A long-time sports handicapper who lives in Las Vegas told me that he loves to calculate “best-case scenarios” and “worst-case scenarios” for teams in the preceding season when deciding which over-under win totals he wants to bet. He looks at how many close games each team won and lost the previous season, then adjusts their best- and worst-case records accordingly. For example, if an 11-5 team won five games by four points or fewer (or in overtime), their worst-case record would be 6-10, given that the team easily could have lost those games. Conversely, if a 4-12 team lost six games by four points or fewer (or in overtime), their best-case record could have been 10-6.
This chart will measure the best- and worst-case records for each team, pertaining to wins and losses by four points or fewer, or in overtime. This can help us make determinations on which teams are overrated and underrated, allowing for more successful over-under win total wagers.
If you’re skeptical, four of the greatest disparities from 2017 to 2018 were the Bears (5-11 to 8-8), Cardinals (8-8 to 4-12), the Steelers (13-3 to 8-8) and the Chargers (9-7 to 13-3). All four hit their respective over/unders.
Follow me @walterfootball for updates.
Best/Worst-Case Records: NFC East
Team |
Real Record |
Best Case |
Worst Case |
Cowboys |
10-6 |
12-4 |
5-11 |
Eagles |
9-7 |
12-4 |
6-10 |
Giants |
5-11 |
9-7 |
3-13 |
Redskins |
7-9 |
8-8 |
5-11 |
The Cowboys were very lucky last year, as they had five very close victories. Some regression is expected, which can’t be a surprise because they’re very poorly coached and perennially overrated. The Giants, conversely, had a 9-7 best-case record, but I wouldn’t put too much stock into that because they lost Odell Beckham and Landon Collins.
Best/Worst-Case Records: NFC North
Team |
Real Record |
Best Case |
Worst Case |
Bears |
12-4 |
15-1 |
11-5 |
Lions |
6-10 |
9-7 |
4-12 |
Packers |
6-9-1 |
10-6 |
3-13 |
Vikings |
8-7-1 |
9-7 |
7-9 |
If you’re expecting the Bears to regress as a result of a fluky 2018 outcome, think again. They actually lost quite a few close games, so their 12-4 was almost a 15-1. The Packers, meanwhile, are all over the place. They both won and lost a number of close games, but I suspect they’ll improve in 2019 if Aaron Rodgers has better luck staying healthy.
Best/Worst-Case Records: NFC South
Team |
Real Record |
Best Case |
Worst Case |
Buccaneers |
5-11 |
9-7 |
4-12 |
Falcons |
7-9 |
10-6 |
5-11 |
Panthers |
7-9 |
10-6 |
5-11 |
Saints |
13-3 |
14-2 |
8-8 |
The Buccaneers are a good bet to perform above expectations. They lost four close games last year. With a far better head coach, they could make the jump to 8-8 or 9-7. Conversely, the Saints stick out as a team that could suffer some major regression. They won five close contests, so that 13-3 easily could have been 8-8.
Best/Worst-Case Records: NFC West
Team |
Real Record |
Best Case |
Worst Case |
49ers |
4-12 |
8-8 |
2-14 |
Cardinals |
3-13 |
7-9 |
1-15 |
Rams |
13-3 |
13-3 |
10-6 |
Seahawks |
10-6 |
13-3 |
6-10 |
The Seahawks had seven close games last year, which is a crazy number. What sticks out here, however, is that San Francisco and Arizona could have been 8-8 and 7-9 last year, respectively, despite abysmal quarterbacking. Jimmy Garoppolo and Kyler Murray should be able to get those wins, so the 49ers and Cardinals make for nice wagers.
Best/Worst-Case Records: AFC East
Team |
Real Record |
Best Case |
Worst Case |
Bills |
6-10 |
8-8 |
3-13 |
Dolphins |
7-9 |
8-8 |
4-12 |
Jets |
4-12 |
7-9 |
3-13 |
Patriots |
11-5 |
12-4 |
11-5 |
There’s not much to see here. I like the Jets this year, but they had just three close losses. However, with Sam Darnold bound to make a big leap, and the roster being improved, New York should be able to challenge for a playoff spot.
Best/Worst-Case Records: AFC North
Team |
Real Record |
Best Case |
Worst Case |
Bengals |
6-10 |
8-8 |
4-12 |
Browns |
7-8-1 |
12-4 |
3-13 |
Ravens |
10-6 |
13-3 |
8-8 |
Steelers |
9-6-1 |
13-3 |
6-10 |
It’s rather remarkable that the Browns would’ve finished 12-4 last year had they won all of their close games. They lost the tight contests because of poor coaching and inexperience at quarterback. That will change in 2019. Meanwhile, the Steelers are a great bet to bounce back, as they could have gone 13-3 in 2018.
Best/Worst-Case Records: AFC South
Team |
Real Record |
Best Case |
Worst Case |
Colts |
10-6 |
12-4 |
6-10 |
Jaguars |
5-11 |
9-7 |
5-11 |
Texans |
11-5 |
14-2 |
6-10 |
Titans |
9-7 |
11-5 |
5-11 |
The Colts could have been 6-10 last year, but won four close games. They improved their roster, however, so I don’t expect regression. Conversely, the Texans prevailed in five close contests and did not upgrade the team, so expect Houston to decline in 2019. Interestingly, the Jaguars could’ve been 9-7 last year despite Blake Bortles’ incompetence. Tennessee, meanwhile, could have been 5-11 last year, but eked out four close victories.
Best/Worst-Case Records: AFC West
Team |
Real Record |
Best Case |
Worst Case |
Broncos |
6-10 |
10-6 |
3-13 |
Chargers |
12-4 |
13-3 |
8-8 |
Chiefs |
12-4 |
15-1 |
10-6 |
Raiders |
4-12 |
5-11 |
1-15 |
Denver could be due to bounce back, though that would require Joe Flacco to stay healthy. The Chargers, meanwhile, enjoyed some unprecedented great luck last year, as losing all of their close games would’ve put them at 8-8.
More 2019 Fantasy Football Articles:
Fantasy Football Rankings
2019 Fantasy Football Rankings:
2019 Fantasy Football Rankings: Quarterbacks - 8/26 (Walt)
Chet Gresham's Fantasy Football Quarterback Rankings - 8/12 (Chet)
2019 Fantasy Football Rankings: Running Backs - 9/4 (Walt)
Chet Gresham's Fantasy Football Running Back Rankings - 8/12 (Chet)
2019 Fantasy Football Rankings: Wide Receivers - 9/3 (Walt)
Chet Gresham's Fantasy Football Wide Receiver Rankings - 8/12 (Chet)
2019 Fantasy Football Rankings: Tight Ends - 8/29 (Walt)
Chet Gresham's Fantasy Football Tight End Rankings - 8/12 (Chet)
2019 Fantasy Football Rankings: Kickers - 5/11 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Rankings: Defenses - 5/11 (Walt)
Fantasy Football Rookie Rankings: Dynasty - 8/27 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Mock Drafts:
2019 Fantasy Football Mock Draft - 8/29 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Real Draft - 8/28 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football PPR Mock Draft - 8/22 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Mock Draft - 8/15 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football PPR Mock Draft - 8/8 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Mock Draft - 8/1 (Walt)
Fantasy Football Experts Draft - 6/23 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Dynasty Rookie Mock Draft - 5/23 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Cheat Sheets:
2019 Fantasy Football Cheat Sheet: Top 250 - 9/4 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Cheat Sheet: Top 250 PPR - 9/4 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Cheat Sheet: Top 250 Half-PPR - 9/4 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Cheat Sheet: Top 250 2-QB - 9/4 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Cheat Sheet: Top 250 Touchdown League - 9/4 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Cheat Sheet: Custom - 9/4 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football: Dynasty Rankings - 9/4 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Spreadsheets - 9/4 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Articles:
2019 Fantasy Football Stock Report: OTAs, Training Camp - 9/4 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Sleepers - 9/1 (Walt)
2019 NFL Preseason Game Recaps - 8/30 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Stock Report: Preseason Games - 8/30 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football Busts - 8/27 (Walt)
2019 Fantasy Football: Wide Receiver Values - 8/20 (Chet)
2019 Fantasy Football: Running Back Values - 8/13 (Chet)
2019 Fantasy Football: Quarterback Values - 8/8 (Chet)
2019 Fantasy Football Round-by-Round Strategy Guide - 8/7 (Walt)
NFL Picks - Nov. 4
NFL Power Rankings - Nov. 4
2025 NFL Mock Draft - Oct. 30
Fantasy Football Rankings - Sept. 4