle Seahawks (11-5) at Washington Redskins (10-6)
Line: Seahawks by 3. Total: 45.5.
Walt’s Projected Line: Redskins -1.

Sunday, Jan. 6, 4:30 ET
Discuss Playoff Games, Talk Trash

The Game. Edge: Seahawks.

This week on FOX, we’re going to have Joe Buck and Troy Aikman calling the shots instead of the great preseason homers like Kevin Reilly and Don Tollefson, inept ESPN guys Emmitt and Matt Millen, annoying guys like Charles Davis and senile guys like Bob Greise. Here’s what it would sound like if those five clowns were calling this game:

Kevin Reilly: Welcome to the nation’s capital, the state of Washington, where the Redskins take on the Seahawks. Guys, we were here last week, and we watched the Redskins destroy the Cowboys. As a true Eagles’ fan, I hate Dallas with every fiber of my being, so I’m not going to lie to you – when Tony Romo threw that last interception, I got a little excited and urinated in my pants a little bit.

Emmitt: Mike, I do not understand what wrong with that. Sometime when I watch the TV show Dancin’ on the Star, I sometime get li-bit excitement too even though one time a couple of month ago I dance on the star in the show.

Reilly: Thanks, Emmitt. That makes me feel better about myself. Does anyone have any embarrassing moments they want to share?

Millen: Oh sure, Kevin, I pee my pants all the time, but I do so on purpose. One of my kielbasa partners, Georgio, is into that sort of thing. We both wear adult diapers so we don’t get our pants wet, and then we have lots of fun together. You should try it, Kevin.

Griese: Did someone say adult diapers? Where are my adult diapers?

Reilly: No one cares about you, Griese. Millen, you’re sick, but perhaps these adult diapers will work for me.

Tollefson: I wouldn’t do that, Kevin. While Millen’s sick pervert friend may like that, it won’t fly with the ladies. How do you expect a woman to cook and clean for you when you wear adult diapers? She’ll think you’re some rich gold-digger and order you to pay a cleaning service to do household chores for you. What sort of woman doesn’t cook or clean around the house? Not one that I’d like to associate with.

Reilly: I don’t care about women, Tolly! I care about my Eagles!

Millen: Oh really? Do you care about men? Because Georgio and I could share some of our kielbasas with you one of these nights.

Reilly: No men, no women! Only Eagles. My Eagles! I just have to figure out a way not to pee myself.

Davis: There are some other things you can do in your pants, Kevin. How about pooping? The good, ole No. 2? That’s a great thing to do in your pants. How about sticking your hand into your pants, Al Bundy style? That always works. What about diarrhea? Not the same as poop, but it’s even messier! How about really, really getting excited and…

Reilly: I SWEAR I DON’T DO THAT EITHER SO SHUT UP CHARLES DAVIS! We’ll be back after a word from our local sponsors!

WASHINGTON OFFENSE: Everyone seems to be wondering how the Redskins can possibly stop Russell Wilson and Marshawn Lynch, but I have similar questions about Seattle’s ability to contain Robert Griffin and Alfred Morris. The Seahawks do not have a great defense. I love their secondary, which will be welcoming back Brandon Browner, but Seattle has not been able to stop the run ever since stud defensive end Red Bryant suffered a foot injury. He’s been playing hurt since the beginning of October, which would explain why his defense is just 27th against ground attacks, surrendering 4.54 yards per carry to the opposition.

The Redskins are just as lethal on offense as Seattle with their read-option attack. Griffin called Morris his Terrell Davis, which is appropriate. Morris rushed for 1,610 yards and 13 touchdowns as a rookie on 4.8 yards per attempt. Even though the Seahawks practice against this scheme, it’s difficult to imagine them containing Washington because Bryant is essentially playing on one leg.

Speaking of playing on one leg, Griffin’s health is obviously the main concern. Griffin was running away with the Offensive Rookie of the Year honors prior to suffering a torn PCL in the fourth quarter of the Baltimore game. He was gimpy against the Eagles and only slightly healthier versus Dallas. Now, team doctors are telling Mike Shanahan that Griffin is completely healthy. That’s obviously bad news for the Seahawks.

SEATTLE OFFENSE: Everything positive I just wrote about the Redskins can also be applied to the Seahawks. Russell Wilson is so dangerous in the read-option style of attack. Marshawn Lynch is an awesome complementary runner, so Washington won’t have much success stopping him. The Redskins are slightly better against the run compared to Seattle, but not by much, ranking 18th in that department (4.34 YPC).

Lynch is great, but Wilson is just playing out of his mind right now. He keeps getting better and better each week. In his previous eight starts, he’s scored 20 touchdowns and has turned the ball over just three times. He’s maintained a YPA of 7.9 or better every contest since Week 10. With Griffin slowing down at the end, it’s fair to say that Wilson should have overtaken Griffin for Offensive Rookie of the Year.

Washington’s best chance to stop Wilson is to do what the Rams did – flood the backfield on nearly every play and hope for the best. The Redskins pressured Tony Romo consistently in Week 17, but did so via the blitz. That won’t work very well against Wilson. St. Louis was able to just rush their defensive line and accumulate six sacks in the process – and despite this, Wilson still went 15-of-19 for 250 yards and two touchdowns (one passing, one rushing) with 58 yards on the ground. He’s just unbelievable.

RECAP: The Seahawks have been on fire lately, but most of their blowout victories have been at home. They crushed the crappy Bills, but that was in Toronto. They lost at Miami, but prevailed in Chicago the following week. That was a great win, but think about it this way – Seattle had to beat the Bears in overtime, yet the Redskins are better than Chicago, so why are the Seahawks favored by three on the road?

I don’t think this spread is right. I feel as though it should be a pick-em game. The Seahawks have no playoff experience, and they’re not nearly as good on the road as they are at home. Yes, they have a convincing victory as a visitor, but that contest could have gone either way. At the time, I wrote that if Chicago had won the coin toss in overtime, it would have prevailed because both defenses were reeling.

This spread is not a pick-em, however. Washington is getting points as a host. The rule with small home underdogs in the playoffs is that you bet on them unless the visiting squad is substantially better. The Seahawks are better than the Redskins, but substantially? Not on the road they’re not. I’m picking Washington for two units.

FINAL THOUGHTS: Nothing has changed for me. Still on the Redskins.

The Psychology. Edge: Redskins.

The Redskins being a home underdog has to be a huge motivational boost.

The Vegas. Edge: None.
Equal action.

Percentage of money on Seattle: 50% (109,000 bets)

The Trends. Edge: Redskins.

Seahawks are 15-29 ATS on the road since 2006 if they’re not coming off an away loss.

Opening Line: Seahawks -2.5.

Opening Total: 45.5.

Weather: Partly cloudy, 42 degrees. Light wind.

Week 18 NFL Pick: Redskins 27, Seahawks 24
Redskins +3 (2 Units) — Incorrect; -$220
Over 45.5 (0 Units) — Incorrect; $0
Seahawks 24, Redskins 14

Week 18 NFL Picks – Saturday Games

Prop/Teaser/Parlay Picks
A list of some of my favorite team/player prop picks this week
(Offense & defensive ROY picks to be counted whenver winners are announced.) Picks carried over on a week-to-week basis will be in black.

Moneyline Underdog: Colts +255 (0.5 Units)

Teaser: Packers -1.5, Redskins +9 (2 Units)

NFL Picks - Nov. 23

2025 NFL Mock Draft - Nov. 20

NFL Power Rankings - Nov. 19

Fantasy Football Rankings - Sept. 4

SUB MENU

Note: For legality purposes, this Web site does not promote or advocate gambling. This is solely for entertainment purposes only.

Last Week's NFL Picks Against The Spread (Week 12, 2024): 11-3 (+$2,020)
Last Week's 2-3 Unit NFL Picks (Week 12, 2024): 3-1 (+$580)
Last Week's 4-5 Unit NFL Picks (Week 12, 2024): 3-0 (+$1,400)
Last Week Over-Under (Week 12, 2024): 6-8 ($0)
Last Week's Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks (Week 12, 2024): +$905

2024 NFL Picks of the Month: 1-3, 25.0% (-$1,365)

2024 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 89-82-6, 52.0% (-$2,545)
2024 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 22-26-1, 45.8% (-$600)
2024 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 18-17, 51.4% (-$155)
2024 Season Over-Under: 82-82-2, 50.0% (+$95)
2024 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$740

1999 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 27-41-3 (39.7%)
2000 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 128-123-8 (51.0%)
2001 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 127-122-7 (51.0%)
2002 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 123-136-7 (47.5%)
2003 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 146-126-8 (53.7%)
2004 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 157-123-8 (56.1%)
2005 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 156-126-11 (55.3%)
2006 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 151-135-9 (52.8%)
2007 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 162-135-10, 54.5% (+$3,585)
2008 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 148-140-7, 51.4% (+$6,105)
2009 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 151-124-9, 54.9% (+$4,235)
2010 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 144-131-8, 52.4% (+$5,880)
2011 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 137-133-12, 50.7% (-$1,335)
2012 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 130-145-8, 47.3% (-$7,445)
2013 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 144-131-8, 52.4% (+$7,825)
2014 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 143-133-7, 51.8% (-$1,885)
2015 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 134-138-12, 49.3% (-$3,215)
2016 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 148-127-10, 53.8% (+$780)
2017 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 137-140-8, 49.5% (-$4,300)
2018 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 140-134-14, 51.3% (+$845)
2019 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 149-128-9, 53.6% (+$1,200)
2020 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 138-124-7, 52.7% (+$9,350)
2021 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 153-141-2, 51.9% (+$210)
2022 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 154-134-8, 53.5% (+$9,860)
2023 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 144-141-7, 50.5% (-$7,285)

2002 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 41-49-2 (45.6%)
2003 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 52-51-2 (50.5%)
2004 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 65-44-3 (59.6%)
2005 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 77-61-1 (55.8%)
2006 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 65-61-4 (51.6%)
2007 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 83-59-5, 58.5% (+$4,110)
2008 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 44-57-3, 43.6% (-$3,510)
2009 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 49-35-3, 58.3% (+$2,260)
2010 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 51-38-4, 57.3% (+$3,180)
2011 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 44-51-3, 46.3% (-$2,715)
2012 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 45-50-2, 47.4% (-$2,130)
2013 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 38-42, 47.5% (-$2,890)
2015 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 47-44-1, 51.6% (-$820)
2016 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 42-35-3, 54.5% (+$475)
2017 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 32-40-3, 43.8% (-$2,395)
2018 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 52-41-2, 55.9% (+$2,670)
2019 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 44-36-2, 55.0% (+$655)
2020 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 47-43-3, 52.2% (-$1,965)
2021 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 50-50, 50.0% (-$1,570)
2022 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 56-44-2, 56.0% (+$1,860)
2023 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 44-40-3, 52.4% (+$285)

2002 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 11-12 (47.8%)
2003 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 16-13-1 (55.2%)
2004 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 18-11 (62.1%)
2005 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 25-22-1 (53.2%)
2006 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 21-29-1 (42.0%)
2007 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 35-30-2, 53.8% (+$420)
2008 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 39-26-2, 60.0% (+$4,055)
2009 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 29-26, 52.7% (+$330)
2010 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 32-22, 59.3% (+$4,790)
2011 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 14-14, 50.0% (-$1,260)
2012 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 14-21, 40.0% (-$3,650)
2013 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 17-9-3, 65.4% (+$2,970)
2015 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 17-16-2, 51.5% (-$1,120)
2016 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 21-22-5, 48.8% (-$1,465)
2017 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 20-22-1, 47.6% (-$1,595)
2018 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 27-32-1, 45.8% (-$4,735)
2019 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 37-27-2, 57.8% (+$2,185)
2020 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 37-22-1, 62.7% (+$5,515)
2021 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 32-32-1, 50.0% (-$725)
2022 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 41-30-1, 57.8% (+$3,725)
2023 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 32-27-1, 54.2% (-$1,310)

2001 Season Over-Under: 3-2 (60.0%)
2002 Season Over-Under: 121-91-3 (57.1%)
2003 Season Over-Under: 126-132-2 (48.8%)
2004 Season Over-Under: 139-124-4 (52.9%)
2005 Season Over-Under: 117-145-4 (44.7%)
2006 Season Over-Under: 129-132-5 (49.4%)
2007 Season Over-Under: 136-145-3, 48.4% (-$1,900)
2008 Season Over-Under: 137-125-6, 52.3% (+$860)
2009 Season Over-Under: 128-135-4, 48.7% (-$3,195)
2010 Season Over-Under: 128-135-5, 48.7% (-$5)
2011 Season Over-Under: 131-131-5, 50.0% (+$135)
2012 Season Over-Under: 125-121-5, 50.8% (+$30)
2013 Season Over-Under: 132-130-5, 50.4% (-$340)
2015 Season Over-Under: 143-119-5, 54.6% ($0)
2016 Season Over-Under: 123-141-1, 46.6% (+$95)
2017 Season Over-Under: 136-139-2, 49.5% (+$640)
2018 Season Over-Under: 118-128-3, 48.0% (-$225)
2019 Season Over-Under: 126-133-4, 48.6% (-$50)
2020 Season Over-Under: 141-122-6, 53.6% ($0)
2021 Season Over-Under: 132-151-3, 46.6% ($0)
2022 Season Over-Under: 133-149-2, 47.2% (-$225)
2023 Season Over-Under: 145-135-3, 51.8% (+$200)

2007 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$1,035
2008 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$1,775
2009 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$865
2010 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$200
2011 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$590
2012 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$1,685
2013 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$2,245
2015 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$855
2016 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$275
2017 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$510
2018 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$1,495
2019 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$1,715
2020 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$4,975
2021 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$3,455
2022 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$5,720
2023 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$2,565

2006 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-3 (50%)
2007 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-3, 50.0% (-$400)
2008 NFL Picks of the Month: 6-1, 85.7% (+$3,720)
2009 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-2, 60.0% (+$640)
2010 NFL Picks of the Month: 2-4, 33.3% (-$1,810)
2011 NFL Picks of the Month: 5-2, 71.4% (+$1,870)
2012 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-2, 60.0% (+$560)
2013 NFL Picks of the Month: 6-0, 100% (+$3,900)
2014 NFL Picks of the Month: 2-4, 33.3% (-$1,350)
2015 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-3, 50.0% (-$100)
2016 NFL Picks of the Month: 5-1, 83.3% (+$2,780)
2017 NFL Picks of the Month: 4-2, 66.7% (+$1,040)
2018 NFL Picks of the Month: 4-3, 57.1% (-$640)
2019 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-3-1, 50.0% (-$625)
2020 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-2, 60.0% (+$665)
2021 NFL Picks of the Month: 2-3, 40.0% (-$920)
2022 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-4, 42.9% (-$1,615)
2023 NFL Picks of the Month: 2-5, 28.6% (-$2,550)

Career NFL Picks Against The Spread: 3,510-3,234-202, 52.0% (+$19,125)
Career 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 1,129-1,011-57 (52.8%)
Career 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 571-502-25 (53.2%)
Career Over-Under: 2,941-2,916-76 (50.2%)
Career Second-Half NFL Picks: 23-16-1 (59.0%)
Career NFL Picks of the Month: 47-37-1 (56.0%)

My Team-by-Team ATS Record
This section shows how well I do when picking each team this year. The purpose is to see how well I read each team. Pushes are not displayed. Winning/losing streak in parentheses.

Cowboys: 6-3	Bears: 5-5	Bucs: 6-4	49ers: 6-4
Eagles: 5-5	Lions: 9-1	Falcons: 6-5	Cardinals: 8-2
Giants: 3-6	Packers: 6-3	Panthers: 4-6	Rams: 5-5
Redskins: 5-5	Vikings: 4-6	Saints: 5-6	Seahawks: 6-3

Bills: 4-7	Bengals: 2-9	Colts: 6-5	Broncos: 7-4
Dolphins: 4-6	Browns: 3-7	Jaguars: 3-7	Chargers: 6-3
Jets: 6-5	Ravens: 5-5	Texans: 5-6	Chiefs: 4-5
Patriots: 6-3	Steelers: 4-6	Titans: 6-3	Raiders: 5-5

Divisional: 21-23 (2011-23: 608-561)	2x Game Edge: 18-14 (2011-23: 401-387)	2x Motivation Edge: 31-25 (2011-23: 510-441)	2x Spread Edge: 21-30 (2011-23: 239-211)
2x Vegas Edge: 33-47 (2011-23: 448-446)	2x Trend Edge: 12-8 (2011-23: 321-293)	Double Edge: 13-16 (2011-23: 207-185)	Triple Edge: 4-8 (2011-23: 33-37)