Drunk Mail, Hate Mail, Lost Mail - March 24, 2010
And: I'm drunk. That means: I'm really drunk. Not like: "Uhhhh, I'm drunk!!!!111!!!11!" No, it's like: "I'm f***ing drunk."
Al Davis Hate Mails/E-mails - March 2, 2010
I know Al Davis isn't the best drafter, but it's a little childish and immature and unprofessional to have him taking 5-6-7-rounders in the first three rounds based on 40 times or height/weight ratios.
Hackers and Dog Killers - Feb. 8, 2010
Whoa, what happened to your forums? Why did your home page keep re-directing to some weird Web site on Saturday night and Sunday morning?
Fresh Batch of Hate Mail - Jan. 17, 2010
You are a f***ing idiot you d***bag. The one time I decide to follow your dumba** advice I get burned hard.
First Hate Mail of the Year - Jan. 10, 2010
You should shut your s***ty site down and save yourself the embarassment. Need help getting the foot out of your mouth?
Hate Mail - Dec. 29, 2009
your a loser and your picks suck c**k just like you
Kansas, Matt Millen, Stolen Word - Dec. 19, 2009
I can't believe NFL network and ESPN have Millen on their staff and giving football advice and opinions; to me, that's like Tiger Woods giving marriage counseling courses... what the hell...
Hate Mail - Nov. 24, 2009
ADMIT UR A F*****G FRAUD BE A MAN YOU SPIKY HAIR DOUCHEBAG MOTHER F****R STUPID SORRY A** LITTLE BOY
Vikings, Jerks Entry, Marriage Talk - Nov. 21, 2009
Hello, am a young single girl never married seeking true love for a long term relationship with marriage potentials,i am happy to contact you after going through your profile which got my interest!
I have no problems with your mock draft for the Raiders. I'm sure you're aware of the need at MLB, but doubling up on defensive tackles would make as much sense given the lack of pass rush outside of Mack.
@jsemmens I've been to the Big Board in the past, but it's still an inefficient way of going about a mock. Not to mention, reports and the people writing them change, no? I come to Walt's site because I used to like his insight on every player. Now, it's simply team needs and a very limited amount of actual analysis. You definitely need SOME amount of explanation behind a pick with regards to team need, but you need much more of the player evaluation angle. Any dummy can write why a particular team "needs" a specific position; it takes a pretty good eye to understand what player needs to fill it. Again, just my 2 cents.
Here's my mock based on team need, prospect value and prevailing opinion as well as some ideas of my own. Please let me know about the team(s) that you follow more closely, and any picks that you agree or disagree with. Please comment, and feel free to rate.