<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Uncategorized &#8211; WalterFootball</title>
	<atom:link href="https://walterfootball.com/category/uncategorized/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://walterfootball.com</link>
	<description>The most accurate NFL draft site in the world. NFL Football.  The draft, picks and fantasy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2025 04:17:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>NFL Top 100 Players of 2025: Analysis</title>
		<link>https://walterfootball.com/nfltop100_2025.php</link>
					<comments>https://walterfootball.com/nfltop100_2025.php#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2025 04:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://walterfootball.com/?p=35971</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I berated the players for their crappy rankings in the Top 100 NFL Players of 2011 and people seemed to like that. I ran other critiques of the Top 100 NFL Players of 2012, the Top 100 NFL Players of 2013, the Top 100 NFL Players of 2014, the Top 100 NFL Players of 2015,...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
I berated the players for their crappy rankings in the <a href = "nfltop100.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2011</a> and people seemed to like that. I ran other critiques of the <a href = "nfltop100_2012.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2012</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2013.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2013</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2014.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2014</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2015.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2015</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2016.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2016</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2017.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2017</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2018.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2018</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2019.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2019</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2020.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2020</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2021.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2021</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2022.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2022</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2023.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2023</a>, and the <a href = "nfltop100_2024.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2024</a>. I&#8217;ve gotten many requests to keep doing this, so here we are. <br> <br>

I really find it amazing how NFL players can screw up these rankings. As I pointed out before, if you&#8217;re in an office, you and your other co-workers can probably rank the best employees and come to a smart consensus. NFL players, however, continuously bungle things like this, probably because many of them don&#8217;t watch film or pay attention to the other games. They ranked Michael Turner in the top 100 twelve years ago, yet the guy couldn&#8217;t even move. Eight years ago, Carson Palmer was 12th, Blake Bortles was 56th, and Chris Ivory was 78th! Here was my reaction:  <br> <br>

<i>
OH MY GOD. CHRIS IVORY IS 78TH?!??!?! ARE YOU F***ING SERIOUS??? CHRIS IVORY&#8230; IS 78TH!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!
</i>
<br> <br>

Seven years ago, DeMarco Murray was voted in as the 31st-best player in the NFL. Yes, DeMarco Murray, the guy who lost his job during the year. The NFL players ranked Murray ahead of Kam Chancellor, Joey Bosa, Bobby Wagner, Trent Williams, and Jadeveon Clowney.  <br> <br>

The following year, Case Keenum was 51st. Let me repeat that. Case Keenum was 51st. Here&#8217;s what I wrote: <br> <br>

<i>
CASE KEENUM IS 51ST!? WHAT!?!?!?!? HOW IN HELL IS CASE KEENUM BETTER THAN PHILIP RIVERS!?!?!?!?
</i>
<br> <br>

The NFL players thought that Case Keenum was a better player than Philip Rivers. It was almost as bad in 2020 when Jimmy Garoppolo was somehow slotted at No. 43. Here were my thoughts: <br> <br>

<i>
HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!1 <br> <br>

WHAT THE F**K IS THIS!? BUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! WOWOWOWOWOWOWOW HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLLL!!!!! <br> <br>

NFL PLAYERS THINK JIMMY GAROPPOLO IS BETTER THAN J.J. WATT!!!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAAHHAAHAHHAALAOALAOLOLOLOLAHAHAHAHAHALOLOOLLLHAHAHA!!!!!
</i>
<br> <br>

In 2022, they rated Mac Jones 85th. Really? Mac Jones, 85th? And then in 2023, Dalvin Cook was ranked 91st even though the Vikings cut him earlier that offseason! In 2024, the players rated Brock Purdy as being better than Joe Burrow. Unreal. <br> <br>



Predictably, there were some very dumb choices in the NFL Top 100 Players of 2025. I&#8217;ve highlighted them, marking the underrated players in blue and overrated players in red.  
<br> <br> 
 

<?php
include("socialmedia.php");
?>
<br> <br>
 


<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2025: 100-91: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 
 

100. Ladd McConkey, WR, Chargers
<br> 99. Leonard Williams, DE, Seahawks
<br> <font color = "red"> 98. Aaron Jones, RB, Vikings  </font>
<br> 97. Drake London, WR, Falcons
<br> 96. Lavonte David, LB, Buccaneers
<br> 95. Josh Sweat, DE, Cardinals
<br> 94. Sam LaPorta, TE, Lions
<br> 93. Creed Humphrey, C, Chiefs
<br> 92. Jessie Bates, S, Falcons
<br> <font color = "red"> 91. Tua Tagovailoa, QB, Dolphins </font>
<br> <br>
 
 
<b> 98. Aaron Jones: </b> Aaron Jones is so good that the Vikings paid big money to Jordan Mason to establish a running back by committee.  <br> <br>
   
<b> 91. Tua Tagovailoa: </b> Tua Tagovailoa is a walking concussion who may not be able to play most of 2025. <br> <br>

<br>
<center>
<?php
include("adsdaq23.php");
?>
</center>
<br>





<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2025: 90-81: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 

90. Zach Allen, DE, Broncos
<br> 89. James Cook, RB, Bills
<br> 88. Andrew Van Ginkel, DE/LB Vikings
<br> 87. Quinnen Williams, DT, Jets
<br> 86. Laremy Tunsil, OT, Redskins
<br> 85. Kyren Williams, RB, Rams
<br> 84. Christian Gonzalez, CB, Patriots
<br> 83. Cameron Heyward, DT, Steelers
<br> <font color = "red"> 82. Jerry Jeudy, WR< Browns  </font>
<br> 81. Trent McDuffie, CB, Chiefs
<br> <br>


<b> 82. Jerry Jeudy: </b> Jerry Jeudy ranked at No. 82 is a classic example of prisoner of the moment syndrome. Jeudy has had like five good games in his career, but everyone remembers what he did at Mile High on a Monday night last year. <br> <br>
 

  <br>
<center>
<?php
include("thirdbox.php");
?>

</center>
<br>




<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2025: 80-71: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 

80. Rashan Gary, DE, Packers
<br> 79. Dak Prescott, QB, Cowboys
<br> 78. Khalil Mack, DE/OLB, Chargers
<br> 77. Tee Higgins, WR, Bengals
<br> 76. Vita Vea, NT, Buccaneers
<br> 75. Patrick Queen, LB, Steelers
<br> 74. Bobby Wagner, LB, Redskins
<br> 73. Christian McCaffrey, RB, 49ers
<br> <font color = "red"> 72. Sam Darnold, QB, Seahawks </font>
<br> 71. Kerby Joseph, S, Lions
<br> <br>



<b> 72. Sam Darnold: </b> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You know, none of the picks from 100 to 73 were that bad. There were some mistakes that I highlighted, but nothing was egregious. I was beginning to think that the NFL players compiled a quality list for a change, but wow. They certainly did not.  <br> <br>
 
How the hell is Sam Darnold the 72nd-best player in the NFL? That is ridiculous. There is no reality in which he&#8217;s a better player than Vita Vea, or Patrick Queen, or Rashan Gary. Ranking him over Dak Prescott is a joke. <br> <br>

Darnold posted great numbers in 2024, but that was a byproduct of Kevin O&#8217;Connell&#8217;s elite coaching and Justin Jefferson&#8217;s presence. Darnold is going to regress greatly in Seattle. <br> <br>


<br>
<center>

<?php
include("spormeon300.php");
?>

</center>
<br>


<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2025: 70-61: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 


70. Frankie Luvu, LB, Redskins
<br> 69. <font color = "blue"> Jordan Mailata, OT, Eagles  </font>
<br> 68. Jordan Love, QB, Packers
<br> 67. Malik Nabers, WR, Giants
<br> 66. Jalen Ramsey, CB, Steelers
<br> 65. Trey McBride, TE, Cardinals
<br> 64. Bo Nix, QB, Broncos
<br> 63. Josh Hines-Allen, DE, Jaguars
<br> 62. Bijan Robinson, RB, Falcons
<br> 61. Brian Thomas Jr., Jaguars
<br> <br>

<b> 69. Jordan Mailata: </b> Jordan Mailata is one of the best left tackles in the NFL, so I would have rated him above the likes of Bo Nix and an aging Jalen Ramsey.  <br> <br>

 

<?php
include("vfn.php");
?>




<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2025: 60-51: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 


60. Cooper DeJean, CB, Eagles
<br> 59. Matthew Stafford, QB, Rams
<br> <font color = "red"> 58. Joe Mixon, RB, Texans </font>
<br> 57. Nick Bosa, DE 49ers
<br> 56. Justin Herbert, QB, Chargers
<br> <font color = "blue"> 55. Aidan Hutchinson, DE, Lions </font>
<br> 54. Derwin James, S, Chargers
<br> 53. Jared Verse, DE/OLB, Rams
<br> 52. Terry McLaurin, WR, Redskins
<br> <font color = "blue"> 51. Kyle Hamilton, S/LB, Ravens </font>
<br> <br>

<b> 58. Joe Mixon: </b> How in seven hells is Joe Mixon considered to be a better running back than Bijan Robinson? I know Mixon was hot to begin last year, but this is ridiculous.  <br> <br>

<b> 55. Aidan Hutchinson: </b> Aidan Hutchinson was on pace for a historic season before getting hurt. Chances are he&#8217;ll be in for a big 2025, so he should easily be in the top 50.  <br> <br>

<b> 51. Kyle Hamilton: </b> Kyle Hamilton is an incredible player who can thrive at a Pro Bowl level at linebacker and safety. He&#8217;s another defender who should be in the top 50. <br> <br>

 


<?php
include("sixthad.php");
?>





<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2025: 50-41: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 


50. Baker Mayfield, QB, Buccaneers
<br> 49. Quinyon Mitchell, CB, Eagles
<br> 48. Jonathan Greenard, DE/OLB, Vikings
<br> <font color = "red"> 47. Tyreek Hill, WR, Dolphins </font>
<br> 46. Will Anderson, DE, Texans
<br> 45. Trent Williams, OT, 49ers
<br> 44. Mike Evans, WR, Buccaneers
<br> 43. Jalen Carter, DT, Eagles
<br> 42. Dion Dawkins, OT, Bills
<br> 41. Puka Nacua, WR, Rams
<br> <br>


<b> 47. Tyreek Hill: </b> I thought it was obvious that Tyreek Hill lost a step. I guess it&#8217;s not that obvious.    <br> <br>
 
 

<br> <br> <br> 



<?php
include("SEKINDO336.php");
?>



<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2025: 40-31: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 

40. Roquan Smith, LB, Ravens
<br> 39. C.J. Stroud, QB, Texans
<br> 38. Nik Bonitto, DE/OLB, Broncos
<br> <font color = "red"> 37. Travis Kelce, TE, Chiefs  </font>
<br> <font color = "blue"> 36. Micah Parsons, DE, Cowboys </font>
<br> 35. CeeDee Lamb, WR, Cowboys
<br> 34. Budda Baker, S, Cardinals
<br> 33. Josh Jacobs, RB, Packers
<br> 32. Nico Collins, WR, Texans
<br> 31. George Kittle, TE, 49ers
<br> <br>

  
<b> 37. Travis Kelce: </b> I guess NFL players haven&#8217;t watched Travis Kelce the past two years. Kelce is a better actor than NFL player right now, and he can&#8217;t act to save his life.     <br> <br>

<b> 36. Micah Parsons: </b> How is Micah Parsons only 36? No wonder Jerry Jones traded him. Parsons is an incredible edge rusher who should be in the top 20, if not the top 10.    <br> <br>


<?php
include("SEKINDO.php");
?>



<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2025: 30-21: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 

30. Xavier McKinney, S, Packers
<br> 29. A.J. Brown, WR, Eagles
<br> 28. Tristan Wirfs, OT, Buccaneers
<br> 27. Jahmyr Gibbs, RB, Lions
<br> 26. Zack Baun, LB, Eagles
<br> 25. Danielle Hunter, DE, Texans
<br> 24. Brock Bowers, TE, Raiders
<br> 23. Lane Johnson, OT, Eagles
<br> 22. Maxx Crosby, DE, Raiders
<br> 21. Jayden Daniels, QB, Redskins
<br> <br>

  
 
Nothing crazy here. Zack Baun was a bit surprising in the 20s, but I don&#8217;t mind it. <br> <br>
 


<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2021: 20-11: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 

20. Amon-Ra St. Brown, WR, Lions
<br> 19. Jalen Hurts, QB, Eagles
<br> 18. Derek Stingley Jr., CB, Texans
<br> 17. Dexter Lawrence, DT, Giants
<br> 16. Fred Warner, LB, 49ers
<br> <font color = "red">  15. Jared Goff, QB, Lions  </font>
<br> 14. Trey Hendrickson, DE, Bengals
<br> 13. Penei Sewell, OT, Lions
<br> 12. Chris Jone, DT, Chiefs
<br> 11. T.J. Watt, DE/OLB, Steelers
<br> <br>

 
<b> 15. Jared Goff: </b> Goff at No. 15 is pretty nuts. He&#8217;s been a byproduct of great coaching and elite offensive line play. He should be in the top 100, but not the top 20!
<br> <br>


<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2021: 10-1: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 
 

10. Patrick Surtain II, CB, Broncos
<br> 9. Justin Jefferson, WR, Vikings
<br> 8. Myles Garrett, DE, Browns 
<br> <font color = "red">  7. Derrick Henry, RB, Ravens  </font>
<br> 6. Joe Burrow, QB, Bengals
<br> 5. Patrick Mahomes, QB, Chiefs
<br> 4. Ja&#8217;Marr Chase, WR, Bengals
<br> 3. Josh Allen, QB, Bills
<br> 2. Lamar Jackson, QB, Ravens 
<br> 1. Saquon Barkley, RB, Eagles
<br> <br>



<b> 7. Derrick Henry: </b> Henry is great, but at 31, it&#8217;s unreasonable to expect him to last the entire season. I couldn&#8217;t put him over Myles Garrett, Patrick Surtain, or T.J. Watt. 
<br> <br>
 

<br> <br> <br> 





<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2025 &#8211; Snubs: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 



<b> Christian Benford, CB, Bills </b> &#8211; Christian Benford was one of the best cornerbacks in the NFL last year.   <br> <br>

<b> Chase Brown, RB, Bengals  </b> &#8211;  Chase Brown is a do-it-all running back who was a key piece in Cincinnati&#8217;s great offense. He should be in the top 100.    <br> <br>
 
<b> Christian Darrisaw, OT, Vikings </b> &#8211; If you want to see the sort of impact that Christian Darrisaw had for the Vikings, check out the games in which he was sidelined in 2022. Minnesota&#8217;s offense was not functional without Darrisaw. He was an obvious snub last year, and he once again has that distinction, although his massive contract will make him feel better about it.  <br> <br>


<b> Marlon Humphrey, CB, Ravens  </b> &#8211; Baltimore&#8217;s secondary was awful last year, but Marlon Humphrey was a rare bright spot.    <br> <br>

<b> Bucky Irving, RB, Buccaneers </b> &#8211; Bucky Irving had an amazing rookie year and should have gotten some consideration to be in the top 100.  <br> <br>

<b> Chris Lindstrom, G, Falcons  </b> &#8211; Chris Lindstrom is usually one of the better guards in the NFL. He needs to be recognized as a top-100 player one of these years.    <br> <br>
 
<b> Quenton Nelson, G, Colts  </b> &#8211; The best guard in the NFL should probably be on this list.    <br> <br>
 
<b> Benhard Raimann, OT, Colts   </b> &#8211; Benhard Raimann is an unknown for most people, but he&#8217;s emerging as one of the better tackles in the NFL.  <br> <br>
 
<b> Rashawn Slater, OT, Chargers </b> &#8211;  This is before the injury. Rashawn Slater is an elite left tackle, so he should&#8217;ve made the list. <br> <br>

<b> Jaxon Smith-Njigba, WR, Seahawks  </b> &#8211; Jaxon Smith-Njigba emerged in the second half of the year. He profiles as a No. 1 receiver.   <br> <br>
 
 





<br /> <br /> <br /> 

 


<br />
<div id="comments"><span style="font-weight:bold; font-size:16pt;"></span></div>

<br />





<br /> <br />





<font size = 4>



<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/draft2027.php"> 2027 NFL Mock Draft</a> </b> - April 30 <br> <br> <br>



<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/fantasy2026runningbacks.php"> Fantasy Football Rankings</a> </b>  - April 5 <br> <br> <br>









<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/picks.php"> NFL Picks</a> </b>  -  Feb. 9 <br> <br> <br>








<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/nflpowerrankings.php"> NFL Power Rankings</a> </b> - Jan. 26 <br>  <br> <br>






























































 





















































































 




 














































 





 



























































  





 













































































































 





 


 





















 

































  

















 






















 




 
 

</font>






<br /> <br />








<center>
<br />
<br />







<center></TD> </TR>
<TR> <TD VALIGN = "top" COLSPAN = "2">
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD COLSPAN = "5">


]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://walterfootball.com/nfltop100_2025.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Quarterback Power Rankings</title>
		<link>https://walterfootball.com/quarterbackpowerrankings.php</link>
					<comments>https://walterfootball.com/quarterbackpowerrankings.php#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2024 05:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/NFL%20Quarterback%20Power%20Rankings</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Numerous summers ago, I got into an argument with a Facebook friend about Russell Wilson being a top-three NFL quarterback. That, plus Ron Jaworski&#8217;s quarterback list got me thinking about making a power ranking for signal-callers. I figured it would be nice to have this as a yearly feature during the summer. So, here it...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />





<!--test-->



<br /> <br />

Numerous summers ago, I got into an argument with a Facebook friend about Russell Wilson being a top-three NFL quarterback. That, plus Ron Jaworski&#8217;s quarterback list got me thinking about making a power ranking for signal-callers. I figured it would be nice to have this as a yearly feature during the summer. So, here it is. If you disagree with anything on here, leave a comment below. Note that I&#8217;m grading the starters of each team only, so don&#8217;t be confused if a talented backup is left off the list. Also, this list is for this upcoming year only, so long-term ability is not taken into account.   <br> <br>

Follow me <a href="http://twitter.com/walterfootball" target="blank" rel="noopener">@walterfootball</a> for updates.    <br> <br>
 




<h2> NFL Quarterback Power Rankings 2024: Updated Sept. 1, 2024 </h2> <br> <br>






<b> 32. <img src = "images/fball/SamDarnold_face.jpg">  Sam Darnold, Vikings. 2023 Ranking: &#8211;. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: 27. 2019 Ranking: 15. 2018 Ranking: 30. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;. </b>   <br>

I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s more difficult to believe: Sam Darnold being given another chance to start, or the fact that he was ranked 15th on this list five years ago. Darnold had a promising rookie year, but has never lived up to his potential. Could he be a late bloomer like another former Jet, Geno Smith?
 

<br>  <br>



<b> 31. <img src = "images/fball/RWilson_face.jpg">  Russell Wilson, Steelers. 2023 Ranking: 17. 2022 Ranking: 6. 2021 Ranking: 4. 2020 Ranking: 2. 2019 Ranking: 4. 2018 Ranking: 4. 2017 Ranking: 3.  2016 Ranking: 2.  2015 Ranking: 3.  </b>   <br>

Last year was the first time Russell Wilson had ever been out of the top 10 in these rankings. Wilson was a disaster in 2022, throwing for only 16 touchdowns, which was by far the fewest in any season of his career. I thought there was a chance Wilson would rebound with Sean Payton serving as an upgrade over Nathaniel Hackett, but Wilson was just as bad last season. He was so terrible that he was benched in favor of Jarrett Stidham. 
 

<br>  <br>











<?php
include("vfn.php");
?>










<b> 30. <img src = "images/fball/BoNix_face.jpg">  Bo Nix, Broncos. 2023 Ranking: &#8211;. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Bo Nix is a checkdown machine with mobility. He was seen by many as a second-round prospect, but the Broncos reached for him at No. 12 overall this past April. There&#8217;s a very real chance the Broncos draft Shedeur Sanders first overall next April, as seen in my <a href = "draft2025.php">2025 NFL Mock Draft</a>, effectively treating Nix like the Cardinals did with Josh Rosen. 

<br>  <br>



<b> 29. <img src = "images/fball/GardnerMinshew_face.jpg">  Gardner Minshew, Raiders. 2023 Ranking: &#8211;. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;.  2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: 29. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Gardner Minshew had some poor performances in Indianapolis after taking over for the injured Anthony Richardson, but he also nearly led the Colts to the playoffs. In fact, Indianapolis would have won the division if it weren&#8217;t for a dropped pass on a weird fourth-down play in the final week of the season. 

<br>  <br>



<b> 28. <img src = "images/fball/DrakeMaye_face.jpg">  Drake Maye, Patriots. 2023 Ranking: &#8211;. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Jacoby Brissett is technically the starting quarterback of the Patriots, but it won&#8217;t be long before Drake Maye replaces him. Maye has Josh Allen-type upside, but as with Allen, there will be a steep learning curve. Maye will also be burdened with an anemic offensive line. 
 

<br>  <br>









 


<br>
<center>

<?php
include("spormeon300.php");
?>

</center>
<br>  <br>

 











<b> 27.  <img src = "images/fball/WillLevis_face.jpg">  Will Levis, Titans. 2023 Ranking: &#8211;. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;.  2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Will Levis took over during the midway point of the 2023 season. He had some great moments &#8211; particularly in his debut versus the Falcons and in a Monday night upset against the Dolphins &#8211; but he didn&#8217;t look like a viable pro quarterback at other times. Levis will have an opportunity to blossom with Calvin Ridley, Tyler Boyd and Tony Pollard serving as new weapons. 

<br>  <br>





<b> 26. <img src = "images/fball/BryceYoung_face.jpg">  Bryce Young, Panthers. 2023 Ranking: 26. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Bryce Young had a horrendous rookie year, but all hope isn&#8217;t lost. Young was stricken with a poor offensive line and awful receiving corps, both of which have been rectified this offseason. The Dave Canales hire should help Young as well, given that Canales was able to revive the careers of Geno Smith and Baker Mayfield the past two years. 
 

<br>  <br>


<b> 25. <img src = "images/fball/DanielJones_face.jpg">  Daniel Jones, Giants. 2023 Ranking: 16. 2022 Ranking: 27. 2021 Ranking: 28. 2020 Ranking: 16. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Daniel Jones enjoyed a solid 2022 season that got him ranked 16th on this page. However, he regressed last year. To be fair, Jones has never possessed an elite receiver or a solid offensive line. He&#8217;ll finally have the former in Malik Nabers, but the blocking still sucks. Saquon Barkley departing will be a hit to Jones&#8217; outlook as well. 

<br>  <br>




<b> 24. <img src = "images/fball/JaydenDaniels_face.jpg">  Jayden Daniels, Redskins. 2023 Ranking: &#8211;. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Jayden Daniels easily won the starting quarterback job with an outstanding training camp and preseason. He has great mobility on top of his passing skills, so he projects as a potential perennial Pro Bowler. 

 
 

<br>  <br>




<b> 23. <img src = "images/fball/DeshaunWatson_face.jpg">  Deshaun Watson, Browns. 2023 Ranking: 8. 2022 Ranking: 9. 2021 Ranking: 6. 2020 Ranking: 5. 2019 Ranking: 11. 2018 Ranking: 10. 2017 Ranking: 24.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;. </b>   <br>

Deshaun Watson was horrendous when he returned from his suspension in 2022. He was so bad that he made Jacoby Brissett look like an All-Pro by comparison. The excuse made when I ranked Watson eighth was that he hadn&#8217;t played football in two years and wasn&#8217;t familiar at all with his supporting cast. I thought there was a real chance he&#8217;d revert to 2020 form with an entire offseason to re-adjust. I was way off, as Watson continued to be dreadful and was once again outplayed by another one of his backups, Joe Flacco. 
 

<br>  <br>




<br>
<center>

<?php
include("adsdaq23.php");
?>

</center>
<br> <br>





























<b> 22. <img src = "images/fball/GenoSmith_face.jpg">  Geno Smith, Seahawks. 2023 Ranking: 18. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;.  2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;. 2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: 30.  </b>   <br>

Geno Smith was considered a steal when the Jets selected him in the second round of the 2013 NFL Draft. Smith was a big bust in New York, but he was able to persevere and work extremely hard. It&#8217;s great to see that Smith&#8217;s relentless work ethic paid off. Smith was great for the Seahawks in his first full season as a starter with the team. He regressed a bit last year, so we&#8217;ll see if that trend continues in 2024. 
 

<br>  <br>




<b> 21. <img src = "images/fball/BakerMayfield_face.jpg">  Baker Mayfield, Buccaneers. 2023 Ranking: 29. 2022 Ranking: 15. 2021 Ranking: 11. 2020 Ranking: 20. 2019 Ranking: 13. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Baker Mayfield is coming off an excellent season in which he led the Buccaneers to the second round of the playoffs. There&#8217;s cause for skepticism this year, however, as Mayfield won&#8217;t be coached up by quarterback whisperer Dave Canales again. Furthermore, Mike Evans is 31, which is often the age in which speed receivers decline. 

<br>  <br>



<b> 20. <img src = "images/fball/CalebWilliams_face.jpg">  Caleb Williams, Bears. 2023 Ranking: &#8211;. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;.  2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;. 2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Caleb Williams has all the tools to become a perennial Pro Bowl quarterback, including elite pocket awareness. He also has a great supporting cast that should allow him to thrive immediately. 
 

<br>  <br>



<b> 19. <img src = "images/fball/DerekCarr_face.jpg">  Derek Carr, Saints. 2023 Ranking: &#8211;. 2022 Ranking: 14.  2021 Ranking: 22. 2020 Ranking: 25. 2019 Ranking: 24. 2018 Ranking: 14. 2017 Ranking: 5.  2016 Ranking: 18.  2015 Ranking: 26.  </b>   <br>

Derek Carr epitomizes the word mediocrity. He&#8217;s good enough to lead a team to the playoffs in a stacked team, but can&#8217;t carry an average or worse squad to the postseason. Carr needs to be coached up, but Dennis Allen is one of the worst coaches in the NFL.

<br>  <br>






  
<?php
include("sixthad.php");
?> 






 




















<b> 18. <img src = "images/fball/KylerMurray_face.jpg">  Kyler Murray, Cardinals. 2023 Ranking: 22. 2022 Ranking: 12. 2021 Ranking: 8. 2020 Ranking: 11. 2019 Ranking: 22. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;. 2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;. </b>   <br>

Kyler Murray is a dynamic dual threat, but there are some concerns. There were earlier worries about his presence in the locker room. Even worse, Murray&#8217;s work ethic came into question when his new contract stipulated that he must study four hours of game film on his own every week. Murray has also yet to complete a full NFL season because of his extensive injury history.  
 

<br>  <br>






<b> 17. <img src = "images/fball/AnthonyRichardson_face.jpg">  Anthony Richardson, Colts. 2023 Ranking: 30. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Anthony Richardson&#8217;s outlook seemed bleak when he could barely complete basic throws last preseason, but he was terrific when the real games began. Unfortunately for Richardson, he suffered an injury in every single game in which he played, so his poor durability must be taken into account in these rankings. 
 

<br>  <br>




<b> 16. <img src = "images/fball/BrockPurdy_face.jpg">  Brock Purdy, 49ers. 2023 Ranking: 19. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Brock Purdy once again proved that he&#8217;s the ideal game manager. It helps that he has immense talent around him, but Purdy just finds ways to win. He nearly defeated the Chiefs in the previous Super Bowl, taking the defending champions to overtime. 
 

<br>  <br>




<b> 15. <img src = "images/fball/KCousins_face.jpg">  Kirk Cousins, Falcons. 2023 Ranking: 11. 2022 Ranking: 13. 2021 Ranking: 18. 2020 Ranking: 22. 2019 Ranking: 19. 2018 Ranking: 15. 2017 Ranking: 16.  2016 Ranking: 19.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Kirk Cousins was having one of the best years of his career in 2023 when disaster struck. He tore his Achilles and missed the second half of the season. He&#8217;s an older player coming off a torn Achilles, so it remains to be seen if he&#8217;ll be 100 percent this upcoming year. 
 

<br>  <br>



<b> 14. <img src = "images/fball/ARodgers_face.jpg">  Aaron Rodgers, Jets. 2023 Ranking: 6. 2022 Ranking: 2. 2021 Ranking: 2. 2020 Ranking: 4. 2019 Ranking: 3. 2018 Ranking: 2. 2017 Ranking: 1.  2016 Ranking: 1.  2015 Ranking: 1.  </b>   <br>

Like Kirk Cousins, Aaron Rodgers is an old quarterback who is coming off a torn Achilles. It remains to be seen how Rodgers, nearly 41, will perform, but he&#8217;ll be an upgrade by default over Zach Wilson. 
 
 

<br>  <br>




 









<br>
<center>

<?php
include("yard300.php");
?>

</center>
<br> <br>












<b> 13. <img src = "images/fball/DakPrescott_face.jpg">  Dak Prescott, Cowboys. 2023 Ranking: 13. 2022 Ranking: 11. 2021 Ranking: 13. 2020 Ranking: 19. 2019 Ranking: 25. 2018 Ranking: 21. 2017 Ranking: 12.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Dak Prescott has played behind a great offensive line for most of his career. He&#8217;s been exposed when some of the blockers have been injured. Dallas lost two of its top blockers this offseason, so there&#8217;s reason to believe that he&#8217;ll regress in 2024. 
 
<br>  <br>




<b> 12. <img src = "images/fball/JordanLove_face.jpg">  Jordan Love, Packers. 2023 Ranking: 31. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

&#8220;No Cookie&#8221; Jordan Love was seen as a very raw quarterback when he entered the NFL. It was very unclear how Love will perform heading into 2023, but he beat all expectations. Love had some rough performances, but was terrific at times, particularly on Thanksgiving and in the final month of the season, including when he nearly beat the 49ers in the divisional round of the playoffs. With Love and the receivers having much more experience, much is expected from the Packer quarterback in 2024. 
 

<br>  <br>




<b> 11. <img src = "images/fball/TuaTagovailoa_face.jpg">  Tua Tagovailoa, Dolphins. 2023 Ranking: 14. 2022 Ranking: 19. 2021 Ranking: 26. 2020 Ranking: 30. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

My main concern with Tua Tagovailoa, as written in last year&#8217;s recap, was his ability to remain on the field. Tagovailoa finally had a healthy season, but everyone around him got hurt instead. Tagovailoa may have his best statistical year yet, as Miami&#8217;s defense has taken a hit, which means Tagovailoa may have to throw a lot more in second halves this year. 

<br>  <br>

 
 
<b> 10. <img src = "images/fball/JaredGoff_face.jpg">  Jared Goff, Lions. 2023 Ranking: 12. 2022 Ranking: 24. 2021 Ranking: 27. 2020 Ranking: 23. 2019 Ranking: 14. 2018 Ranking: 19. 2017 Ranking: 30. 2016 Ranking: 29.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Jared Goff was originally a byproduct of great coaching (Sean McVay, Greg Olson) as well as an elite offensive line. Goff lost Olson and some key blockers after 2018, which would explain a major decline in his production. Goff, however, found a second career in Detroit. Granted, he&#8217;s once again being protected by an elite offensive line, but Goff has worked hard to improve the mental part of his game. 
 

<br>  <br>



<br>
<center>
<?php
include("thirdbox.php");
?>

</center>
<br> <br>


 








  





<b> 9. <img src = "images/fball/MStafford_face.jpg">  Matthew Stafford, Rams. 2023 Ranking: 10. 2022 Ranking: 7. 2021 Ranking: 9. 2020 Ranking: 15. 2019 Ranking: 18. 2018 Ranking: 12. 2017 Ranking: 9.  2016 Ranking: 13.  2015 Ranking: 15.  </b>   <br>

Matthew Stafford was always limited by bad coaching and a mediocre supporting cast in Detroit. We all saw how great Stafford could be with incredible coaching and a stellar group of receivers and blockers. It was no surprise that he won the Super Bowl in his first year with the Rams. Things took a turn for the worse in 2022 regarding Stafford&#8217;s health and blocking, but things seem back to normal now.  

<br>  <br>
 



<b> 8. <img src = "images/fball/TrevorLawrence_face.jpg">  Trevor Lawrence, Jaguars. 2023 Ranking: 7. 2022 Ranking: 18. 2021 Ranking: 12. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Trevor Lawrence got off to a hot start in 2023, leading the Jaguars to an 8-3 record through 12 weeks. Then, the injuries came. Lawrence inexplicably suffered a new injury every single week, resulting in the team&#8217;s one-win collapse to close out the year. Lawrence will rebound this upcoming season. 
 

<br>  <br>
 





<b> 7. <img src = "images/fball/JustinHerbert_face.jpg">  Justin Herbert, Chargers.  2023 Ranking: 3. 2022 Ranking: 8. 2021 Ranking: 10. 2020 Ranking: 31. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Justin Herbert took the NFL by storm as a rookie. Now, four years later, he can say that he has the most passing yards (17,223) of any quarterback in NFL history through four seasons. However, this has not translated into any sort of playoff success. Herbert will now be playing in a run-first offense with a diminished receiving corps. 

<br>  <br>
 



<b> 6. <img src = "images/fball/JalenHurts_face.jpg">  Jalen Hurts, Eagles. 2023 Ranking: 4. 2022 Ranking: 23. 2021 Ranking: 31. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Jalen Hurts&#8217; relentless work ethic allowed him to improve his passing ability by leaps and bounds. He emerged as an MVP favorite two seasons ago, ultimately leading the Eagles to the Super Bowl. It&#8217;s possible that Hurts wasn&#8217;t even 100 percent in the playoffs as a result of a shoulder injury he suffered in December. Hurts should continue to bolster his game, so with Saquon Barkley aiding him in the backfield, he should be considered one of the leading candidates to win MVP in 2024.
 

<br>  <br>







<br>

<?php
include("carambo.php");
?>

<br>














<b> 5. <img src = "images/fball/LamarJackson_face.jpg">  Lamar Jackson, QB, Ravens. 2023 Ranking: 9. 2022 Ranking: 10. 2021 Ranking: 7. 2020 Ranking: 7. 2019 Ranking: 23. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;. 2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;. </b>   <br>

Lamar Jackson just won MVP for the second time in his career. The last time he won MVP, he disappointed the following season because his offensive line suffered multiple injuries and departures. That&#8217;s exactly what transpired this offseason, with three Baltimore blockers leaving for other teams.  
 

<br>  <br>



<b> 4. <img src = "images/fball/JoshAllen_face.jpg">  Josh Allen, Bills. 2023 Ranking: 5. 2022 Ranking: 4. 2021 Ranking: 5. 2020 Ranking: 10. 2019 Ranking: 29. 2018 Ranking: 31. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Josh Allen was a raw passer with great mobility as a rookie, and then he made a big leap in his second season. And yet, he made the same type of jump in his third season, becoming a top-five NFL quarterback. Allen&#8217;s stats were stagnant after that, and it&#8217;s fair to wonder if he&#8217;ll suffer any sort of decline with Stefon Diggs now in Houston. 
 
<br>  <br>




<b> 3. <img src = "images/fball/CJStroud_face.jpg">  C.J. Stroud, Texans. 2023 Ranking: 27. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

C.J. Stroud made Panthers owner Axe Tepper look like a complete imbecile for selecting Bryce Young over him. All Stroud did was put together the best rookie quarterback season of all time. A sophomore slump seems unlikely, given Stroud&#8217;s skills, high football IQ, and stacked receiving corps. 


<br>  <br>





<b> 2. <img src = "images/fball/JoeBurrow_face.jpg">  Joe Burrow, Bengals. 2023 Ranking: 2. 2022 Ranking: 3. 2021 Ranking: 16. 2020 Ranking: 17. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;. 2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;. </b>   <br>

Joe Burrow is the No. 1 quarterback against the blitz, which is remarkable, given how young he is. Burrow is only entering his fifth season, and he&#8217;s expected to make another big leap this year because he has an improved offensive line. Burrow looked like he was going to lead his team to the playoffs last year, but suffered a season-ending injury versus Baltimore. He should be able to pick up where he left off. 

 

<br>  <br>






<b> 1. <img src = "images/fball/PatrickMahomes_face.jpg">  Patrick Mahomes, Chiefs. 2023 Ranking: 1. 2022 Ranking: 1. 2021 Ranking: 1. 2020 Ranking: 1. 2019 Ranking: 2. 2018 Ranking: 16. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br>

Two years ago, someone working the ticket counter at a Las Vegas sportsbook told me that &#8220;Patrick Mahomes is no longer a difference maker at this stage of his career.&#8221; This person is clearly an idiot. Mahomes continues to be the best quarterback in the NFL, and there&#8217;s no doubting that. He has no weaknesses. He has a rocket arm, great accuracy, dangerous mobility, infectious leadership, a very high football IQ, and a tireless work ethic. Amazingly, Mahomes wasn&#8217;t voted as the top quarterback on the NFL Top 100 Players list, so he&#8217;ll be motivated to prove his doubters wrong despite coming off back-to-back Super Bowl victories. 
 

<br>  <br>

 

 




 



<br /> <br />  


<div id="comments"><span style="font-weight:bold; font-size:16pt;"></span></div>

<br />

<br />





 










<br /> <br /> <br />





<font size = 4>



<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/draft2027.php"> 2027 NFL Mock Draft</a> </b> - April 30 <br> <br> <br>



<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/fantasy2026runningbacks.php"> Fantasy Football Rankings</a> </b>  - April 5 <br> <br> <br>









<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/picks.php"> NFL Picks</a> </b>  -  Feb. 9 <br> <br> <br>








<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/nflpowerrankings.php"> NFL Power Rankings</a> </b> - Jan. 26 <br>  <br> <br>






























































 





















































































 




 














































 





 



























































  





 













































































































 





 


 





















 

































  

















 






















 




 
 

</font>







<br /> <br />



</CENTER>



]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://walterfootball.com/quarterbackpowerrankings.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>PGA Bets for the 2024 Tour Championship</title>
		<link>https://walterfootball.com/pga-bets-for-the-2024-tour-championship.php</link>
					<comments>https://walterfootball.com/pga-bets-for-the-2024-tour-championship.php#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2024 20:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://walterfootball.com/?p=30299</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[PGA Picks (2024 Genesis): -$400 PGA Picks (2024 Mexico Open): -$45 PGA Picks (2024 Cognizant): +$200 PGA Picks (2024 Arnold Palmer): -$400 PGA Picks (2024 Players Championship): +$1,500 PGA Picks (2024 Valspar): -$290 PGA Picks (2024 Houston Open): -$395 PGA Picks (2024 Valero Texas Open): +$3,025 PGA Picks (2024 Masters): +$625 PGA Picks (2024 RBC...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--test-->



 

 
 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Genesis): </b> -$400  <br>    
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Mexico Open): </b> -$45  <br>
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Cognizant): </b> +$200  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Arnold Palmer): </b> -$400  <br>  
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Players Championship): </b> +$1,500  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Valspar): </b> -$290  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Houston Open): </b> -$395  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Valero Texas Open): </b> +$3,025  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Masters): </b> +$625  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 RBC Heritage): </b> -$425  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Zurich Classic): </b> -$480  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Byron Nelson): </b> -$415  <br>
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Wells Fargo): </b> -$600  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 PGA Championship): </b> -$385  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Charles Schwab): </b> -$390  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Canadian Open): </b> -$705  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Memorial): </b> +$865  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 US Open): </b> -$515  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Travelers): </b> -$485  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Rocket Mortgage): </b> -$400  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 John Deere): </b> -$340  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Scottish Open): </b> -$430  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 British Open): </b> -$265  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 3M): </b> -$395  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 Wyndham): </b> +$2,520  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 St. Jude): </b> -$650  <br> 
<b> PGA Picks (2024 BMW): </b> -$450  <br>

       <br>  <b> PGA Picks (2024): </b> +$580	
       <br>  <b> PGA Picks (2023): </b> +$7,020 
       <br>  <b> PGA Picks (2020): </b> +$270  <br>


<div id="mtc-incontent-ad-1"></div>



<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Tour Championship:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 


Another heartbreak. We had two chances to win this past Sunday, but Brian Burns and Ludvig Aberg both finished second at one stroke behind Keegan Bradley. We&#8217;d be rich if we just bet on golfers to finish in second place this year! <br> <br>

We&#8217;ve reached the end of the season. The Tour Championship is a weird tournament in that every golfer begins with a score based on their PGA ranking. Here&#8217;s the breakdown: <br> <br>

<img src = "images/pgachampionship.jpg">
<br> <br>

As you can see, it&#8217;s very difficult for the lower-tier golfers to win. For example, for Viktor Hovland to prevail, he&#8217;ll have to outscore Scottie Scheffler by nine strokes and Xander Schauffele by seven strokes. It can be done, but it&#8217;s very unlikely. <br> <br>

I&#8217;m only going to bet one golfer to win for this reason. I will, however, post three bets for lowest score of the tournament, which would make everyone in play. <br> <br>


<div id="mtc-incontent-ad-2"></div>

  

<br> <b> Xander Schauffele to win the Tour Championship +251 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
My plan all along was to bet Scottie Scheffler to win the Tour Championship, but he tweaked his back last week. If he&#8217;s not 100 percent, this will be Xander Schauffele&#8217;s tournament. Schauffele projects extremely well at this course, which would explain why he finished second here last year behind Viktor Hovland. Schauffele, who has been clutch in the majors this year, will be tough to beat because he&#8217;ll begin this tournament at eight under.    <br> <br>

Betting 2.5 Units to win 6.3 (to win +251)     
<br> <br>



<div id="mtc-incontent-ad-3"></div>





<br> <b> Collin Morikawa to earn lowest score at the Tour Championship +1600 (BetMGM)     </b> <br> 
Collin Morikawa may not beat Xander Schauffele by five strokes, but he can beat him by one. I like the idea of buying him low, as he&#8217;s had a great season but has struggled in the past few tournaments. He can rebound at this course, which requires elite accuracy and approach. That&#8217;s Morikawa&#8217;s game in a nutshell. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 16 (to score lowest +1600)   <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a>   
<br> <br>
 
 

 

<div id="mtc-incontent-ad-4"></div>

<br> <b> Tommy Fleetwood to earn lowest score at the Tour Championship +2000 (FanDuel)     </b> <br> 
Tommy Fleetwood ranks fifth in my model. Like Morikawa, he&#8217;s terrific when it comes to accuracy and approach. I&#8217;d bet him to win this tournament if he were starting at much higher than -1. Fleetwood has been hot lately, finishing in the top five of two of his previous three tournaments. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.<br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 20 (to score lowest +2000)    <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> 
<br> <br>


<div id="mtc-incontent-ad-5"></div>

  


<br> <b> Russell Henley to earn lowest score at the Tour Championship +2500 (DraftKings)     </b> <br> 
I love Russell Henley at this tournament, so it&#8217;s a shame that he&#8217;s starting at -1. Henley has elite traits when it comes to accuracy and approach, and he&#8217;s played well in big moments. He&#8217;s finished seventh or better in three of his previous eight majors. He ranks fourth in my model behind Scheffler, Schauffele, and Morikawa. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $200 in bonus bets from DraftKings</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 25 (to score lowest +2500)      <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $200 in bonus bets from DraftKings</a>
<br> <br>
 
 

 

<div id="mtc-incontent-ad-6"></div>

 




<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the BMW Championship:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 



I posted a Scottie Scheffler +1250 bet heading into Sunday, which could have hit if Scheffler had one of his vintage fourth rounds, but that didn&#8217;t come to fruition. Our other plays didn&#8217;t pan out either. <br> <br>

The BMW Championship will take place at Castle Pines, which is the longest golf course in PGA history. It&#8217;ll also take place in altitude, so driving distance is extremely important, as is long iron play. Accuracy matters as well because there are lots of trees and hazards on this course. <br> <br>

Xander Schauffele is atop my model, followed by Scottie Scheffler. I found Schauffele at +705 on Bookmaker, but I&#8217;m going to look for a better deal throughout the weekend. <br> <br>
 
  

<br> <b> Ludvig Aberg to win the BMW Championship +2200 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Ludvig Aberg was having a great season until his Sunday meltdown at the Scottish Open. He hasn&#8217;t finished better than 18th since, but his skill set matches up well with this course. He&#8217;s third in my model, as he&#8217;s an elite driver with terrific approach skills. I like buying Aberg low like this, as he&#8217;s one of the most talented golfers in this tournament. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.    <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 22 (to win +2200) <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>    
<br> <br>

 



<br> <b> Viktor Hovland to win the BMW Championship +2250 (Bookmaker)     </b> <br> 
Viktor Hovland won the BMW last year, which sparked his victory at the championship the following week. Hovland had a horrible start to his 2024 season, but looks like he&#8217;s finally rounding into form. He finished second at St. Jude, and his skills translate to this tournament, ranking fifth in my model. 

Betting 1 Units to win 22.5 (to win +2250)      
<br> <br>
 


<br> <b> Wyndham Clark to win the BMW Championship +3300 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Like Hovland, Wyndham Clark has struggled mightily at times this year, but has rounded into form lately. He&#8217;s finished in the top 10 in three of his previous five tournaments. He&#8217;s a great fit for this course because of his immense driving power. Furthermore, this is a local course for him. Clark is one of the few golfers who has played at Castle Pines before, so this could give him a nice edge. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.   <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 33 (to win +3500)   <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>   
<br> <br>


 

<br> <b> Tony Finau to win the BMW Championship +3500 (Caesars)  </b> <br> 
Sticking with the theme of improved recent play, Tony Finau has finished eighth, third, fifth, 12th, and 16th in five of his previous six tournaments. Finau drives the ball with great power and possesses elite iron play.  You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.   <br> <br>

Betting 0.75 Units to win 26.25 (to win +4500)    <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>



 





 
<br> <b> Sam Burns to win the BMW Championship +3850 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Sticking with the theme of improved play, Sam Burns had some poor performances in the middle of the season as a result of becoming a new dad. He has since recovered. He&#8217;s finished in the top 10 four times since June 2, including fifth last week. Burns&#8217; skill set matches up well for Castle Pines. <br> <br>

Betting 0.75 Units to win 28.9 (to win +3850)    <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>





<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the St. Jude Championship:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 



It appeared as though our bad Sunday luck was going to continue at the Wyndham Championship when Max Greyserman hit two eagles in Round 4. However, he quadruple bogeyed on 14, allowing Aaron Rai to come back and win. It was great to hit Rai at 35/1. Let&#8217;s hope this improved fortune continues! <br> <br>

The top golfers are back for the opening round of the playoffs. TPC Southwind, host of the St. Jude Championship, is a very similar course to the Wyndham, where incredible accuracy and approach play matter the most. This is why Lucas Glover won both the St. Jude and the Wyndham last year. Will we have another repeat champion? <br> <br>
 


<br> <b> Collin Morikawa to win the St. Jude Championship +1400 (Bookmaker)     </b> <br> 
Collin Morikawa ranks ahead of Scottie Scheffler in my model. Both are elite approach players, but Morikawa is the most accurate golfer on tour, which gives him the edge at the St. Jude. If you&#8217;re comparing the two, Scheffler is +375, while Morikawa is 14/1. It&#8217;s worth noting that Morikawa has been bet down from 14/1 to 12/1 at many books, but 14/1 is still available at Bookmaker.   <br> <br>

Betting 2 Units to win 28 (to win +1400)      
<br> <br>
 
  

 



<br> <b> Russell Henley to win the St. Jude Championship +3500 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Collin Morikawa is the most accurate golfer on tour. Russell Henley is tied for second. Henley, who finished sixth at the St. Jude last year, has been hot lately. He finished fifth at the British Open and seventh at the U.S. Open. He&#8217;s been able to contend with the top players, so he has a very real chance to take down this tournament at 35/1.     <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 35 (to win +3500)     
<br> <br>



<br> <b> Tom Kim to win the St. Jude Championship +3500 (Caesars)  </b> <br> 
Tom Kim has a great mix of accuracy and approach. If you combine the two categories, only four golfers rank ahead of him in this field: Collin Morikawa, Scottie Scheffler, Russell Henley, and Aaron Rai. Dating back to the beginning of June, Kim has three top-eight finishes, including second at the Travelers and eighth at the Olympics.    <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 35 (to win +3500)      
<br> <br>


 


<br> <b> Aaron Rai to win the St. Jude Championship +4500 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Here he is. Can Aaron Rai repeat what Lucas Glover did last year and win both the Wyndham and the St. Jude? I think so. Rai is tied with Russell Henley for second in accuracy, which is incredibly important at this course. Part of the reason I loved Rai last week is that his putting has improved tremendously in the past couple of months. That would explain why he&#8217;s been so hot. Since June 30, he&#8217;s finished second, seventh, fourth, and first in four of his five tournaments.  You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.   <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 45 (to win +4500)    <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>



 


 
<br> <b> Davis Thompson to win the St. Jude Championship +7000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Here&#8217;s my long shot. I love Davis Thompson at 70/1, as he&#8217;s 11th in my model. Others may not have him ranked very high, and I think that would be because they&#8217;re ignoring his major improvement in accuracy. Thompson had huge issues with accuracy earlier in the year, but he&#8217;s been incredibly accurate since early May. Dating back to May 12, he&#8217;s had second-, ninth-, second-, and first-place finishes. He was 12th at the Wyndham, which should translate over to St. Jude. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 35 (to win +7000)    <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>




<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Wyndham Championship:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 



Our bad luck continued at the 3M. We had Taylor Pendrith at 40/1. He was up three strokes on Saturday and was priced at +125 to win. Then, he had a four-hole stretch in which he went bogey, par, bogey, double bogey. He still finished fourth, so if it wasn&#8217;t for those four holes, he would have won. <br> <br>

We&#8217;re back after a week off because of the Olympics. The Wyndham Championship is the final tournament before the FedEx Cup Playoffs. The course requires elite accuracy because there are lots of trees and other hazards. Approach play and putting are also vital at this tournament. <br> <br>
 


<br> <b> Brian Harman to win the Wyndham Championship +3000 (BetMGM)  You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a> by clicking the link.   </b> <br> 
Brian Harman is the only golfer in this field who is terrific in accuracy, approach, and putting. Sungjae Im is close, but not quite there in accuracy. Given that, as well as the fact that Harman is second in my model, I believe that he&#8217;s a steal at 30/1.    <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 30 (to win +3000)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a>   
<br> <br>
 
  


 



<br> <b> Aaron Rai to win the Wyndham Championship +3500 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
I mentioned that Brian Harman is second in my model. Aaron Rai is first. Rai has been on a tear lately. In his previous three tournaments prior to the British Open, he finished fourth, seventh, and second. He&#8217;s the most accurate golfer in the field, which makes him a great bet to win, especially at 35/1.  You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.   <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 35 (to win +3500)    <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>




<br> <b> Akshay Bhatia to win the Wyndham Championship +3500 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Akshay Bhatia has been good to us this year, as we had him at 68/1 to win the Texas Open. This is another great course for him. He&#8217;s been deadly accurate recently, finishing second and fifth in two of his previous four tournaments. It looks like he&#8217;s on the cusp of winning again, so 35/1 seems like a great price for him in this field. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.    <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 35 (to win +3500)    <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>





<br> <b> Brendon Todd to win the Wyndham Championship +10000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
I like two long shots this week. Brendon Todd can perhaps continue the trend of older golfers performing well in recent tournaments. Todd, who has three top-six finishes this year, is elite when it comes to accuracy. He&#8217;s also a great putter. His iron play isn&#8217;t great, but it&#8217;s not bad either, so he can win this tournament.  You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.4 Units to win 40 (to win +10000)     <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>
 


 
<br> <b> Ben Kohles to win the Wyndham Championship +11000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Ben Kohles is the other long shot. Like Todd, he&#8217;s an extremely accurate golfer, ranking second in the field in this metric. He has also improved at putting the past couple of months after struggling in that regard earlier in the year. He finished second at the Byron Nelson back in May, so he has proven that he can put himself in position to win at tournaments where driving distance is inconsequential. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 0.4 Units to win 44.4 (to win +11000)    <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>



 

<br> <b> Webb Simpson to finish in the top 10/top 20 at the Wyndham Championship +900, +400 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Webb Simpson&#8217;s course history here is immaculate. Look at the results from 2023 backward: 5th, 7th, 3rd, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd, 72nd, 6th, 5th, 11th, 22nd, 1st. He has done so well at the Wyndham that he named his son Wyndham! Knowing that, how can you not bet even a bit on Simpson? I don&#8217;t want to bet him to win because his putting has been atrocious this year, but I&#8217;m going to bet him to finish in the top 10 and top 20.  You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 4.5 (to finish top 10 +900), 0.5 Units to win 2 (to finish top 20 +400)   <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>  
<br> <br>
 




<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the 3M Open:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 





The British Open was not kind to us. It wasn&#8217;t kind to some of the top golfers in the world either, as Rory McIlroy, Ludvig Aberg and Wyndham Clark, three of the top six-ranked golfers on the PGA tour, failed to make the cut. McIlroy didn&#8217;t even score a birdie until hole 14 of the second round. <br> <br>

The 3M is a much easier course, provided the golfers in question can hit long. This is a bombers&#8217; paradise, so you&#8217;ll want to bet on golfers who blast the ball. It&#8217;ll help if they&#8217;re good when it comes to approach and putting as well. <br> <br>

Tony Finau is the favorite here, and for good reason. He&#8217;s a bomber and a very talented golfer. He won the 3M two years ago, and he&#8217;s gained the most strokes of any golfer at this course. Unfortunately, he&#8217;s 12/1, so he doesn&#8217;t provide great value. I&#8217;ll be looking to get him at a better number if he endures a negative Round 1.  <br> <br>

As for the golfers I&#8217;m betting, I&#8217;ll be on one of the top players near the top of the board&#8230; <br> <br>
 


<br> <b> Sam Burns to win the 3M Open +2000 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Sam Burns had a great start to his season. He went into a swoon in the middle of the year, but has caught fire recently. The reason for his poor play was because of the birth of his first child. Burns has since refocused, and he seems primed to win. He can blast the ball very well, and he&#8217;s also a terrific putter. It&#8217;s no surprise that he has a seventh-place finish at this course.   <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 20 (to win +2000)   
<br> <br>
 
  

 



<br> <b> Keith Mitchell to win the 3M Open +3500 (Caesars)  </b> <br> 
This is a late add on Wednesday evening. I love Keith Mitchell&#8217;s fit on this course as far as his driving distance and approach are concerned. Mitchell is a horrendous putter, but he knows these greens well. He&#8217;s gained strokes on putting the previous two times he&#8217;s played at the 3M. In those two tournaments, he finished fifth on both occasions.    <br> <br>

Betting 0.75 Units to win 26.25 (to win +3500)    
<br> <br>




<br> <b> Keegan Bradley to win the 3M Open +3750 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Keegan Bradley, eighth in my model, has been enjoying a great year. He&#8217;s finished second in two tournaments, and he was able to make the cut in all three American majors. Bradley isn&#8217;t amazing at driving the ball, but does everything well.     <br> <br>

Betting 0.6 Units to win 22.5 (to win +3750)    
<br> <br>





<br> <b> Taylor Pendrith to win the 3M Open +4065 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Taylor Pendrith checks in fourth in my model behind Finau, Burns, and Sahith Theegala. He&#8217;s been on fire this year, earning three top-10 finishes since the beginning of May, including an outright win at the Byron Nelson. He finished 16th at the U.S. Open, another bombers&#8217; course, despite playing against much tougher competition. Pendrith drives the ball extremely well, while his putter has been hot for the most part.   <br> <br>

Betting 0.75 Units to win 30.49 (to win +4065)    
<br> <br>
 

 
<br> <b> Kurt Kitayama to win the 3M Open +4500 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Kurt Kitayama drives the ball with great distance, and he&#8217;s also excellent with his irons. He has a win on tour in the past, and this could definitely be his second win. Kitayama, who is sixth in my model, is as low as 35/1 at Bookmaker, but FanDuel lists him at 45/1. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 22.5 (to win +4500)    
<br> <br>


 


<br> <b> Kevin Yu to win the 3M Open +7500 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Here&#8217;s my long shot. Kevin Yu is not known to many, but he has four top-nine finishes this year. He was fourth at the Myrtle Beach not too long ago. Although he can&#8217;t put well, he can blast the hell out of the ball and also fare well with his irons.   You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.35 Units to win 26.25 (to win +7500)   
<br> <br>
 




<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the British Open:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 





We continue to have the worst luck on Sundays. Ludvig Aberg led after the second and third round, but hit the fairway just five times on Sunday. He also missed so many putts. All he needed was -2 on Sunday to win, but he imploded. We&#8217;ve been subjected to so many Sunday meltdowns this year, it&#8217;s been ridiculous. <br> <br>

Hopefully our luck turns around at the British Open. Scottie Scheffler is the favorite, of course, but he struggled in England last year. He barely made the cut at the 2023 British Open. He even skipped out on the Scottish Open this year to improve his links course play. His struggles with links courses will be enough to keep me off of him this week, but he could still win because he&#8217;s the greatest golfer in the world. <br> <br>

I&#8217;m not a huge fan of any of the favorites, considering their odds. The top five golfers in my model are Scottie Scheffler, Collin Morikawa, Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy, and Ludvig Aberg, but there&#8217;s not much of a dropoff from them to some of the golfers in the 50/1 to 75/1 range. <br> <br>
 


<br> <b> Tom Kim to win the British Open +5000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
This week, I&#8217;m looking for golfers who are accurate and possess elite iron play. And as with the Scottish Open, I&#8217;m targeting either foreigners or golfers who have great links experience. Tom Kim is only 22, but plays links courses extremely well. In his previous three links events, he has finished 15th, second, and sixth. The second-place result was in last year&#8217;s British Open. It&#8217;s amazing that Kim is only 22, yet he already has two top-10 finishes in majors, including the second-place finish. He&#8217;s been hot lately, and his best two traits are accuracy and iron play. He&#8217;s a steal at 50/1.  You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.75 Units to win 37.5 (to win +5000)   
<br> <br>
 
  
 



<br> <b> Cameron Young to win the British Open +7000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Cameron Young is extremely talented, but has been known to go into some deep funks. When he&#8217;s hot, however, he can be unstoppable. He&#8217;s had two top-10 finishes in his previous two tournaments, so he&#8217;s rounding into form. Young, who can be accurate when he scales down his great power, has tremendous links experience. He has finished second and eighth in his two British Open appearances. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.7 Units to win 49 (to win +7000)    
<br> <br>




<br> <b> Sungjae Im to win the British Open +7500 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Sungjae Im is one of the top young golfers in the world, but he struggled to start the season. He skipped a PGA event to fly to his home in South Korea, where he won a small tournament. Ever since then, he&#8217;s been on fire. Dating back to May 12, Im has five top-10 finishes, including three in the top four. He just finished fourth at the Scottish Open, and he placed 20th at the British Open last year, so he can definitely win at this course. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 0.6 Units to win 45 (to win +7500)    
<br> <br> 

 
 
<br> <b> Brian Harman to win the British Open +7500 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
I can&#8217;t believe that Brian Harman is 75/1 to win the British Open. He won the previous British Open, and he finished sixth the year before that. Harman is a terrific links golfer who possesses great accuracy and irons ability. Furthermore, he&#8217;s left-handed, which, according to Phil Mickelson, is a positive trait to have at the Royal Troon. By that measure, Akshay Bhatia could be a great play at 125/1, but he has no links experience. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.6 Units to win 45 (to win +7500)    
<br> <br>



 

<br> <b> Sebastian Soderberg to win the British Open +40000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Most people haven&#8217;t heard of Sebastian Soderberg, but he&#8217;s the No. 1 player on the European tour at the moment. He&#8217;s an awesome irons player, and in his previous four European events, he has finished second, second, third, and second. That&#8217;s ridiculous. He&#8217;s a long shot, but at 400/1, I&#8217;m willing to take a chance on a guy who is mostly an unknown.    You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.1 Units to win 40 (to win +40000)   
<br> <br> 
 


<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Scottish Open:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 





Denny McCarthy looked like he&#8217;d have a chance to win the John Deere at +2450, but he had an awful Saturday to take himself out of contention.  <br> <br>

We now go overseas to the Scottish Open and then the British Open. It should be noted that Americans have a disadvantage in these European events. Only two Americans finished in the top 10 of the Scottish Open last year, and one of them was Scottie Scheffler. <br> <br>

Speaking of Scheffler, he won&#8217;t be playing at this event because he has decided to prepare for the British Open. He barely made the cut in last year&#8217;s British Open, so he is likely making the right choice to practice for it instead. Without Scheffler in the field, the odds of everyone else winning have improved substantially. However, that doesn&#8217;t mean that we&#8217;ll avoid the favorite&#8230; <br> <br>
 


<br> <b> Rory McIlroy to win the Scottish Open +750 (FanDuel/DraftKings)  </b> <br> 
You guys know I almost never bet the favorite unless it&#8217;s Scottie Scheffler. However, I love Rory McIlroy&#8217;s fit for this course. The Scottish Open requires great driving distance and approach play, plus quality putting abilities. McIlroy checks all the boxes. Of course, you could have known that if you looked at last year&#8217;s results. McIlroy won the Scottish Open in 2023, and I think he&#8217;ll be victorious again after taking some time off in the wake of his second-place finish at the U.S. Open. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 2 Units to win 15 (to win +750)   
<br> <br>
 
  
 


<br> <b> Ludvig Aberg to win the Scottish Open +1600 (FanDuel/DraftKings)  </b> <br> 
Ludvig Aberg is second in my model behind Rory McIroy. He&#8217;s a European player who thrives in driving distance, approach, and putting. He&#8217;s actually great in all regards, and he&#8217;s done well at very tricky golf courses like the Masters. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.   <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 16 (to win +1600)    
<br> <br>


<br> <b> Viktor Hovland to win the Scottish Open +2325 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Viktor Hovland had a horrible start to his 2024 season because he changed his swing. I&#8217;m not sure why he would do that after becoming the 2023 FedEx Cup champion, but he seems to be rounding into form lately. Hovland is a great course fit and has great history on these European courses. He&#8217;s fourth in my model (Xander Schaffele is third.)  <br> <br>

Betting 0.75 Units to win 17.45 (to win +2325)    
<br> <br> 



<br> <b> Byeong Hun An to win the Scottish Open +7550 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Byeong Hun An has tremendous power and plus approach skills. He&#8217;s a great fit for this course, so his third-place finish last year was not a surprise. An is performing even better than he did in 2023, so he&#8217;ll have an even better chance to prevail this time.  <br> <br>


Betting 0.3 Units to win 22.65 (to win +7550)   
<br> <br>

  


<br> <b> Nicolai Hojgaard to win the Scottish Open +10000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Nicolai Hojgaard doesn&#8217;t have great results this year, but that&#8217;s because he&#8217;s been playing in North America. He dominated the European tour last year, and he also finished sixth at the 2023 Scottish Open. Hohgaard has great driving ability, so now that he&#8217;s 23 years old, he could win this tournament.  You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.25 Units to win 25 (to win +10000)   
<br> <br>

 






<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the John Deere Classic:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 





We&#8217;ve had so much bad luck on Sundays this year. We once again bet a guy who finished second, as Min Woo Lee had a horrible chip on 18 to bogey, which cost him a playoff with Cameron Davis.  <br> <br>

Let&#8217;s hope for better luck this week at the John Deere Classic. We called Seppulon Straka as the winner here last year at 55/1. We&#8217;re not getting the same amazing odds with Straka again, so are we going to bet him once more? <br> <br>
 


<br> <b> Seppulon Straka to win the John Deere Classic +1800 (FanDuel/DraftKings)  </b> <br> 
I&#8217;m going to bet Seppulon Straka once more. He&#8217;s made for this course, which requires great accuracy, approach, and putting. Straka&#8217;s putting hasn&#8217;t been great this year, but he&#8217;s been excellent in the other two aspects. Plus, you can&#8217;t deny the course history. I&#8217;m not a big course history guy, but Straka dominated the field last year. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 1.25 Units to win 22.5 (to win +1800)   
<br> <br>
 
  
 



<br> <b> Denny McCarthy to win the John Deere Classic +2450 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Putting is extremely important at a tournament like this, so I&#8217;m interested in backing the best putter in the field. McCarthy is average in both accuracy and approach, but no one is a better putter than him. He tied for sixth at this tournament last year.   <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 24.5 (to win +2450)    
<br> <br>


<br> <b> J.T. Poston to win the John Deere Classic +3560 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
J.T. Poston&#8217;s top traits are accuracy and putting. His approach game is decent enough as well. He has a bright outlook on this course, as evidenced by his sixth-place finish last year. Poston has four top-10 finishes this year, including three inside the top six, so he&#8217;s been very close to triumphing. Perhaps this is his week.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.75 Units to win 26.7 (to win +3560)    
<br> <br>
 



 


<br> <b> Andrew Putnam to win the John Deere Classic +11635 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Andrew Putnam has no power to his swing, but he&#8217;s incredibly accurate and can putt extremely well. His approach game is hit or miss, so hopefully it&#8217;ll be a hit this weekend. Putnam has two top-10 finishes this year, so he has shown that he can contend on occasion. This is the right course for him.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.25 Units to win 29.1 (to win +11635)   
<br> <br>

 
 
<br> <b> Ben Kohles to win the John Deere Classic +15000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
I found this interesting. Look at how Ben Kohles has improved his putting throughout the year:  <br> <br>

<img src = "images/kohles.jpg">
<br> <br>

Kohles was an absolutely horrific putter at the beginning of the year, but he&#8217;s turned that part of his game completely around. This helped him finish second at the Byron Nelson. If this trend continues, Kohles will have a chance to prevail at the John Deere because he&#8217;s extremely accurate with his swing. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>


Betting 0.2 Units to win 30 (to win +15000)   
<br> <br>



<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Rocket Mortgage Classic:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 





Scottie Scheffler wins again. Unreal. The Travelers wasn&#8217;t even a great tournament for Scheffler, yet he prevailed anyway. It was incredibly disappointing to see Xander Schauffele and Collin Morikawa both suffer meltdowns on Day 4 when they were expected to compete with Scheffler down the stretch.  <br> <br>

Scheffler will be taking the next two weeks off before competing in the Scottish Open, British Open and the Olympics, so this field is wide open. We picked the winner last year with Rickie Fowler, who was putting incredibly well at the time. Fowler&#8217;s putting hasn&#8217;t been as good this year, so he won&#8217;t be wagering on him again. Instead, we&#8217;ll be looking at golfers who thrive with their putter and can hit the ball well enough over the bunkers at this course. <br> <br>
 

<br> <b> Min Woo Lee to win the Rocket Mortgage Classic +2106 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Min Woo Lee has incredible talent. The results don&#8217;t show that &#8211; he&#8217;s finished in the 20s in several tournaments recently &#8211; but those tournaments were all majors and elevated events. This is a massive step down in competition for Lee, who thrives in distance and putting.  <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 21.06 (to win +2106)   
<br> <br>
 
  

 



<br> <b> Maverick McNealy to win the Rocket Mortgage Classic +2858 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Maverick McNealy checks right behind Min Woo Lee in my model. He&#8217;s the No. 3 overall player and ranks as the fourth-best putter. McNealy has been heating up lately, most recently finishing seventh at the Canadian Open, so he can certainly win in an easier field.  <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 28.58 (to win +2858)    
<br> <br>


<br> <b> Taylor Pendrith to win the Rocket Mortgage Classic +3000 (FanDuel/DraftKings)  </b> <br> 
Min Woo Lee is second in my model. Taylor Pendrith is first. Pendrith, who has six top-11 finishes this year, including a win at the Byron Nelson, is a perfect match for this course. He drives the ball well and excels in putting, which are the two attributes you need at the Detroit Golf Club. In fact, he&#8217;s the No. 3-ranked putter in this field.   You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 30 (to win +3000)    <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>
 



 

<br> <b> Ryan Fox to win the Rocket Mortgage Classic +5500 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
If you ignore everything besides putting and driving distance, and average the two metrics together, there are only two golfers at this tournament who will have a better number than Ryan Fox: Taylor Pendrith and Min Woo Lee. Fox will be able to use his strengths to perform well in this field. He has three top-seven finishes in the past few months, and those finishes were against tougher competition than this.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 27.5 (to win +)   
<br> <br>

 

 
<br> <b> Beau Hossler to win the Rocket Mortgage Classic +7070 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Beau Hossler is just average when it comes to driving the ball, but there is no better putter at this tournament. This gives Hossler, who finished fourth at Myrtle Beach a couple of months ago, a chance to win this tournament.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.3 Units to win 21.21 (to win +7070)   
<br> <br>


<br> <b> Pre-Round 2 Bet: Tom Kim to win the Rocket Mortgage Classic +22000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Tom Kim is the best golfer in this field. He had a lousy Thursday, finishing at +1, but he could easily have an insane Friday to vault back into contention. Most of the top of the leaderboard isn&#8217;t overly impressive, so Kim could still win this tournament. Getting 220/1 is a steal.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.1 Units to win 22 (to win +22000)   
<br> <br>


<br> <b> Pre-Round 3 Bet: Will Zalatoris to win the Rocket Mortgage Classic +10000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Will Zalatoris&#8217; odds were much better heading into Friday, thanks to his -6 in Round 1. However, he went just -1 on Friday, which puts him six strokes back of the lead. Zalatoris is a very talented golfer, so he could easily make up that deficit in two days, especially since many of the golfers ahead of him aren&#8217;t very good. I think 100/1 is a great value.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.1 Units to win 10 (to win +10000)   
<br> <br>


<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Travelers Championship:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 





It&#8217;s a shame we didn&#8217;t have a great course formula for the U.S. Open. As I wrote on Sunday, Pinehurst turned into a bombers&#8217; paradise, which is why we bet Bryson DeChambeau prior to the final round. Had we possessed more data and known this ahead of time, we would&#8217;ve gotten a much better number on DeChambeau earlier in the week. <br> <br>

Fortunately, we have plenty of data for the Travelers Championship, which is a far easier course than Pinehurst. Winning the Travelers is contingent on approach play and putting. Accuracy is important as well, but approach and putting are the two most significant stats. <br> <br>

Given that Scottie Scheffler is not a great putter, I won&#8217;t be betting him this week. Scheffler actually came out to be third in my model behind Xander Schauffele and Collin Morikawa, so I would suggest betting on them instead. Scheffler is the best golfer in the world and could obviously win this tournament, but we&#8217;re getting a bad number on a course that doesn&#8217;t suit his strengths. <br> <br>
 

<br> <b> Collin Morikawa to win the Travelers Championship +1200 (FanDuel/DraftKings)  </b> <br> 
Of Schauffele and Morikawa, the latter is available for a much better price. I&#8217;m seeing 12/1 at FanDuel and DraftKings, whereas Schauffele is +750. Schauffele won a major recently, so he may not be as hungry as Morikawa, who is enjoying an amazing season. Morikawa has come close to winning so often, so perhaps he&#8217;ll finally prevail this weekend. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $200 in bonus bets from DraftKings</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 2 Units to win 24 (to win +1200)    <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $200 in bonus bets from DraftKings</a>
<br> <br>
 
  
 




<br> <b> Russell Henley to win the Travelers Championship +3500 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Russell Henley is coming off a terrific U.S. Open when considering that he was able to contend despite not being a bomber. Henley is also having a terrific season, and this course fits him like a glove. Henley has no power, but he&#8217;s outstanding when it comes to accuracy and putting. He&#8217;s also very good with his irons. Henley ranks fourth in my model and is a steal at 35/1. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 0.75 Units to win 26.25 (to win +3500)    <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>
 



<br> <b> Denny McCarthy to win the Travelers Championship +8000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
When it comes to putting, no one is better than Denny McCarthy. So, on courses where putting is one of the top attributes, you must consider betting him. McCarthy isn&#8217;t great when it comes to accuracy or approach play, but he gains strokes in both categories, so it&#8217;s not like he&#8217;ll have any liabilities at this tournament. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.   <br> <br>

Betting 0.3 Units to win 24 (to win +8000)    
<br> <br>

 


<br> <b> Christiaan Bezuidenhout to win the Travelers Championship +8000 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Christian Bezuidenhout is also enjoying a terrific year. He has finished second, fourth, and ninth in three PGA tournaments this year, so he&#8217;s definitely live to win. Bezuidenhout is an amazing putter who also does well when it comes to accuracy and approach. He&#8217;s a steal at 80/1. <br> <br>

Betting 0.3 Units to win 24 (to win +8000)   
<br> <br>
 

<br> <b> Pre-Round 2 Bet: Ludvig Aberg to win the Travelers Championship +2200 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
I wrote earlier that I had interest in Ludvig Aberg to win this tournament, but didn&#8217;t love the 14/1 number. Aberg is 22/1 now, which is much more appealing. He&#8217;s currently -3 right now, so he&#8217;s definitely not out of it. Aberg is a stud, so he could easily have a nine-under day and vault to the top of the leaderboard. <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 11 (to win +2200)   
<br> <br>
  
<br> <b> Pre-Round 4 Bet: Xander Schauffele to win the Travelers Championship +550 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Xander Schauffele was No. 1 in my model for this course. He&#8217;s only two back of the lead, so he can certainly win. I regret not betting him at +925, which I saw on Bookmaker on Wednesday evening. I think +550 is a solid number though, given where he ranks on the leaderboard at the moment. <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 2.75 (to win +550)   
<br> <br>
  

  




<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the U.S. Open:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 





We didn&#8217;t get an amazing number with Scottie Scheffler, but we got the win in a tight one on Sunday. Scheffler recorded his fifth victory of the year, and there will be more to come. <br> <br>

Perhaps Scheffler&#8217;s sixth win will come at the U.S. Open. This year&#8217;s U.S. Open will be at Pinehurst in North Carolina. Pinehurst is arguably the toughest course on the entire tour this year. The last time Pinehurst hosted a PGA event, only one person finished under par. I&#8217;ll repeat and emphasize: ONLY ONE PERSON FINISHED UNDER PAR. <br> <br>

Only a complete player can win at an extremely difficult course like this. Pinehurst will expose everyone&#8217;s flaws, so let&#8217;s take a look at the players who can thrive in all aspects. <br> <br>
 


<br> <b> Scottie Scheffler to win the U.S. Open +333 (BetMGM)  </b> <br> 
We&#8217;re betting Scottie Scheffler again. I compared his run to that of James Holzhauer on <i>Jeopardy</i>. Holzhauer demolished all of his opponents despite the show&#8217;s efforts to boot him off with increasingly difficult questions. He finally lost when they began asking very easy questions. Holzhauer couldn&#8217;t be beaten when the tough questions were asked because he was better than everyone. Similarly, Scheffler has such a huge advantage over the rest of the field on a course like this because he&#8217;s in a tier of his own. I&#8217;d bet him at 2/1, so +333 is a good deal.  <br> <br>

Betting 3 Units to win 10 (to win +333)    
<br> <br>
 
  

 


<br> <b> Collin Morikawa to win the U.S. Open +1653 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Collin Morikawa is playing some ridiculous golf right now. He didn&#8217;t have his best season last year because he was dealing with back spasms, but he&#8217;s healthy now, and it shows. He&#8217;s finished third and fourth in his previous two majors, and he&#8217;s gone second, fourth and fourth in the past three tournaments. No one is more accurate than Morikawa &#8211; not even Scheffler &#8211; which is the most important trait to have at Pinehurst.    <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 16.53 (to win +1653)    
<br> <br>


<br> <b> Brooks Koepka to win the U.S. Open +2652 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Brooks Koepka has a great track record at majors, so he could certainly beat Scottie Scheffler. Koepka is also someone who has no flaws in his game. He let many bettors down at the PGA Championship, but once that tournament turned into a birdie fest, it was clear that he would have trouble winning it. This course is much tougher, which helps Koepka versus most of the field.    <br> <br>

Betting 0.75 Units to win 19.89 (to win +2652)    
<br> <br>

 



<br> <b> Tommy Fleetwood to win the U.S. Open +3652 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Tommy Fleetwood is known for being a choke artist, but so was Xander Schauffele before he won the PGA Championship. Fleetwood has had some great finishes in majors in the past few years. He&#8217;s had four top-fives since 2022. He ranks very highly in accuracy and approach, the two most important traits when it comes to playing at Pinehurst. <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 18.26 (to win +3652)   
<br> <br>



<br> <b> Hideki Matsuyama to win the U.S. Open +5053 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Contrary to Tommy Fleetwood, Hideki Matsuyama has a major win, prevailing at the 2021 Masters. He&#8217;s also been enjoying a great year. He won the Genesis in February, and since then, he&#8217;s placed in the top eight on three occasions. Matsuyama has no weaknesses, and he&#8217;s especially strong in approach and around the green, two of the three most vital traits to have at Pinehurst. <br> <br> 

Betting 0.4 Units to win 20.21 (to win +5053)   
<br> <br>
 


 

 
<br> <b> Sungjae Im to win the U.S. Open +9000 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Sungjae Im is an extremely talented, young golfer, but was struggling early in the year. He took a trip to South Korea in late April, and he&#8217;s been fantastic since. He&#8217;s been in the top nine in three of his past four tournaments. Im has no weaknesses when he&#8217;s playing at the top of his game, and he&#8217;s great when it comes to accuracy and around-the-green play, so he has what it takes to win at Pinehurst.   <br> <br>

Betting 0.25 Units to win 22.5 (to win +9000)   
<br> <br>
 
 

 
 
<br> <b> Round 4 Bets: Bryson DeChambeau (-115), Ludvig Aberg (+2050)  </b> <br> 
Our formula was off for Pinehurst, as it&#8217;s turned into a bombers&#8217; paradise. Bryson DeChambeau is the best bomber there is. Getting -115 may not seem great, but DataGolf puts him at 55.1 percent to win, meaning -124 is correct. I like the bit of value we&#8217;re getting with DeChambeau. Meanwhile, Ludvig Aberg is the most talented golfer in contention. He&#8217;s five back of DeChambeau, but he&#8217;s talented enough to catch him. You can get him at +2050 on Bookmaker.   <br> <br>

Betting 1.15 Unit to win 1 (to win -115 on DeChambeau)
<br> Betting 0.25 Units to win 5.13 (to win +2050 on Aberg)  
<br> <br>
 



<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Memorial Tournament:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 





For the third consecutive Sunday, we had a guy in contention, only to see the frontrunner have an amazing finish. Mackenzie Hughes looked like he was going to make a charge for a while, but he imploded on nine, and it didn&#8217;t help that two of his putts lipped out of the hole.  <br> <br>

We have a loaded field this week with Scottie Scheffler and all the top golfers at the Memorial Tournament. This is an incredibly tough course, so it&#8217;ll be a surprise if anyone besides Scottie Scheffler is able to reach -10. Speaking of Scheffler&#8230; <br> <br>

<div id="mtc-incontent-ad-2"></div>


<br> <b> Scottie Scheffler to win the Memorial Tournament +366 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Scottie Scheffler had major problems putting last year. That was the case at the 2023 Memorial, where he finished third. He had that great finish despite losing eight strokes putting. Let me emphasize that. Scheffler finished third despite losing EIGHT STROKES PUTTING. Scheffler has since figured out his putter and has actually done very well in that regard since March. This course is perfect for Scheffler, which rewards golfers for accuracy, approach play, and scrambling. Scheffler is top notch in all three of those categories.  <br> <br>

Betting 3 Units to win 10.98 (to win +366)    
<br> <br>
 
  

 





<br> <b> Alex Noren to win the Memorial Tournament +6250 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Alex Noren sucked last week, but he&#8217;s not too far removed from a third-place finish at the Byron Nelson, or an 11th-place finish at the Houston Open, where Scheffler was second. Noren&#8217;s weakness is his driving distance, but that won&#8217;t matter on this course. Noren can do well here, as we saw in 2021 when he was 13th. He&#8217;s worth a look at 62/1.   <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Unit to win 31.25 (to win +6250)    
<br> <br>

 



<br> <b> Denny McCarthy to win the Memorial Tournament +8450 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Denny McCarthy&#8217;s odds are all over the place. He&#8217;s 55/1 at Bovada, and 84/1 at Bookmaker. He was one of the two players who finished ahead of Scottie Scheffler at the 2023 Memorial Tournament, with the winner being Viktor Hovland. I also like Hovland a bit overall, but not so much at 20/1. At any rate, McCarthy has great stats for scrambling and putting, so he should perform well here again.    <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 42.25 (to win +8450)   
<br> <br>



<br> <b> Lucas Glover to win the Memorial Tournament +12500 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
First of all, I was set to type up Lucas Glover, and the song &#8220;Automatic Lover&#8221; by the Real McCoy popped up on my iTunes. I&#8217;ve always called Lucas Glover &#8220;Automatic Glover&#8221; as an homage to that song, so it has to be a sign, right? Second, I think it&#8217;s important to note Glover&#8217;s putting. Glover is a horrendous putter by his own admission, but he repaired that aspect to his game late in 2023 and won two consecutive tournaments, including the first leg of the FedEx Cup Playoffs. Glover reverted to putting poorly in early 2024, but take a look at how he&#8217;s done in that area recently: <br> <br>

<img src = "images/gloverputting.jpg">  <br> <br>

Ever since the Masters, Glover has gained strokes putting in four of five tournaments, and he was exceptional at putting in his most recent outing. I think there&#8217;s a chance that Glover has fixed things again, and if so, he&#8217;s live to win any tournament because he&#8217;s one of the top ball strikers on tour. I was thrilled to see Automatic Glover available at 125/1. <br> <br> 

Betting 0.5 Units to win 62.5 (to win +12500)   
<br> <br>
 


 
 
<br> <b> Andrew Putnam to win the Memorial Tournament +17500 (Caesars)  </b> <br> 
We&#8217;re not done with our long shots! Andrew Putnam ranked much higher than expected in my model (7th). Then again, maybe I shouldn&#8217;t be too surprised because his sole weakness is driving distance. Putnam excels in all other areas, so he can win this tournament, as evidenced by his fifth-place finish last year.   <br> <br>

Betting 0.25 Units to win 44 (to win +17500)   
<br> <br>
 
 
 
<br> <b> Round 4 Hedges: Collin Morikawa +1000 (FanDuel), Seppulon Straka +2050 (Bookmaker), Adam Hadwin +3000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
We&#8217;re in a great spot with Scottie Scheffler. I&#8217;m going to spray 0.2 units on everyone who&#8217;s at -6 at the moment. I don&#8217;t think you need to do that, and you could perhaps wait to bet one golfer, but I&#8217;ll be at the beach tomorrow with my family, so I won&#8217;t be able to watch the tournament live.   <br> <br>

Betting 0.2 Units to win 2 (to win +1000 on Morikawa)
<br> Betting 0.2 Units to win 4.1 (to win +2050 on Straka) 
<br> Betting 0.2 Units to win 6 (to win +3000 on Hadwin)   
<br> <br>
 


 




<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Canadian Open:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 





We were able to get a great number on Scottie Scheffler last weekend after his dismal Round 1 performance. We had him at 11/1. Unfortunately, he inexplicably struggled in  Round 4. We were able to hedge with Davis Riley, at least. <br> <br>

Scheffler is not playing at the RBC Canadian Open, so this is a wide-open field. Rory McIlroy is the favorite, and for good reason: He&#8217;s on fire now, and he lit up this course the last time he played it, winning by five strokes. However, McIlroy is not Scheffler, so I&#8217;m more confident in our longer shots. <br> <br>
 


<b> Sahith Theegala to win the Canadian Open +2000 (BetMGM)  </b> <br> 
Hamilton Golf &#038; Country Club is all about iron play and putting. Sahith Theegala excels in both. He&#8217;s No. 1 in my model, just ahead of Rory McIlroy, so getting him at 20/1 when McIlroy is 4/1 is an absolute steal. Theegala has finished in the top six on four occasions this year, so he&#8217;s primed to win.  <br> <br>

Betting 1.5 Units to win 30 (to win +2000)    <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a>
<br> <br>
 
  

 





<b> Alex Noren to win the Canadian Open +2500 (BetMGM)  </b> <br> 
I like the price we&#8217;re getting on Alex Noren as well. Noren isn&#8217;t an elite putter like Theegala is, but he&#8217;s very good in that area. He also thrives with his irons. He&#8217;s fourth in my model, and he&#8217;s been hot lately. He&#8217;s finished 14th or better in five of his previous eight tournaments, and he had a third-place finish on May 5.  You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a> by clicking the link.    <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 25 (to win +2500)     <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a>
<br> <br>

 




<b> Mackenzie Hughes to win the Canadian Open +4400 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Mackenzie Hughes is the best putter at this tournament, which gives him a huge edge. He&#8217;s fifth in my model. He&#8217;s also Canadian, which can&#8217;t hurt!     <br> <br>

Betting 0.65 Units to win 29 (to win +5050)   
<br> <br>



<b> Erik Van Rooyen to win the Canadian Open +6400 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Erik Van Rooyen ranks ninth in my model, as his best attributes are iron play and putting. He&#8217;s also finished in second and fourth in tournaments dating back to March. Despite this, he&#8217;s 64/1, which seems like a tremendous value.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 32 (to win +6400)   
<br> <br>
 

 


<b> Pre-Round 2 Bet: Cameron Young to win the Canadian Open +4500 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Cameron Young is one of the most talented golfers at this tournament. He&#8217;s only -1 right now, but he&#8217;s capable of making a big push. He was 16th in my model this week, so I like getting him at 45/1 odds.   <br> <br>

Betting 0.2 Units to win 9 (to win +4500)   
<br> <br>


<b> Pre-Round 2 Bet: Corey Conners to win the Canadian Open +4500 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
What I said about Cameron Young also applies to Corey Conners. He&#8217;s 18th in my model, and he&#8217;s talented enough to have a huge round and really jump up the leaderboard. He&#8217;s -1 right now, but 45/1 is too good of a price to pass up.   <br> <br>

Betting 0.2 Units to win 9 (to win +4500)   
<br> <br>


<b> Pre-Round 2 Bet: Thorbjorn Olesen to win the Canadian Open +9000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
I actually had Thorbjorn Olesen higher in my model than Young and Conners. He&#8217;s 13th on my spreadsheet, and he&#8217;s at -2 right now. Given his great putting ability, he&#8217;ll be able to post lots of birdies and move up the leaderboard.   <br> <br>

Betting 0.1 Units to win 9 (to win +9000)   
<br> <br>


<b> Pre-Round 2 Bet: Sahith Theegala to win the Canadian Open +60000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
This is probably silly because Sahith Theegala just had a horrible first round, and at +4, he&#8217;s more likely to miss the cut than not. However, he&#8217;s the second-best golfer at this tournament, and he could easily have a -7 or -8 second round to put himself in contention. I can&#8217;t pass on the second-best golfer at a tournament at 600/1, even if he&#8217;s at +4 after the first round.   <br> <br>

Betting 0.05 Units to win 30 (to win +60000)   
<br> <br> 

 



<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Charles Schwab:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 





Last weekend hurt. We had Bryson DeChambeau at about 30/1, and he lost by a single stroke. What&#8217;s worse is that I wanted to hedge my bet, but never saw a great opportunity. I thought we&#8217;d get one if DeChambeau and renowned choke artist Xander Schauffele went to extra holes, but Schauffele came up big in the clutch for the first time and won the tournament.  <br> <br>

We&#8217;ve had lots of chalk lately, and I&#8217;m afraid that will continue in this tournament. Scottie Scheffler is a massive favorite, and for good reason. This is a perfect course for Scheffler because great iron players do extremely well at it. Putting is also important, and Scheffler has improved markedly in that department. I&#8217;ll be betting Scheffler, as he&#8217;ll be looking to redeem himself from last weekend&#8217;s ridiculous arrest. <br> <br>
 


<b> Scottie Scheffler to win the Charles Schwab +305 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Again, this is a perfect course for Scheffler, so I have no problem betting him, even at this low number. Also, keep in mind that there aren&#8217;t many great golfers at this tournament. Collin Morikawa is Scheffler&#8217;s top competition, and Morikawa&#8217;s mediocre putting could end up costing him.  <br> <br>

Betting 3 Units to win 9.15 (to win +305)    
<br> <br>
 
  


 




<b> Christiaan Bezuidenhout to win the Charles Schwab +5000 (BetMGM)  </b> <br> 
Christiaan Bezuidenhout is one of the top putters on tour. He&#8217;s also solid when it comes to his iron play. Both these features rank him highly in this tournament. Bezuidenhout has a second-place finish this year in which he placed ahead of Schauffele, so we know that he can win.  You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a> by clicking the link.    <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 25 (to win +5000)     <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a>
<br> <br>
 


<b> Tom Hoge to win the Charles Schwab +5050 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
This is a perfect course for Tom Hoge. Iron play is Hoge&#8217;s specialty, and he&#8217;s also a top-50 putter. Hoge also ranks highly in greens in regulation. He has six top-20 finishes this year, including two in the top 10, so he could finally take down a tournament.     <br> <br>

Betting 0.6 Units to win 30.3 (to win +5050)   
<br> <br>



<b> Andrew Putnam to win the Charles Schwab +6050 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Andrew Putnam is similar to Tom Hoge. He ranks highly in all three major categories, and he&#8217;s also had two top-10 finishes this year. He ranks fifth in my model despite the fact that he&#8217;s just $7,400 on DraftKings.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 30.25 (to win +6050)   
<br> <br>
 


 


<b> Pre-Round 2 Bet: Scottie Scheffler to win the Charles Schwab +1100 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
We&#8217;re going to double down on Scottie Scheffler. He&#8217;s the best golfer in the world, but is coming off the worst round he&#8217;s had since 2022, thanks to a triple bogey. He could easily rebound with a five-under second round and get back on track to win this tournament.   <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 5.5 (to win +1100)   
<br> <br>


<b> Pre-Round 2 Bet: Seppulon Straka to win the Charles Schwab +2200 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Seppulon Straka is the fifth golfer I considered betting ahead of this tournament. Straka&#8217;s putting has been inconsistent this year, but if he can continue to putt well, he could easily take down this tournament. He&#8217;s -2 at the moment, so he&#8217;s in a good spot to make a run in the final three rounds.   <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 22 (to win +2200)   
<br> <br>

<b> Pre-Round 4 Hedge: Riley Davis to win the Charles Schwab +110 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
I want to hedge my Scottie Scheffler bets. I currently have Scheffler at $350 to win $1,480. I&#8217;m going to bet two units on Riley Davis at +110, and I&#8217;m going to wait for a +200 or so on Sunday for a third unit.  <br> <br>

Betting 2 Units to win 2.2 (to win +110)   
<br> <br>

 


<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the PGA Championship:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 





Last week&#8217;s tournament was no fun, as the chalk ran too strong. That could easily occur at the PGA Championship, as Scottie Scheffler is back on the menu, while Rory McIlroy is coming off consecutive wins. However, this is the easiest course for a major championship in recent memory, so there will be more golfers in play for the victory than usual. Let&#8217;s try to find someone with decent odds who can win it. <br> <br>

<div id="mtc-incontent-ad-2"></div>


<b> Brooks Koepka to win the PGA Championship +1650 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Brooks Koepka went into a funk after winning the PGA Championship last year. However, he recently rededicated himself to his craft, and it led to a victory in the most recent LIV tournament. Koepka is known as a big-gae hunter with his five major wins, and he could very easily win his sixth this weekend, as he enters Louisville in great form. <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 16.5 (to win +1650)    
<br> <br>
 
  
 


<b> Jon Rahm to win the PGA Championship +2050 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Jon Rahm is 16/1 or 18/1 in most places, but he&#8217;s slightly above 20/1 at Bookmaker. This is an outstanding price for someone who is arguably the second-best golfer in the world. Rahm has no wins this year, but he has so many top-10 finishes. This course fits him like a glove, so he&#8217;s very intriguing at this price.    <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 20.5 (to win +2050)   
<br> <br>
 





<b> Bryson DeChambeau to win the PGA Championship +2955 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Speaking of great course fits, Bryson DeChambeau certainly qualifies in that regard. DeChambeau, who nearly won the Masters, has one slight weakness, and it&#8217;s his around the green play. That won&#8217;t matter much, if at all, at this course.  <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 29.55 (to win +2955)   
<br> <br>
 


<b> Joaquin Niemann to win the PGA Championship +4050 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Joaquin Niemann ranges from 25/1 to 35/1 depending on the sportsbook, but he&#8217;s above 40/1 at Bookmaker. This is an incredible price for Niemann, who has been the best golfer on LIV this year. Niemann has three wins on the season, and this could be his fourth on what is a great course fit for him. If there&#8217;s an argument to be made against Niemann, it&#8217;s that he hasn&#8217;t had success at majors, but this could be an exception because it&#8217;s an unusually easy course for a major championship.    <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 20.25 (to win +4050)   
<br> <br>

 



<b> Stephan Jaeger to win the PGA Championship +15055 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
In a field like this, you have to ask yourself, &#8220;Who can beat Scottie Scheffler and the other top golfers?&#8221; We know Stephan Jaeger can because he beat Scheffler in the Houston Open on Easter weekend. Jaeger&#8217;s plus driving distance makes him a great fit on this course as well.    <br> <br>

Betting 0.2 Units to win 30.11 (to win +15055)   
<br> <br>

 


<b> Keith Mitchell to win the PGA Championship +20000 (Bovada)  </b> <br> 
I have one more other long shot. Keith Mitchell is a weird one. On one hand, I don&#8217;t have confidence that he can win because he hasn&#8217;t prevailed in a PGA tournament since 2020. On the other hand, Mitchell ranks in the top five of my model, so I&#8217;ll feel terrible if he wins and I don&#8217;t bet him. This is a perfect course fit for Mitchell, so I&#8217;ll put a little bit on him.     <br> <br>

Betting 0.15 Units to win 30 (to win +20000)   
<br> <br>
 
 



<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Wells Fargo:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 





Our top golfer last week was Aaron Rai, who finished fourth, so that wasn&#8217;t too exciting. We move on to the Wells Fargo, which features a wide-open field. Scottie Scheffler is on paternity leave, while Ludvig Aberg withdrew for knee concerns. Aberg was going to be my top choice to win this tournament, but we still have some intriguing options. <br> <br>
 


<b> Wyndham Clark to win the Wells Fargo +1600 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
It&#8217;s no surprise that Wyndham Clark won this tournament last year. This is the perfect course for Clark, as it calls for great power off the tee and plus bogey avoidance. Clark is sixth and 20th in both categories, respectively. I don&#8217;t love this number, but with Aberg out, Clark has a good chance to prevail again. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 1.5 Units to win 24 (to win +1600)   <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>
 
  

 



<b> Max Homa to win the Wells Fargo +2500 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
If you&#8217;re looking for great course history, Max Homa&#8217;s your guy. Homa won the Wells Fargo in 2022 and then finished eighth in it last year. Homa has good, but not great power off the tee, but he makes up for it with incredible bogey avoidance and scrambling, both of which are very key at this course.    <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 25 (to win +2500)   
<br> <br> 


<b> Sahith Theegala to win the Wells Fargo +3350 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Sahith Theegala has great power off the tee with incredible bogey avoidance and plus scrambling. This is what I like to see from someone I&#8217;m picking in this tournament. Theegala&#8217;s having a great year, finishing second at the RBC Heritage a few weeks ago.  <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 33.5 (to win +3350)   
<br> <br>
 


<b> Stephan Jaegar to win the Wells Fargo +7255 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Stephan Jaegar is 72/1 at Bookmaker, yet he&#8217;s third in my model! Jaegar is known for his great power off the tee. He also ranks 26th in scrambling and 48th in bogey avoidance. He beat Scottie Scheffler at the Houston Open on Easter weekend. He also has plus course history, finishing sixth here two years ago.    <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 72.55 (to win +7255)   
<br> <br>

 



<b> Kurt Kitayama to win the Wells Fargo +10000 (BetMGM)  </b> <br> 
Kurt Kitayama doesn&#8217;t fit well at every course, but he&#8217;s always live when playing somewhere that requires great power off the tee. Kitayama possesses that trait, and he also ranks well in bogey avoidance (33th) and scrambling (29th). You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 50 (to win +10000)   <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a>
<br> <br>
 

<b> Sunday Wager: Sungjae Im and Seppulon Straka to win the Wells Fargo +1800, +4000 (FanDuel) </b> <br>
Shout out to four-time DraftKings milly-maker winner Cam Cole for putting this out there, but Xander Schauffele and Rory McIlroy are renowned choke artists. There&#8217;s a decent chance one of Sungjae Im or Seppulon Straka catches them. I&#8217;m taking a shot on both for a half unit each. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 9, 0.5 Units to win 20 (to win +1800, +4000)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>
  




<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Byron Nelson:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 





Remind me not to play the Zurich Classic next year, especially if it&#8217;s during draft week. I don&#8217;t like the team format, as it was very difficult to formulate. I&#8217;m glad we get to go back to regular golf this week at the Byron Nelson, a tournament that is wide open with most of the top golfers taking the week off. <br> <br>
 


<b> Tom Hoge to win the Byron Nelson +3450 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
I&#8217;m looking at three traits golfers need to win the Byron Nelson: greens in regulation percentage, birdie percentage, and putting ability. Tom Hoge excels in all three traits, ranking 23rd, sixth and 30th in those three. Hoge has golfed well this year with multiple top-10 finishes.  <br> <br>

Betting 1.35 Units to win 46.58 (to win +3450)  
<br> <br>
 
  

 


<b> Thomas Detry to win the Byron Nelson +4650 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Thomas Detry is just mediocre when it comes in greens in regulation (75th), but he&#8217;s top 30 in the other categories. Detry has fourth-, second- and eighth-place finishes this year, so it seems like he&#8217;s due to win one of these weeks. <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 46.5 (to win +4650)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a> 
<br> <br>
 

 


<b> Mark Hubbard to win the Byron Nelson +6000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Mark Hubbard has third- and fourth-place finishes this year, so he can definitely win this tournament. Hubbard ranks favorably in all three categories, especially birdie percentage (16th). You can You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.    <br> <br>

Betting 0.6 Units to win 36 (to win +6000)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>




<b> Davis Thompson to win the Byron Nelson +6600 (BetMGM)  </b> <br> 
Davis Thompson&#8217;s worst trait here is putting, but he&#8217;s still 75th in that regard. He&#8217;s 44th in greens in regulation and 30th in birdie percentage. Thompson doesn&#8217;t have a top-10 finish this year, but he could spike a victory in such a bad field. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a> by clicking the link.    <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 33 (to win +6600)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a>
<br> <br>

 




<b> Aaron Rai to win the Byron Nelson +7050 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Aaron Rai&#8217;s putting is hit or miss. If it&#8217;s hit this weekend, he can win this tournament because he ranks highly in the other two categories. Rai finished seventh in a tournament a month ago, so he can win this one. <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 35.25 (to win +7050)   
<br> <br>
 


<b> Nico Echavarria to win the Byron Nelson +25000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Nico Echavarria is my long shot to win. He and his parnter finished fourth last week, so perhaps that&#8217;s a sign that he can prevail in this tournament. Echavarria&#8217;s putting is mediocre, but he ranks highly in the other two categories.  You can You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.    <br> <br>

Betting 0.2 Units to win 50 (to win +25000)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>

 




<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Zurich Classic:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 


I&#8217;m really kicking myself because I considered betting Scottie Scheffler last week at 11/1 after his mediocre first round. I don&#8217;t know why I didn&#8217;t pull the trigger, but that would have been a great bet. <br> <br>
 
Scheffler is not playing at the Zurich Classic, which is a team event. This makes it tricky to handicap, but I think we have some nice values. <br> <br>

<div id="mtc-incontent-ad-2"></div>

<b> Tom Hoge and Maverick McNealy to win the Zurich Classic +2500 (BetMGM)  </b> <br> 
I actually have Hoge and McNealy ranked at the very top of my model. They complement each other very well, with the two of them no worse than 30th in all the important metrics. Hoge was near the top of the leaderboard last week, so perhaps that&#8217;s a sign that he&#8217;s ready to win.   <br> <br>

Betting 1.5 Units to win 37.5 (to win +2500)  
<br> <br>




<b> Corey Conners and Taylor Pendrith to win the Zurich Classic +2800 (BetMGM)  </b> <br> 
Conners and Pendrith are as low as 18/1 at FanDuel, so 28/1 at BetMGM seems like an incredible bargain. The duo ranks in the top 20 of approach and putting. They&#8217;re in the middle of the pack when it comes to scrambling, but I can&#8217;t turn down 28/1.        <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 28 (to win +2800)  
<br> <br>





<b> Adam Hadwin and Nick Taylor to win the Zurich Classic +2800 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
This is an even better deal because Hadwin and Taylor are 14/1 to win the Zurch on FanDuel. You can get 28/1 at BetMGM, which is a steal. Hadwin and Taylor are seventh, ranking highly in approach and putting.      <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 28 (to win +4050)  
<br> <br>



<b> Andrew Novak and Davis Thompson to win the Zurich Classic +4500 (BetMGM)  </b> <br> 
BetMGM is killing it with these futures because Novak and Davis are 28/1 on FanDuel, yet they&#8217;re 45/1 at BetMGM. I have the duo eighth in my model. They&#8217;re excellent in approach and scrambling. They&#8217;re not the best putting team, but they&#8217;re not ranked poorly in that regard either.   <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 22.5 (to win +4500)   
<br> <br>


 


<b> Chesson Hadley and Greyson Sigg to win the Zurich Classic +6600 (BetMGM)  </b> <br> 
It gets crazier here. Hadley and Sigg are just 33/1 at FanDuel, but they&#8217;re 66/1 at BetMGM. They rank very high in my model, finishing fourth. They&#8217;re 31st or better in every important category at this course.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 33.3 (to win +14050)  
<br> <br>
 
  
<b> Parker Coody and Pierceson Coody to win the Zurich Classic +10000 (BetMGM)  </b> <br> 
Last but not least, we have the Coody brothers. They complement each other very well. One is great at approach and scrambling, while the other is terrific at putting. They&#8217;re 55/1 at FanDuel, but 100/1 at BetMGM! You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.3 Units to win 30 (to win +10000)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a> 
<br> <br>
 

 
 





<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the RBC Heritage:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 


We hit back-to-back winners with Akshay Bhatia at 68/1 during the Valero Texas Open, and then Scottie Scheffler at +480 during the Masters. It&#8217;s nice to be on a hot streak after we had some bad luck to start the year. <br> <br>

I&#8217;m not going to bet Scheffler this week. This is not a great course fit for him. Sure, he could win it because he&#8217;s the best golfer on the planet, but he doesn&#8217;t have a huge built-in advantage like he did at the Masters. Besides, his wife is due soon, and Scheffler said he would withdraw if his wife were to go into labor. This was only a very minor concern last week, but with the date quickly approaching, there&#8217;s added risk. <br> <br>
 
 

<b> Ludvig Aberg to win the RBC Heritage +1450 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Ludvig Aberg finished second at the Masters, and he happens to be second in my model behind Scheffler this week. The case could be made that Aberg is the second-best golfer in the world right now despite the fact that he&#8217;s playing in just his first full season. I think he&#8217;s the most likely person to win the RBC Heritage if Scheffler is excluded, so his number (+1450) is excellent compared to Scheffler&#8217;s +450.    <br> <br>

Betting 1.5 Units to win 21.75 (to win +1450)  
<br> <br>

 



<b> Matt Fitzpatrick to win the RBC Heritage +3050 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Matt Fitzpatrick won this tournament last year. He&#8217;s a great fit for this course, so that wasn&#8217;t a surprise. He&#8217;s in the top 10 of my model, and he&#8217;s been hot lately. He finished fifth at the Players, 10th at the Valero Texas Open, and 22nd at the Masters.       <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 30.5 (to win +3050)  
<br> <br>


 



<b> Sahith Theegala to win the RBC Heritage +4050 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Sahith Theegala is a great fit for this course, ranking fifth in my model. Coincidentally, he finished fifth at this tournament last year. He&#8217;s had fifth-, sixth- and ninth-place finishes since Feb. 11, so it feels like he&#8217;s right on the cusp of winning. He provides great value at 40/1.      <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 40.5 (to win +4050)  
<br> <br>



<b> Matthieu Pavon to win the RBC Heritage +9050 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Someone needs to explain this number to me. Matthieu Pavon is not some no-name scrub who spiked one tournament this year. He won the Farmers Insurance Open, then followed that up with third at Pebble Beach. And just last week, he finished 12th at the Masters. Pavon ranks in the top five of my model this week, so 90/1 seems like a steal.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 45.25 (to win +9050)   <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>

 


<b> Emiliano Grillo to win the RBC Heritage +14050 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Emiliano Grillo is a great bet at 140/1. He has two top-10 finishes this year, and he was seventh at this tournament last year. He didn&#8217;t make the cut at the Masters, but this is a much friendlier golf course for him, as he specializes in accuracy, approach and putting, which is what you need to win at Hilton Head.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.25 Units to win 35.13 (to win +14050)  
<br> <br>

 





<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Masters:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 


It was nice to hit our first huge bet of the year, getting Akshay Bhatia at 68/1. It was very tilting down the stretch when Denny McCarthy was making everything near the green, so it was shocking when McCarthy dunked the ball into the water during the first overtime hole. We&#8217;ll definitely take it as we move on to the Masters, which features all the best golfers in the world. This is the first tournament of the year where we have to worry about the LIV golfers competing with Scottie Scheffler and everyone else on the PGA Tour. <br> <br>
 
 

<b> Scottie Scheffler to win the Masters +480 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
There&#8217;s no way I&#8217;m not betting Scottie Scheffler as a built-in hedge on my card. I&#8217;d recommend for you to do that with Scheffler or Jon Rahm, but not both. Scheffler is the best golfer on the planet right now, and he appears to have fixed his putting issue. He&#8217;s the best fit for this course, ranking No. 1 in the model. Scheffler finished second in his previous showing, but he didn&#8217;t even have his &#8220;A&#8221; game for that tournament.     <br> <br>

Betting 2 Units to win 9.6 (to win +480)  
<br> <br>

 



<b> Hideki Matsuyama to win the Masters +2200 (FanDuel/DraftKings)  </b> <br> 
Aside from Scottie Scheffler, there may not be a hotter golfer on the PGA Tour than Hideki Matsuyama. In his previous four tournaments, he&#8217;s finished first, 12th, sixth, and seventh. He&#8217;s also a great fit for this course, which isn&#8217;t a surprise because he won the Masters in 2021. He&#8217;s sixth in the model, so he&#8217;s definitely worth a bet at 22/1.      <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 22 (to win +2200)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>



<b> Will Zalatoris to win the Masters +4550 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Will Zalatoris had a back injury last year that knocked him out for most of the 2023 season, but he has been rounding into shape lately. He has recently posted second- and fourth-place finishes, and he could be 100 percent for the Masters. Zalatoris ranks eighth in the model, and he&#8217;s finished second and sixth in his two appearances at the Masters, so he seems like a steal at 45/1. <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 45.5 (to win +6850)  
<br> <br>




<b> Sahith Theegala to win the Masters +5000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Everyone on our After Dark Show loved Sahith Theegala. Watch here: <br> <br>
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/S9QHrnf4zGI?si=pL7f1IreL5agy1Nl" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<br> <br>
I&#8217;m on board. He&#8217;s 11th in my model, but he&#8217;s done very well at the Masters, so he seems like a steal at 50/1. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 25 (to win +5000)   <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>

 


<b> Si Woo Kim to win the Masters +8550 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Si Woo Kim has been hot lately, finishing sixth and 17th in his previous two tournaments. He&#8217;s also a great fit for this course, ranking fifth in the model. Kim also has a solid history at the Masters, finishing 12th a few years ago. <br> <br>

Betting 0.35 Units to win 29.92 (to win +8550)  
<br> <br>


<b> Sergio Garcia to win the Masters +12000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Sergio Garcia is my ultra long shot to win at 120/1. He somehow came up fourth in the model because of some terrific scrambling and par-five scoring numbers. He also excels at approach, which is very important for the Masters. Also, course history is a plus for Garcia, who won the Masters in 2017. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 0.25 Units to win 30 (to win +12000)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>
 
 
<b> Hedge: Ludvig Aberg to win the Masters +750 (Caesars)  </b> <br> 
Scottie Scheffler is up two strokes on Ludvig Aberg as of this writing. I&#8217;m going to hedge with Aberg for 0.25 units.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.25 Units to win 1.87 (to win +750)   
<br> <br>

 
 


 





<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Valero Texas Open:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 


Scottie Scheffler missed a 3-foot putt to send the Houston Open into overtime versus Stephan Jaegar this past weekend. Bummer. Scheffler&#8217;s not in the field this week, so it&#8217;s wide open. Rory McIlroy deserves to be the favorite, but I will not be betting him at about 9/1. <br> <br>
 
 
<b> Corey Conners to win the Valero Texas Open +3050 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Corey Conners won this tournament last year, and that was no fluke. Conners&#8217; game is a terrific fit for this course; in fact, he ranks No. 1 in my model, even ahead of McIlroy. Conners&#8217; ranks in off the tee, par-five scoring and approach are all high. He&#8217;s a great bargain at 30/1.    <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 30.5 (to win +3050)  
<br> <br>
 



<b> Keith Mitchell to win the Valero Texas Open +6500 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Keith Mitchell comes in fourth in my model. He ranks highly in off the tee and approach. He&#8217;s finished in the top 20 in four of his six previous tournaments, including ninth at the Cognizant Classic, so he&#8217;s been golfing well lately.      <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 30.25 (to win +4050)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>



<b> Akshay Bhatia to win the Valero Texas Open +6850 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Akshay Bhatia is sixth in the model. He ranks in the top 40 in off the tee and approach. He&#8217;s come close to winning recently, finishing 11th and 17th in the previous two tournaments. <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 34.25 (to win +6850)  
<br> <br>
 


<b> Erik Van Rooyen to win the Valero Texas Open +9050 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Erik Van Rooyen is fifth in the model. His approach game isn&#8217;t stellar, but he&#8217;s tremendous off the tee, and he&#8217;s great in par-five scoring. He&#8217;s been hot lately as well. Prior to the Players Championship, he finished second, eighth, and 25th. <br> <br>

Betting 0.4 Units to win 36.2 (to win +9050)  
<br> <br>


<b> Kevin Dougherty to win the Valero Texas Open +40000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Yes, 400/1. Kevin Dougherty has somehow come up second in my model, so he&#8217;s worth a shot. Dougherty ranks insanely high in off the tee, which is great for this course. He also does well in par-five scoring. His short game sucks, so hopefully that doesn&#8217;t hurt him too much on this course. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 0.1 Units to win 40 (to win +40000)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>
 

<b> Hedge: Denny McCarthy to win the Valero Texas Open +450 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Akshay Bhatia looks great to win as of Sunday morning. He&#8217;s -15, while the next-closest golfer, Denny McCarthy, is -11. After that, the next score is -8. I&#8217;m going to take out a two-unit hedge on McCarthy, just in case Bhatia implodes on Sunday. <br> <br>

Betting 2 Units to win 9 (to win +450)   
<br> <br>









<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Houston Open:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 


Xander Schauffele didn&#8217;t come through for us last week, finishing fifth after a late charge on Sunday. Congrats to Peter Malnati for winning. If you didn&#8217;t see Malnati&#8217;s teary-eyed post-tournament interview, it&#8217;s worth watching. <br> <br>

Scottie Scheffler is back on the menu this week, which means we&#8217;re going to be betting him. However, there are some long shots of interest. <br> <br>

 

<b> Scottie Scheffler to win the Houston Open +275 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Scottie Scheffler was already the best golfer in the world prior to March despite his issues with the putter. After taking some time off and changing his putter, Scheffler has been putting extremely well. In fact, he finished first in putting on Sunday of the Players Championship, which is insane. If Scheffler continues to putt at a high level, no one is going to beat him. I know +275 sucks to bet, but Scheffler should be closer to +100 in this field. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a> by clicking the link.    <br> <br>

Betting 3 Units to win 8.25 (to win +275) <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a>
<br> <br>

 



<b> Alex Noren to win the Houston Open +4050 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Alex Noren checks in second in my model behind Scottie Scheffler. Noren is a great fit for this course, and he&#8217;s been golfing well lately, finishing ninth and 19th in his previous two tournaments.    <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 20.25 (to win +4050)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>



<b> Billy Horschel to win the Houston Open +7050 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Billy Horschel is third in my model behind Scheffler and Noren. Horschel finished ninth three tournaments ago. He&#8217;s a good golfer who has what it takes to win if Scheffler inexplicably slips up. <br> <br>

Betting 0.3 Units to win 21.15 (to win +7050)  
<br> <br>

 

<b> Andrew Novak to win the Houston Open +14550 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Here&#8217;s my long shot to win. Andrew Novak is 145/1 at Bookmaker, yet he&#8217;s fourth in my model. He&#8217;s had some great finishes recently as well. In four of his previous five tournaments, Novak has finished eighth, eighth, ninth, and 17th. <br> <br>

Betting 0.15 Units to win 21.83 (to win +14550)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>
 


<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Valspar Championship:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 


Congrats if you hit with Scottie Scheffler last week. It was the first time we bet a favorite this year, and it paid off. If Scheffler has figured out his putting, he&#8217;s going to win so tournaments this year.  <br> <br>

Scheffler is not in the field this week, so it&#8217;s wide open. My pick to win is Xander Schauffele, but he&#8217;s the favorite and priced unfavorably at +650. I may want to bet him live at some point, but the only golfer I&#8217;d bet at that number is Scheffler. <br> <br>

 
<b> Doug Ghim to win the Valspar Championship +5000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Doug Ghim is a great bet to win the Valspar. He&#8217;s finished 13th, 12th, eighth, 16th, and 16th in his previous five tournaments. He fits this course extremely well. In a diminished field, he could definitely win this week. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.    <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 50 (to win +5000) <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>

 

<b> Billy Horschel to win the Valspar Championship +10551 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Billy Horschel is 105/1, yet he&#8217;s actually No. 1 in my model. He&#8217;s third in greens in regulation and does well in par-three scoring, both of which are key for this course. Horschel finished ninth two tournaments ago, and this is a weak field outside of Schauffele and Sam Burns. <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 52.75 (to win +10551)  
<br> <br>


<b> Ben Silverman to win the Valspar Championship +20000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Ben Silverman has three top-20 finishes this year, and now he&#8217;ll be playing in a weaker field. Silverman projects well for this course because he scores highly in the two major categories and also putts well. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.25 Units to win 50 (to win +20000)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>


 


<b> Hayden Springer to win the Valspar Championship +35000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Hayden Springer is my super long shot to win this tournament. I can&#8217;t believe he&#8217;s 350/1. Springer finished third at the Puerto Rico Open a couple of weeks ago. He rates highly in greens in regulation and par-three scoring, and he also putts well. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.15 Units to win 52.5 (to win +35000)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>

<b> Xander Schauffele to win the Valspar Championship +1600 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
As promised above, I wanted to bet Xander Schauffele at a better number. He was +625, but he&#8217;s now 16/1. He&#8217;s four strokes back of the lead, which seems doable. Schauffele is the best golfer in this field, and I believe he will win. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 16 (to win +1600)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>

 

 

 


<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Players Championship:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 


Shane Lowry looked like he had a chance once again on Sunday as our 75/1 long shot, but he and everyone else got steamrolled by Scottie Scheffler.  <br> <br>

The Players Championship is one of the toughest courses on the tour. Seventeen of the 18 holes have water hazards. We&#8217;re looking at golfers with high greens-in-regulation percentages, as well as those who have good form at the moment. <br> <br>
 

<b> Scottie Scheffler to win the Players Championship +550 (every sportsbook)  </b> <br> 
I seldom bet the favorite, but if Scottie Scheffler figured out his putter, the entire PGA tour is in trouble because he could go on a Tiger Woods-type run and win everything. Scheffler is the best ball striker on tour, but his putting has been terrible. Yet, he was first in putting during the final round last weekend! Whatever Scheffler did during his week off is paying dividends. If it continues, he&#8217;ll win this tournament easily. He&#8217;s first in greens-in-regulation percentage, and no one has better form than him. He even won this tournament last year. When factoring everything in, +550 actually seems like a good deal.     <br> <br>

Betting 3 Units to win 16.5 (to win +550) 
<br> <br>
 


<b> Si-Woo Kim to win the Players Championship +5500 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
We can take some long shots to accompany our Scottie Scheffler bet. Si-Woo Kim is a previous winner at this tournament. He&#8217;s 17th in greens-in-regulation percentage and has performed well lately. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 27.5 (to win +5500)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>


<b> Tony Finau to win the Players Championship +6000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Tony Finau is 11th in greens-in-regulation percentage, and he&#8217;s great with his irons. In three of the past four tournaments, he&#8217;s gone sixth, 13th, and 19th. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 30 (to win +6000)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>
 


<b> Keith Mitchell to win the Players Championship +10000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Keith Mitchell is one of two extreme long shots at 100/1. Mitchell is third in greens-in-regulation percentage. In his previous three tournaments, he&#8217;s finished 17th, 19th, and ninth. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.25 Units to win 25 (to win +10000)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br>

 


<b> Doug Ghim to win the Players Championship +11000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Doug Ghim is my second long shot. Ghim has been hot this year. In his previous four tournaments, he&#8217;s finished 16th, eighth, 12th, and 13th. Speaking of 13th, that would be Ghim&#8217;s ranking in greens-in-regulation percentage. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 0.25 Unit to win 27.5 (to win +11000)   <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a>
<br> <br> 
 

 

<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Arnold Palmer Invitational:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 


Ugh. For the second week in a row, we had someone 41/1 or better tied on Sunday, only to see them choke.  <br> <br>

The Arnold Palmer Classic features one of the toughest golf courses on the tour. It requires golfers to be excellent in all metrics, particularly in approach. <br> <br>

 

<b> Xander Schauffele to win the Arnold Palmer Invitational +1850 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Xander Schauffele is my pick to win the Arnold Palmer. He has no flaws in his game. He could be a bit more accurate, but he&#8217;s great elsewhere. He&#8217;s also been so close to winning this year. He&#8217;s gotten 10th, third, ninth and fourth place in four of his five events.     <br> <br>

Betting 1.5 Units to win 27.75 (to win +1850) 
<br> <br>
 


<b> Collin Morikawa to win the Arnold Palmer Invitational +2650 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Collin Morikawa is pretty close to Xander Schauffele. Morikawa is great at everything except putting, which isn&#8217;t as prevalent on this course as it is on some others. He has gotten top 20 in all but one tournament this year, including fifth at the Sentry.  <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 26.5 (to win +2650)  
<br> <br>

<b> Sam Burns to win the Arnold Palmer Invitational +2750 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Sam Burns is in the top five of my model, but I wasn&#8217;t sure if I wanted to bet him at a price lower than 35/1. However, Jacob Camenker told me that he has Burns No. 1 in his model, so perhaps there&#8217;s a reason that Burns is just +2750.  <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 27.5 (to win +2750)  
<br> <br>
 

<b> Jake Knapp to win the Arnold Palmer Invitational +6000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Jake Knapp is a 29-year-old rookie who has been awesome this year. In his previous three tournaments, he&#8217;s finished third, first, and fourth. It was remarkable how well he did last weekend after winning the Mexico Open. He grades out extremely well in the model, so 60/1 seems like a great value. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link.  <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 30 (to win +6000)  
<br> <br>

 


<b> Shane Lowry to win the Arnold Palmer Invitational +7500 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
We&#8217;re riding with Shane Lowry again as one of our two long shots. Lowry is a great fit for this course, as he excels in all the major categories essential for the Arnold Palmer. Hopefully he doesn&#8217;t choke on Sunday again! You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Unit to win 37.5 (to win +7500)   
<br> <br> 
 


<b> Mathieu Pavon to win the Arnold Palmer Invitational +9000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Mathieu Pavon has been one of the best golfers this year. In three of his five tournaments, he&#8217;s finished third, first, and seventh. He&#8217;s great in all categories, so 90/1 seems like a steal. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 45 (to win +9000)  
<br> <br> 
<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Cognizant Classic:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 


What a disappointment. Sami Valimaki had the Mexico Open for the taking, but hit the water on 10 and that was that. I tweeted out a hedge on Jake Knapp, so we got that at least. <br> <br>

We move on to the Cognizant Classic, which is the first year it&#8217;s being called the Cognizant Classic, so I&#8217;m not sure why it&#8217;s a &#8220;classic.&#8221; I know this used to be the Honda Classic, but still. <br> <br>

This course is the opposite of the Mexico Open. The Mexico Open called for great driving distance, while the Cognizant Classic contains so many water hazards that accuracy is most important, followed by approach play. <br> <br>

 

<b> Shane Lowry to win the Cognizant Classic +4151 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Shane Lowry is first in my model. He&#8217;s extremely accurate. He&#8217;s ranked highly in approach. He tends to play well on water-heavy courses. He has a great course history. He finished second and fifth at this tournament in the past two seasons. He&#8217;s a steal at 41/1 at Bookmaker.    <br> <br>

Betting 1.25 Units to win 51.89 (to win +4151) 
<br> <br>

 


<b> Daniel Berger to win the Cognizant Classic +5250 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Daniel Berger is right behind Lowry in my model. He&#8217;s a very similar golfer to Lowry. He also has a great course and course-type history. The last time he played at this course, he finished fourth.  <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 52.5 (to win +5250)  
<br> <br>
 

<b> Chris Kirk to win the Cognizant Classic +4001 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Chris Kirk is third in my model. He won this tournament last year, and he&#8217;s been excellent thus far this season with a win at the Sentry nearly two months ago.   <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 40.01 (to win +4001) 
<br> <br>

 


<b> Seppulon Straka to win the Cognizant Classic +4501 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
We rode Seppulon Straka to victory last year at the John Deere Classic, so let&#8217;s do that again at this tournament! Straka won the Honda Classic two years ago, and he&#8217;s an amazing fit for this course. <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 45.01 (to win +4501)  
<br> <br> 

 

<b> Carson Young to win the Cognizant Classic +12500 (BetMGM)  </b> <br> 
Here&#8217;s my long shot to win this tournament. Carson Young has made great strides to improve his game &#8211; he just finished eighth at the Mexico Open, which wasn&#8217;t even a tremendous course fit for him &#8211; and now he may be ready to take down a PGA tournament. His accuracy and approach metrics are both excellent, so he&#8217;s a great fit for this course. Unlike the other bets, the best number can be found at BetMGM. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 0.25 Units to win 31.25 (to win +12500)  <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a>
<br> <br> 


<b> Hedges:  </b> <br>  
Shane Lowry is in a great position to win, but it&#8217;s worth hedging. I like Austin Eckroat &#8211; he rated relatively highly in my model &#8211; and I&#8217;m not a believer in this David Skinns guy, so I will do the following:  <br> <br>

Austin Eckroat to win +350 (2 Units) &#8211; BetMGM <br>
David Skinns to win +800 (0.5 Units) &#8211; BetMGM <br>
You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $158 in bonus bets from BetMGM</a> by clicking the link. 

  

 


 


<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Mexico Open:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 


The Gensis Invitational didn&#8217;t go so well, as Hideki Matsuyama not only won, but broke the course record. We didn&#8217;t have him ranked highly in the model, so the course may not have been diagnosed correctly. I think the Mexico Open is more predictable. <br> <br>


<b> Taylor Pendrith to win the Mexico Open +2850 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Tony Finau is No. 1 in my model, but he&#8217;s +750 or so. Taylor Pendrith is right behind Finau at No. 2, and yet he&#8217;s +2850 at Bookmaker. This course calls for either great power or tremendous long iron play, and Pendrith is fantastic in both regards.    <br> <br>

Betting 1.5 Units to win 42.75 (to win +2850) 
<br> <br>



<b> Davis Thompson to win the Mexico Open +4250 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Davis Thompson is third in the model. He&#8217;s a top-15 player when it comes to long irons, and he has enough power to blast the ball past the bunkers on this course. Thompson is 35/1 in most places, but you can get +4250 at Bookmaker.  <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 42.5 (to win +4250)  
<br> <br>



<b> Brandon Wu to win the Mexico Open +4853 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
Brandon Wu has mastered this course. In the past two years, he&#8217;s finished third and second. Now, Jon Rahm is gone, so Wu has a great chance to win it. Wu is a great irons player and putts extremely well on this grass. He&#8217;s fifth in the model.   <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 48.53 (to win +4853) 
<br> <br>



<b> Sami Valimaki to win the Mexico Open +11000 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Here&#8217;s my long shot. Sami Valimaki is a European golfer who hits the ball with great power. He won a tournament on the European tour in October. I wouldn&#8217;t like him against the top PGA golfers, but this is not a strong field by any means. Valimaki ranks fourth in the model, yet is 110/1! Unlike the other picks, the best sportsbook for this wager is FanDuel. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 0.25 Units to win 27.5 (to win +11000) <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> 
<br> <br>

<b> Jake Knapp Hedge +110 (FanDuel)  </b> <br> 
Posted on Twitter. <br> <br>

Betting 3 Units to win 3.3 (to win +110) <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $150 in bonus bets from FanDuel</a> 
<br> <br>




<br> <br>
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Genesis Invitational:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br> <br> 


The NFL season is over, so our golf picks are back! I don&#8217;t like making golf bets in January anyway because the layoff could impact everyone&#8217;s game, which skews the stats as a result. Now that we&#8217;ve had some tournaments to begin the 2024 season, we have some good data to hopefully make some great bets like we did in 2023.  <br> <br>

 


<b> Sam Burns to win the Genesis Invitational +2250 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
I&#8217;m jealous of those who were able to get Sam Burns at 35/1, and even 25/1. This number has been hammered down for good reason. Burns is actually No. 1 in my model. He&#8217;s been hot to start 2024, finishing in the top 10 in the previous three events. I don&#8217;t mind 22/1 on Burns when he&#8217;s my No. 1 golfer this week.   <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 22.5 (to win +2250) 
<br> <br>



<b> Wyndham Clark to win the Genesis Invitational +4650 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br> 
This number is shocking. Wyndham Clark is one of the top golfers in the world. He&#8217;s won three tournaments since May 2023. He&#8217;s also a perfect fit for this golf course with his great power. And yet, he&#8217;s just 46.5/1? Clark is No. 2 in my model this week, so I&#8217;m more than happy to bet him at +4650.  <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 46.5 (to win +4650)  
<br> <br>




<b> Sahith Theegala to win the Genesis Invitational +3500 (DraftKings)  </b> <br> 
Sahith Theegala is knocking on the door of a trophy with two top-five finishes this season. He&#8217;s a great fit for this golf course &#8211; he&#8217;s fifth in my model &#8211; so he&#8217;s a great bet at 35/1. Shopping around is key, as I&#8217;ve seen Theegala as low as 22/1 at some books. You can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $200 in bonus bets from DraftKings</a> by clicking the link. <br> <br>

Betting 1 Unit to win 35 (to win +3500) <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/sportsbook-promo-codes/walter" target="blank" rel="noopener"> Get $200 in bonus bets from DraftKings</a>  
<br> <br>



<b> Kurt Kitayama to win the Genesis Invitational +9050 (Bookmaker); to finish top 10 +500 (DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM)  </b> <br> 
Kurt Kitayama is my long shot this week. He&#8217;s about 90/1 despite being 11th in my model. He has great power, so he&#8217;s a great fit for this course. I&#8217;m also going to take a shot on him finishing in the top 10 at 5/1, which you can find at any sportsbook.   <br> <br>

Betting 0.5 Units to win 45.25 (to win +9050) 
<br> Betting 0.5 Units to win 2.5 (top 10 +500)
<br> <br>

 
To check out our <a href = "pga2023.php">2023 PGA Picks</a>, click the link. <br> <br>


  ]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://walterfootball.com/pga-bets-for-the-2024-tour-championship.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Top 100 Players of 2024: Analysis</title>
		<link>https://walterfootball.com/nfltop100_2024.php</link>
					<comments>https://walterfootball.com/nfltop100_2024.php#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 04:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://walterfootball.com/?p=27331</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I berated the players for their crappy rankings in the Top 100 NFL Players of 2011 and people seemed to like that. I ran other critiques of the Top 100 NFL Players of 2012, the Top 100 NFL Players of 2013, the Top 100 NFL Players of 2014, the Top 100 NFL Players of 2015,...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[I berated the players for their crappy rankings in the <a href = "nfltop100.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2011</a> and people seemed to like that. I ran other critiques of the <a href = "nfltop100_2012.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2012</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2013.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2013</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2014.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2014</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2015.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2015</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2016.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2016</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2017.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2017</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2018.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2018</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2019.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2019</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2020.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2020</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2021.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2021</a>, the <a href = "nfltop100_2022.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2022</a>, and the <a href = "nfltop100_2023.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2023</a>. I&#8217;ve gotten many requests to keep doing this, so here we are. <br> <br>

I really find it amazing how NFL players can screw up these rankings. As I pointed out before, if you&#8217;re in an office, you and your other co-workers can probably rank the best employees and come to a smart consensus. NFL players, however, continuously bungle things like this, probably because many of them don&#8217;t watch film or pay attention to the other games. They ranked Michael Turner in the top 100 twelve years ago, yet the guy couldn&#8217;t even move. Eight years ago, Carson Palmer was 12th, Blake Bortles was 56th, and Chris Ivory was 78th! Here was my reaction:  <br> <br>

<i>
OH MY GOD. CHRIS IVORY IS 78TH?!??!?! ARE YOU F***ING SERIOUS??? CHRIS IVORY&#8230; IS 78TH!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!
</i>
<br> <br>

Seven years ago, DeMarco Murray was voted in as the 31st-best player in the NFL. Yes, DeMarco Murray, the guy who lost his job during the year. The NFL players ranked Murray ahead of Kam Chancellor, Joey Bosa, Bobby Wagner, Trent Williams, and Jadeveon Clowney.  <br> <br>

The following year, Case Keenum was 51st. Let me repeat that. Case Keenum was 51st. Here&#8217;s what I wrote: <br> <br>

<i>
CASE KEENUM IS 51ST!? WHAT!?!?!?!? HOW IN HELL IS CASE KEENUM BETTER THAN PHILIP RIVERS!?!?!?!?
</i>
<br> <br>

The NFL players thought that Case Keenum was a better player than Philip Rivers. It was almost as bad in 2020 when Jimmy Garoppolo was somehow slotted at No. 43. Here were my thoughts: <br> <br>

<i>
HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!1 <br> <br>

WHAT THE F**K IS THIS!? BUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! WOWOWOWOWOWOWOW HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLLL!!!!! <br> <br>

NFL PLAYERS THINK JIMMY GAROPPOLO IS BETTER THAN J.J. WATT!!!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAAHHAAHAHHAALAOALAOLOLOLOLAHAHAHAHAHALOLOOLLLHAHAHA!!!!!
</i>
<br> <br>

In 2022, they rated Mac Jones 85th. Really? Mac Jones, 85th? And then in 2023, Dalvin Cook was ranked 91st even though the Vikings cut him earlier that offseason! <br> <br>



Predictably, there were some very dumb choices in the NFL Top 100 Players of 2024. I&#8217;ve highlighted them, marking the underrated players in blue and overrated players in red.  
<br> <br> 
 

<?php
include("socialmedia.php");
?>
<br> <br>
 


<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2024: 100-91: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 
 

<font color = "red"> 100. Zaire Franklin, LB, Colts </font>
<br> 99. Lavonte David, LB, Buccaneers
<br> 98. Cameron Heyward, DL, Steelers
<br> 97. Terry McLaurin, WR, Redskins
<br> 96. Dion Dawkins, OT, Bills
<br> 95. Julian Love, S, Seahawks
<br> 94. Trevor Lawrence, QB, Jaguars
<br> 93. Harrison Smith, S, Vikings
<br> 92. Aaron Rodgers, QB, Jets
<br> 91. Tariq Woolen, CB, Seahawks
<br> <br>
 
 
<b> 100. Zaire Franklin: </b> We start off with quite the banger, as Zaire Franklin struggled mightily in coverage last year and wasn&#8217;t good enough versus the run to compensate for that weakness.  <br> <br>
   
 

<br>
<center>
<?php
include("adsdaq23.php");
?>
</center>
<br>





<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2024: 90-81: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 

90. DeVonta Smith, WR, Eagles
<br> 89. Budda Baker, S, Cardinals
<br> 88. Chris Lindstrom, G, Falcons
<br> 87. Haason Reddick, DE/OLB, Jets
<br> 86. Saquon Barkley, RB, Eagles
<br> <font color = "blue"> 85. Tristan Wirfs, OT, Buccaneers  </font>
<br> 84. D.K. Metcalf, WR, Seahawks
<br> 83. Derwin James, S, Chargers
<br> 82. Montez Sweat, DE/OLB, Bears
<br> <font color = "red"> 81. Kirk Cousins, QB, Falcons </font>
<br> <br>


<b> 85. Tristan Wirfs: </b> I consider Tristan Wirfs to be one of the better tackles in the NFL, so No. 85 seems awfully low for him.  <br> <br>

<b> 81. Kirk Cousins: </b> It seems wrong to rank Kirk Cousins over Aaron Rodgers. Now, before you say, &#8220;Aaron Rodgers is old and is coming off an Achilles injury,&#8221; recall that the same thing can be said about Cousins.  <br> <br>

  <br>
<center>
<?php
include("thirdbox.php");
?>

</center>
<br>




<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2024: 80-71: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 

<font color = "blue"> 80. Sam LaPorta, TE, Lions </font>
<br> 79. Minkah Fitzpatrick, S, Steelers
<br> 78. Kyren Williams, RB, Rams
<br> 77. Trey Hendrickson, DE, Bengals
<br> 76. Dre Greenlaw, LB, 49ers
<br> 75. Justin Herbert, QB, Chargers 
<br> 74. Jessie Bates, S, Falcons
<br> 73. Jeffery Simmons, DT, Titans
<br> 72. Garrett Wilson, WR, Jets
<br> 71. Laremy Tunsil, OT, Texans
<br> <br>



<b> 80. Sam LaPorta: </b> There&#8217;s an argument to be made that Sam LaPorta is the best tight end in the NFL right now. Even if he&#8217;s just in the top three, he should be ranked higher than No. 80.  <br> <br>
 


<br>
<center>

<?php
include("spormeon300.php");
?>

</center>
<br>


<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2024: 70-61: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 


70. Amari Cooper, WR, Browns
<br> <font color = "red"> 69. Cooper Kupp, WR, Rams </font>
<br> 68. Danielle Hunter, DE, Texans
<br> 67. Terron Armstead, OT, Dolphins
<br> 66. Brandon Aiyuk, WR, 49ers
<br> <font color = "red"> 65. Jordan Poyer, S, Dolphins </font>
<br> 64. Patrick Queen, LB, Steelers
<br> 63. Jaylen Waddle, WR, Dolphins
<br> 62. Bradley Chubb, DE, Dolphins
<br> 61. Justin Madubuike, DL, Ravens
<br> <br>

<b> 69. Cooper Kupp: </b> Cooper Kupp looked washed up last year. Even if he rebounds this season , no one in their right mind would take a 31-year-old Kupp over D.K. Metcalf, for example. <br> <br>

<b> 65. Jordan Poyer: </b>  Jordan Poyer!? The same Jordan Poyer no one was willing to give more than $2 million to this offseason? That&#8217;s all Poyer got on the open market, and yet he&#8217;s the 65th-best player in the NFL? What sort of drugs have these voters taken?   <br> <br>
 

<?php
include("vfn.php");
?>




<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2024: 60-51: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 


<font color = "red"> 60. Raheem Mostert, RB, Dolphins </font>
<br> <font color = "red"> 59. Bobby Wagner, LB, Seahawks </font>
<br> 58. Christian Wilkins, DT, Raiders
<br> <font color = "red"> 57. Justin Simmons, S, Free Agent </font>
<br> 56. Stefon Diggs, WR, Texans
<br> 55. Brian Burns, DE/OLB, Giants
<br> 54. Jonathan Allen, DL, Redskins
<br> <font color = "red"> 53. Zack Martin, G, Cowboys </font>
<br> 52. Patrick Surtain II, CB, Broncos
<br> 51. Keenan Allen, WR, Bears
<br> <br>

<b> 60. Raheem Mostert: </b> Apparently, these drugs are very strong. How can someone justify Raheem Mostert being 60th on this list? Yes, that&#8217;s right, Mostert is 26 slots better than Saquon Barkley. That makes a lot of sense.  <br> <br>

<b> 59. Bobby Wagner: </b> I like Bobby Wagner. He used to be a top-60 player. But he&#8217;s an older player now, so that&#8217;s not the case anymore.  <br> <br>

<b> 57. Justin Simmons: </b> It&#8217;s a bit embarrassing that the 57th-ranked player on this list is an unsigned free agent. Seriously, anyone can sign him right now, and yet no one is doing so. <br> <br>

<b> 53. Zack Martin: </b> This is much like the Wagner ranking. Martin used to be a top-20 player, but he&#8217;s way past his prime and shouldn&#8217;t be on this list as a result. <br> <br>



<?php
include("sixthad.php");
?>





<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2024: 50-41: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 


50. Rashan Gary, DL, Packers
<br> <font color = "red"> 49. Derrick Henry, RB, Ravens </font>
<br> 48. Jared Goff, QB, Lions
<br> 47. Aidan Hutchinson, DE, Lions
<br> 46. Antoine Winfield, S, Buccaneers
<br> 45. Ja&#8217;Marr Chase, WR, Bengals
<br> 44. Demario Davis, LB, Saints
<br> 43. Kyle Hamilton, S, Ravens
<br> 42. Matthew Stafford, QB, Rams
<br> 41. Lane Johnson, OT, Eagles
<br> <br>


<b> 49. Derrick Henry: </b> My reaction to seeing this ranking: &#8220;Oh my God, Derrick Henry is 49th!?&#8221; I didn&#8217;t think he would even be on this list, let alone in the top 50. I guess I fully don&#8217;t recognize how stupid these voters are. Henry had many games last year in which he had 10-12 carries because he lost touches to Tyjae Spears. He&#8217;s not nearly the same dominant player he once was, so slotting him 49th is absolutely ridiculous.      <br> <br>
 
 

<br> <br> <br> 



<?php
include("SEKINDO336.php");
?>



<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2024: 40-31: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 

40. Davante Adams, WR, Raiders
<br> <font color = "blue"> 39. Joe Burrow, QB, Bengals  </font>
<br> 38. Sauce Gardner, CB, Jets
<br> 37. Quinnen Williams, DT, Jets
<br> 36. Tua Tagovailoa, QB, Dolphins
<br> 35. Josh Hines-Allen, DE, Jaguars
<br> 34. &#8220;No Cookie&#8221; Jordan Love, QB, Packers
<br> 33. Puka Nacua, WR, Rams
<br> <font color = "red"> 32. Quincy Williams, LB, Jets </font>
<br> 31. DaRon Bland, CB, Cowboys
<br> <br>

  
<b> 39. Joe Burrow: </b> It takes a very &#8220;special&#8221; kind of person to think that Joe Burrow is not as good of a quarterback as Tua Tagovailoa and &#8220;No Cookie&#8221; Jordan Love. Even if you want to argue constant injuries, Tagovailoa is worse than Burrow in that regard.      <br> <br>

<b> 32. Quincy Williams: </b> Do people really consider Quincy Williams to be the best defender on the Jets? I&#8217;d rather have Sauce Gardner and Quinnen Williams, and it&#8217;s not even close. Maybe some Jets fans want to weigh in on this one.     <br> <br>


<?php
include("SEKINDO.php");
?>



<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2024: 30-21: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 

30. Deebo Samuel, WR, 49ers
<br> 29. Khalil Mack, DE, Chargers 
<br> <font color = "red"> 28. Brock Purdy, QB, 49ers </font> 
<br> 27. Nick Bosa, DE, 49ers
<br> 26. Mike Evans, WR, Buccaneers
<br> 25. Jalen Ramsey, CB, Dolphins
<br> 24. Dexter Lawrence, DT, Giants
<br> 23. Amon-Ra St. Brown, WR, Lions
<br> 22. Penei Sewell, OT, Lions
<br> 21. A.J. Brown, WR, Eagles
<br> <br>

  
 
<b> 28. Brock Purdy: </b> There are NFL players who believe that Brock Purdy is better than Joe Burrow, Tua Tagovailoa, &#8220;No Cookie&#8221; Jordan Love, Matthew Stafford, and Aaron Rodgers. No wonder many of them can&#8217;t pass a simple test that asks them to name the eighth month of the year. 
<br> <br>
 


<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2021: 20-11: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 

20. C.J. Stroud, QB, Texans
<br> 19. Roquan Smith, LB, Ravens
<br> 18. Justin Jefferson, WR, Vikings
<br> 17. Micah Parsons, DE, Cowboys
<br> <font color = "red"> 16. Dak Prescott, QB, Cowboys </font>
<br> 15. Jalen Hurts, QB, Eagles
<br> 14. George Kittle, TE, 49ers
<br> 13. CeeDee Lamb, WR, Cowboys
<br> 12. Josh Allen, QB, Bills
<br> 11. Fred Warner, LB, 49ers
<br> <br>

 
<b> 16. Dak Prescott: </b> The league&#8217;s leader in interceptions in 2022 is now the 16th-best player in the NFL somehow. Things can change very quickly, apparently. 
<br> <br>


<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2021: 10-1: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 
 

10. Maxx Crosby, DE, Raiders 
<br> <font color = "red">  9. Travis Kelce, TE, Chiefs  </font> 
<br> 8. T.J. Watt, DE/OLB, Steelers 
<br> 7. Trent Williams, OT, 49ers
<br> 6. Chris Jones, DT, Chiefs
<br> 5. Myles Garrett, DE, Browns
<br> <font color = "blue"> 4. Patrick Mahomes, QB, Chiefs   </font> 
<br> 3. Christian McCaffrey, RB, 49ers
<br> <font color = "red"> 2. Lamar Jackson, QB, Ravens </font> 
<br> 1. Tyreek Hill, WR, Dolphins
<br> <br>



<b> 9. Travis Kelce: </b> Travis Kelce had a great three-game stretch in the playoffs, but looked downright decrepit at times during the regular season. I can&#8217;t get behind him still being a top-10 player in the NFL.
<br> <br>

<b> 4. Patrick Mahomes: </b> Congratulations to the players for motivating Patrick Mahomes enough for him to win his third-consecutive and fourth-overall Super Bowl. Nice job, guys. And really, what the hell is this ranking? If all the NFL players are available, and a new franchise could choose any of them, they would have to be brain dead not to select Mahomes No. 1 overall.
<br> <br>

<b> 2. Lamar Jackson: </b> Lamar Jackson is the superior athlete, but that&#8217;s not what this ranking is all about. Jackson is not a better NFL player than Mahomes, or even most of the other individuals in the top 10. He&#8217;s a great talent, but hasn&#8217;t been able to put it together in tough NFL playoff games. Putting him in the 10-20 range is perfectly fine, but listing him as the best quarterback in the league and the No. 2 overall player is completely absurd. 
<br> <br>


<br> <br> <br> 





<br> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2024 &#8211; Snubs: </b> </font> 
<br> <br> 


 
<b> Mark Andrews, TE, Ravens </b> &#8211; I&#8217;d rather have Mark Andrews than Travis Kelce, but then again, I&#8217;d rather have almost any tight end on this list over Kelce. Andrews should be in the top 100.  <br> <br>


<b> Christian Darrisaw, OT, Vikings </b> &#8211; If you want to see the sort of impact that Christian Darrisaw had for the Vikings, check out the games in which he was sidelined in 2022. Minnesota&#8217;s offense was not functional without Darrisaw. He was an obvious snub last year, and he once again has that distinction, although his massive contract will make him feel better about it.  <br> <br>

<b> Breece Hall, RB, Jets </b> &#8211; There are a number of running backs who could be listed, namely Breece Hall, Bijan Robinson, and Jahmyr Gibbs. I like Breece Lightning more than the other two, as Hall was producing Marshall Faulk-type receiving stats late last year.  <br> <br>



<b> Creed Humphrey, C, Chiefs  </b> &#8211; Jason Kelce was the top center in the NFL for years. You could make the case that Creed Humphrey deserves that distinction now, so why wasn&#8217;t he listed in the top 100? This is the second year in a row that Humphrey has been snubbed, but considering how dumb NFL player voters are, Humphrey should take it as a compliment.    <br> <br>
 
<b> Jaylon Johnson, CB, Bears  </b> &#8211;  Chicago&#8217;s pass defense struggled to start the year, but improved considerably as the season progressed. Jaylon Johnson&#8217;s return from injury was a huge factor in that transpiring.     <br> <br>
 

<b> Jordan Mailata, OT, Eagles  </b> &#8211; Once a seventh-round former rugby player, Jordan Mailata has evolved into one of the top left tackles in the NFL. Most of the players voting on this list probably never heard of him.    <br> <br>
 
<b> D.J. Moore, WR, Bears  </b> &#8211; D.J. Moore has been paired up with some awful quarterbacks in his time with the Panthers and Bears. It&#8217;ll be exciting to see what he does with Caleb Williams.    <br> <br>
 

<b> Quenton Nelson, G, Colts  </b> &#8211; The best guard in the NFL should probably be on this list.    <br> <br>
 
 
<b> Chris Olave, WR, Saints   </b> &#8211; Chris Olave has been a big producer despite being hamstrung by Derek Carr, Jameis Winston, and Andy Dalton. Imagine what he&#8217;ll do with a real quarterback whenever he gets one.   <br> <br>
 
 
<b> Rashawn Slater, OT, Chargers </b> &#8211;  Rashawn Slater missed most of 2022, but came back strong in 2023 and had an amazing year. I suppose the NFL players who voted on this list weren&#8217;t paying attention. <br> <br>



<b> Andrew Thomas, OT, Giants  </b> &#8211; Andrew Thomas missed time with an injury this past season, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that someone as talented as him should be kept off this list.     <br> <br>
 

<b> Devon Witherspoon, CB, Seahawks </b> &#8211;  Devon Witherspoon didn&#8217;t disappoint as the No. 5 overall pick in this past draft. He was one of the top cornerbacks in the NFL despite being just a rookie. <br> <br>






<br /> <br /> <br /> 

 


<br />
<div id="comments"><span style="font-weight:bold; font-size:16pt;"></span></div>

<br />





<br /> <br />





<font size = 4>



<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/draft2027.php"> 2027 NFL Mock Draft</a> </b> - April 30 <br> <br> <br>



<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/fantasy2026runningbacks.php"> Fantasy Football Rankings</a> </b>  - April 5 <br> <br> <br>









<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/picks.php"> NFL Picks</a> </b>  -  Feb. 9 <br> <br> <br>








<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/nflpowerrankings.php"> NFL Power Rankings</a> </b> - Jan. 26 <br>  <br> <br>






























































 





















































































 




 














































 





 



























































  





 













































































































 





 


 





















 

































  

















 






















 




 
 

</font>






<br /> <br />








<center>
<br />
<br />







<center></TD> </TR>
<TR> <TD VALIGN = "top" COLSPAN = "2">
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD COLSPAN = "5">


]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://walterfootball.com/nfltop100_2024.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>PGA Bets for the 2023 season</title>
		<link>https://walterfootball.com/pga2023.php</link>
					<comments>https://walterfootball.com/pga2023.php#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 06:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://walterfootball.com/?p=22830</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[PGA Picks (US Open): -$50 PGA Picks (Travelers): -$425 PGA Picks (Rocket Mortgage): +$1,025 PGA Picks (John Deere): +$4,080 PGA Picks (Scottish + Barbasol): -$1,115 PGA Picks (British Open): -$625 PGA Picks (3M Open): -$705 PGA Picks (Wyndham): -$45 PGA Picks (St. Jude): +$2,305 PGA Picks (BMW): +$1,310 PGA Picks (2023): +$5,755 PGA Picks (2020):...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[




<!--test-->



<b> PGA Picks (US Open): </b> -$50  <br />    
<b> PGA Picks (Travelers): </b> -$425  <br /> 
<b> PGA Picks (Rocket Mortgage): </b> +$1,025  <br /> 
<b> PGA Picks (John Deere): </b> +$4,080  <br /> 
<b> PGA Picks (Scottish + Barbasol): </b> -$1,115  <br /> 
<b> PGA Picks (British Open): </b> -$625  <br /> 
<b> PGA Picks (3M Open): </b> -$705  <br /> 
<b> PGA Picks (Wyndham): </b> -$45  <br /> 
<b> PGA Picks (St. Jude): </b> +$2,305  <br /> 
<b> PGA Picks (BMW): </b> +$1,310  <br /> 


       <br />  <b> PGA Picks (2023): </b> +$5,755 
       <br />  <b> PGA Picks (2020): </b> +$270  <br />




<br /> <br />
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Tour Championship:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br /> <br /> 


We won another tournament, as Viktor Hovland led a charge from behind to win the BMW Championship. The final golf tournament of the season is coming up, as the top 30 golfers will battle in Atlanta at the Tour Championship. Betting this one is tricky because everyone starts the tournament with a score. Scottie Scheffler is the leader at -10, which is why he&#8217;s the overwhelming favorite. This dynamic has given us some nice values, however.  <br /> <br />

 


<b> Viktor Hovland to win the Tour Championship +555 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br /> 
I believe Viktor Hovland will win the Tour Championship. You need to putt well at East Lake, which is something Scottie Scheffler doesn&#8217;t do well. Hovland begins only two back of Scheffler, which would have given them a tie at the BMW. In that case, I believe Hovland would have beaten Scheffler in a playoff. I said this last week, but Hovland somehow ups his game at harder courses, and East Lake certainly qualifies.    <br /> <br />

Betting 3 Units to win 16.65 (to win +550) 
<br /> <br />



<b> Patrick Cantlay to win the Tour Championship +2115 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br /> 
Patrick Cantlay begins at -4. If you think that&#8217;s too difficult to overcome, Rory McIlroy beat Scottie Scheffler despite starting at -4 last year. Cantlay can do it as well. He&#8217;s actually No. 1 in my rankings, which distributes 20 percent to driving distance, 35 percent to accuracy, 30 percent to approach, and 15 percent to putting.  <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 21.15 (to win +2115)  
<br /> <br />




<b> Max Homa to win the Tour Championship +4650 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br /> 
I&#8217;m prepared to be a flaming Homa-sexual this week, as Max Homa comes in third in my rankings. Like Patrick Cantlay, Homa begins at -4, but he can overcome that if he performs up to his abilities. Also, this likely means nothing, but I had a dream that Homa won the Tour Championship, so I&#8217;d be lying if I said that didn&#8217;t influence this wager at all. <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 46.5 (to win +4650)  
<br /> <br />



<b> Lucas Glover to win the Tour Championship +6050 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br /> 
We&#8217;re betting the number here, as Lucas Glover&#8217;s odds should be much better than +6050. Glover comes in tied for eighth in my rankings, and he&#8217;s also beginning this tournament at -5. Automatic Glover has been the hottest golfer over the past couple of months, so I like him as my long shot this week.    <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 60.5 (to win +6050) 
<br /> <br />


<b> Seppulon Straka to finish in the top 10 +750 (FanDuel/DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
Seppulon Straka begins at par, so it would take a host of miracles for him to win this tournament. However, I like him to make a charge up the leaderboard and potentially finish in the top 10. Straka comes in at seventh in my rankings, so the +750 to finish in the top 10 seems like great value.   <br /> <br />
 
Betting 1 Unit to win 7.5 (finish top 10 +750)
<br /> <br />




 
Good luck to everyone this weekend! Here are my PGA Rankings: <br /> <br />

<img decoding="async" src="/images/pga2023_11.jpg">
<br /> <br />









<br /> <br />
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the BMW Championship:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br /> <br /> 


It was great hitting our 90/1 bet on Lucas Glover, though it was quite the sweat. It was obviously well worth it, especially after some down weeks. Let&#8217;s keep on winning as we advance to the semi-finals of the Fex Ex Cup Championship.  <br /> <br />



<b> Patrick Cantlay to win the BMW Championship +1100 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br /> 
This course is a very tricky one. It requires great driving and accuracy, while the approach stat can&#8217;t be ignored either. When combining everything, as well as a shade to putting, Patrick Cantlay is first in my rankings. Yes, even above Jon Rahm and Scottie Scheffler. Given that Cantlay is No. 1, I have to bet him, even at 11/1.   <br /> <br />

Betting 2 Units to win 22 (to win +1100)  
<br /> <br />




<b> Viktor Hovland to win the BMW Championship +1850 (Bookmaker)  </b> <br /> 
Viktor Hovland is third in my formula this week, with Scottie Scheffler in between him and Cantlay. We&#8217;re not getting great odds with Scheffler, but the +1850 with Hovland is appealing. Hovland always seems to play great on the tough courses, so perhaps he&#8217;ll come through for us this week.  <br /> <br />

Betting 1.3 Units to win 24.05 (to win +1850) 
<br /> <br />



<b> Tommy Fleetwood to win the BMW Championship +2500 (Bovada); finish in the top 10 +175 (DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
Tommy Fleetwood is a late add here. Fleetwood has had so many top-10 finishes recently, and he lines up well for this course. His driving accuracy has been off the charts in the past couple of months, which is what has turned me on to this bet.  <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Units to win 25 (to win +2500) <br />
Betting 1 Units to win 1.75 (finish top 10 +175)
<br /> <br />




<b> Rickie Fowler to win the BMW Championship +4000 (Bookmaker); finish in the top 10 +270 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Rickie Fowler has made huge improvements to his game, so he has a good chance to win this tournament. Fowler is terrific when it comes to driving distance and approach, and he&#8217;s accurate enough to win at this course.  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 20 (to win +4000) <br />
Betting 0.5 Units to win 1.35 (finish top 10 +270)
<br /> <br />



<b> Tony Finau to win the BMW Championship +4500 (FanDuel); finish in the top 10 +320 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Tony Finau has had quite the fall from grace to be 45/1 at this tournament, but this course sets up well for him. Finau&#8217;s main issue has been his putting, but that aspect doesn&#8217;t mean as much in this tournament. Finau excels where it matters most here, so he could be a surprise winner at the BMW.    <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 27.5 (to win +4500) <br />
Betting 0.35 Units to win 1.12 (finish top 10 +320)
<br /> <br />


<b> Seppulon Straka to win the BMW Championship +11050 (Bookmaker); finish in the top 10 +450 (BetMGM/DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
Our long shot won last week. How about two in a row? It&#8217;s insane to me that Seppulon Straka is 110/1 on Bookmaker. Straka is FIFTH in my rankings, only behind Cantlay, Scheffler, Hovland, and Rahm. He has improved his driving distance recently, and he&#8217;s elite when it comes to accuracy and approach. He fits this course so well, and it&#8217;s not too long ago that he won a tournament for us.   <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 110.5 (to win +11050) <br />
Betting 0.5 Units to win 2.25 (finish top 10 +450)
<br /> <br />




 
Good luck to everyone this weekend! Here are my PGA Rankings: <br /> <br />

<img decoding="async" src="/images/pga2023_10.jpg">
<br /> <br />






<br />   
<center>









</center>
<br />  





<br /> <br />
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the St. Jude Championship:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br /> <br /> 


Ugh. Russell Henley was in first prior to the rain delay. Afterward, he bogied thrice. Lucas Glover, on the other hand, had his ball hit the cart and then bounce into play. Sometimes, it feels like I&#8217;m cursed. <br /> <br />



<b> Collin Morikawa to win the St. Jude Championship +2500 (BetMGM); finish in the top 10 +210 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
I&#8217;m combining ball striking (40%), approach (45%) and putting (15%) this week, and when I do that, Collin Morikawa finishes fourth. He&#8217;s 10th in ball striking and second in approach. This course is made for him, so I think 25/1 is a great price.   <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 25 (to win +2500) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 2.1 (finish top 10 +210)
<br /> <br />




<b> Rickie Fowler to win the St. Jude Championship +3450 (Bookmaker); finish in the top 10 +260 (DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
I love this number for Rickie Fowler. When combining ball striking, approach, and putting, Fowler comes in second behind Jon Rahm. He&#8217;s 17th in ball striking and eighth in approach, and he&#8217;s played extremely well this year.  <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 34.5 (to win +3450) <br /> 
Betting 1 Unit to win 2.6 (finish top 10 +260)
<br /> <br />





<b> Seppulon Straka to win the St. Jude Championship +6000 (FanDuel); finish in the top 10 +410 (FanDuel/DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
We won big with Seppulon Straka about a month ago, so hopefully we get the same magic again. Straka is sixth when it comes to our ball striking, approach and putting ratios. He&#8217;s been playing so well of late, and he could win with his top-15 ratings in ball striking and approach.  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 30 (to win +6000) <br />
Betting 0.5 Units to win 2.05 (finish top 10 +410)
<br /> <br />





<b> Corey Conners to win the St. Jude Championship +7250 (Bookmaker); finish in the top 10 +450 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Corey Conners has a great course fit. He&#8217;s 26th in ball striking and 13th in approach. He hasn&#8217;t done well here, but I&#8217;m done looking at course history after last week&#8217;s fiasco.    <br /> <br />

Betting 0.4 Units to win 29 (to win +7250) <br />
Betting 0.4 Units to win 1.8 (finish top 10 +450)
<br /> <br />


<b> Lucas Glover to win the St. Jude Championship +9500 (FanDuel); finish in the top 10 +650 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
I&#8217;m kicking myself for not betting Lucas &#8220;Automatic&#8221; Glover last week, not including the hedge. I was riding him for a while, but stayed away for once because he had a poor course history. Serves me right for falling into that nonsense trap. Glover is top 20 in ball striking and approach, and he&#8217;s been putting better lately.  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.3 Units to win 27 (to win +9000) <br />
Betting 0.3 Units to win 1.95 (finish top 10 +650)
<br /> <br />




<b> Parlay: Scottie Scheffler, Jon Rahm, Rickie Fowler to Finish Top 10 +968 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
These are the top three golfers in my rankings, so I&#8217;m going to have a for-fun parlay. I want some action on Scottie Scheffler and Jon Rahm, but their odds to win are so low.  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 4.84 (to finish top 10s +968)  
<br /> <br />


 



 
Good luck to everyone this weekend! You can see my <a href="/pgarankings.php">PGA Rankings</a> here. 
<br /> <br />









<br />





<br /> <br />
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Wyndham Championship:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br /> <br /> 


We were looking at the wrong stats in the 3M Open, as I didn&#8217;t take driving distance enough into account. I&#8217;m more confident with the Wyndham Championship configuration, so let&#8217;s get to the picks.  <br /> <br />


<b> Russell Henley to win the Wyndham Championship +2000 (all sportsbooks); finish in the top 10 +230 (DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
Driving accuracy is very important on this course, and no one on the tour is more accurate than Russell Henley. The weakness in Henley&#8217;s game has been putting, but he has been putting better recently. He also has great course history in Greensboro. I&#8217;m usually not big on course history, but that matters more here than most courses.  <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 20 (to win +2000) <br /> 
Betting 0.5 Units to win 1.15 (finish top 10 +230)
<br /> <br />


<b> Si-Woo Kim to win the Wyndham Championship +2000 (any sportsbook); finish in the top 10 +250 (DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
Si-Woo Kim is another golfer who has amazing course history at Greensboro. He comes in second place in my rankings, as he&#8217;s 10th in driving accuracy and 18th in approach.  <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 20 (to win +2000) <br />
Betting 0.5 Units to win 1.25 (finish top 10 +250)
<br /> <br />




<b> Alex Smalley to win the Wyndham Championship +4000 (any sportsbook); finish in the top 10 +400 (DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
Alex Smalley has officially played on this course twice on the tour, but he lives right near it and knows it like the back of his hand. Smalley has been played much better golf lately, with his accuracy and approach showing great improvement. He&#8217;s worth a bet this weekend.  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 20 (to win +4000) <br />
Betting 0.25 Units to win 1 (finish top 10 +400)
<br /> <br />



<b> Adam Hadwin to win the Wyndham Championship +5000 (BetMGM); finish in the top 10 +450 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Adam Hadwin was a big disappointment last weekend, but this is a better course for him. He&#8217;s 27th in driving accuracy, 34th in approach, and 32nd in putting, so he should golf extremely well this weekend. Oh, and he finished 10th the last time he played this course.  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.6 Units to win 30 (to win +5000) <br />
Betting 0.3 Units to win 1.35 (finish top 10 +450)
<br /> <br />



<b> Brendon Todd to win the Wyndham Championship +5500 (BetMGM); finish in the top 10 +500 (DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
Brendon Todd doesn&#8217;t have amazing course history at the Wyndham, but he finished 10th two years ago. He also fits the course well, ranking ninth in accuracy, 72nd in approach, and 20th in putting.   <br /> <br />

Betting 0.4 Units to win 22 (to win +5500) <br />
Betting 0.15 Units to win 0.75 (finish top 10 +500)
<br /> <br />




<b> Andrew Putnam to win the Wyndham Championship +8000 (Bovada, BetMGM); finish in the top 10 +600 (Bovada) </b> <br /> 
I can&#8217;t speak highly of Andrew Putnam&#8217;s course history at Greensboro, as he has played this course only twice. However, he profiles as someone who can win on this course despite being 80/1. He&#8217;s 38th in driving accuracy, 31st in approach, and 10th in putting, so he looks great as a long shot.  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 40 (to win +8000) <br />
Betting 0.25 Units to win 1.5 (finish top 10 +600)
<br /> <br />

 

 

<b> Webb Simpson to win the Wyndham Championship +11000 (FanDuel); finish in the top 10 +850 (DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
I like betting a long shot each week, and Webb Simpson qualifies for this tournament. There are two reasons to consider betting Simpson. First, he has changed his swing and has performed better as a result recently. Second, his course history here is immaculate. Look at the results from 2021 backward: 7th, 3rd, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd, 72nd, 6th, 5th, 11th, 22nd, 1st. He has done so well at the Wyndham that he named his son Wyndham! Knowing that, how can you not bet even a bit on Simpson?  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.25 Units to win 27.5 (to win +11000) <br />
Betting 0.2 Units to win 1.7 (finish top 10 +850)
<br /> <br />

<b> Hedges: Lucas Glover (+200), Billy Horschel (+210) </b> <br />
We&#8217;re in a good spot to hedge our Russell Henley bet. I&#8217;m going to wager 1.5 units on both Lucas &#8220;Automatic&#8221; Glover and Billy Horschel. It&#8217;s a bummer I didn&#8217;t bet Glover to begin with, failing to do so because of his poor course history at the Wyndham. Serves me right for looking at course history for the first time! <br /> <br />

Betting 1.5 Units to win 3 (to win +200) <br />
Betting 1.5 Units to win 3.15 (to win +210)
<br /> <br />




 
Good luck to everyone this weekend! You can see my <a href="/pgarankings.php">PGA Rankings</a> here. 
<br /> <br />


<br /> 
<center>









</center>
<br /> 






<br /> <br />
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the 3M Open:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br /> <br /> 


I&#8217;m glad we&#8217;re done with these European courses at the moment. The British Open was another s**t show like the Scottish Open, as Scottie Scheffler barely made the cut. We looked at the wrong attributes for that tournament, so hopefully we hit the right ones at the 3M.  <br /> <br />


<b> Hideki Matsuyama to win the 3M Open +1800 (Bovada); finish in the top 10 +210 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Hideki Matsuyama appears to be in good form after dealing with an injury earlier in the season. His approach game is elite, which is very important for this course. He also appears to be putting better of late, so I like him to win out of the top favorites. He&#8217;s my top hedge play for this tournament.  <br /> <br />

Betting 1.5 Units to win 27 (to win +1800) <br /> 
Betting 1 Units to win 2.1 (finish top 10 +210)
<br /> <br />


<b> Seppulon Straka to win the 3M Open +2350 (Bookmaker); finish in the top 10 +290 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
We won with Seppulon Straka a few weeks ago. He finished tied for second last week at the British Open, so he&#8217;s still hot. He&#8217;s my top golfer according to my <a href="/pgarankings.php">PGA Rankings</a> because of his amazing approach and putting stats.  <br /> <br />

Betting 1.5 Unit to win 35.25 (to win +2350) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 2.9 (finish top 10 +210)
<br /> <br />




<b> Emiliano Grillo to win the 3M Open +2500 (Bovada, BetMGM, DraftKings); finish in the top 10 +290 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Emiliano Grillo is coming off a sixth-place finish at the British Open, and he has a victory a couple of months ago. He&#8217;s my fifth-ranked golfer this week, as he&#8217;s top 50 in approach and adjusted putting.   <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 25 (to win +2500) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 2.6 (finish top 10 +260)
<br /> <br />

 


<b> Adam Hadwin to win the 3M Open +3500 (every sportsbook); finish in the top 10 +390 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
I didn&#8217;t like Adam Hadwin&#8217;s putting at the John Deere Classic, but he may have been mentally exhausted after going to extra holes with Rickie Fowler and Collin Morikawa at the Rocket Mortgage Classic. He should bounce back in this great course fit. Hadwin is fourth when combining greens in reg, approach, and putting.  <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 35 (to win +3500) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 3.9 (finish top 10 +390)
<br /> <br />


<b> Lucas Glover to win the 3M Open +5000 (FanDuel); finish in the top 10 +600 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Lucas &#8220;Automatic&#8221; Glover&#8217;s odds are all over the place, with Bovada listing him at 35/1, while FanDuel has him at 50/1. I&#8217;ve been all over Glover recently, as his putting game has improved ever since switching to a long putter. If this continues, he&#8217;ll have a good chance to win because he&#8217;s a great fit for everything else this course requires.  <br /> <br />

(FanDuel allowed me to cash out 0.05 units despite Glover failing to make the cut) <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 25 (to win +25000) <br />
Betting 0.5 Units to win 3 (finish top 10 +600)
<br /> <br />


<b> Nate Lashley to win the 3M Open +13000 (DraftKings); finish in the top 20 +450 (FanDuel, DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
Nate Lashley is my long shot to win this tournament. He&#8217;s somehow second when combining greens in regulation, approach, and putting, and yet he&#8217;s 130/1! I don&#8217;t get these odds, but I&#8217;ll happily bet them.  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.25 Units to win 32.5 (to win +13000) <br />
Betting 0.4 Units to win 1.8 (finish top 20 +450)
<br /> <br />






 
Good luck to everyone this weekend! You can see my <a href="/pgarankings.php">PGA Rankings</a> here. 
<br /> <br />









<br />





<br /> <br />
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the British Open:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br /> <br /> 


What a miserable weekend. Lucas Glover led for most of the Barbasol, but choked on Saturday and Sunday. I wanted to hedge with Vincent Norrman, who ended up winning the Barbasol, but I was in Las Vegas, and no sportsbooks there offered live betting because they&#8217;re all stuck in the 1990s for some reason. In the Scottish Open, none of our guys did well except for Scottie Scheffler and Max Homa, and the latter just barely missed the top 10. I&#8217;m not going heavy this weekend because these European courses are weird.  <br /> <br />


<b> Scottie Scheffler to win the British Open +805 (Bookmaker); finish in the top five +185 (Bookmaker); finish in the top 10 -110 (Bookmaker) </b> <br /> 
Scottie Scheffler continued to dominate in the top 10. As mentioned last week, the last time he finished outside the top 12 was back in October 2022. He&#8217;s the best fit for this golf course, as the winner is likely to be someone who dominates in strokes gained and elite iron play. It would be shocking if Scheffler didn&#8217;t have another top-five finish. The best number for him is +805 at Bookmaker, but you can juice it up to +1000 at DraftKings, albeit at a $5 cap.  <br /> <br />

Betting 2 Units to win 16.1 (to win +805) <br />
Betting 0.05 Units to win 0.5 (to win +1000) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 1.85 (finish top 5 +185) <br />
Betting 1.1 Units to win 1 (finish top 10 -110)
<br /> <br />


<b> Cameron Smith to win the British Open +2250 (Bookmaker); finish in the top 10 +210 (DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
I don&#8217;t have strokes gained numbers on Cameron Smith because he&#8217;s from the LIV, but he&#8217;s a terrific irons player. Also, check out his previous tournament results: first, ninth, ninth, fourth, 12th, and first. He had a ninth and a fourth in the previous two majors. He&#8217;s also from England, so he knows the course well.  <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 22.5 (to win +2250) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 2.1 (finish top 10 +210)
<br /> <br />




<b> Tyrrell Hatton to win the British Open +2800 (FanDuel, Caesars); finish in the top 10 +260 (Caesars, DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
Speaking of golfers who know this course well, Tyrrell Hatton is another Englishman who has been on fire lately. Since May, Hatton has two thirds, a fifth, and a sixth, which he just earned at the Scottish Open. Hatton is third in strokes gained this year, and he&#8217;s very solid with his iron play. Hatton has done extremely well in European courses over the years, so that could translate into a victory this weekend.   <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 28 (to win +2800) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 2.6 (finish top 10 +260)
<br /> <br />

 


<b> Tommy Fleetwood to win the British Open +2950 (Bookmaker); finish in the top 10 +260 (Caesars, DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
Like Hatton, Tommy Fleetwood is an Englishman who has been hot lately. Since May, he has a second, two fifths, and a sixth, which occurred at the Scottish Open last week. Fleetwood is seventh in strokes gained, and he&#8217;s terrific with his iron play.  <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 29.5 (to win +2950) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 2.6 (finish top 10 +260)
<br /> <br />


<b> Chris Kirk to win the British Open +25000 (Bovada); finish in the top 20 +490 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Here&#8217;s my super long shot to win. I think this number is outrageous. Chris Kirk is 24th in strokes gained this year, and he&#8217;s an excellent irons player, ranking 14th in around the green and 38th in approach. He doesn&#8217;t have a good history in Europe, except for when he finished 19th in the British Open in 2014 &#8211; which happened to be at this golf course!  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.2 Units to win 50 (to win +25000) <br />
Betting 0.5 Units to win 2.45 (finish top 20 +490)
<br /> <br />



 
Good luck to everyone this weekend! You can see my <a href="/pgarankings.php">PGA Rankings</a> here. 
<br /> <br />









<br />





<br /> <br />
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Genesis Scottish Open:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br /> <br /> 


Congratulations to those who bet Seppulon Straka along with me at 55/1 odds last week! Straka had a rough Thursday, but was on fire the final three days, especially on Sunday. This week, we have a much tougher field at the Scottish Open, but there are still some great betting opportunities.  <br /> <br />


<b> Scottie Scheffler to win the Genesis Scottish Open +700 (FanDuel, Bovada, BetMGM); finish in the top 10 -130 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Scottie Scheffler is the best golfer in the world right now, and I think he&#8217;s a great bet to win every tournament, assuming you hedge with a top-10 finish. The last time Scheffler finished outside the top 12 was in October 2022! If Scheffler can put at an average level &#8211; he changed his putter recently, which could help &#8211; he&#8217;ll win this tournament. There&#8217;s an odds boost on Scheffler at +950 on DraftKings, but they are being cheapskates with a $5 limit this time.  <br /> <br />

Betting 1.95 Units to win 13.65 (to win +700) <br />
Betting 0.05 Units to win 0.48 (to win +1900) <br />
Betting 2 Units to win 1.55 (finish top 10 -130)
<br /> <br />


<b> Patrick Cantlay to win the Genesis Scottish Open +1575 (Bookmaker); finish in the top 10 +160 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
The three metrics I&#8217;m considering this week are ball striking, approach, and putting. Thanks to putting, there are two players ahead of Scottie Scheffler in these rankings, and Patrick Cantlay is one of them. Cantlay is No. 2 in this regard. I love that Cantlay has great course history here with a top-four finish last year. I usually don&#8217;t care too much about course history, but playing in Europe is a different animal.   <br /> <br />

Betting 1.5 Unit to win 23.63 (to win +1575) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 1.6 (finish top 10 +160)
<br /> <br />



<b> Rickie Fowler to win the Genesis Scottish Open +2100 (Bookmaker); finish in the top 10 +210 (Caesars, DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
I&#8217;m usually against betting players coming off wins, but Rickie Fowler is a seasoned pro who has two top-four finishes after victories in his career. I love Fowler this week because he&#8217;s first in the combination of ball striking, approach, and putting. He also played at the Scottish Open last year, so I like that he has experience playing in these conditions. Fowler is having an amazing year with the changes he has made to his game, so I&#8217;ll continue to bet him.  <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 21 (to win +2100) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 2.1 (finish top 10 +210)
<br /> <br />






<b> Xander Schauffele to win the Genesis Scottish Open +1800 (Bookmaker); finish in the top 10 +165 (Caesars, DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
Xander Schauffele is fourth if you combine ball striking, approach, and putting, so I like getting him at 18/1. Also, if you&#8217;re talking course history, there&#8217;s no one better than Schauffele because he won this tournament last year! Schauffele has six top-10 finishes in his previous nine events, so he&#8217;s in great form as well. <br /> <br />

Betting 1.25 Units to win 22.5 (to win +1800) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 1.65 (finish top 10 +165)
<br /> <br />

 

<b> Wyndham Clark to win the Genesis Scottish Open +4000 (Bovada, BetMGM); finish in the top 10 +360 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Wyndham Clark delivered a win for us a month ago at the U.S. Open, so here&#8217;s to hoping we see more magic from him overseas. Clark is one of the hottest golfers right now, and he projects well for this course. Clark is sixth in ball striking, approach, and putting. He also has nice course history here with a top-16 finish last year. We&#8217;re obviously looking for better than top 16, but keep in mind that Clark recently said that he has finally learned to win when something clicked for him. <br /> <br />

Betting 0.8 Units to win 32 (to win +4000)  <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 3.6 (finish top 10 +360)
<br /> <br />



<b> Max Homa to win the Genesis Scottish Open +5150 (Bookmaker); finish in the top 10 +420 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
I shouted, &#8220;Max Homa is 51/1 to win!?&#8221; when I saw his odds on Bookmaker. Homa is fourth when it comes to ball striking, approach, and putting. Some would say he&#8217;s not in great form, but he had eighth- and ninth-place finishes in May. He missed a couple of cuts, but bounced back a bit to finish 21st at the Rocket Mortgage Classic. Perhaps a week off will help Homa, who finished 16th at this course last year. I think he&#8217;s worth a shot at +5150.  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.6 Units to win 30.9 (to win +5150) <br />
Betting 1 Units to win 4.2 (finish top 10 +420)
<br /> <br />





<b> Alex Smalley to win the Genesis Scottish Open +10250 (Bookmaker); finish in the top 10 +600 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Alex Smalley is my super long shot to win, but I think he has a good chance. He&#8217;s coming off a great tournament at the John Deere with a second-place finish. He&#8217;s 15th when combining ball striking, approach, and putting. But what sold me the most, aside from his amazing odds at 102/1, is that he finished 10th in the Scottish Open last year. Some of the guys ahead of him in the rankings like Corey Conners, Gary Woodland, Justin Rose and Ben Martin have poor or no course history at the Renaissance Club. Smalley does, and he has two top-10 finishes in his previous three tournaments.  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.4 Units to win 41 (to win +10250) <br />
Betting 0.5 Units to win 3.5 (finish top 10 +700)
<br /> <br />



<br /> <br />
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Barbasol Championship:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br /> <br /> 

There are two golf tournaments this weekend! The guys who weren&#8217;t good enough to qualify for the British Open are staying in America and playing in the Barbasol Championship and then the Barracuda Championship next weekend. I would have gone with the Red Jaguars Championship, but that&#8217;s just me. <br /> <br />

I like five guys in this tournament: <br /> <br />


<b> Lucas Glover to win the Barbasol Championship +2350 (Bookmaker); finish in the top 10 +270 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
We bet on Lucas Glover last week because he switched to a long putter to improve the weakest part of his game. The results spoke for themselves, so perhaps Glover can win in this very weak field. Glover ranks second in ball striking, approach, and putting, which I&#8217;m also using for this course (though with different proportions).  <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 23.5 (to win +2350) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 2.7 (finish top 10 +270)
<br /> <br />


<b> Peter Kuest to win the Barbasol Championship +2500 (Bovada, BetMGM); finish in the top 10 +320 (FanDuel, Caesars) </b> <br /> 
Peter Kuest has burst onto the field with some great performances. The rookie finished fourth at the Rocket Mortgage and 17th last week, and now he&#8217;ll be playing in a much easier field. He&#8217;s third if you combine ball striking, approach, and putting. He&#8217;s worth a shot at 25/1.    <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 25 (to win +2500) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 2.9 (finish top 10 +320)
<br /> <br />



<b> Akshay Bhatia to win the Barbasol Championship +2800 (BetMGM); finish in the top 10 +320 (FanDuel, Caesars) </b> <br /> 
Akshay Bhatia is actually ranked ahead of Lucas Glover in ball striking, approach, and putting. He&#8217;s atop the list. Bhatia finished second at the Mexico Open if you exclude Jon Rham and Tony Finau, and I&#8217;m doing so because there&#8217;s no one remotely close to that caliber in this field.    <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 23.5 (to win +2350) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 3.2 (finish top 10 +320)
<br /> <br />


<b> Satoshi Kodaira to win the Barbasol Championship +10000 (Bovada, BetMGM); finish in the top 10 +800 (FanDuel, Bovada) </b> <br /> 
Don&#8217;t look at Satoshi Kodaira&#8217;s recent finishes because they are ugly. However, this is the Barbasol Championship, where Russell Knox is a top-10 golfer. It&#8217;s ugly. What&#8217;s not ugly is that Satoshi Kodaira is fourth if you combine ball striking, approach, and putting. For that reason, he&#8217;s worth a shot at 100/1.    <br /> <br />

Betting 0.3 Units to win 30 (to win +10000) <br />
Betting 0.5 Units to win 4 (finish top 10 +800)
<br /> <br />


<b> Kevin Roy to win the Barbasol Championship +12500 (Bovada, BetMGM); finish in the top 10 +900 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Kevin Roy is our final pick in this tournament. He&#8217;s also a mega long shot at 125/1, but he&#8217;s fifth when combining ball striking, approach, and putting. As with Satoshi Kodaira, you&#8217;ll want to avoid looking at this year&#8217;s results because this is a far weaker field than anything he has played in recently.   <br /> <br />

Betting 0.25 Units to win 31.25 (to win +12500) <br />
Betting 0.5 Units to win 4.5 (finish top 10 +900)
<br /> <br />



Good luck to everyone this weekend! You can see my <a href="/pgarankings.php">PGA Rankings</a> here. 
<br /> <br />






<br />
<center>









</center>
<br />





<br /> <br />
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the John Deere Classic:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br /> <br /> 


It looked like Rickie Fowler was going to choke away his Sunday lead, but he ended up with two birdies on 18, giving us a nice win at 14/1. Let&#8217;s keep it going at the John Deere Classic, which doesn&#8217;t have any tier-one or tier-two golfers in the field.  <br /> <br />

<b> Denny McCarthy to win the John Deere Classic +1600 (Bovada, DraftKings); finish in the top 10 +200 (DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
I used Rickie Fowler as a hedge for my larger bets last week, and I&#8217;m going to do the same with Denny McCarthy, who happens to be the hottest golfer in the field. Driving accuracy, approach, and putting are the key attributes at TPC Deere Run, and McCarthy ranks third if you combine all the stats (you can see my <a href="/pgarankings.php">PGA Rankings</a> here.) By the way, you can get an odds boost at DraftKings to make this 19/1, but the cap on that wager is only $20.  <br /> <br />

Betting 1.3 Units to win 20.8 (to win +1600) <br />
Betting 0.2 Units to win 3.8 (to win +1900) <br />
Betting 0.5 Units to win 1 (finish top 10 +200)
<br /> <br />

<b> Adam Hadwin to win the John Deere Classic +3100 (Bookmaker); finish in the top 10 +350 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
I mentioned that Denny McCarthy is third if you combine driving accuracy, approach, and putting. So, who&#8217;s first? That would be Adam Hadwin, who is coming off a great tournament in Detroit that he nearly won. Hadwin is obviously in great form, and this is the perfect course for him. <br /> <br />

Betting 1.5 Units to win 46.5 (to win +3100) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 3.5 (finish top 10 +350)
<br /> <br />



<b> Eric Cole to win the John Deere Classic +3500 (DraftKings); finish in the top 10 +400 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
If you like good karma bets, Eric Cole might be the guy for you. Cole skipped the Rocket Mortgage Classic to play in a local tournament, which he won. He then gave all of his winnings to charity. But this is more than just about karma. Cole has been enjoying an excellent season with second-, fifth-, and sixth-place finishes since February. He also had a 15th at a major (PGA Championship). Cole could dominate this field, especially when considering that he&#8217;s 13th in combined driving accuracy, approach, and putting.   <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 35 (to win +3500) <br />
Betting 1 Unit to win 4 (finish top 10 +400)
<br /> <br />



<b> Sepp Straka to win the John Deere Classic +5500 (FanDuel, BetMGM); finish in the top 10 +500 (DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
So, Adam Hadwin is first if you combine driving accuracy, approach, and putting. Denny McCarthy is third. As for second, that would be Seppulon Straka. I love the odds on Straka, who is coming off a great tournament if you exclude what occurred on Saturday. Straka has three top-16 finishes dating back to February, and this could very easily be his fourth. <br /> <br />

Betting 0.75 Units to win 41.3 (to win +5500) <br />
Betting 0.5 Units to win 2.5 (finish top 10 +500)
<br /> <br />

 


<b> Chez Reavie to win the John Deere Classic +6500 (FanDuel); finish in the top 10 +600 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Chez Reavie has been hot since the end of March, which is when he finished sixth at the Valero Texas Open, then placed 11th two weekends later at the RBC Heritage. He then finished fourth at the Travelers two weeks ago. Reavie is a great fit for this course, ranking seventh when combining driving accuracy, approach, and putting.  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 32.5 (to win +6500) <br />
Betting 0.5 Units to win 3 (finish top 10 +600)
<br /> <br />


<b> Lucas Glover to win the John Deere Classic +6600 (BetMGM); finish in the top 10 +700 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
There&#8217;s been sharp money coming in on Lucas Glover, who was once 100/1 to win this tournament. He&#8217;s now down to 66/1, but I still like him at that price. Glover is fifth if you combine driving accuracy, approach, and adjusted putting. I say &#8220;adjusted&#8221; putting because Glover&#8217;s putting numbers are poor this year. However, Steve Elkington said on the Secret Golf Podcast that Glover switched to a long putter for the Rocket Mortgage Classic, and that worked brilliantly, as Glover was putting very well to finish fourth in that tournament. <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 33 (to win +6600)  <br />
Betting 0.5 Units to win 3.5 (finish top 10 +700)
<br /> <br />




<b> Mark Hubbard to win the John Deere Classic +6600 (BetMGM); finish in the top 10 +600 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Mark Hubbard is coming off a missed cut at the Rocket Mortgage Classic, which was a huge disappointment for me because he was the captain in my sole RM-tier Reignmakers lineup. However, Hubbard was looking pretty solid at -5 until the final couple of holes, which ruined both of our weekends. Hubbard should be able to rebound; he has 11th-, sixth-, and ninth-place finishes in a span of two months. Hubbard is 10th if you combine driving accuracy, approach, and putting.  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 33 (to win +6600) <br />
Betting 0.5 Units to win 3 (finish top 10 +600)
<br /> <br />

Good luck to everyone this weekend! Once again, you can see my <a href="/pgarankings.php">PGA Rankings</a> here. 
<br /> <br />




<br />
<center>









</center>
<br />






<br /> <br />
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Rocket Mortgage Classic:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br /> <br /> 


I bet Patrick Cantlay live on Sunday &#8211; I was on vacation, which is why I didn&#8217;t get to post it here &#8211; so it was disappointing to see that he couldn&#8217;t catch Keegan Bradley. Let&#8217;s hope we can get a winner this week. <br /> <br />

<b> Rickie Fowler to win the Rocket Mortgage Classic +1400 (Bovada, FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Rickie Fowler is tied as one of the favorites, but I like him better than Tony Finau and Collin Morikawa. Finau is struggling, while Morikawa has back spasms. Fowler, on the other hand, has been red hot, and he&#8217;s made for this course. If you factor in ball striking and putting, two of the most important stats on this course, he ranks at the very top, so I&#8217;m going to play him as a hedge against some of my other longer shots. <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 14
<br /> <br />

<b> Max Homa to win the Rocket Mortgage Classic +2000 (Bovada) </b> <br /> 
I mentioned that Rickie Fowler is first if you combine ball striking and putting. Max Homa is second. Homa hasn&#8217;t done well in the past couple of tournaments, but he&#8217;s had some nice finishes earlier in the season, including two top 10s in May. An easier course like this could help him snap out of his mini slump. <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 20 
<br /> <br />

<b> Brian Harman to win the Rocket Mortgage Classic +5000 (Bovada) </b> <br /> 
Continuing down the chain of ball striking and putting, Brian Harman comes in third in that category. Harman, who finished second last week, said that this is the best he&#8217;s ever felt as a golfer, which was great to hear because of how mentally taxing this sport can be. I also liked to hear that Steve Elkington picked Harman as his &#8220;one to watch&#8221; this week. <br /> <br />

Betting 0.75 Units to win 37.5 
<br /> <br />

 
<b> Sepp Straka to win the Rocket Mortgage Classic +5500 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Seppulon Straka is fifth when you combine ball striking and putting. Dating back to February, Straka has three top-16 finishes, including fifth at the Honda Classic and seventh at the PGA Championship. If Straka can get seventh at a major, he can certainly obtain a victory at a course that fits his strengths very well. <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Unit to win 27.5 (to win) 
<br /> <br />


<b> Taylor Moore to win the Rocket Mortgage Classic +6000 (Bovada) </b> <br /> 
Like Homa, Taylor Moore is on a bit of a slump after being hot earlier in the year. He has three missed cuts recently, but he previously had a first at the Valspar and a fourth at the Zurich Classic. This easier golf course should help him improve, and it&#8217;s nice that he&#8217;s 12th in ball striking plus putting.  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 30 
<br /> <br />



<b> Justin Suh to win the Rocket Mortgage Classic +7000 (Bovada) </b> <br /> 
Like Straka, Justin has three top-16 finishes since February, which also includes a fifth at the Honda Classic and a sixth at the Players Championship. He was 26th and 27th in the two majors he played, so this easier course should feel like a breeze to him, especially when considering that he&#8217;s seventh in ball striking plus putting.  <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 35 
<br /> <br />


<b> Austin Eckroat to win the Rocket Mortgage Classic +5500 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
I&#8217;m adding this one late; too late, in fact. I planned to do a show on YouTube, but fell asleep on the couch, as I&#8217;m catching up on the no sleep I got on &#8220;vacation.&#8221; Anyway, I&#8217;ve noticed a strong correlation between golfing success and price increases on Reignmakers, and I challenge anyone to find a reasonable Austin Eckroat anywhere on that platform. I already liked Eckroat anyway, as he is 11th in ball striking plus putting.   <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 27.5 
<br /> <br />




<br /> <br />
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the Travelers Championship:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br /> <br /> 


It was nice to get the win with Wyndham Clark last week even though I bet it a bit late. I&#8217;m not going to count that for my overall stats here because I didn&#8217;t post it when I bet it. We took Scottie Scheffler here for a hedge, but he had a disappointing Sunday. Nevertheless&#8230; <br /> <br />

<b> Scottie Scheffler to win the Travelers Championship +705 (Bookmaker) </b> <br /> 
I&#8217;m playing this as a hedge once again. Scottie Scheffler is the best golfer in the world right now, and his putting improved at the US Open. Scheffler has finished third, third, third, second and fifth in his previous five events. He&#8217;s hungry for a win, and he&#8217;s going to obliterate the field one of these weekends. I don&#8217;t want to miss it when that happens. <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 7.05
<br /> <br />

<b> Tommy Fleetwood to win the Travelers Championship +3500 (DraftKings) </b> <br /> 
Tommy Fleetwood has been hot lately, with four top-five finishes since the middle of March. He has made great improvements to his game, and it really showed on Sunday of the U.S. Open when he had a great Sunday. This is a good course for him as well. <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 17.5 
<br /> <br />

<b> Tom Kim to win the Travelers Championship +3500 (BetMGM) </b> <br /> 
Tom Kim has been great in big tournaments lately. He was eighth at the U.S. Open and 16th at the Masters. This isn&#8217;t a major, but it&#8217;s an elevated event with lots of big names in the field. What I like most about Tom Kim is that he&#8217;s fourth in driving accuracy, which is crucial for this course. <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 17.5 
<br /> <br />

 
<b> Si-Woo Kim to win the Travelers Championship +5000 (BetMGM), to finish in top 10 +410 (FanDuel) </b> <br /> 
Si-Woo Kim is in great form with second- and fourth-place finishes recently. He&#8217;s also seventh in driving accuracy, which, again, is very important at this course. It also must be mentioned that he&#8217;s the Pete Dye whisperer. Google how Kim has done on courses designed by Pete Dye if you want to see his great history in that regard. This is my favorite bet from a value perspective. <br /> <br />

Betting 1 Unit to win 50 (to win) <br />
Betting 0.5 Units to win 2.05 (top 10)
<br /> <br />


<b> Russell Henley to win the Travelers Championship +4000 (BetMGM) </b> <br /> 
I&#8217;ve been talking about driving accuracy being important at the Travelers Championship. There is no golfer with better driving accuracy metrics than Russell Henley, who is in fantastic form at the moment. With the exception of the PGA Championship, Henley has finished in the top 20 of every tournament in which he has played since March 9. <br /> <br />

Betting 0.75 Units to win 30 
<br /> <br />



 

<br /> <br />
<h2>
<font size = 3> <b> PGA Bets for the US Open:  </b> </font>
</h2>
<br /> <br /> 


I posted golf bets three years ago because there was nothing else to do gambling-wise during the pandemic. I&#8217;ve since gotten more into golf, so I will be listing my golf bets on this page once again. <br /> <br />

<b> Scottie Scheffler to win the US Open +462 (Bookmaker) </b> <br /> 
I&#8217;m doing this as a hedge for a Wyndham Clark wager I made live on Thursday evening: <br /> <br />

<img decoding="async" src="/images/pga2023_01.jpg">
<br /> <br />

I liked Clark because he&#8217;s ninth in driving distance, which matters for this long course, and he&#8217;s been in great form recently. I meant to bet him before the tournament, but it slipped my mind. I mentioned him on our show on Wednesday: <br /> <br />

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jn8J93btDzc" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<br /> <br />

In that video, I also mentioned that Scottie Scheffler was my favorite of all the $10K+ guys on DraftKings. He hasn&#8217;t won a major this year, unlike Jon Rahm and Brooks Koepka, and he&#8217;s hungry for a victory. I&#8217;ve heard him described as the Terminator on Sundays because he never goes away and always chases down the leader. He&#8217;s only three strokes back, and he&#8217;s been so close to winning the past four tournaments. I think he&#8217;ll catch up to the three guys ahead of him and win the U.S. Open, so I like that he&#8217;s a bigger dog than everyone in front of him. <br /> <br />

Betting 0.5 Units to win 2.3
<br /> <br />

 
 


 


 
 
 



 
 



 
 






 





 


  
 


 


 


 



























 







  


















   










 
 







 

 








</ol>





 
 


<br />









<br /> <br />









<br />

<div id="comments"><span style="font-weight:bold; font-size:16pt;"></span></div>

<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />





<font size = 4>



<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/draft2027.php"> 2027 NFL Mock Draft</a> </b> - April 30 <br> <br> <br>



<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/fantasy2026runningbacks.php"> Fantasy Football Rankings</a> </b>  - April 5 <br> <br> <br>









<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/picks.php"> NFL Picks</a> </b>  -  Feb. 9 <br> <br> <br>








<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/nflpowerrankings.php"> NFL Power Rankings</a> </b> - Jan. 26 <br>  <br> <br>






























































 





















































































 




 














































 





 



























































  





 













































































































 





 


 





















 

































  

















 






















 




 
 

</font>






 




<table width = 99% border = 0>


<tr>
<td>
<img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/fantasyinjury.jpg">

</td>

<td> <div class = "article">
Injured/injury risk
</div>

</td>



<td>
<img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/fantasybust.jpg">

</td>

<td> <div class = "article">
Potential bust
</div>

</td>



<td>
<img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/fantasysleeper.jpg">

</td>

<td> <div class = "article">
Potential sleeper
</div>

</td>


</tr>



<tr>
<td>
<img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/fantasytdplus.jpg">

</td>

<td> <div class = "article">
Rank higher in touchdown leagues
</div>

</td>



<td>
<img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/fantasytdminus.jpg">

</td>

<td> <div class = "article">
Rank lower in touchdown leagues
</div>

</td>


</tr>



<tr>
<td>
<img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/fantasypprplus.jpg">

</td>

<td> <div class = "article">
Rank higher in PPR (points per reception) leagues
</div>

</td>



<td>
<img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/fantasypprminus.jpg">

</td>

<td> <div class = "article">
Rank lower in PPR leagues
</div>

</td>


</tr>

</table>
















</CENTER>



]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://walterfootball.com/pga2023.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Picks Against the Spread: Week 1, 2023</title>
		<link>https://walterfootball.com/nflpicks2023_01early.php</link>
					<comments>https://walterfootball.com/nflpicks2023_01early.php#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/NFL%20Picks%20Against%20the%20Spread:%20Week%201,%202023</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NFL Picks (Preseason 2023): 4-7 (-$905) 2023 NFL Picks: 4-7 (-$905) 2022 NFL Picks: 154-134-8 (+$9,860) 2021 NFL Picks: 153-141-2 (+$210) NFL Picks (2020): 138-124-7 (+$9,350) NFL Picks (2019): 148-128-9 (+$1,200) NFL Picks (2018): 140-134-12 (+$845) NFL Picks (2017): 137-147-10 (-$4,300) NFL Picks (2016): 148-127-10 (+$780) NFL Picks (2015): 133-138-10 (-$3,215) NFL Picks (2014): 143-133-7...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b> NFL Picks (Preseason 2023): </b> 4-7 (-$905)  <br />
    <b>2023 NFL Picks: 4-7 (-$905)</b> <br />

        <br /> <b>2022 NFL Picks:  </b> 154-134-8 (+$9,860)

<br /> <b>2021 NFL Picks:  </b> 153-141-2 (+$210) <br />  <b> NFL Picks (2020): </b> 138-124-7 (+$9,350)  <br />  <b> NFL Picks (2019): </b> 148-128-9 (+$1,200)  <br />  <b> NFL Picks (2018): </b> 140-134-12 (+$845)  <br />  <b> NFL Picks (2017): </b> 137-147-10 (-$4,300)  <br />  <b> NFL Picks (2016): </b> 148-127-10 (+$780)  <br /> <b> NFL Picks (2015): </b> 133-138-10 (-$3,215)  <br />  <b> NFL Picks (2014): </b> 143-133-7 (-$1,885)  <br />  <b> NFL Picks (2013): </b> 144-131-8 (+$7,825)  <br />  <b> NFL Picks (2012): </b> 130-145-8 (-$7,445)   <br /> <b> NFL Picks (2011): </b> 137-133-12 (-$1,335)  <br />  <b> NFL Picks (2010): </b> 144-131-8 (+$5,880)  <br />  <b> NFL Picks (2009): </b> 151-124-9 (+$4,235)   <br /> <b> NFL Picks (2008): </b> 136-125-6 (+$6,105)   <br /> <b> NFL Picks (2007): </b> 162-135-10 (+$3,585)  <br />
If you don&#8217;t quite understand the line, total or anything else, go to my
<a href="/betrules.php"> Sports Betting FAQ</a>.
<hr /> <br /> 


    Vegas betting action updated Sept. 10, 11:35 a.m. ET.     <!-- Change -->
    Follow <a href="http://twitter.com/walterfootball" target="blank">@walterfootball</a> for updates.           <br /> <br /> <br />
    Go to <b> <a href="/nflpicks2023_01late.php"> Week 1 NFL Picks</a></b> &#8211; Late Games  <br /> <br /> <br />


    

  

    


    <br /><br />
    <h2> NFL Picks Against the Spread: Week 1 Early Games  </h2>



<div class="analysisWrapper">


    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/lionsb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Detroit Lions" />
    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/chiefsb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Kansas City Chiefs" />
    <br />

    <b> Detroit Lions (0-0) at Kansas City Chiefs (0-0) <br /> Line:   Chiefs by 4. Total:  54.5.   </b>
    <br /> Thursday, Sept. 7,  8:20 PM

    <br /> <b> </b>

    <br /> <br />

    <b> <span class="red"> The Matchup. </span> Edge:   None.  </b>            <br /> <br />


Football is back! I can&#8217;t believe the summer went by so quickly. Not that I&#8217;m complaining, but where did it go? Does anyone else feel as though this was the quickest summer of their lives? <br /> <br />

If you haven&#8217;t visited the site in a while, you may have noticed the new look. Yes, after nearly two decades, we&#8217;ve finally re-designed our site to be more modern. This was not done on a whim, but rather out of necessity because of what occurred during the 2023 NFL Draft. Our site crashed during the entire first day of the draft, which was disastrous for our revenue stream because we make more money during the draft than any other time. The site crashed because a line of code conflicted with the old format of the site, so we had to transition to this new look. <br /> <br />

Because we lost so much money during the draft, I want to point out that you can really help support the site by paying for the ad-free version of it at the top. It&#8217;s $7.99 per month, but you&#8217;ll get a super-fast version with no ads. If you don&#8217;t want to pay, please spread the word about the site through word of mouth. That would also be a big help! <br /> <br />

At any rate, I&#8217;m looking forward to this season. I&#8217;ve done a lot of research this summer to refine my handicapping. We&#8217;re coming off a great year, and I think this season could be even better! <br /> <br />


<i> KANSAS CITY OFFENSE: </i> I don&#8217;t need to tell you that the Chiefs will score plenty of points in this game, but perhaps it needs to be pointed out that doing so won&#8217;t be as easy as some think. The Lions had one of the league&#8217;s worst defenses in the first half of 2022, but improved markedly at the halfway point of the season. Some of their younger players were much better, including Aidan Hutchinson, who became a force on the edge. Detroit then added a good amount of talent to its secondary this offseason, picking up Emmanuel Moseley, Chauncey Gardner-Johnson, Cameron Sutton, and Brian Branch. <br /> <br />

Hutchinson will be even better in his second season, which could be problematic for a Kansas City offensive line that went through a transition this spring. The Chiefs have two new tackles, so it remains to be seen how this new unit will function. Patrick Mahomes enjoyed flawless protection during his playoff run, but that&#8217;s not likely to be the case in this season opener. <br /> <br />

Then again, we&#8217;re talking about Mahomes, who is the best quarterback in the NFL. There&#8217;s also Travis Kelce, who will create a huge mismatch edge against Detroit&#8217;s shaky linebacking corps. The two could have a terrific 2023 debut, nullifying all potential concerns, at least for this game. <br /> <br />
 
<i> DETROIT OFFENSE: </i> While breaking in a new offensive line is problematic, Kansas City&#8217;s greatest concern is the potential absence of Chris Jones. The All-Pro defensive tackle is currently holding out, so it doesn&#8217;t appear as though he will play in this game. <br /> <br />

Jones&#8217; absence would be a massive blow to the Chiefs, whose defense isn&#8217;t nearly the same unit without him. The pass rush will severely diminish without Jones, so Jared Goff will enjoy more time in the pocket than expected, which is saying something because Detroit boasts an elite offensive line. He&#8217;ll have an easy time carving through Kansas City&#8217;s young secondary. <br /> <br />

The Detroit rushing attack will also be enhanced with Jones being out of the lineup. The Lions used the No. 12 overall pick on Jahmyr Gibbs, whom the team has compared to Alvin Kamara or Jamaal Charles. Having this sort of dynamic threat in the backfield will bring a new dimension to an already-explosive offense. <br /> <br />

<i> RECAP: </i>  If you want to bet on the Chiefs, you&#8217;re paying a tax because Vegas knows that this is public inclination. Nearly two-thirds of the bets are coming in on Kansas City, after all. It should come as no surprise, but casual bettors want to wager on the defending Super Bowl champions. <br /> <br />

The tax means that the line is too high, however. Based on the ratings of these teams &#8211; using my <a href="/nflpowerrankings.php">NFL Power Rankings</a> and adjusted EPA &#8211; I believe the correct spread is Kansas City -4.5. It&#8217;s only a difference of two points, but the key number of six is involved. Since the new extra point rule, games priced at -4.5 see margins of six occur 7.8 percent of the time. If you don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s significant, imagine hitting 50 percent of your plays, and then nailing 57.8 percent of your bets. In one case, you&#8217;re losing. In the other, you&#8217;re probably getting booted from some ghetto sportsbooks like Pointsbet. <br /> <br />

I like the Lions quite a bit. Not only are we getting five of six key numbers with them; we&#8217;re also fading the team with the best absent player (Chris Jones). Also, there&#8217;s a chance the young Chiefs players did a bit too much celebrating following their Super Bowl victory. Do we honestly think they&#8217;ll be 100-percent focused against the Lions? They likely deem this to be an easy victory after going through the Bengals and Eagles seven months ago. 

<br /> <br /> Our Week 1 NFL Picks will be posted all day Tuesday. Follow <a href="http://twitter.com/walterfootball" target = "blank">@walterfootball</a> for updates.   

<br /> <br /> <i> THURSDAY THOUGHTS: </i> So, a lot has changed since I posted this pick on Tuesday morning. Travis Kelce hyperextended his knee in Tuesday&#8217;s practice, so he could be sidelined. He&#8217;s currently questionable after missing Wednesday&#8217;s practice. Losing Kelce would be a huge blow to the offense, but the spread has compensated for that. Check back Thursday evening for my final thoughts and official wager once we know Kelce&#8217;s status. 

<br /> <br /> <i> FINAL THOUGHTS: </i> Travis Kelce has been ruled out. That, as well as tons of sharp action on the Lions, has dropped this spread down to +4, or even +3.5 in some places. The best line I see is +4 -110 at BetMGM and Bovada. This is still a three-unit play.

</div><!--^END analysis wrapper Don't remove-->


<br />
<br />
<br />







<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Motivation. </span> Edge:   None. </b>
<br />

No edge found.








<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Spread. </span>  Edge:   None. </b>
<br />

<br /> <b> WalterFootball.com Calculated Spread: </b>    Chiefs -4.5.
<br /> <b> Westgate Advance Point Spread: </b>    N/A.
<br /> <b> Computer Model: </b>    Chiefs -8.
<br />
<br />






<br />
<br />


<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Vegas. </span> Edge:  None. </b>
<br />

Equal action.

<br />
<br /> <b> <span class="green"> Percentage of money on Kansas City: </span> </b> 53% (820,000 bets)



<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Trends. </span> Edge:  None. </b>


<li> Dan Campbell is 15-4 ATS as an underdog of 4+.  </li>
<li> Chiefs are 21-11 ATS in season openers at home since 1971.  </li>
<li> Andy Reid is 7-3 ATS in Week 1 games with the Chiefs. </li>
<li> Patrick Mahomes is 72-18 SU, 48-41 ATS (37-29 ATS when not favored by double digits.) </li>
<li> <b> Opening Line: </b>   Chiefs -6.5. </li>
<li> <b> Opening Total: </b>   53.5. </li>
<li>
    <b> Weather: </b>    .
</li>

<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> Week 1 NFL Pick: </b>   Chiefs 34, Lions 31		<br /> Lions +4 (3 Units) &#8211; BetMGM/Bovada		  <i> &#8212; Correct; +$300 </i>	<br /> Over 54.5 (0 Units)     <i> &#8212; Incorrect; $0 </i>
<br />
<i> Lions 21, Chiefs 20 </i>
<br />





<br />
<br />
        <hr />

<div class="analysisWrapper">


    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/panthersb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Carolina Panthers" />
    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/falconsb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Atlanta Falcons" />
    <br />

    <b> Carolina Panthers (0-0) at Atlanta Falcons (0-0) <br /> Line:   Falcons by 3.5. Total:  40.5.   </b>
    <br /> Sunday, Sept. 10,  1:00 PM

    <br /> <b> </b>

    <br /> <br />

    <b> <span class="red"> The Matchup. </span> Edge:   Falcons.  </b>            <br /> <br />



My overrated-underrated feature was posted in this spot the past couple of years. I thought it would be better if there was less clutter on this page, so I set up a new <a href="/overratedunderrated.php">NFL Overrated and Underrated Teams</a> page that will be updated every Monday. I have overrated and underrated teams listed there, and some may shock you! <br /> <br />
 
<i> ATLANTA OFFENSE: </i> I&#8217;ve bet the Falcons to win the NFC South at 2/1 odds because of numerous upgrades they&#8217;ve made this offseason. The one casual fans know about Bijan Robinson, who will add a new element to the offense. The Falcons had a strong rushing attack last year, but Robinson is a dynamic receiving threat out of the backfield. Defenses will undoubtedly be focused on that, which will open things up for Drake London and Kyle Pitts. <br /> <br />

Robinson drawing attention will be especially problematic for the Panthers, who were 29th against the pass last year. They had major problems defending Pitts, who caught five passes for 80 yards and a touchdown in the matchup in Atlanta last year. In that game, Tyler Allgeier turned three catches into 46 receiving yards and a touchdown. Think Robinson is going to do more than that? <br /> <br />

The problem for the Panthers is that they can&#8217;t generate any pressure on the quarterback outside of Brian Burns. They really miss Haason Reddick, as their pass rush was sorely diminished without him. Desmond Ridder should have all the time he needs to lead his team to victory. <br /> <br />

<i> CAROLINA OFFENSE: </i> Speaking of weak pass rushes, the Falcons maintained the league&#8217;s worst pressure rate in both 2021 and 2022. It&#8217;s highly unlikely that this will occur a third time, given those aforementioned offseason upgrades. Two major improvements made to the front seven were Calais Campbell and Kaden Ellis, both of whom can create havoc for opposing passers. <br /> <br />

This is not good news for Bryce Young, who will be operating behind a shaky blocking unit. Young had trouble with his protection in the preseason despite battling against backups on occasion, so you have to wonder how he&#8217;ll deal with it in real action. This wouldn&#8217;t have been an issue for Young last year, but the Falcons will actually be able to generate pressure. <br /> <br />

Knowing this, the Panthers will want to keep the ball out of the rookie quarterback&#8217;s hands. However, the Falcons made other upgrades to their defense, so they figure to be better than the middle-of-the-pack standing versus the run from last year. <br /> <br />

<i> RECAP: </i> I&#8217;ve heard the opinion that betting Week 1 NFL games during the summer is foolish. To those who think that way, I&#8217;d like to provide this as an example of why it&#8217;s sometimes necessary. <br /> <br />

This spread used to be Falcons -2.5. I liked the Falcons at that number, but so did the sharps, because they moved the line to -3. I still liked Atlanta a bit at -3, but so did the sharps as well, because they then moved the line to -3.5. <br /> <br />

I no longer like the Falcons at -3.5. The case could be made that Atlanta by three is the most likely result of this game. If you don&#8217;t believe me, when games are lined -3.5, the result of three occurs 17.5 percent of the time! <br /> <br />

I&#8217;ve always said that if you bet a -3.5, you need a damn good reason to do so, and I can&#8217;t really find one here. I think the Falcons are better than the Panthers, and I like the idea of fading a new coach-new quarterback dynamic, but it&#8217;s not like Atlanta is some established juggernaut. There&#8217;s a chance I could be wrong about the Falcons being improved, and call me crazy, but I don&#8217;t trust Ridder to consistently cover a -3.5 line unless he&#8217;s playing an absolutely dreadful team like the Falcons. <br /> <br />

I&#8217;m still going to pick the Falcons, but I won&#8217;t be betting them. I wish I had done so earlier this summer. 

<br /> <br /> <i> THURSDAY THOUGHTS: </i> I&#8217;m still salty that we missed the -2.5 and -3 lines. I can&#8217;t bet a -3.5 confidently, knowing that Desmond Ridder needs to have a good game to consistently cover that spread. 

<br /> <br /> <i> SATURDAY NOTES: </i> There&#8217;s a chance the Panthers could be without their top two receivers. D.J. Chark has been ruled out, while Adam Thielen was LDL in practice this week. A limited designation probably means he plays, but if he&#8217;s ruled out Sunday morning, this spread could be steamed up to -5.5. 

<br /> <br /> <i> FINAL THOUGHTS: </i> The site can&#8217;t load, of course, but I hope some people see these. Anyway, Adam Thielen will play, which takes the Falcons out of consideration for me. I still like the Falcons, but can&#8217;t bet the -3.5. I was hoping to find a -3 out there, but I don&#8217;t see one available. The sharps bet the Falcons at -2.5 and -3, but not -3.5.

</div><!--^END analysis wrapper Don't remove-->


<br />
<br />
<br />







<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Motivation. </span> Edge:   None. </b>
<br />


No edge found.







<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Spread. </span>  Edge:   None. </b>
<br />

<br /> <b> WalterFootball.com Calculated Spread: </b>    Falcons -3.
<br /> <b> Westgate Advance Point Spread: </b>    N/A.
<br /> <b> Computer Model: </b>    Falcons -2.
<br />
<br />






<br />
<br />


<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Vegas. </span> Edge:  Panthers. </b>    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">  
<br />

Sharp money on the Falcons.

<br />
<br /> <b> <span class="green"> Percentage of money on Atlanta: </span> </b> 69% (151,000 bets)



<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Trends. </span> Edge:  None. </b>



<li> <b> History: </b>  Falcons have won 12 of the last 18 meetings. </li>
<li> <b> Opening Line: </b>   Falcons -2.5. </li>
<li> <b> Opening Total: </b>   43.5. </li>
<li>
    <b> Weather: </b>    Dome.
</li>

<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> Week 1 NFL Pick: </b>   Falcons 20, Panthers 14		<br /> Falcons -3.5 (0 Units)	   <i> &#8212; Correct; $0 </i>	<br /> Under 40.5 (0 Units)     <i> &#8212; Correct; $0 </i>
<br />
<i> Falcons 24, Panthers 10 </i>
<br />





<br />
<br />
        <hr />




<div class="analysisWrapper">


    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/texansb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Houston Texans" />
    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/ravensb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Baltimore Ravens" />
    <br />

    <b> Houston Texans (0-0) at Baltimore Ravens (0-0) <br /> Line:   Ravens by 9.5. Total:  43.5.   </b>
    <br /> Sunday, Sept. 10,  1:00 PM

    <br /> <b> </b>

    <br /> <br />

    <b> <span class="red"> The Matchup. </span> Edge:   Ravens.  </b>     <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">  <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">         <br /> <br />




<i> VEGAS UPDATE: </i> I&#8217;ll be posting how the Vegas sportsbooks have done the previous week in this spot.  The highest-bet sides were 34-42 in 2020 and 48-37 in 2021. The highest bet sides were 32-35-1 last year.    <br /> <br />


Here are the teams getting the most bets this week: <br /> <br />

<li> Jaguars -4.5 </li> 
<li> Bills -2.5 </li> 
<li> Redskins -7 </li> 
<li> Ravens -10  </li> 
<li> Dolphins +3 </li> 

<br /> <br />

I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m surprised that two road favorites are getting the most money!   <br /> <br />

<i> BALTIMORE OFFENSE: </i> The Ravens were apparently tired of their quarterbacking having no one to throw to besides Mark Andrews, so they decided to make wholesale changes to their receiving corps. They obtained Odell Beckham Jr. and Zay Flowers to join Rashon Bateman to give Jackson some viable threats.   <br /> <br />

This improved receiving corps will be vital to cracking Houston&#8217;s defense. Many don&#8217;t realize this, but the Texans had a very underrated stop unit last year. They were fifth in pass defense EPA, and that&#8217;s not even factoring in third-overall pick Will Anderson, who will bolster the pass rush. Anderson and company will hound Jackson, who isn&#8217;t protected nearly as well as he was during his MVP season in 2019. <br /> <br />

Jackson, of course, will do some damage on the ground, but what about J.K. Dobbins and the other Baltimore backs? The Texans may be known for their woeful rush defense in some circles &#8211; particularly those who play Derrick Henry against them in DFS &#8211; but the Texans improved versus the run in the second half of last year. Thus, Dobbins fantasy owners may be disappointed when their runner doesn&#8217;t quite look like Henry in this matchup. <br /> <br />

<i> HOUSTON OFFENSE: </i> The Texans&#8217; top-10 defense from a year ago couldn&#8217;t save the team from having one of the worst records in the NFL. That&#8217;s because the offense was so dreadful. Davis Mills was not a serious starting quarterback, so it was obvious that Houston had to use the No. 2 overall selection on an upgrade. <br /> <br />

C.J. Stroud has tons of talent and can become Houston&#8217;s franchise quarterback, but there will be growing pains in his rookie campaign, and especially in his first start. However, perhaps those growing pains won&#8217;t be too sharp in this matchup because Baltimore&#8217;s defense was a shell of its former self last year, especially when it came to defending the pass. The Ravens were just 24th in that regard, and they lost a couple of veterans this offseason to perhaps worsen that ranking. <br /> <br />

The Ravens were much stronger versus the run than the pass last year, so I don&#8217;t have good news for Dameon Pierce. However, Calais Campbell is no longer around, so perhaps Pierce will have a bit more success than he would have had in a hypothetical 2022 matchup. <br /> <br />

<i> RECAP: </i> John Harbaugh is nearly flawless in Week 1. Just look at the trends below if you don&#8217;t believe me. It&#8217;s remarkable how well he&#8217;s done with all offseason to prepare for a game. <br /> <br />

With Harbaugh&#8217;s record, it&#8217;s so difficult to fade the Ravens, but that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m going to do in this scenario. You may think I&#8217;m crazy because not only am I picking against Harbaugh; I&#8217;m also siding with a new coach-new quarterback dynamic. I know, I know. <br /> <br />

However, I think this line is outrageous. To show you how outrageous, I made this spread Baltimore -4. I don&#8217;t think the Ravens are very good, and I believe the Texans are better than people think they are. Houston&#8217;s defense is legit, and Stroud, despite being a rookie, is a huge upgrade over Mills. I&#8217;ve said this on the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@walterfootball4279" target = "blank">After Dark Show</a>, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s that crazy to bet the Texans to make the playoffs this year at 6/1 odds. <br /> <br />

Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t think I can place a multi-unit bet on Houston. Despite everything I said, it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me at all if we saw more Harbaugh magic amid a 49-10 victory, or something like that. If something of that nature occurs, you better believe I&#8217;ll be hammering the Texans hard next week. 

<br /> <br /> <i> THURSDAY THOUGHTS: </i> The Texans will be without three starting offensive linemen, so I&#8217;m going to be completely off of them. They still have some quality blockers, but missing a trio of blockers could really hurt.

<br /> <br /> <i> SATURDAY NOTES: </i> The Ravens won&#8217;t have Marlon Humphrey in this game, but that doesn&#8217;t matter much to me, considering the matchup. I still like the Texans a bit, but I&#8217;m more concerned about their offensive line missing three starters. 

<br /> <br /> <i> SATURDAY NOTES II: </i> Mark Andrews is out, which has dropped the spread to +9.5. I may end up betting the Texans after all. I&#8217;ll see how I feel Sunday morning. 

<br /> <br /> <i> FINAL THOUGHTS: </i> I&#8217;m going to bet a unit on the Texans. I think this line is way too high, and the sharps agree. The best line is +9.5 -108 at Bookmaker.




</div><!--^END analysis wrapper Don't remove-->


<br />
<br />
<br />






<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Motivation. </span> Edge:   Texans. </b>     <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">  <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">
<br />

The Ravens play against the Bengals next week. 







<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Spread. </span>  Edge:   Texans. </b>    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">  <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">
<br />

<br /> <b> WalterFootball.com Calculated Spread: </b>    Ravens -4.
<br /> <b> Westgate Advance Point Spread: </b>    N/A.
<br /> <b> Computer Model: </b>    Ravens -9.
<br />
<br />






<br />
<br />


<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Vegas. </span> Edge:  None. </b>   
<br />

Equal action.

<br />
<br /> <b> <span class="green"> Percentage of money on Baltimore: </span> </b> 58% (225,000 bets)



<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Trends. </span> Edge:  Ravens. </b>   <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif"> <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">


<li> John Harbaugh is 11-4 ATS in Week 1 games.   </li>
<li> Lamar Jackson is 8-3 ATS as a favorite of 10+.  </li>
<li> <b> Opening Line: </b>   Ravens -9.5. </li>
<li> <b> Opening Total: </b>   45. </li>
<li>
    <b> Weather: </b>    Rain, 81 degrees. Light wind.
</li>

<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> Week 1 NFL Pick: </b>   Ravens 24, Texans 17		<br /> Texans +9.5 -108 (1 Unit) &#8211; Bookmaker	   <i> &#8212; Incorrect; -$110 </i>	<br /> Under 43.5 (0 Unit)     <i> &#8212; Correct; $0 </i>
<br />
<i> Ravens 25, Texans 9 </i>
<br />



<br />
<br />
        <hr />


<div class="analysisWrapper">


    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/bengalsb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Cincinnati Bengals" />
    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/brownsb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Cleveland Browns" />
    <br />

    <b> Cincinnati Bengals (0-0) at Cleveland Browns (0-0) <br /> Line:   Bengals by 2. Total:  47.   </b>
    <br /> Sunday, Sept. 10,  1:00 PM

    <br /> <b> </b>

    <br /> <br />

    <b> <span class="red"> The Matchup. </span> Edge:   None.  </b>            <br /> <br />




<i>HATE MAIL: </i> We&#8217;re going to post hate mail here this year. Here&#8217;s some of what we saw last season: <br /> <br /> 

<img decoding="async" src="/images/hatemail2022_73.jpg">
<br /> <br /> 

On second thought, I&#8217;m not quite sure Matt Gregory/Greg Matthews knows how to read. <br /> <br />

Here&#8217;s more from Matt/Greg: <br /> <br />

<img decoding="async" src="/images/hatemail2022_77.jpg">
<br /> <br /> 

I couldn&#8217;t imagine being this clueless about sports betting. I got the game right, yet he&#8217;s criticizing me for it! Then again, this is the same guy who doesn&#8217;t know as much football as his 4-year-old niece: <br /> <br />

<img decoding="async" src="/images/mattgregory.jpg">
<br /> <br /> 

Let&#8217;s get to another hate mailer, with this one being from Twitter: <br /> <br />

<img decoding="async" src="/images/hatemail2022_74.jpg">
<br /> <br /> 

Darius got the game wrong &#8211; his 4-year-old niece must also be smarter than him &#8211; but he also resorted to calling me fat: <br /> <br />

<img decoding="async" src="/images/hatemail2022_76.jpg">
<br /> <br /> 

That would be impossible. If that were true, I&#8217;d be the smartest person in the world. <br /> <br />

Here&#8217;s one more: <br /> <br />

<img decoding="async" src="/images/hatemail2022_75.jpg">
<br /> <br /> 

I&#8217;m actually sincere in my response. I&#8217;m a bit disappointed to only be up about $5,000 now, especially after how we started the year. 
<br /> <br />

<i> CINCINNATI OFFENSE: </i> Joe Burrow suffered a scary moment in training camp when he was carted off the field. Burrow is on track to play in this game, but at what capacity? The latest report we have concerning Burrow is Ian Rapoport citing that &#8220;all signs point&#8221; to Burrow playing versus Cleveland. That&#8217;s not the most encouraging statement, as it seems as though there&#8217;s a good chance that Burrow won&#8217;t be fully healthy. <br /> <br />

This is unfortunate for Burrow, who had severe struggles the last time he visited Cleveland. His team was down 25-0 at one point, as his offensive line couldn&#8217;t protect against Myles Garrett. There&#8217;s a better chance of that occurring with Orlando Brown now shielding Burrow&#8217;s blind side, but if Burrow doesn&#8217;t have any mobility as a result of his balky calf, he&#8217;ll be a sitting duck in the pocket. <br /> <br />

One possible solution to this issue is that the Bengals could establish Joe Mixon. The long-time Cincinnati runner really struggled last year, but he was dealing with an injury. Now healthy, there&#8217;s a chance that Mixon will rebound to 2021 form. The Browns were just average versus the run last year, so there&#8217;s a chance for Mixon to succeed. <br /> <br />

<i> CLEVELAND OFFENSE: </i> While Burrow had trouble maintaining drives in last year&#8217;s Halloween battle, Jacoby Brissett couldn&#8217;t miss. He was 17-of-22 for 278 yards and a touchdown. Deshaun Watson was supposed to be an upgrade over Brissett when he returned from suspension, but he was anything but. Watson&#8217;s incompetence sunk Cleveland&#8217;s offense, causing the team to sputter down the stretch. <br /> <br />

It was obvious that Watson was going to struggle after a long layoff from football, but he&#8217;s had an entire offseason to re-acclimate himself into the NFL and gel with his teammates. I was bullish on the Browns&#8217; chances because of that, but Watson looked just as lost in his primary preseason performance. Perhaps this was Watson being aloof in a meaningless game, but it&#8217;s still worrying. Watson would ordinarily have a nice matchup against a Cincinnati secondary that lost some talent this offseason, but there&#8217;s no guarantee that Watson will be able to take advantage of that. <br /> <br />

The Bengals at least figure to be stronger versus the run. This is obviously key for this matchup, as Nick Chubb trampled through the Bengals in the aforementioned Halloween contest. <br /> <br />

<i> RECAP: </i>  When this line was initially released, all I heard was, &#8220;Wow, the Bengals are only favored by 2.5!? This is easy money!&#8221; My response to those saying that was: &#8220;Remember the last time the Bengals went into Cleveland.&#8221; The Browns ripped the Bengals a new one on Halloween, beating them, 32-13. <br /> <br />

The Browns, for whatever reason, have had the Bengals number. I can&#8217;t explain why, but that&#8217;s been the case. And now, the Bengals are supposed to beat the Browns on the road with Burrow possibly being less than 100 percent? I&#8217;m not buying it. <br /> <br />

I like Cleveland, if you couldn&#8217;t tell. This, however, is not a big play because I just don&#8217;t know what to make of Watson. As stated earlier, he was putrid in the preseason, so if that continues, the Bengals could find a way to win this game. Still, it seems like the Browns have a nice advantage going against an injured quarterback as home underdogs. 

<br /> <br /> <i> THURSDAY THOUGHTS: </i> This has nothing to do with this game, but I finally pulled the trigger on Nick Chubb winning offensive player of the year on my <a href="/nflbettingprops2023.php">NFL Betting Futures</a> page. I think he should be the favorite for the rushing title, which should earn him the award. 

<br /> <br /> <i> SATURDAY NOTES: </i> The more I think about it, the more I&#8217;m convinced Joe Burrow isn&#8217;t 100 percent. I&#8217;m going to put a unit on the Browns, but I feel like we&#8217;re getting robbed with a bad number. 

<br /> <br /> <i> FINAL THOUGHTS: </i> The sharps have dragged the Browns down to +1. I still like them for a unit, and I considered going to two. The best line was just +1.5 at Bovada, but they moved it to +1 as soon as I tried to punch in my bet. The top line is now +1 across the board. 



</div><!--^END analysis wrapper Don't remove-->


<br />
<br />
<br />







<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Motivation. </span> Edge:   None. </b>
<br />


No edge found.







<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Spread. </span>  Edge:  None. </b>
<br />

<br /> <b> WalterFootball.com Calculated Spread: </b>    Bengals -2.5.
<br /> <b> Westgate Advance Point Spread: </b>    N/A.
<br /> <b> Computer Model: </b>    Bengals -1.
<br />
<br />






<br />
<br />


<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Vegas. </span> Edge:  None. </b>
<br />

Equal action.

<br />
<br /> <b> <span class="green"> Percentage of money on Cleveland: </span> </b> 58% (247,000 bets)



<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Trends. </span> Edge:  None. </b>


<li> <b> History: </b> Browns have won 8 of the last 10 meetings. </li>
<li> <b> Opening Line: </b>   Bengals -2.5. </li>
<li> <b> Opening Total: </b>   47.5. </li>
<li>
    <b> Weather: </b>    Possible rain, 72 degrees. Mild wind, 12 mph.
</li>

<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> Week 1 NFL Pick: </b>   Browns 27, Bengals 24		<br /> Browns +2 (1 Unit)		   <i> &#8212; Correct; +$100 </i>	<br /> Over 47 (0 Units)     <i> &#8212; Incorrect; $0 </i>
<br />
<i> Browns 24, Bengals 3 </i>
<br />





<br />
<br />
        <hr />

<div class="analysisWrapper">


    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/jaguarsb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Jacksonville Jaguars" />
    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/coltsb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Indianapolis Colts" />
    <br />

    <b> Jacksonville Jaguars (0-0) at Indianapolis Colts (0-0) <br /> Line:   Jaguars by 3.5. Total:  45.5.   </b>
    <br /> Sunday, Sept. 10,  1:00 PM

    <br /> <b> </b>

    <br /> <br />

    <b> <span class="red"> The Matchup. </span> Edge:   Jaguars.  </b>    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">         <br /> <br />

Contest Announcement time! <br /> <br />

Our weekly fantasy football contest will return soon. I&#8217;ll post the link here when it&#8217;s available. <br /> <br />

Also, our <a href="https://debacled.walterfootball.com/survivor">Survivor Contest</a> has returned as well. It&#8217;s free to enter, and you can win $350! <br /> <br />  

Want to wager at the best sportsbook? I&#8217;ve been using Bookmaker for several years, and I think it&#8217;s the top sportsbook out there. You can set your own line and pay the according vig, and there are so many options. They also send a check days after the withdraw request. <a href="http://w-as.com/?Rc54L" target = "blank">Go here to sign up for Bookmaker</a>. <br /> <br /> 

If you&#8217;re looking for the best DFS content on the Web, 	 <a href="https://www.stokastic.com/join?aff=soswalter" target = "blank">sign up for Stokastic</a> for the greatest projections and ownership data. Sign up with this link or use promo code WALTERFOOTBALL for 25% off! <br /> <br /> 

<i> JACKSONVILLE OFFENSE: </i> It&#8217;s almost impossible to remember how horrible Trevor Lawrence played as a rookie. Lawrence had the misfortune of being coached by the inept Urban Meyer, so he naturally improved under a real coach last year. Lawrence was especially hot down the stretch in incredible comebacks versus the Cowboys and Chargers. <br /> <br />

Lawrence will be even better this year with Calvin Ridley joining the active roster. Lawrence will have a legitimate No. 1 receiver at his disposal for the first time in his professional career, which is bad news for an Indianapolis secondary that lost Stephon Gilmore to a trade this offseason. Lawrence will be able to shred the Colts with all of his weapons. <br /> <br />

The Jaguars will have success against the Colts on the ground as well, assuming that Shaq Leonard continues to miss action. Leonard was out for most of last year, and it sounds like he&#8217;ll once again be sidelined with a concussion. It makes you wonder if he&#8217;ll ever play again. <br /> <br />

<i> INDIANAPOLIS OFFENSE: </i> Anthony Richardson will be making the first start of his career, and I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s ready. Richardson was hideous as a passer in the preseason. Granted, the Colts didn&#8217;t design any running plays for him in meaningless games, but Richardson didn&#8217;t look close to prepared for real action. <br /> <br />

I&#8217;d feel better about Richardson playing if the Colts could protect him well, but I don&#8217;t trust their blocking at all. The Jaguars will be able to take advantage of this liability, as they have Travon Walker and Josh Allen to generate pressure on Richardson. <br /> <br />

Another reason Richardson should sit for a while is the lack of a running game. Jonathan Taylor is holding out/nursing some fake injury, so it&#8217;ll be up to Deon Jackson and Evan Hull to carry the load. The problem with that, pertaining to this matchup, is that the Jaguars were sixth versus the rush last year. <br /> <br />

<i> RECAP: </i> Does this line feel trappy to you? It feels trappy to me. The Jaguars were a playoff team from last year, while the Colts had one of the worst records in the league. Indianapolis also has a new coach and a new quarterback. Why, then, are the Jaguars favored by only 4.5 points in this matchup, especially with Taylor sidelined? <br /> <br />

One guess is that the Colts are viewed favorably by the sharps. I spoke to some professional bettors this summer, and a couple of them pointed out Indianapolis as a positive regression team. I don&#8217;t quite buy it because the Colts don&#8217;t have much going for them. I think there&#8217;s a good chance they&#8217;ll be a bottom-three team in the NFL this year, especially if Leonard continues to miss time. <br /> <br />

Conversely, I really like the Jaguars. I did some digging into their metrics this offseason, and I came away impressed. It wouldn&#8217;t shock me at all if they dominated this matchup as a result, but then again, a three-point victory wouldn&#8217;t surprise me either because it sure seems like something fishy is going on.

<br /> <br /> <i> THURSDAY THOUGHTS: </i> There&#8217;s some sharp money coming in on the Colts, though not a crazy amount. I&#8217;m not buying it. I think they&#8217;re going to suck this year. 

<br /> <br /> <i> SATURDAY NOTES: </i> No change here, and the injury report was a nothin&#8217; burger. 

<br /> <br /> <i> FINAL THOUGHTS: </i>  The sharps are on the Colts, but I think they&#8217;re wrong about this. We&#8217;ll see. I don&#8217;t have an urge to bet the Jaguars. If you do, -3.5 is available at FanDuel and BetMGM. 



</div><!--^END analysis wrapper Don't remove-->


<br />
<br />
<br />







<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Motivation. </span> Edge:   None. </b>
<br />

No edge found.








<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Spread. </span>  Edge:   None. </b>
<br />

<br /> <b> WalterFootball.com Calculated Spread: </b>    Jaguars -5.5.
<br /> <b> Westgate Advance Point Spread: </b>    N/A.
<br /> <b> Computer Model: </b>    Jaguars -5.
<br />
<br />






<br />
<br />


<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Vegas. </span> Edge:  Colts. </b>     <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">  
<br />

Decent lean on the Jaguars.

<br />
<br /> <b> <span class="green"> Percentage of money on Jacksonville: </span> </b> 68% (199,000 bets)



<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Trends. </span> Edge:  Colts. </b>


<li> <b> History: </b> Home Team has won the last 11 meetings. </li>
<li> <b> Opening Line: </b>   Jaguars -3.5. </li>
<li> <b> Opening Total: </b>   43.5. </li>
<li>
    <b> Weather: </b>    Dome.
</li>

<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> Week 1 NFL Pick: </b>   Jaguars 31, Colts 17		<br /> Jaguars -3.5 (0 Units)	   <i> &#8212; Correct; $0 </i>	<br /> Over 45 (0 Units)     <i> &#8212; Correct; $0 </i>
<br />
<i> Jaguars 31, Colts 21 </i>
<br />





<br />
<br />
        <hr />

<div class="analysisWrapper">


    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/Bucsb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Tampa Bay Buccaneers" />
    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/vikingsb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Minnesota Vikings" />
    <br />

    <b> Tampa Bay Buccaneers (0-0) at Minnesota Vikings (0-0) <br /> Line:   Vikings by 4.5. Total:  45.   </b>
    <br /> Sunday, Sept. 10,  1:00 PM

    <br /> <b> </b>

    <br /> <br />

    <b> <span class="red"> The Matchup. </span> Edge:   None.  </b>            <br /> <br />




If you missed it, I have an <a href="/nflbettingprops2023.php">NFL Betting Props</a> page. I&#8217;ll be adding to it as the season progresses! <br /> <br />

Also, <a href="/confidencepool.php">Confidence Pool Picks</a> will return. They&#8217;ll be posted by Wednesday morning each week! <br /> <br />


<i> MINNESOTA OFFENSE: </i> We constantly bet against the Vikings last year, but it had nothing to do with the offense in most games. Minnesota had a stellar scoring unit last year, and it&#8217;ll be even better in 2023 if Jordan Addison is as good as advertised.   <br /> <br />

I made sure I said &#8220;most&#8221; games because I criticized Kirk Cousins&#8217; inability to handle a strong pass rush in battles against the Eagles and Cowboys. All quarterbacks struggle with pressure, but the dichotomy with Cousins is greater than with anyone else. Luckily for Cousins, he won&#8217;t be dealing with any sort of pass rush in this contest, as the Buccaneers couldn&#8217;t get to the quarterback last year. <br /> <br />

The one change on this side of the ball for the Vikings, aside from Addison replacing Adam Thielen, is Alexander Mattison subbing in for the departed Dalvin Cook. I think this could actually be an upgrade, as Cook was a very inefficient runner last year. Regardless, it&#8217;s not an ideal matchup for Mattison, given that Tampa Bay was seventh versus the run last year. <br /> <br />

<i> TAMPA BAY OFFENSE: </i> The Buccaneers were horrible last year, but they were able to win the worst division in football last year because Tom Brady willed them to victory in some games, including the Week 17 battle against the Panthers. Brady was not very good overall, but his declining performance can be attributed to his team&#8217;s horrific blocking. <br /> <br />

As pedestrian as Brady was last year, he&#8217;s still a better option than Baker Mayfield, whose pocket presence and football IQ have diminished considerably. However, it&#8217;s possible that Mayfield could have a great debut with the Buccaneers because Minnesota&#8217;s defense is so bad. The Vikings also have no pass rush (outside of Danielle Hunter), while their secondary is in shambles. Mike Evans and Chris Godwin have terrific matchups, as Mayfield enjoys a rare, clean pocket. <br /> <br />

The Vikings were better versus the run than the pass last year, but only by default. They were just 22nd versus the rush, so this bodes well for Rachaad White and Sean Tucker. <br /> <br />

<i> RECAP: </i> If you read my <a href="/survivoradvice.php">Survivor Pool Advice</a> page, you know that I think this is the survivor trap game of the week. The Vikings are a high favorite, so they&#8217;re sure to be a popular play against lowly Tampa. However, I think there&#8217;s a decent chance the Buccaneers will pull the outright upset. <br /> <br />

I love the matchup the Buccaneer receivers have with Minnesota&#8217;s dreadful secondary. I also think Tampa&#8217;s weak offensive line won&#8217;t be exposed by the Vikings, who have diminished their pass rush this offseason. A six-point underdog shouldn&#8217;t have such advantages over such a big favorite. A big favorite that has a matchup against the Eagles next Thursday, by the way. <br /> <br />

The back door will be open for the Buccaneers, should they need it. We&#8217;re getting five of the six key numbers with them on this inflated line, after all. Given that there&#8217;s a good possibility of an upset occurring, Tampa Bay is one of my top picks of the week.

<br /> <br /> <i> THURSDAY THOUGHTS: </i> I still love the Buccaneers, and I&#8217;m going to lock this in soon for fear that the line will drop to +5.5. 

<br /> <br /> <i> SATURDAY NOTES: </i> I love being a dad to my two amazing children, but the slight downside is that I can&#8217;t monitor the spreads closely anymore. I missed the +6s, but I would consider buying up. Hopefully we get a good opportunity to do so on Sunday morning. Regardless, I still love the Buccaneers.

<br /> <br /> <i> FINAL THOUGHTS: </i> Ugh, so much for paying up for +6. The sharps have pounded the Buccaneers into oblivion, dragging this line down to +4 at almost every sportsbook. The best vig is -106 at Bookmaker, which is not a surprise. 



</div><!--^END analysis wrapper Don't remove-->


<br />
<br />
<br />







<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Motivation. </span> Edge:   Buccaneers. </b>   <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif"> <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">
<br />


The Vikings play on Thursday against the Eagles in Week 2.







<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Spread. </span>  Edge:   Buccaneers. </b>   <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif"> <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">
<br />

<br /> <b> WalterFootball.com Calculated Spread: </b>    Vikings -3.
<br /> <b> Westgate Advance Point Spread: </b>    N/A.
<br /> <b> Computer Model: </b>    Vikings -6.
<br />
<br />






<br />
<br />


<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Vegas. </span> Edge:  None. </b>
<br />

Equal action.

<br />
<br /> <b> <span class="green"> Percentage of money on Minnesota: </span> </b> 56% (205,000 bets)



<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Trends. </span> Edge:  Buccaneers. </b>   <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">


<li> Road Team is 122-86 ATS in Buccaneers games since 2009.  </li>
<li> Vikings are 41-31 ATS at home since 2014 (10-16 ATS since 2020).  </li>
<li> <b> Opening Line: </b>   Vikings -6.5. </li>
<li> <b> Opening Total: </b>   46. </li>
<li>
    <b> Weather: </b>    Dome.
</li>

<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> Week 1 NFL Pick: </b>   Buccaneers 23, Vikings 20		<br /> Buccaneers +4 -106 (5 Units) &#8211; Bookmaker	   <i> &#8212; Correct; +$500 </i>	<br /> Under 45 (0 Units)     <i> &#8212; Correct; $0 </i>
<br />
<i> Buccaneers 20, Vikings 17 </i>
<br />





<br />
<br />
        <hr />

<div class="analysisWrapper">


    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/titansb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Tennessee Titans" />
    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/saintsb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="New Orleans Saints" />
    <br />

    <b> Tennessee Titans (0-0) at New Orleans Saints (0-0) <br /> Line:   Saints by 3. Total:  41.5.   </b>
    <br /> Sunday, Sept. 10,  1:00 PM

    <br /> <b> </b>

    <br /> <br />

    <b> <span class="red"> The Matchup. </span> Edge:   Titans.  </b>            <br /> <br />



If you&#8217;d like to support this site outside of buying my books or referring people to it, you can check out the <a href="https://www.zazzle.com/s/walterfootball" target = "blank">WalterFootball Merch Store</a> as well! I can design shirts rather easily, so if you have any new ideas, let me know in the comments below. In addition to WalterFootball t-shirts, you can also buy AMC and GameStop stock gear as well! <br /> <br />
 
<i> TENNESSEE OFFENSE: </i> I can&#8217;t say I disagree with the sentiment regarding these two teams. I&#8217;ve seen some projecting the Titans to achieve as few as four victories, which seems unlikely, given the coaching staff. Also, the Titans added DeAndre Hopkins this offseason to give them a legitimate threat at receiver that they missed last year after trading A.J. Brown. <br /> <br />

Many aren&#8217;t fans of the Titans&#8217; offensive line, and I can&#8217;t say I am either. However, I think there&#8217;s a chance the unit will be better than people are projecting, as Peter Skoronski, Andre Dillard and Dillon Radunz have the potential to be quality starters in the NFL. Regardless of how they play for the rest of the season, they&#8217;ll have an opportunity to perform on a high level in this matchup because New Orleans has a poor pass rush. The Saints were bottom 10 in pressure rate last year, and that was with Marcus Davenport and Kaden Ellis. They drafted some rookies as replacements, but there&#8217;s no guarantee they&#8217;ll succeed in the pros, especially in their first game. <br /> <br />

The Saints also have to worry about stopping the run, which was also a problem last year. They were 25th versus the rush, which does not bode well in a matchup against Derrick Henry. <br /> <br />

<i> NEW ORLEANS OFFENSE: </i> I have some concerns with the Saints&#8217; offensive line as well. New Orleans&#8217; front projects to be superior to Tennessee&#8217;s, but the Saints will actually have to deal with a quality pass rush in this matchup.  <br /> <br />

The Titans didn&#8217;t put great pressure on the quarterback last year, but Harold Landry was out for the season. Landry&#8217;s return will be huge for Tennessee&#8217;s front seven, and defense as a whole. Derek Carr won&#8217;t have an easy time in the pocket, though I suspect he&#8217;ll be able to connect with Chris Olave and Michael Thomas for some big gains. <br /> <br />

Another problem for Carr is that Alvin Kamara won&#8217;t be available. The Saints&#8217; offense has been much worse without Kamara since the dynamic back entered the NFL, so points will be at a premium until he returns. His replacement is Jamaal Williams, one of the most overrated players in the NFL. Williams is known for his league-leading touchdown total from last year, but that is always a fluky statistic that regresses. <br /> <br />

<i> RECAP: </i>  I don&#8217;t understand what everyone&#8217;s obsession with the Saints is. Everyone seems to believe they&#8217;ll win the NFC South, yet they have no pass rush, and they also have issues on the offensive line. And for the first three weeks, Kamara is out as well. <br /> <br />

Oh, and the Saints are extremely poorly coached. Dennis Allen is atrocious, giving the Titans a huge edge with Mike Vrabel. It just so happens that Vrabel is excellent when it comes to covering as an underdog, making Tennessee very appealing. <br /> <br />

Then again, the argument could be made that the Titans shouldn&#8217;t even be underdogs in the fist place. My personal line says this spread should be Tennessee -1.5, so I love the 4.5 points of value. That&#8217;s a marginal difference of 10.8 percent, which is tremendous. <br /> <br />

With the coaching mismatch and spread value, the Titans are an obvious choice to be one of the top plays of the week. I&#8217;d love this even more if we were still getting +3.5, but the sharps took care of that.  

<br /> <br /> <i> THURSDAY THOUGHTS: </i> The sharps have been all over the Titans. I&#8217;m worried about a line drop here as well, so I&#8217;ll lock in this pick until I see a real injury report. 

<br /> <br /> <i> SATURDAY NOTES: </i> We didn&#8217;t miss the +3 line here, which is still available despite all the sharp money on Tennessee. That said, some of the juice is making it seem like this line will drop to +2.5, so I&#8217;m going to lock in the +3 -115 at FanDuel. Also, now that this line has dropped to +2.5 in some sportsbooks, it&#8217;s OK to put Tennessee into a teaser. My other team in the teaser will be the Steelers.

<br /> <br /> <i> NFL PLAYER PROP: </i> I&#8217;ve been using <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/?via=walter" target = "blank">OddsShopper</a> to find the best EVs on player props, and I like this one: Derek Carr over pass attempts is 31.5 -110 at BetMGM. I think the Saints will be trailing in this game, so Carr will have to throw. According to OddsShopper, -110 is the best vig by far for this prop. I also like Michael Thomas over 3.5 receptions -115. To find the best odds for any spread or prop, you can <a href="https://www.oddsshopper.com/?via=walter" target = "blank">sign up for OddsShopper</a> here!

<br /> <br /> <i> FINAL THOUGHTS: </i> As mentioned earlier, there&#8217;s sharp money on the Titans. The best line available is +3 -117. If you happen to like the Saints, you can get -2.5 -115 at BetMGM. 




</div><!--^END analysis wrapper Don't remove-->


<br />
<br />
<br />







<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Motivation. </span> Edge:   None. </b>
<br />


No edge found.







<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Spread. </span>  Edge:   Titans. </b>   <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">  <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif"> 
<br />

<br /> <b> WalterFootball.com Calculated Spread: </b>    Titans -1.5.
<br /> <b> Westgate Advance Point Spread: </b>    N/A.
<br /> <b> Computer Model: </b>    Saints -3.
<br />
<br />






<br />
<br />


<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Vegas. </span> Edge:  Saints. </b>   <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">   <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">  
<br />

Decent lean on the Titans, but mostly from the sharps.

<br />
<br /> <b> <span class="green"> Percentage of money on Tennessee: </span> </b> 72% (188,000 bets)



<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Trends. </span> Edge:  Titans. </b>   <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">  <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif"> 


<li> Mike Vrabel is 22-9 ATS as an underdog of 3+ points. </li>
<li> Saints are 3-17 ATS in Weeks 1-2 since 2013. </li>
<li> <b> Opening Line: </b>   Saints -3.5. </li>
<li> <b> Opening Total: </b>   42. </li>
<li>
    <b> Weather: </b>    Dome.
</li>

<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> Week 1 NFL Pick: </b>   Titans 19, Saints 16		<br /> Titans +3 -115 (4 Units) &#8211; FanDuel	     <i> &#8212; Correct; +$400 </i>	<br /> Teaser: Titans +9, Steelers +8 (2 Units) &#8211; Bookmaker     <i> &#8212; So far, so good&#8230; </i>		<br /> Under 41.5 (0 Units)     <i> &#8212; Correct; $0 </i>	<br /> Player Prop: Derek Carr Over 31.5 Pass Attempts -110 (0.4 Units) &#8211; BetMGM	    <i> &#8212; Correct; +$40 </i>	<br /> Player Prop: Michael Thomas Over 3.5 Receptions -115 (0.25 Units) &#8211; Bet MGM      <i> &#8212; Correct; +$25 </i>
<br />
<i> Saints 16, Titans 15 </i>
<br />




<br />
<br />
        <hr />

<div class="analysisWrapper">


    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/49ersb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="San Francisco 49ers" />
    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/steelersb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Pittsburgh Steelers" />
    <br />

    <b> San Francisco 49ers (0-0) at Pittsburgh Steelers (0-0) <br /> Line:   49ers by 2. Total:  40.5.   </b>
    <br /> Sunday, Sept. 10,  1:00 PM

    <br /> <b> </b>

    <br /> <br />

    <b> <span class="red"> The Matchup. </span> Edge:   Steelers.  </b>            <br /> <br />


If you&#8217;ve followed this site for a while, you might remember that I like to respond to my spam mails. It all started numerous years ago, when a man named Jon Wire from the &#8220;United Bank of Africoan&#8221; promised me an ATM card of some sort, so I responded as a man named Mister Compassion Chuck Norris, who was raised by wolves. The following season, I received e-mails from Richard Held and Loon Bruce, who told me I won a Facebook Award, which comes with a &#8220;lump sum pay out of (750,000.00 GBP).&#8221; Pretending to be Matthew Millen Kim, I sent out my application and fake money.  <br /> <br />

I&#8217;ve been messing around with spammers ever since, pretending to be Harvey Weinstein, Joe Biden, Ramsay Bolton and Walter White. I had plenty of <b><a href="/spam2022.php">Spam Mails</a></b> this year, so check them out if you want to see me screw with spammers. I&#8217;ll have new ones every week this year!  <br /> <br />
 
<i> PITTSBURGH OFFENSE: </i> People tend to underestimate the importance of elite pass rushers. You&#8217;d think that would be a ridiculous thing to say, but hardly any public bettors noticed that T.J. Watt&#8217;s absence had a profound impact on the Steelers last year. The Steelers were 1-6 and 30th against the pass without Watt, yet they were 8-2 and sixth versus the pass with him. Their only losses were to the Bengals and Ravens, two playoff teams that they beat in their other matchups against them. <br /> <br />

I bring up Watt because Nick Bosa is a similar player. Bosa is currently holding out, so he may not play in this game. San Francisco&#8217;s defense is a vastly different unit without him, and if you doubt that, check out what happened in the 49ers&#8217; embarrassing loss to the Falcons last year as proof. If Bosa is out, Pittsburgh&#8217;s improved offensive line will shield Kenny Pickett, who is coming off a tremendous preseason. George Pickens and Diontae Johnson will have their way against the 49ers&#8217; troubled cornerbacks. <br /> <br />

The Steelers will obviously attempt to establish their backs as well, especially Jaylen Warren, who was very impressive in the preseason. Running against the 49ers will prove to be difficult, however, as San Francisco boasted the league&#8217;s top ground defense last year. <br /> <br />

<i> SAN FRANCISCO OFFENSE: </i> Doubters of the 49ers don&#8217;t believe in Brock Purdy. I have some concerns with him, but not regarding his talent. I love Purdy&#8217;s quick release, accuracy, and intelligence. He seems perfect for Kyle Shanahan&#8217;s offense. <br /> <br />

My concern with Purdy is in relation to his surgically repaired elbow. I don&#8217;t know if Purdy will have the stamina to play a complete game, so he could struggle, especially if the 49ers&#8217; replacement for Mike McGlinchey at right tackle doesn&#8217;t perform up to par. Remember how good the Steelers were with Watt last year, so imagine how Watt will dominate a team breaking in a new starting tackle. <br /> <br />

Purdy will naturally want to lean on Christian McCaffrey. However, the Steelers were 11th against the run last year, and they made an upgrade in their linebacking corps when they obtained Cole Holcomb. McCaffrey will still be productive, but this is not a matchup in which he&#8217;s likely to be completely dominant. <br /> <br />

<i> RECAP: </i> I mentioned in the Falcons-Panthers write-up that it was extremely important to bet an early number in the summer. This is another example of that. The Steelers were +3 for a while, but the sharps took the line down to +2.5. <br /> <br />

Despite the line move off three, I still like the Steelers a good deal, provided Bosa misses this game. The 49ers have an elite defense, but they are not the same unit without Bosa. The Steelers, meanwhile, are my favorite long shot to win the Super Bowl at 60/1. They&#8217;re great with Watt on the field, and Watt gives them a big edge against a team breaking in a new tackle. The offense is also expected to make a big leap. <br /> <br />

I would have made this a five-unit play had +3 still been available. I&#8217;m going to wager four units on the Steelers now, but I&#8217;ll be looking out for a +3 to reappear. Keep in mind that this will all be moot if Bosa reports back to the team. 

<br /> <br /> <i> THURSDAY THOUGHTS: </i> Argh. Nick Bosa re-signed, so he&#8217;ll almost certainly be on the field for this game. I liked the Steelers a lot previously, but now I have just a slight lean in their direction. 

<br /> <br /> <i> SATURDAY NOTES: </i> I forgot to change the unit count below when I posted my Thursday Thoughts. The proper unit count is now two. It sucks that Bosa will be available.

<br /> <br /> <i> FINAL THOUGHTS: </i>  Again, my unit count was sliced in half because of the Nick Bosa news, but it&#8217;s worth noting that the sharps haven&#8217;t cared. They&#8217;ve been on the Steelers all week. I&#8217;m not seeing anything better than +2 -110 at BetMGM. 




</div><!--^END analysis wrapper Don't remove-->


<br />
<br />
<br />






<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Motivation. </span> Edge:   None. </b>
<br />

No edge found.








<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Spread. </span>  Edge:   None. </b>
<br />

<br /> <b> WalterFootball.com Calculated Spread: </b>    Steelers -1.
<br /> <b> Westgate Advance Point Spread: </b>    N/A.
<br /> <b> Computer Model: </b>   49ers -4.
<br />
<br />





<br />
<br />


<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Vegas. </span> Edge:  None. </b>
<br />

Equal action.

<br />
<br /> <b> <span class="green"> Percentage of money on Pittsburgh: </span> </b> 58% (237,000 bets)



<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Trends. </span> Edge:  Steelers. </b>   <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif"> 


<li> Mike Tomlin is 52-29 ATS as an underdog. </li> 
<li> <b> Opening Line: </b>   49ers -3. </li>
<li> <b> Opening Total: </b>   42. </li>
<li>
    <b> Weather: </b>    Rain, 76 degrees. Light wind.
</li>

<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> Week 1 NFL Pick: </b>   Steelers 23, 49ers 20		<br /> Steelers +2 (2 Units) &#8211; BetMGM	   <i> &#8212; Incorrect; -$220 </i>	<br /> Teaser: Titans +9, Steelers +8 (2 Units) &#8211; Bookmaker     <i> &#8212; Incorrect; -$240 </i>		<br /> Over 40.5 (0 Units)      <i> &#8212; Incorrect; $0 </i>
<br />
<i> 49ers 30, Steelers 7 </i>
<br />




<br />
<br />
        <hr />

<div class="analysisWrapper">


    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/cardinalsb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Arizona Cardinals" />
    <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/redskinsb_logo.gif" width="50" VALIGN="middle" title="Washington Redskins" />
    <br />

    <b> Arizona Cardinals (0-0) at Washington Redskins (0-0) <br /> Line:   Redskins by 7. Total:  37.5.   </b>
    <br /> Sunday, Sept. 10,  1:00 PM

    <br /> <b> </b>

    <br /> <br />

    <b> <span class="red"> The Matchup. </span> Edge:   Redskins.  </b>   <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">  <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">           <br /> <br />



Video of the Week: The NFL is back, so I must remind you of what was stolen from us, due to ESPN&#8217;s incompetence. <br /> <br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDyQiSUh7eU&#038;t=1472s" target = "blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDyQiSUh7eU&#038;t=1472s</a>
<br /> <br />
Check out the game starting at 22 minutes. Imagine having Seahawks +3 in that game! The Ravens were able to push because of two successful Hail Marys, a blocked punt returned for a touchdown, an injury to Matt Hasselbeck, and a fourth timeout awarded to Baltimore! <br /> <br />

<i> ARIZONA OFFENSE: </i> I&#8217;m beginning with the Cardinals because we don&#8217;t know who&#8217;s going to quarterback their team in Week 1. It was supposed to be Colt McCoy, but they cut him. Now, it&#8217;s down to Joshua Dobbs versus Clayton Tune. New head coach Jonathan Gannon said he&#8217;s keeping his decision a secret because of a competitive advantage. I imagine Ron Rivera and Jack Del Rio are losing sleep as a result. <br /> <br />

Regardless of which quarterback gets the nod, the Cardinals aren&#8217;t expected to do much on this side of the ball. The Redskins have a fierce pass rush, even without Chase Young, so they should be able to hound whichever overwhelmed quarterback starts. Washington was mediocre when it came to stopping the run last year, but it&#8217;ll be able to load the box against James Conner because of the quarterback situation. <br /> <br />

<i> WASHINGTON OFFENSE: </i> The Redskins don&#8217;t exactly have the most proven quarterback either, as Slingin&#8217; Sammy Howell will be making the second start of his professional career. I liked Howell in North Carolina, however, and he&#8217;s been impressive when given the chance in the pros, whether it&#8217;s been his preseason performances or his upset of Dallas in the finale last year. <br /> <br />

Howell will get a dream matchup in Week 1. As bad as the Cardinals are offensively, they&#8217;re even worse on this side of the ball. They have no pass rush to speak of, while their secondary is a total disaster. Even if Terry McLaurin is out, Howell should have his way with Arizona&#8217;s beleaguered defensive backfield. <br /> <br />

The Cardinals weren&#8217;t horrible at stopping the run last year, but keep in mind that J.J. Watt had something to do with that. Watt has retired, so Brian Robinson has a promising matchup as well. <br /> <br />

<i> RECAP: </i> Earlier in the summer, I would have sided with the Cardinals in this game. I said this to QuackyTakes when I was on the phone with him: &#8220;There&#8217;s no way I&#8217;m laying seven with this stupid Redskins team.&#8221; <br /> <br />

Things have changed, however. The Cardinals cut McCoy, leaving them with either Dobbs or Tune as the starter. Believe me, I&#8217;m no big fan of McCoy, but he was at least a stable presence under center. Dobbs has no chemistry with his teammates, while Tune has no experience. I&#8217;m all for going against dreadful teams starting horrible quarterbacks, and this certainly qualifies. <br /> <br />

I almost talked myself into betting Washington. However, I just can&#8217;t do it. Regardless of the quarterback situation, I just can&#8217;t bring myself to lay seven with this stupid Redskins team. 

<br /> <br /> <i> THURSDAY THOUGHTS: </i> Barring some insane injury news, I can&#8217;t see myself betting either side in this stupid game. 

<br /> <br /> <i> SATURDAY NOTES: </i> There&#8217;s no insane injury news, unless you consider Terry McLaurin being off the injury report &#8220;insane.&#8221; I don&#8217;t. Let&#8217;s just move on with our lives.

<br /> <br /> <i> FINAL THOUGHTS: </i> I still have no interest in betting this game. If you do, the best line is Redskins -6.5 -114 at FanDuel. The sharps have not touched this abomination. 




</div><!--^END analysis wrapper Don't remove-->


<br />
<br />
<br />






<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Motivation. </span> Edge:   None. </b>
<br />

No edge found.








<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Spread. </span>  Edge:   None. </b>
<br />

<br /> <b> WalterFootball.com Calculated Spread: </b>    Redskins -7.
<br /> <b> Westgate Advance Point Spread: </b>    N/A.
<br /> <b> Computer Model: </b>    Redskins -10.
<br />
<br />





<br />
<br />


<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red">  The Vegas. </span> Edge:  Cardinals. </b>   <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">  <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif"> 
<br />

No surprise here.

<br />
<br /> <b> <span class="green"> Percentage of money on Washington: </span> </b> 85% (163,000 bets)



<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> <span class="red"> The Trends. </span> Edge:  Cardinals. </b>   <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/star.gif">


<li> Redskins are 11-24 ATS in September home games since 2001.  </li>
<li> Redskins are 10-25 ATS as home favorites of more than 4 since 2000. </li>
<li> <b> Opening Line: </b>   Redskins -6. </li>
<li> <b> Opening Total: </b>   40.5. </li>
<li>
    <b> Weather: </b>    Possible rain, 81 degrees. Light wind.
</li>

<br />
<br />
<br />


<b> Week 1 NFL Pick: </b>   Redskins 24, Cardinals 10		<br /> Redskins -7 (0 Units)	   <i> &#8212; Incorrect; $0 </i>	<br /> Under 37.5 (0 Units)      <i> &#8212; Correct; $0 </i>
<br />
<i> Redskins 20, Cardinals 16 </i>
<br />




<br />
<br />
        <hr />






    <!-- Late Games Link -->


    <br /> <br /> <br />

    <b> <a href="/nflpicks2023_01late.php"> Week 1 NFL Picks</a> &#8211; Late Games   </b>

    <br />
    <i>




Packers at Bears, Raiders at Broncos, Eagles at Patriots, Dolphins at Chargers, Rams at Seahawks, Cowboys at Giants, Bills at Jets



    </i>

    <br /> <br /> <br />





    
    <br />

    <div id="comments"><span style="font-weight:bold; font-size:16pt;"></span></div>


    <br />




    <b> Prop/Teaser/Parlay Picks </b> <br />
    <i>
        A list of some of my favorite team/player prop picks this week <br /> (Offense &#038; defensive ROY picks to be counted
        whenever winners are announced.) Picks carried over on a week-to-week basis will be in black.
    </i>
    <br /> <br />





    Prop/teaser/parlay picks posted in <b> <a href="/nflpicks2023_01late.php"> Week 1 NFL Picks</a> &#8211; Late Games   </b>


    <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />





<font size = 4>



<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/draft2027.php"> 2027 NFL Mock Draft</a> </b> - April 30 <br> <br> <br>



<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/fantasy2026runningbacks.php"> Fantasy Football Rankings</a> </b>  - April 5 <br> <br> <br>









<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/picks.php"> NFL Picks</a> </b>  -  Feb. 9 <br> <br> <br>








<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/nflpowerrankings.php"> NFL Power Rankings</a> </b> - Jan. 26 <br>  <br> <br>






























































 





















































































 




 














































 





 



























































  





 













































































































 





 


 





















 

































  

















 






















 




 
 

</font>



<br /> <br />






    SUB MENU  <br />
    <br /> <br />





<div class = 'article'>

<br> <b> Note: </b> For legality purposes, this Web site does not promote or advocate gambling. This is solely for entertainment purposes only. <br>
</div>

<br> <br>

<div class = 'article'>
 
 
<b> Last Week's NFL Picks Against The Spread (Week 21, 2025): </b> 1-1 (+$1,205)
<br> 

                                                       
<b> Last Week's 2-3 Unit NFL Picks (Week 21, 2025): </b> 0-1 (-$310)
<br> 

<b> Last Week's 4-5 Unit NFL Picks (Week 21, 2025): </b> 1-0 (+$400)
<br> 
<b> Last Week Over-Under (Week 21, 2025): </b> 1-1 ($0)
<br> 


<b> Last Week's Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks (Week 21, 2025): </b>  +$1,115
<br> <br>
<b> 2025 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 3-2, 60.0% (+$655) <br> 
<br> 
<b> 2025 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 153-138-4, 52.6% (+$5,245) <br>
<b> 2025 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 55-43-1, 56.1% (+$1,320) <br>
<b> 2025 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 21-23-1, 47.7% (-$2,945)  <br>
<b> 2025 Season Over-Under: </b> 151-130-1, 53.7% ($0)   <br>
<b> 2025 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> +$6,035 <br>


<br>
<b> 1999 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 27-41-3 (39.7%) <br>
<b> 2000 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 128-123-8 (51.0%) <br>
<b> 2001 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 127-122-7 (51.0%) <br>
<b> 2002 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 123-136-7 (47.5%) <br>
<b> 2003 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 146-126-8 (53.7%) <br>
<b> 2004 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 157-123-8 (56.1%) <br>
<b> 2005 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 156-126-11 (55.3%) <br>
<b> 2006 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 151-135-9 (52.8%) <br>
<b> 2007 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 162-135-10, 54.5% (+$3,585) <br>
<b> 2008 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 148-140-7, 51.4% (+$6,105) <br>
<b> 2009 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 151-124-9, 54.9% (+$4,235) <br>
<b> 2010 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 144-131-8, 52.4% (+$5,880) <br>
<b> 2011 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 137-133-12, 50.7% (-$1,335) <br>
<b> 2012 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 130-145-8, 47.3% (-$7,445) <br>
<b> 2013 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 144-131-8, 52.4% (+$7,825) <br>
<b> 2014 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 143-133-7, 51.8% (-$1,885) <br>
<b> 2015 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 134-138-12, 49.3% (-$3,215) <br>
<b> 2016 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 148-127-10, 53.8% (+$780) <br>
<b> 2017 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 137-140-8, 49.5% (-$4,300) <br>
<b> 2018 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 140-134-14, 51.3% (+$845) <br>
<b> 2019 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 149-128-9, 53.6% (+$1,200) <br>
<b> 2020 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 138-124-7, 52.7% (+$9,350) <br>
<b> 2021 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 153-141-2, 51.9% (+$210) <br>
<b> 2022 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 154-134-8, 53.5% (+$9,860) <br>
<b> 2023 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 144-141-7, 50.5% (-$7,285) <br>
<b> 2024 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 147-137-12, 51.8% (-$1,380) <br>
<br>
<b> 2002 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 41-49-2 (45.6%) <br>
<b> 2003 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 52-51-2 (50.5%) <br>
<b> 2004 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 65-44-3 (59.6%) <br>
<b> 2005 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 77-61-1 (55.8%) <br>
<b> 2006 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 65-61-4 (51.6%) <br>
<b> 2007 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 83-59-5, 58.5% (+$4,110) <br>
<b> 2008 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 44-57-3, 43.6% (-$3,510) <br>
<b> 2009 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 49-35-3, 58.3% (+$2,260) <br>
<b> 2010 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 51-38-4, 57.3% (+$3,180) <br>
<b> 2011 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 44-51-3, 46.3% (-$2,715) <br>
<b> 2012 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 45-50-2, 47.4% (-$2,130) <br>
<b> 2013 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 38-42, 47.5% (-$2,890) <br>
<b> 2015 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 47-44-1, 51.6% (-$820) <br>
<b> 2016 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 42-35-3, 54.5% (+$475) <br>
<b> 2017 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 32-40-3, 43.8% (-$2,395) <br>
<b> 2018 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 52-41-2, 55.9% (+$2,670) <br>
<b> 2019 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 44-36-2, 55.0% (+$655) <br>
<b> 2020 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 47-43-3, 52.2% (-$1,965) <br>
<b> 2021 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 50-50, 50.0% (-$1,570) <br>
<b> 2022 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 56-44-2, 56.0% (+$1,860)  <br>
<b> 2023 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 44-40-3, 52.4% (+$285)  <br>
<b> 2024 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 40-45-1, 47.0% (-$1,390) <br>
<br>
<b> 2002 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 11-12 (47.8%) <br>
<b> 2003 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 16-13-1 (55.2%) <br>
<b> 2004 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 18-11 (62.1%) <br>
<b> 2005 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 25-22-1 (53.2%) <br>
<b> 2006 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 21-29-1 (42.0%) <br>
<b> 2007 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 35-30-2, 53.8% (+$420) <br>
<b> 2008 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 39-26-2, 60.0% (+$4,055) <br>
<b> 2009 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 29-26, 52.7% (+$330) <br>
<b> 2010 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 32-22, 59.3% (+$4,790) <br>
<b> 2011 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 14-14, 50.0% (-$1,260) <br>
<b> 2012 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 14-21, 40.0% (-$3,650) <br>
<b> 2013 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 17-9-3, 65.4% (+$2,970) <br>
<b> 2015 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 17-16-2, 51.5% (-$1,120) <br>
<b> 2016 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 21-22-5, 48.8% (-$1,465) <br>
<b> 2017 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 20-22-1, 47.6% (-$1,595) <br>
<b> 2018 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 27-32-1, 45.8% (-$4,735) <br>
<b> 2019 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 37-27-2, 57.8% (+$2,185) <br>
<b> 2020 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 37-22-1, 62.7% (+$5,515) <br>
<b> 2021 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 32-32-1, 50.0% (-$725) <br>
<b> 2022 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 41-30-1, 57.8% (+$3,725)  <br>
<b> 2023 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 32-27-1, 54.2% (-$1,310)   <br>
<b> 2024 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 29-25-2, 53.7% (+$855)  <br>
<br>
<b> 2001 Season Over-Under: </b> 3-2 (60.0%) <br>
<b> 2002 Season Over-Under: </b> 121-91-3 (57.1%) <br>
<b> 2003 Season Over-Under: </b> 126-132-2 (48.8%) <br>
<b> 2004 Season Over-Under: </b> 139-124-4 (52.9%) <br>
<b> 2005 Season Over-Under: </b> 117-145-4 (44.7%) <br>
<b> 2006 Season Over-Under: </b> 129-132-5 (49.4%) <br>
<b> 2007 Season Over-Under: </b> 136-145-3, 48.4% (-$1,900) <br>
<b> 2008 Season Over-Under: </b> 137-125-6, 52.3% (+$860) <br>
<b> 2009 Season Over-Under: </b> 128-135-4, 48.7% (-$3,195) <br>
<b> 2010 Season Over-Under: </b> 128-135-5, 48.7% (-$5) <br>
<b> 2011 Season Over-Under: </b> 131-131-5, 50.0% (+$135) <br>
<b> 2012 Season Over-Under: </b> 125-121-5, 50.8% (+$30) <br>
<b> 2013 Season Over-Under: </b> 132-130-5, 50.4% (-$340) <br>
<b> 2015 Season Over-Under: </b> 143-119-5, 54.6% ($0) <br>
<b> 2016 Season Over-Under: </b> 123-141-1, 46.6% (+$95) <br>
<b> 2017 Season Over-Under: </b> 136-139-2, 49.5% (+$640) <br>
<b> 2018 Season Over-Under: </b> 118-128-3, 48.0% (-$225) <br>
<b> 2019 Season Over-Under: </b> 126-133-4, 48.6% (-$50) <br>
<b> 2020 Season Over-Under: </b> 141-122-6, 53.6% ($0) <br>
<b> 2021 Season Over-Under: </b> 132-151-3, 46.6% ($0) <br>
<b> 2022 Season Over-Under: </b> 133-149-2, 47.2% (-$225)  <br>
<b> 2023 Season Over-Under: </b> 145-135-3, 51.8% (+$200)   <br>
<b> 2024 Season Over-Under: </b> 141-138-6, 50.5% (+$95)   <br>


<br>
<b> 2007 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> +$1,035 <br>
<b> 2008 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> +$1,775 <br>
<b> 2009 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> +$865 <br>
<b> 2010 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> -$200 <br>
<b> 2011 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> +$590 <br>
<b> 2012 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> -$1,685 <br>
<b> 2013 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> +$2,245 <br>
<b> 2015 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> -$855 <br>
<b> 2016 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> -$275 <br>
<b> 2017 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> -$510 <br>
<b> 2018 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> +$1,495 <br>
<b> 2019 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> -$1,715 <br>
<b> 2020 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> +$4,975 <br>
<b> 2021 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> +$3,455 <br>
<b> 2022 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> +$5,720 <br>
<b> 2023 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> -$2,565 <br>
<b> 2024 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: </b> +$2,230 <br>
<br>
<b> 2006 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 3-3 (50%) <br>
<b> 2007 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 3-3, 50.0% (-$400) <br> 
<b> 2008 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 6-1, 85.7% (+$3,720) <br> 
<b> 2009 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 3-2, 60.0% (+$640) <br> 
<b> 2010 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 2-4, 33.3% (-$1,810) <br> 
<b> 2011 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 5-2, 71.4% (+$1,870) <br> 
<b> 2012 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 3-2, 60.0% (+$560) <br> 
<b> 2013 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 6-0, 100% (+$3,900) <br> 
<b> 2014 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 2-4, 33.3% (-$1,350) <br> 
<b> 2015 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 3-3, 50.0% (-$100) <br>
<b> 2016 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 5-1, 83.3% (+$2,780) <br> 
<b> 2017 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 4-2, 66.7% (+$1,040) <br> 
<b> 2018 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 4-3, 57.1% (-$640) <br> 
<b> 2019 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 3-3-1, 50.0% (-$625) <br> 
<b> 2020 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 3-2, 60.0% (+$665) <br> 
<b> 2021 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 2-3, 40.0% (-$920) <br> 
<b> 2022 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 3-4, 42.9% (-$1,615) <br>
<b> 2023 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 2-5, 28.6% (-$2,550) <br>
<b> 2024 NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 2-4, 33.3% (-$1,445) <br> 
<br>
<b> Career NFL Picks Against The Spread: </b> 3,686-3,402-211, 52.0%  (+$25,660) <br>
<b> Career 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 1,193-1,066-58 (52.8%) <br>
<b> Career 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: </b> 601-530-27 (53.1%) <br>
<b> Career Over-Under: </b> 3,122-3,080-81 (50.3%) <br> 
<b> Career Second-Half NFL Picks: </b> 23-16-1 (59.0%) <br>
<b> Career NFL Picks of the Month: </b> 51-39-1 (56.7%) <br>
 <br> 

</div>

<br> <br>

<font size = 5> My Team-by-Team ATS Record </font> <br>
<font size = "2"> <i> This section shows how well I do when picking each team this year. The purpose is to see how well I read each team. Pushes are not 
displayed. Winning/losing streak in parentheses.  </i> </font>

<br> <br>



<table width="99%" border="0">
  <tr> 
    <td width ="24%"> <div class = 'article'> <b> Cowboys: </b> 7-10    </div></td>
    <td width = "24%"> <div class = 'article'> <b> Bears: </b> 6-11   </div></td>
    <td width = "24%"> <div class = 'article'> <b> Bucs: </b> 14-3   </div></td>
    <td width = "24%"> <div class = 'article'> <b> 49ers: </b> 13-6   </div></td>
  </tr>
 <tr>
	<td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Eagles: </b> 7-11   </div>  </td>
    <td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Lions: </b> 8-9    </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> Falcons: </b> 9-7    </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> Cardinals: </b> 9-8    </div></td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
	<td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Giants: </b> 5-11     </div>  </td>
    <td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Packers: </b> 6-10  </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> Panthers: </b> 10-8    </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> Rams: </b> 12-8    </div></td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
	<td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Redskins: </b> 6-11   </div>  </td>
    <td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Vikings: </b> 11-6  </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> Saints: </b> 14-3   </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> Seahawks: </b> 12-7   </div></td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
	<td> <div class = 'article'> </div>  </td>
    <td> <div class = 'article'>  </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'>  </div></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
	<td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Bills: </b>  8-11     </div>  </td>
    <td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Bengals: </b> 11-6    </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> Colts: </b> 9-7  </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> Broncos: </b> 11-8     </div></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
	<td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Dolphins: </b> 9-8     </div>  </td>
    <td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Browns: </b> 7-10  </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> Jaguars: </b> 10-8   </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> Chargers: </b> 7-11    </div></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
	<td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Jets: </b> 7-10     </div>  </td>
    <td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Ravens: </b> 6-11  </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> Texans: </b> 11-8     </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> Chiefs: </b> 5-12     </div></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
	<td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Patriots: </b> 13-7    </div>  </td>
    <td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Steelers: </b> 4-13    </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> Titans: </b> 9-8    </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> Raiders: </b> 12-5     </div></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
	<td> <div class = 'article'> </div>  </td>
    <td> <div class = 'article'>  </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'>  </div></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
	<td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Divisional: </b> 46-52 (2011-24: 654-616) </div>  </td>
    <td> <div class = 'article'> <b> 2x Game Edge: </b> 44-47 (2011-24: 436-413) </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> 2x Motivation Edge: </b> 46-47   (2011-24: 560-486) </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> 2x Spread Edge: </b> 43-33  (2011-24: 261-258) </div></td>
 </tr>


 <tr>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> 2x Vegas Edge: </b> 62-43    (2011-24: 511-522) </div></td>
	<td> <div class = 'article'> <b> 2x Trend Edge: </b> 12-15   (2011-24: 336-308) </div>  </td>
    <td> <div class = 'article'> <b> Double Edge: </b> 22-17   (2011-24: 230-208) </div></td>
    <td><div class = 'article'> <b> Triple Edge: </b> 9-3    (2011-24: 38-47) </div></td>

 </tr>



</table>




<div class = 'small'>

<br>


2003 Preseason:

<a href =
"pred2003_P3.php">3</a> |
<a href =
"pred2003_P4.php">4</a> |
<a href =
"pred2003_P4.php">5</a> 
<br>
2003 Season:
<a href =
"pred2003_01.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2003_02.php">2</a> | 

<a href =
"pred2003_03.php">3</a> |
<a href =
"pred2003_04.php">4</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2003_05.php">5</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2003_06.php">
6</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2003_07.php">7</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2003_08.php">8</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2003_09.php">
9</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2003_10.php">10</a> |
 
<a href =
"pred2003_11.php">11</a> | 
<a href =
"pred2003_12.php">12</a>
| 
<a href =
"pred2003_13.php">13</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2003_14.php">
14</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2003_15.php">15</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2003_16.php">16</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2003_17.php">17</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2003_18.php">18</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2003_20.php">20</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2003_21.php">XXXVIII</a>

<br>


2004 Preseason:

<a href =
"pred2004_P1.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_P2.php">2</a> |
<a href =
"pred2004_P3.php">3</a> |
<a href =
"pred2004_P4.php">4</a> 
<br>
2004 Season:
<a href =
"pred2004_01.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_02.php">2</a> | 

<a href =
"pred2004_03.php">3</a> |
<a href =
"pred2004_04.php">4</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_05.php">5</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_06.php">
6</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_07.php">7</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_08.php">8</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_09.php">
9</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_10.php">10</a> |
 
<a href =
"pred2004_11.php">11</a> | 
<a href =
"pred2004_12.php">12</a>
| 
<a href =
"pred2004_13.php">13</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_14.php">
14</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_15.php">15</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_16.php">16</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_17.php">17</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_18.php">18</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_19.php">19</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_20.php">20</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2004_21.php">XXXIX</a>

<br>
2005 Preseason:

<a href =
"pred2005_P1.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_P2.php">2</a> |
<a href =
"pred2005_P3.php">3</a> |
<a href =
"pred2005_P4.php">4</a> 
<br>
2005 Season:
<a href =
"pred2005_01.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_02.php">2</a> | 

<a href =
"pred2005_03.php">3</a> |
<a href =
"pred2005_04.php">4</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_05.php">5</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_06.php">
6</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_07.php">7</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_08.php">8</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_09.php">
9</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_10.php">10</a> |
 
<a href =
"pred2005_11.php">11</a> | 
<a href =
"pred2005_12.php">12</a>
| 
<a href =
"pred2005_13.php">13</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_14.php">
14</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_15.php">15</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_16.php">16</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_17.php">17</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_18.php">18</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_19.php">19</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_20.php">20</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2005_21.php">XL</a>

<br>
2006 Preseason:

<a href =
"pred2006_P1.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_P2.php">2</a> |
<a href =
"pred2006_P3.php">3</a> |
<a href =
"pred2006_P4.php">4</a> 
<br>
2006 Season:
<a href =
"pred2006_01.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_02.php">2</a> | 

<a href =
"pred2006_03.php">3</a> |
<a href =
"pred2006_04.php">4</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_05.php">5</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_06.php">
6</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_07.php">7</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_08.php">8</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_09.php">
9</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_10.php">10</a> |
 
<a href =
"pred2006_11.php">11</a> | 
<a href =
"pred2006_12.php">12</a>
| 
<a href =
"pred2006_13.php">13</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_14.php">
14</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_15.php">15</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_16.php">16</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_17.php">17</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_18.php">18</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_19.php">19</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_20.php">20</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2006_21.php">XLI</a>

<br>
2007 Preseason:

<a href =
"pred2007_P1.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_P2.php">2</a> | 
<a href =
"pred2007_P3.php">3</a> |
<a href =
"pred2007_P4.php">4</a>
<br>
2007 Season:

<a href =
"pred2007_01.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_02.php">2</a> | 

<a href =
"pred2007_03.php">3</a> |
<a href =
"pred2007_04.php">4</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_05.php">5</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_06.php">
6</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_07.php">7</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_08.php">8</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_09.php">
9</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_10.php">10</a> |
 
<a href =
"pred2007_11.php">11</a> | 
<a href =
"pred2007_12.php">12</a>
| 
<a href =
"pred2007_13.php">13</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_14.php">
14</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_15.php">15</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_16.php">16</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_17.php">17</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_18.php">18</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_19.php">19</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_20.php">20</a>
|
<a href =
"pred2007_21.php">XLII</a>
|


<br>

2008 Preseason:

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_P1.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_P2.php"> 2</a>
|
<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_P3.php"> 3</a>
|
<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_P4.php"> 4</a>
|
<br>
2008 Season:

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_01.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_02.php">2</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_03.php">3</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_04.php">4</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_05.php">5</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_06.php">6</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_07.php">7</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_08.php">8</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_09.php">9</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_10.php">10</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_11.php">11</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_12.php">12</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_13.php">13</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_14.php">14</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_15.php">15</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_16.php">16</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_17.php">17</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_18.php">18</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_19.php">19</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_20.php">20</a> | 

<a href =
"freenflpicks2008_21.php">XLIII</a> | 


<br>
2009 Season:


<a href =
"nflpicks2009_01.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2009_02.php">2</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_03.php">3</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_04.php">4</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_05.php">5</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_06.php">6</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_07.php">7</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_08.php">8</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_09.php">9</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_10.php">10</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_11.php">11</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_12.php">12</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_13.php">13</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_14.php">14</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_15.php">15</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_16.php">16</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_17.php">17</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_18.php">18</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_19.php">19</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_20.php">20</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2009_21.php">XLIV</a> |



<br>

2010 Preseason:

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_preseason1.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2010_preseason2.php"> 2</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2010_preseason3.php"> 3</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2010_preseason4.php"> 4</a>
|
 


<br>
2010 Season:


<a href =
"nflpicks2010_01.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2010_02.php">2</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_03.php">3</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_04.php">4</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_05.php">5</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_06.php">6</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_07.php">7</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_08.php">8</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_09.php">9</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_10.php">10</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_11.php">11</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_12.php">12</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_13.php">13</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_14.php">14</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_15.php">15</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_16.php">16</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_17.php">17</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_18.php">18</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_19.php">19</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_20.php">20</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2010_21.php">XLV</a> |


<br>

2011 Preseason:

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_preseason1.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2011_preseason2.php"> 2</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2011_preseason3.php"> 3</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2011_preseason4.php"> 4</a>
|


<br>
2011 Season:


<a href =
"nflpicks2011_01.php"> 1</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2011_02.php">2</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_03.php">3</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_04.php">4</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_05.php">5</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_06.php">6</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_07.php">7</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_08.php">8</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_09.php">9</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_10.php">10</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_11.php">11</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_12.php">12</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_13.php">13</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_14.php">14</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_15.php">15</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_16.php">16</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_17.php">17</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_18.php">18</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_19.php">19</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_20.php">20</a> | 

<a href =
"nflpicks2011_21.php">XLVI</a> |



<br>

2012 Preseason:

<a href =
"nflpicks2012_preseason1.php"> 1</a>
| 
<a href =
"nflpicks2012_preseason2.php"> 2</a>
| 
<a href =
"nflpicks2012_preseason3.php"> 3</a>
| 
<a href =
"nflpicks2012_preseason4.php"> 4</a>
| 


<br>
2012 Season:


<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_01.php"><b> Week 1 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_02.php"><b> Week 2 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_03.php"><b> Week 3 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_04.php"><b> Week 4 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_05.php"><b> Week 5 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_06.php"><b> Week 6 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_07.php"><b> Week 7 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_08.php"><b> Week 8 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_09.php"><b> Week 9 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_10.php"><b> Week 10 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_11.php"><b> Week 11 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_12.php"><b> Week 12 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_13.php"><b> Week 13 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_14.php"><b> Week 14 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_15.php"><b> Week 15 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_16.php"><b> Week 16 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_17.php"><b> Week 17 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_18.php"><b> Week 18 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_19.php"><b> Week 19 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_20.php"><b> Week 20 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2012_21.php"><b> Super Bowl XLVII NFL Pick</b></a>           

<br>

2013 Preseason:

<a href =
"nflpicks2013_preseason1.php"> 1</a>
| 
<a href =
"nflpicks2013_preseason2.php"> 2</a>
| 
<a href =
"nflpicks2013_preseason3.php"> 3</a>
| 
<a href =
"nflpicks2013_preseason4.php"> 4</a>
| 


<br>
2013 Season:


<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_01.php"><b> Week 1 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_02.php"><b> Week 2 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_03.php"><b> Week 3 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_04.php"><b> Week 4 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_05.php"><b> Week 5 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_06.php"><b> Week 6 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_07.php"><b> Week 7 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_08.php"><b> Week 8 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_09.php"><b> Week 9 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_10.php"><b> Week 10 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_11.php"><b> Week 11 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_12.php"><b> Week 12 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_13.php"><b> Week 13 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_14.php"><b> Week 14 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_15.php"><b> Week 15 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_16.php"><b> Week 16 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_17.php"><b> Week 17 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_18.php"><b> Week 18 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_19.php"><b> Week 19 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2013_20.php"><b> Week 20 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"picks.php"><b> Super Bowl XLVIII NFL Pick</b></a>             

<br>
2014 Preseason:

<a href =
"nflpicks2014_preseason1.php"> 1</a>
|  
<a href =
"nflpicks2014_preseason2.php"> 2</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2014_preseason3.php"> 3</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2014_preseason4.php"> 4</a>
|

<br>
2014 Season:


<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_01.php"><b> Week 1 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_02.php"><b> Week 2 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_03.php"><b> Week 3 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_04.php"><b> Week 4 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_05.php"><b> Week 5 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_06.php"><b> Week 6 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_07.php"><b> Week 7 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_08.php"><b> Week 8 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_09.php"><b> Week 9 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_10.php"><b> Week 10 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_11.php"><b> Week 11 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_12.php"><b> Week 12 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_13.php"><b> Week 13 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_14.php"><b> Week 14 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_15.php"><b> Week 15 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_16.php"><b> Week 16 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_17.php"><b> Week 17 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_18.php"><b> Week 18 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_19.php"><b> Week 19 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_20.php"><b> Week 20 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2014_21.php"><b> Super Bowl XLIX Pick</b></a>     



<br>
2015 Preseason:

<a href =
"nflpicks2015_preseason1.php"> 1</a>
|   
<a href =
"nflpicks2015_preseason2.php"> 2</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2015_preseason3.php"> 3</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2015_preseason4.php"> 4</a>
|

<br>
2015 Season:


<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_01.php"><b> Week 1 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_02.php"><b> Week 2 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_03.php"><b> Week 3 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_04.php"><b> Week 4 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_05.php"><b> Week 5 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_06.php"><b> Week 6 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_07.php"><b> Week 7 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_08.php"><b> Week 8 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_09.php"><b> Week 9 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_10.php"><b> Week 10 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_11.php"><b> Week 11 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_12.php"><b> Week 12 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_13.php"><b> Week 13 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_14.php"><b> Week 14 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_15.php"><b> Week 15 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_16.php"><b> Week 16 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_17.php"><b> Week 17 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_18.php"><b> Week 18 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_19.php"><b> Week 19 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2015_20.php"><b> Week 20 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"picks.php"><b> Super Bowl 50 NFL Pick</b></a>       

 


<br>
2016 Preseason:

<a href =
"nflpicks2016_preseason1.php"> 1</a>
|   
<a href =
"nflpicks2016_preseason2.php"> 2</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2016_preseason3.php"> 3</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2016_preseason4.php"> 4</a>
|

<br>
2016 Season:


<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_01.php"><b> Week 1 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_02.php"><b> Week 2 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_03.php"><b> Week 3 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_04.php"><b> Week 4 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_05.php"><b> Week 5 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_06.php"><b> Week 6 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_07.php"><b> Week 7 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_08.php"><b> Week 8 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_09.php"><b> Week 9 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_10.php"><b> Week 10 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_11.php"><b> Week 11 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_12.php"><b> Week 12 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_13.php"><b> Week 13 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_14.php"><b> Week 14 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_15.php"><b> Week 15 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_16.php"><b> Week 16 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_17.php"><b> Week 17 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_18.php"><b> Week 18 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_19.php"><b> Week 19 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2016_20.php"><b> Week 20 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"picks.php"><b> Super Bowl LI NFL Pick</b></a>              



<br>
2017 Preseason:

<a href =
"nflpicks2017_preseason1.php"> 1</a>
|   
<a href =
"nflpicks2017_preseason2.php"> 2</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2017_preseason3.php"> 3</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2017_preseason4.php"> 4</a>


<br>
2017 Season:


<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_01.php"><b> Week 1 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_02.php"><b> Week 2 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_03.php"><b> Week 3 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_04.php"><b> Week 4 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_05.php"><b> Week 5 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_06.php"><b> Week 6 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_07.php"><b> Week 7 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_08.php"><b> Week 8 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_09.php"><b> Week 9 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_10.php"><b> Week 10 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_11.php"><b> Week 11 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_12.php"><b> Week 12 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_13.php"><b> Week 13 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_14.php"><b> Week 14 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_15.php"><b> Week 15 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_16.php"><b> Week 16 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_17.php"><b> Week 17 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_18.php"><b> Week 18 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_19.php"><b> Week 19 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_20.php"><b> Week 20 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2017_21.php"><b> Super Bowl LII NFL Pick</b></a>               


<br>
2018 Preseason:

<a href =
"nflpicks2018_preseason1.php"> 1</a>
|    
<a href =
"nflpicks2018_preseason2.php"> 2</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2018_preseason3.php"> 3</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2018_preseason4.php"> 4</a>

    
<br>
2018 Season:


<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_01.php"><b> Week 1 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_02.php"><b> Week 2 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_03.php"><b> Week 3 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_04.php"><b> Week 4 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_05.php"><b> Week 5 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_06.php"><b> Week 6 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_07.php"><b> Week 7 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_08.php"><b> Week 8 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_09.php"><b> Week 9 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_10.php"><b> Week 10 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_11.php"><b> Week 11 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_12.php"><b> Week 12 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_13.php"><b> Week 13 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_14.php"><b> Week 14 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_15.php"><b> Week 15 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_16.php"><b> Week 16 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_17.php"><b> Week 17 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_18.php"><b> Week 18 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_19.php"><b> Week 19 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2018_20.php"><b> Week 20 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"picks.php"><b> Super Bowl LIII NFL Pick</b></a>             




<br>
2019 Preseason:

<a href =
"nflpicks2019_preseason1.php"> 1</a>
|  
<a href =
"nflpicks2019_preseason2.php"> 2</a>
| 
<a href =
"nflpicks2019_preseason3.php"> 3</a>
|
<a href =
"nflpicks2019_preseason4.php"> 4</a>
    
<br>
2019 Season:


<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_01.php"><b> Week 1 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_02.php"><b> Week 2 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_03.php"><b> Week 3 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_04.php"><b> Week 4 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_05.php"><b> Week 5 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_06.php"><b> Week 6 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_07.php"><b> Week 7 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_08.php"><b> Week 8 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_09.php"><b> Week 9 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_10.php"><b> Week 10 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_11.php"><b> Week 11 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_12.php"><b> Week 12 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_13.php"><b> Week 13 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_14.php"><b> Week 14 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_15.php"><b> Week 15 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_16.php"><b> Week 16 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_17.php"><b> Week 17 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_18.php"><b> Week 18 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_19.php"><b> Week 19 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_20.php"><b> Week 20 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2019_21.php"><b> Super Bowl LIV NFL Pick</b></a>           
<br>


<br>
2020 Season:


<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_01.php"><b> Week 1 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_02.php"><b> Week 2 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_03.php"><b> Week 3 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_04.php"><b> Week 4 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_05.php"><b> Week 5 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_06.php"><b> Week 6 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_07.php"><b> Week 7 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_08.php"><b> Week 8 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_09.php"><b> Week 9 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_10.php"><b> Week 10 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_11.php"><b> Week 11 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_12.php"><b> Week 12 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_13.php"><b> Week 13 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_14.php"><b> Week 14 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_15.php"><b> Week 15 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_16.php"><b> Week 16 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_17.php"><b> Week 17 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_18.php"><b> Week 18 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_19.php"><b> Week 19 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2020_20.php"><b> Week 20 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
picks.php"><b> Super Bowl LV Pick</b></a>              
     
<br>




<br>
2021 Season:


<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_01.php"><b> Week 1 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_02.php"><b> Week 2 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_03.php"><b> Week 3 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_04.php"><b> Week 4 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_05.php"><b> Week 5 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_06.php"><b> Week 6 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_07.php"><b> Week 7 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_08.php"><b> Week 8 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_09.php"><b> Week 9 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_10.php"><b> Week 10 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_11.php"><b> Week 11 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_12.php"><b> Week 12 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_13.php"><b> Week 13 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_14.php"><b> Week 14 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_15.php"><b> Week 15 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_16.php"><b> Week 16 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_17.php"><b> Week 17 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_18.php"><b> Week 18 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_19.php"><b> Week 19 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_20.php"><b> Week 20 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_21.php"><b> Week 21 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2021_22.php"><b> Super Bowl LVI Pick</b></a>             



<br> 



<br>
2022 Season:


<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_01.php"><b> Week 1 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_02.php"><b> Week 2 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_03.php"><b> Week 3 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_04.php"><b> Week 4 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_05.php"><b> Week 5 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_06.php"><b> Week 6 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_07.php"><b> Week 7 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_08.php"><b> Week 8 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_09.php"><b> Week 9 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_10.php"><b> Week 10 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_11.php"><b> Week 11 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_12.php"><b> Week 12 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_13.php"><b> Week 13 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_14.php"><b> Week 14 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_15.php"><b> Week 15 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_16.php"><b> Week 16 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_17.php"><b> Week 17 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_18.php"><b> Week 18 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_19.php"><b> Week 19 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_20.php"><b> Week 20 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_21.php"><b> Week 21 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2022_22.php"><b> Super Bowl LVII NFL Pick</b></a> 




<br>
2023 Season:


<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_01.php"><b> Week 1 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_02.php"><b> Week 2 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_03.php"><b> Week 3 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_04.php"><b> Week 4 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_05.php"><b> Week 5 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_06.php"><b> Week 6 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_07.php"><b> Week 7 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_08.php"><b> Week 8 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_09.php"><b> Week 9 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_10.php"><b> Week 10 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_11.php"><b> Week 11 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_12.php"><b> Week 12 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_13.php"><b> Week 13 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_14.php"><b> Week 14 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_15.php"><b> Week 15 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_16.php"><b> Week 16 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_17.php"><b> Week 17 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_18.php"><b> Week 18 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_19.php"><b> Week 19 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_20.php"><b> Week 20 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_21.php"><b> Week 21 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2023_22.php"><b> Super Bowl LVIII NFL Pick</b></a>            




<br>
2024 Season:


<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_01.php"><b> Week 1 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_02.php"><b> Week 2 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_03.php"><b> Week 3 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_04.php"><b> Week 4 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_05.php"><b> Week 5 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_06.php"><b> Week 6 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_07.php"><b> Week 7 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_08.php"><b> Week 8 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_09.php"><b> Week 9 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_10.php"><b> Week 10 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_11.php"><b> Week 11 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_12.php"><b> Week 12 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_13.php"><b> Week 13 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_14.php"><b> Week 14 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_15.php"><b> Week 15 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_16.php"><b> Week 16 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_17.php"><b> Week 17 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_18.php"><b> Week 18 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_19.php"><b> Week 19 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_20.php"><b> Week 20 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_21.php"><b> Week 21 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2024_22.php"><b> Super Bowl LIX NFL Pick</b></a>
<br> 




<br>
2024 Season:


<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_01.php"><b> Week 1 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_02.php"><b> Week 2 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_03.php"><b> Week 3 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_04.php"><b> Week 4 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_05.php"><b> Week 5 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_06.php"><b> Week 6 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_07.php"><b> Week 7 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_08.php"><b> Week 8 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_09.php"><b> Week 9 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_10.php"><b> Week 10 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_11.php"><b> Week 11 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_12.php"><b> Week 12 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_13.php"><b> Week 13 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_14.php"><b> Week 14 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_15.php"><b> Week 15 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_16.php"><b> Week 16 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_17.php"><b> Week 17 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_18.php"><b> Week 18 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_19.php"><b> Week 19 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_20.php"><b> Week 20 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"nflpicks2025_21.php"><b> Week 21 NFL Picks</b></a>
<br> <a href =
"picks.php"><b> Super Bowl LX NFL Pick</b></a>              




</div>

<br> <br>




]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://walterfootball.com/nflpicks2023_01early.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Quarterback Power Rankings 2023</title>
		<link>https://walterfootball.com/quarterbackpowerrankings2023.php</link>
					<comments>https://walterfootball.com/quarterbackpowerrankings2023.php#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 07:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://walterfootball.com/?p=27794</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Numerous summers ago, I got into an argument with a Facebook friend about Russell Wilson being a top-three NFL quarterback. That, plus Ron Jaworski&#8217;s quarterback list got me thinking about making a power ranking for signal-callers. I figured it would be nice to have this as a yearly feature during the summer. So, here it...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />





<!--test-->



<br /> <br />

Numerous summers ago, I got into an argument with a Facebook friend about Russell Wilson being a top-three NFL quarterback. That, plus Ron Jaworski&#8217;s quarterback list got me thinking about making a power ranking for signal-callers. I figured it would be nice to have this as a yearly feature during the summer. So, here it is. If you disagree with anything on here, leave a comment below. Note that I&#8217;m grading the starters of each team only, so don&#8217;t be confused if a talented backup is left off the list.   <br /> <br />

Follow me <a href="http://twitter.com/walterfootball" target="blank" rel="noopener">@walterfootball</a> for updates.    <br /> <br />
 




<h2> NFL Quarterback Power Rankings 2023: Updated Aug. 17, 2022 </h2> <br /> <br />






<b> 32. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/DesmondRidder_face.jpg">  Desmond Ridder, Falcons. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;. 2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

The Falcons&#8217; front office did a great job of improving the overall roster this offseason, but the quarterback situation remains a big concern. In limited action last year, Desmond Ridder maintained a horrific 6.2 YPA. It didn&#8217;t look like he was ready for pro action, but perhaps a complete offseason will help him. Having a healthy Kyle Pitts won&#8217;t hurt either. 
 

<br />  <br />



<b> 31. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/JordanLove_face.jpg">  Jordan Love, Packers. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

&#8220;No Cookie&#8221; Jordan Love was seen as a very raw quarterback when he entered the NFL. It&#8217;s still unclear how Love will perform, but perhaps Green Bay&#8217;s coaching staff will be able to get the most out of him. Love is the ultimate wild card in 2023. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if he had a Pro Bowl season, and yet I also wouldn&#8217;t be shocked if he happened to be benched at some point. 
 

<br />  <br />









<b> 30. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/AnthonyRichardson_face.jpg">  Anthony Richardson, Colts. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

Anthony Richardson has tremendous upside because he has a huge arm and was able to run just as fast as Justin Fields at the combine. However, he&#8217;s incredibly raw, so it may take him some time to develop. 
 

<br />  <br />




<b> 29. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/BakerMayfield_face.jpg">  Baker Mayfield, Buccaneers. 2022 Ranking: 15. 2021 Ranking: 11. 2020 Ranking: 20. 2019 Ranking: 13. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

Baker Mayfield finished the season well when Sean McVay was coaching him up, but he was a complete disaster in Carolina. Mayfield&#8217;s pocket awareness was disastrous, as he has regressed tremendously since his stellar 2020 season. The coaching in Tampa Bay won&#8217;t be nearly as good as it was in Los Angeles, so it seems as though Mayfield made a huge mistake by leaving the Rams.

<br />  <br />



<b> 28. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/SamHowell_face.jpg">  Sam Howell, Redskins. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

Slingin&#8217; Sammy Howell was once the top-overall pick in a 2022 NFL Mock Draft. Things obviously changed in the two years between that mock draft&#8217;s creation and the actual 2022 NFL Draft, as Howell slipped to the fifth round. Howell, however, was impressive in the preseason ahead of the 2022 campaign, and he then shined in his lone start despite battling Dallas&#8217; superb defense. Howell figures to perform well in his first full season as a starter. At the very least, he won&#8217;t be worse than Carson Wentz was.

 
 

<br />  <br />






<b> 27. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/CJStroud_face.jpg">  C.J. Stroud, Texans. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

C.J. Stroud had a heroic performance against Georgia in the college football playoff semi-final. He wasn&#8217;t known for his rushing ability, but he used his 4.6 speed on crucial drives. With his quality field vision, solid accuracy, and arm strength, it would be a surprise if Stroud busted in the NFL.


<br />  <br />









 


<br />
<center>









</center>
<br />  <br />

 


<b> 26. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fballBryceYoung_face.jpg">  Bryce Young, Panthers. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

Bryce Young is an athletic quarterback who possesses plus accuracy and great instincts. The only issue is his size. Kyler Murray has proven that he can succeed in the NFL with that type of build, but he has also shown that he is very injury-prone. Young will have to avoid the same issues Murray has been plagued by his entire career. 
 

<br />  <br />



<b> 25. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/MacJones_face.jpg">  Mac Jones, Patriots. 2022 Ranking: 16. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

I can&#8217;t believe Mac Jones was ranked 16th here last year. Jones was horrific last year, as he spent more time yelling at the coaching staff than he did leading successful drives. Granted, Jones didn&#8217;t have a real offensive coordinator, but he was still outplayed by rookie Bailey Zappe. 
 

<br />  <br />



<b> 24. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/KennyPickett_face.jpg">  Kenny Pickett, Steelers. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: 27. 2018 Ranking: 26. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

Kenny Pickett had some bright moments as a rookie, including some late game-winning drives toward the end of the season. There were some horrific performances as well. However, Pickett will have more experience and a bolstered offensive line to aid him this season. Pickett put on a clinic versus the Buccaneers in his sole drive in the preseason opener, so perhaps that&#8217;s a sign of things to come. 

<br />  <br />




<b> 23.  <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/RTannehill_face.jpg">  Ryan Tannehill, Titans. 2022 Ranking: 20.  2021 Ranking: 17. 2020 Ranking: 26. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: 24. 2017 Ranking: 19.  2016 Ranking: 26.  2015 Ranking: 14.  </b>   <br />

Ryan Tannehill was completely exposed in the loss to the Bengals in the playoffs a couple of years ago. He then regressed after losing A.J. Brown to the Eagles. It seemed as though the Titans would move on from Tannehill and begin anew, but they obtained DeAndre Hopkins instead. Hopkins will help Tannehill rebound this season, but it&#8217;s still likely that Tannehill will be gone after this year. 

<br />  <br />


















<br />
<center>









</center>
<br /> <br />




<b> 22. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/KylerMurray_face.jpg">  Kyler Murray, Cardinals. 2022 Ranking: 12. 2021 Ranking: 8. 2020 Ranking: 11. 2019 Ranking: 22. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;. 2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;. </b>   <br />

Kyler Murray is a dynamic dual threat, but there are some concerns. There were earlier worries about his presence in the locker room. Even worse, Murray&#8217;s work ethic came into question when his new contract stipulated that he must study four hours of game film on his own every week. Now, Murray is coming off a torn ACL, so he won&#8217;t be fully healthy until 2024. Arizona fans have to wonder if Murray will ever be able to complete a full season, which has yet to happen in his career.   
 

<br />  <br />



<b> 21. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/JimmyGaroppolo_face.jpg">  Jimmy Garoppolo, Raiders. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;.  2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: 21. 2019 Ranking: 17. 2018 Ranking: 11. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

Jimmy Garoppolo has major problems staying on the field. He&#8217;s been a fine game manager when healthy, but keep in mind that this has been under Kyle Shanahan. Garoppolo won&#8217;t be coached nearly as well in Las Vegas as he was in San Francisco. 

<br />  <br />



<b> 20. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/DerekCarr_face.jpg">  Derek Carr, Saints. 2022 Ranking: 14.  2021 Ranking: 22. 2020 Ranking: 25. 2019 Ranking: 24. 2018 Ranking: 14. 2017 Ranking: 5.  2016 Ranking: 18.  2015 Ranking: 26.  </b>   <br />

It&#8217;s hard to believe, but Derek Carr nearly threw for 5,000 yards two years ago (4,804). He completed 68.4 percent of his passes on a 7.7 YPA. Those stats took a big hit in 2022, however. Carr had just 3,522 passing yards, and a 60.8 completion rate. He cried at the podium at one point and was ultimately benched in favor of Jarrett Stidham. Carr would be able to rebound if he were coached well, but Dennis Allen is one of the worst coaches in the NFL.

<br />  <br />




<b> 19. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/BrockPurdy_face.jpg">  Brock Purdy, 49ers. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;. 2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

For a while, Brock Purdy looked like he was going to duplicate what Tom Brady accomplished in 2001. Brady took over for an injured veteran and led his team to the Super Bowl despite being a sixth-round draft pick. Purdy was Mr. Irrelevant, yet he was able to lead the 49ers to the NFC Championship, as he completed 67.1 percent of his passes on an 8.1 YPA and a 13:4 touchdown-to-interception ratio. Purdy suffered an elbow injury, but it appears as though he&#8217;ll be ready for Week 1.
 

<br />  <br />









<b> 18. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/GenoSmith_face.jpg">  Geno Smith, Seahawks. 2022 Ranking: &#8211;.  2021 Ranking: &#8211;. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;. 2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: 30.  </b>   <br />

Geno Smith was considered a steal when the Jets selected him in the second round of the 2013 NFL Draft. Smith was a big bust in New York, but he was able to perservere and work extremely hard. It&#8217;s great to see that Smith&#8217;s relentless work ethic paid off. Smith was great for the Seahawks in his first full season as a starter with the team. He completed an absurd 69.8 percent of his passes, throwing 30 touchdowns and only 11 interceptions. 
 

<br />  <br />




<b> 17. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/RWilson_face.jpg">  Russell Wilson, Broncos. 2022 Ranking: 6. 2021 Ranking: 4. 2020 Ranking: 2. 2019 Ranking: 4. 2018 Ranking: 4. 2017 Ranking: 3.  2016 Ranking: 2.  2015 Ranking: 3.  </b>   <br />

This is the first time Russell Wilson has ever been out of the top 10 in these rankings, but it&#8217;s completely warranted. Wilson was a disaster last year, throwing for only 16 touchdowns, which was by far the fewest in any season of his career. However, it&#8217;s worth pointing out that Nathaniel Hackett&#8217;s miserable coaching was a big part of Wilson&#8217;s struggles, so it shouldn&#8217;t shock anyone if Wilson rebounds in 2023 under Sean Payton.
 

<br />  <br />


 




<b> 16. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/DanielJones_face.jpg">  Daniel Jones, Giants. 2022 Ranking: 27. 2021 Ranking: 28. 2020 Ranking: 16. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

Daniel Jones had more turnovers than touchdowns in his career for a while. That&#8217;s no longer the case, as Jones ceased being a turnover machine. Things predictably improved for Jones after the Giants found a competent coach for him. An improved offensive line and a healthy Saquon Barkley certainly have helped. Now with Darren Waller at his disposal, Jones should continue to improve.  

<br />  <br />



<b> 15. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/JustinFields_face.jpg">  Justin Fields, Bears. 2022 Ranking: 26. 2021 Ranking: 19. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;.  2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;. 2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: 20.  </b>   <br />

A year ago, it seemed as though the Bears set up Justin Fields to fail. They assembled the league&#8217;s worst offensive line to block for him, while the receiving corps had just one talented player in Darnell Mooney. Fields, however, was able to overcome this with so many amazing rushing performances. Chicago&#8217;s front office made amends this offseason, trading for D.J. Moore and acquiring two big upgrades to the offensive line. Fields, as a result, is expected to make a big leap in 2023.
 

<br />  <br />




<b> 14. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/TuaTagovailoa_face.jpg">  Tua Tagovailoa, Dolphins. 2022 Ranking: 19. 2021 Ranking: 26. 2020 Ranking: 30. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

Tua Tagovailoa was incredible at times last year, as he was able to repeatedly connect with his two dynamic receivers for deep gains. Unfortunately for Tagovailoa, he had severe problems staying on the field. Tagovailoa missed so much action this past season, including the playoff game against the Bills. Tagovailoa&#8217;s health will be a major question mark going forward.  
 

<br />  <br />

 








 









<br />
<center>









</center>
<br /> <br />







<b> 13. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/DakPrescott_face.jpg">  Dak Prescott, Cowboys. 2022 Ranking: 11. 2021 Ranking: 13. 2020 Ranking: 19. 2019 Ranking: 25. 2018 Ranking: 21. 2017 Ranking: 12.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

Dak Prescott has played behind a great offensive line for most of his career. He&#8217;s been exposed when some of the blockers have been injured. The improved offensive line helped him last year, but Prescott&#8217;s coaching took a hit with Kellen Moore leaving for the Chargers. Mike McCarthy will cap Prescott&#8217;s upside.
 
<br />  <br />



<b> 12. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/JaredGoff_face.jpg">  Jared Goff, Lions. 2022 Ranking: 24. 2021 Ranking: 27. 2020 Ranking: 23. 2019 Ranking: 14. 2018 Ranking: 19. 2017 Ranking: 30. 2016 Ranking: 29.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

Jared Goff was originally a byproduct of great coaching (Sean McVay, Greg Olson) as well as an elite offensive line. Goff lost Olson and some key blockers after 2018, which would explain a major decline in his production. Goff, however, found a second career in Detroit. Granted, he&#8217;s once again being protected by an elite offensive line, but Goff has worked hard to improve the mental part of his game. 
 

<br />  <br />




<b> 11. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/KCousins_face.jpg">  Kirk Cousins, Vikings. 2022 Ranking: 13. 2021 Ranking: 18. 2020 Ranking: 22. 2019 Ranking: 19. 2018 Ranking: 15. 2017 Ranking: 16.  2016 Ranking: 19.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

Kirk Cousins has the greatest dichotomy when it comes to enduring pressure. Obviously, all quarterbacks are worse when they&#8217;re hounded by opposing pass rushers, but Cousins&#8217; stats take the biggest hit when he&#8217;s pressured. Luckily for Cousins, he has a talented blocking unit in front of him to protect him this year. 
 

<br />  <br />



<b> 10. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/MStafford_face.jpg">  Matthew Stafford, Rams. 2022 Ranking: 7. 2021 Ranking: 9. 2020 Ranking: 15. 2019 Ranking: 18. 2018 Ranking: 12. 2017 Ranking: 9.  2016 Ranking: 13.  2015 Ranking: 15.  </b>   <br />

Matthew Stafford was always limited by bad coaching and a mediocre supporting cast in Detroit. We all saw how great Stafford could be with incredible coaching and a stellar group of receivers and blockers. It was no surprise that he won the Super Bowl in his first year with the Rams. Unfortunately, things have taken a turn for the worse regarding Stafford&#8217;s health. It seems unlikely that he&#8217;ll last all 17 games in 2023.
 

<br />  <br />
 

<b> 9. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/LamarJackson_face.jpg">  Lamar Jackson, QB, Ravens. 2022 Ranking: 10. 2021 Ranking: 7. 2020 Ranking: 7. 2019 Ranking: 23. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;. 2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;. </b>   <br />

Despite what some may think, Lamar Jackson is a terrific quarterback. He&#8217;s a constant presence in the top 10 of this list for a reason. Jackson hasn&#8217;t completed worse than 62.3 percent of his passes if you exclude his rookie season, and his YPA has always been 6.9 or better. He has thrown 101 touchdowns to 38 interceptions in his career. Now, consider the garbage he had to throw to last year besides Mark Andrews, who was banged up. Jackson will be much better in 2023, but the question is: Can he stay healthy? Jackson hasn&#8217;t been able to finish his past two seasons.
 

<br />  <br />









<br />
<center>









</center>
<br /> <br />


 







<b> 8. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/DeShaunWatson_face.jpg">  Deshaun Watson, Browns. 2022 Ranking: 9. 2021 Ranking: 6. 2020 Ranking: 5. 2019 Ranking: 11. 2018 Ranking: 10. 2017 Ranking: 24.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;. </b>   <br />

Deshaun Watson was horrendous when he returned from his suspension last year. He was so bad that he made Jacoby Brissett look like an All-Pro by comparison. However, Watson hadn&#8217;t played football in two years and wasn&#8217;t familiar at all with his supporting cast. There&#8217;s a real chance he reverts to 2020 form with an entire offseason to re-adjust.
 

<br />  <br />



<b> 7. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/TrevorLawrence_face.jpg">  Trevor Lawrence, Jaguars. 2022 Ranking: 18. 2021 Ranking: 12. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

Trevor Lawrence was able to rebound from his horrendous rookie season to lead the Jaguars into the second round of the playoffs last year. It shouldn&#8217;t have been surprising to anyone that Lawrence would improve, given that he was coached so poorly by Urban Meyer. Lawrence should continue to improve, especially now that he has Calvin Ridley at his disposal. 
 

<br />  <br />
 
  
<b> 6. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/ARodgers_face.jpg">  Aaron Rodgers, Jets. 2022 Ranking: 2. 2021 Ranking: 2. 2020 Ranking: 4. 2019 Ranking: 3. 2018 Ranking: 2. 2017 Ranking: 1.  2016 Ranking: 1.  2015 Ranking: 1.  </b>   <br />

Aaron Rodgers was the reigning two-time MVP heading into 2022, but he had a poor season by his standards; he threw more interceptions (12) than any season in his career since his rookie campaign. There&#8217;s a slight chance this is permanent regression, but it can&#8217;t be ignored that Rodgers was playing with a broken thumb. Rodgers, who should be healthy now, will be heading into 2023 in F-U mode in an attempt to prove the Packers wrong. I like his odds of doing so.
 
 

<br />  <br />


 






<br />









<br />














<b> 5. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/JoshAllen_face.jpg">  Josh Allen, Bills. 2022 Ranking: 4. 2021 Ranking: 5. 2020 Ranking: 10. 2019 Ranking: 29. 2018 Ranking: 31. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

Josh Allen was a raw passer with great mobility as a rookie, and then he made a big leap in his second season. And yet, he made the same type of jump in his third season, becoming a top-five NFL quarterback. Allen&#8217;s stats were stagnant between his third and fourth seasons, but perhaps they&#8217;ll improve in 2023 because his team drafted Dalton Kincaid and made some upgrades to the interior offensive line.  
 
<br />  <br />



<b> 4. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/JalenHurts_face.jpg">  Jalen Hurts, Eagles. 2022 Ranking: 23. 2021 Ranking: 31. 2020 Ranking: &#8211;. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

Jalen Hurts&#8217; relentless work ethic allowed him to improve his passing ability by leaps and bounds. He emerged as an MVP favorite last season, ultimately leading the Eagles to the Super Bowl. It&#8217;s possible that Hurts wasn&#8217;t even 100 percent in the playoffs as a result of a shoulder injury he suffered in December. Hurts should continue to bolster his game, so he should be considered one of the leading candidates to win MVP in 2023.
 

<br />  <br />





<b> 3. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/JustinHerbert_face.jpg">  Justin Herbert, Chargers.  2022 Ranking: 8. 2021 Ranking: 10. 2020 Ranking: 31. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

Justin Herbert took the NFL by storm as a rookie. Now, three years later, he can say that he has the most passing yards (14,089) of any quarterback in NFL history through three seasons. What&#8217;s crazier is that Herbert has done this with a supporting cast that is frequently suffering injuries. His Pro Bowl left tackle, Rashawn Slater, was out most of 2022, while Keenan Allen and Mike Williams also missed a bunch of games. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what Herbert can accomplish with a complete supporting cast intact.

<br />  <br />
 




<b> 2. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/JoeBurrow_face.jpg">  Joe Burrow, Bengals. 2022 Ranking: 3. 2021 Ranking: 16. 2020 Ranking: 17. 2019 Ranking: &#8211;. 2018 Ranking: &#8211;. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;. 2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;. </b>   <br />

Joe Burrow is the No. 1 quarterback against the blitz, which is remarkable, given how young he is. Burrow is only entering his fourth season, and he&#8217;s expected to make another big leap this year because he has an improved offensive line. Burrow&#8217;s one weakness has been getting off to slow starts, as Cincinnati began 0-2 last year. Burrow will have a tall task to avoid that again, as his team battles much-improved Cleveland in Week 1. 

 

<br />  <br />






<b> 1. <img decoding="async" src="/images/fball/PatrickMahomes_face.jpg">  Patrick Mahomes, Chiefs. 2022 Ranking: 1. 2021 Ranking: 1. 2020 Ranking: 1. 2019 Ranking: 2. 2018 Ranking: 16. 2017 Ranking: &#8211;.  2016 Ranking: &#8211;.  2015 Ranking: &#8211;.  </b>   <br />

A year ago, someone working the ticket counter at a Las Vegas sportsbook told me that &#8220;Patrick Mahomes is no longer a difference maker at this stage of his career.&#8221; This person is clearly an idiot. Mahomes continues to be the best quarterback in the NFL, and there&#8217;s no doubting that. He has no weaknesses. He has a rocket arm, great accuracy, dangerous mobility, infectious leadership, a very high football IQ, and a tireless work ethic. Mahomes has just five years of starting experience, so he&#8217;s only entering the prime of his career right now.
 

<br />  <br />

 




 



<br /> <br />  


<div id="comments"><span style="font-weight:bold; font-size:16pt;"></span></div>

<br />

<br />





 










<br /> <br /> <br />





<font size = 4>



<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/draft2027.php"> 2027 NFL Mock Draft</a> </b> - April 30 <br> <br> <br>



<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/fantasy2026runningbacks.php"> Fantasy Football Rankings</a> </b>  - April 5 <br> <br> <br>









<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/picks.php"> NFL Picks</a> </b>  -  Feb. 9 <br> <br> <br>








<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/nflpowerrankings.php"> NFL Power Rankings</a> </b> - Jan. 26 <br>  <br> <br>






























































 





















































































 




 














































 





 



























































  





 













































































































 





 


 





















 

































  

















 






















 




 
 

</font>







<br /> <br />



</CENTER>



]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://walterfootball.com/quarterbackpowerrankings2023.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Top 100 Players of 2023: Analysis</title>
		<link>https://walterfootball.com/nfltop100_2023.php</link>
					<comments>https://walterfootball.com/nfltop100_2023.php#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 04:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/NFL%20Top%20100%20Players%20of%202023:%20Analysis</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I berated the players for their crappy rankings in the Top 100 NFL Players of 2011 and people seemed to like that. I ran other critiques of the Top 100 NFL Players of 2012, the Top 100 NFL Players of 2013, the Top 100 NFL Players of 2014, the Top 100 NFL Players of 2015,...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[I berated the players for their crappy rankings in the <a href="/nfltop100.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2011</a> and people seemed to like that. I ran other critiques of the <a href="/nfltop100_2012.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2012</a>, the <a href="/nfltop100_2013.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2013</a>, the <a href="/nfltop100_2014.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2014</a>, the <a href="/nfltop100_2015.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2015</a>, the <a href="/nfltop100_2016.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2016</a>, the <a href="/nfltop100_2017.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2017</a>, the <a href="/nfltop100_2018.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2018</a>, the <a href="/nfltop100_2019.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2019</a>, the <a href="/nfltop100_2020.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2020</a>, the <a href="/nfltop100_2021.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2021</a> and the <a href="/nfltop100_2022.php"> Top 100 NFL Players of 2022</a>. I&#8217;ve gotten many requests to keep doing this, so here we are. <br /> <br />

I really find it amazing how NFL players can screw up these rankings. As I pointed out before, if you&#8217;re in an office, you and your other co-workers can probably rank the best employees and come to a smart consensus. NFL players, however, continuously bungle things like this, probably because many of them don&#8217;t watch film or pay attention to the other games. They ranked Michael Turner in the top 100 eleven years ago, yet the guy couldn&#8217;t even move. Seven years ago, Carson Palmer was 12th, Blake Bortles was 56th, and Chris Ivory was 78th! Here was my reaction:  <br /> <br />

<i>
OH MY GOD. CHRIS IVORY IS 78TH?!??!?! ARE YOU F***ING SERIOUS??? CHRIS IVORY&#8230; IS 78TH!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!
</i>
<br /> <br />

Six years ago, DeMarco Murray was voted in as the 31st-best player in the NFL. Yes, DeMarco Murray, the guy who lost his job during the year. The NFL players ranked Murray ahead of Kam Chancellor, Joey Bosa, Bobby Wagner, Trent Williams, and Jadeveon Clowney.  <br /> <br />

The following year, Case Keenum was 51st. Let me repeat that. Case Keenum was 51st. Here&#8217;s what I wrote: <br /> <br />

<i>
CASE KEENUM IS 51ST!? WHAT!?!?!?!? HOW IN HELL IS CASE KEENUM BETTER THAN PHILIP RIVERS!?!?!?!?
</i>
<br /> <br />

The NFL players thought that Case Keenum was a better player than Philip Rivers. It was almost as bad in 2019, when Jared Goff was slotted in 32nd place. Yes, NFL players thought Goff was the 32nd-best player in the NFL. Like I said, these players have no clue. <br /> <br />

The big screw-up in 2020 was Jimmy Garoppolo, who was somehow slotted at No. 43. Here were my thoughts: <br /> <br />

<i>
HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!1 <br /> <br />

WHAT THE F**K IS THIS!? BUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! WOWOWOWOWOWOWOW HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLLL!!!!! <br /> <br />

NFL PLAYERS THINK JIMMY GAROPPOLO IS BETTER THAN J.J. WATT!!!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAAHHAAHAHHAALAOALAOLOLOLOLAHAHAHAHAHALOLOOLLLHAHAHA!!!!!
</i>
<br /> <br />

I don&#8217;t think 2021 was as bad, but the players still put Ryan Tannehill at No. 83. And in 2022, they rated Mac Jones 85th. Really? Mac Jones, 85th? <br /> <br />



Predictably, there were some very dumb choices in the NFL Top 100 Players of 2023. I&#8217;ve highlighted them, marking the underrated players in blue and overrated players in red.  
<br /> <br />





<!--test-->



<br /> <br />
 


<br /> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2023: 100-91: </b> </font> 
<br /> <br /> 
 

100. DeVonta Smith, WR, Eagles
<br /> 99. DeMarcus Lawrence, DE, Cowboys
<br /> 98. Tristan Wirfs, OT, Buccaneers
<br /> 97. Harrison Smith, S, Vikings
<br /> <font color = "blue"> 96. Trevor Lawrence, QB, Jaguars </font>
<br /> <font color = "red"> 95. Jamaal Williams, RB, Saints </font>
<br /> 94. Trevor McLaurin, WR, Redskins
<br /> <font color = "red"> 93. Eric Kendricks, LB, Chargers </font>
<br /> 92. Marlon Humphrey, CB, Ravens
<br /> <font color = "red"> 91. Dalvin Cook, RB, Vikings </font>
<br /> <br />
 
 
<b> 96. Trevor Lawrence: </b> I find it amusing that the players from a year ago thought Mac Jones is better than Trevor Lawrence is now. What!?  <br /> <br />
   
  
<b> 95. Jamaal Williams: </b> OMG JAMAAL WILLIAMS SCORED SO MANY TOUCHED DOWNS SO HE MUST BE GRATE OMG OMG OMG!!! Ugh. Come on. Damien Harris and LeGarrett Blount also scored a ton of touchdowns in one season. Did they deserve to be in the top 100?
  <br /> <br />
   
<b> 93. Eric Kendricks: </b> Do NFL players even pay attention? I mean, really. Eric Kendricks once belonged on this list, but he can barely move anymore.   <br /> <br />
  
<b> 91. Dalvin Cook: </b> Oh yeah, Dalvin Cook is great. Except, his team cut him, and no one really wants to sign him all that much. Whoops. <br /> <br />


<br />
<center>









</center>
<br />





<br /> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2023: 90-81: </b> </font> 
<br /> <br /> 

90. DeAndre Hopkins, WR, Titans
<br /> 89. Marshon Lattimore, CB, Saints
<br /> 88. Aidan Hutchinson, DE, Lions
<br /> 87. Chris Lindstrom, G, Falcons
<br /> 86. Justin Fields, QB, Bears
<br /> 85. Laremy Tunsil, OT, Texans
<br /> 84. Za&#8217;Darius Smith, DE, Browns
<br /> 83. Terron Armstead, OT, Dolphins
<br /> 82. Tua Tagovailoa, QB, Dolphins
<br /> 81. Christian Wilkins, DT, Dolphins
<br /> <br />


After than 100-91 fiasco, this grouping isn&#8217;t so bad. You could argue against Tua Tagovailoa because he can&#8217;t stay healthy, but perhaps that&#8217;ll change this year. 
<br /> <br />

  <br />
<center>









</center>
<br />




<br /> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2023: 80-71: </b> </font> 
<br /> <br /> 

80. Mark Andrews, TE, Ravens
<br /> 79. Dre Greenlaw, LB, 49ers
<br /> 78. Talanoa Hufanga, S, 49ers
<br /> <font color = "red"> 77. Geno Smith, QB, Seahawks  </font>
<br /> <font color = "red"> 76. Tariq Woolen, CB, Seahawks </font>
<br /> 75. Trey Hendrickson, DE, Bengals
<br /> 74. Garrett Wilson, WR, Jets
<br /> 73. Budda Baker, S, Cardinals
<br /> 72. Lamar Jackson, QB, Ravens
<br /> 71. DeForest Buckner, DT, Colts
<br /> <br />



<b> 77. Geno Smith: </b> In what world is Geno Smith about 20 spots better than Trevor Lawrence? Smith is coming off a great year, but come on.  <br /> <br />

<b> 76. Tariq Woolen: </b> Did Pete Carroll pay off the players to vote for his guys? Tariq Woolen is coming off a good rookie year, but he&#8217;s not the 76th-best player in the NFL. Not yet, anyway.  <br /> <br />



<br />
<center>









</center>
<br />


<br /> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2023: 70-61: </b> </font> 
<br /> <br /> 


<font color = "blue"> 70. Joey Bosa, DE, Chargers </font>
<br /> 69. Matt Milano, LB, Bills
<br /> <font color = "blue"> 68. Zack Martin, G, Cowboys </font>
<br /> 67. Amon-Ra St. Brown, WR, Lions
<br /> 66. Jared Goff, QB, Lions
<br /> 65. Darius Slay, CB, Eagles
<br /> <font color = "red"> 64. Aaron Jones, RB, Packers  </font>
<br /> 63. Grady Jarrett, DT, Falcons
<br /> <font color = "red"> 62. Bobby Wagner, LB, Seahawks </font>
<br /> Deebo Samuel, CB, 49ers
<br /> <br />

<b> 70. Joey Bosa: </b> Joey Bosa is one of the top edge rushers in the NFL, so he should be ranked higher than this. Then again, he has a dubious injury history. <br /> <br />

<b> 68. Zack Martin: </b>  Martin is arguably the best guard in the NFL, so he should be much higher than this.  <br /> <br />

 <b> 64. Aaron Jones: </b>  Aaron Jones owes most of his success to Aaron Rodgers. Let&#8217;s see how he does without him. <br /> <br />

 <b> 62. Bobby Wagner: </b> Pete Carroll apparently paid for Bobby Wagner as well. Seriously though, what&#8217;s with these old linebackers being slotted in the top 100? Wagner deserved a spot in the top 50 once upon a time, but he&#8217;s way past his prime. <br /> <br />









<br /> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2023: 60-51: </b> </font> 
<br /> <br /> 


60. Trevon Diggs, CB, Cowboys
<br /> 59. Justin Simmons, S, Broncos
<br /> 58. Jeffery Simmons, DT, Titans
<br /> 57. Jordan Poyer, S, Bills
<br /> <font color = "red"> 56. Dak Prescott, QB, Cowboys </font>
<br /> 55. Tony Pollard, RB, Cowboys
<br /> 54. Brian Burns, DE/OLB, Panthers
<br /> 53. Mike Evans, WR, Buccaneers
<br /> 52. Jonathan Allen, DT, Redskins
<br /> 51. Aaron Rodgers, QB, Jets
<br /> <br />

<b> 56. Dak Prescott: </b> Dak Prescott led the NFL in interceptions last year, so what is he doing inside the top 60? <br /> <br />









<br /> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2023: 50-41: </b> </font> 
<br /> <br /> 


50. <font color = "red"> Cameron Jordan, DE, Saints </font>
<br /> 49. Patrick Surtain, CB, Broncos
<br /> 48. Haason Reddick, DE, Eagles
<br /> 47. Cooper Kupp, WR, Rams
<br /> <font color = "red">  46. C.J. Mosley, LB, Jets </font>
<br /> 45. Cameron Hayward, DT, Steelers
<br /> 44. Jaylen Waddle, WR, Dolphins
<br /> 43. Demario Davis, LB, Saints
<br /> <font color = "red">  42. Kirk Cousins, QB, Vikings </font>
<br /> 41. Lane Johnson, OT, Eagles
<br /> <br />


<b> 50. Cameron Jordan: </b> Here&#8217;s another example of an old player being ranked too high, solely based on past production. The Saints had a bottom-10 pressure rate in the NFL last year. Some of that was on Jordan, whose pass-rushing ability dimished. He was still a force against the run, but he&#8217;s now 34, so some regression was expected.     <br /> <br />
 
<b> 46. C.J. Mosley, LB, Jets: </b> C.J Mosley, now 31, is always hurt. When he&#8217;s not hurt, he&#8217;s playing mediocre football. I don&#8217;t know why he&#8217;s so high in the top 100.     <br /> <br />
 
<b> 42. Kirk Cousins, QB, Vikings: </b> Ugh, come on. Why is Kirk Cousins almost inside the top 40? Top 140, maybe, but not the top 40.


<br /> <br /> <br />





<!-- Ad Unit [4932] WalterFootball.com - 728x90 -->
<div id="switch_placeholder_9aec2fee7a9184bfa75ec4fd83abac61" class="switch_placeholder"></div>
<script> (__scads = window.__scads || []).push({"z":4932,"targetId":"switch_placeholder_9aec2fee7a9184bfa75ec4fd83abac61","domain":"delivery.switchadhub.com","width":"728","height":"90"}); </script>
<script async src="//delivery.switchadhub.com/adserver/sat.js"></script>



<br /> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2023: 40-31: </b> </font> 
<br /> <br /> 

40. Quinnen Williams, DT, Jets
<br /> 39. Ja&#8217;Marr Chase, WR, Bengals
<br /> 38. Khalil Mack, DE, Chargers
<br /> 37. Jason Kelce, C, Eagles
<br /> 36. Jalen Ramsey, CB, Dolphins
<br /> 35. Christian McCaffrey, RB, 49ers
<br /> 34. CeeDee Lamb, WR, Cowboys
<br /> 33. Matthew Judon, DE, Patriots
<br /> 32. Justin Herbert, QB, Chargers
<br /> 31. Saquon Barkley, RB, Giants
<br /> <br />

  
I don&#8217;t see anything wrong with this list. I&#8217;m glad to see Jason Kelce finally getting some respect! <br /> <br />





<!-- WalterFootball_300x250_300x600 -->
<div align="center" id="div-gpt-ad-300x250-3">
    <script data-cfasync="false" type='text/javascript'>
        googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-300x250-3'); });
    </script>
</div>



<br /> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2023: 30-21: </b> </font> 
<br /> <br /> 

30. Derwin James, S, Chargers
<br /> 29. Nick Chubb, RB, Browns
<br /> 28. Dexter Lawrence, DT, Giants
<br /> <font color = "blue"> 27. T.J. Watt, DE, Steelers </font>
<br /> 26. Jaire Alexander, CB, Packers
<br /> 25. Derrick Henry, RB, Titans
<br /> 24. Roquan Smith, LB, Ravens
<br /> 23. Sauce Gardner, CB, Jets
<br /> 22. A.J. Brown, WR, Eagles
<br /> 21. Austin Ekeler, RB, Chargers
<br /> <br />

  
 
<b> 27. T.J. Watt: </b> T.J. Watt is arguably the best defensive player in the NFL. The Steelers were 8-2 with him last year and 1-6 without him. How can he possibly be ranked outside of the top 10?
<br /> <br />
 


<br /> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2021: 20-11: </b> </font> 
<br /> <br /> 

20. Myles Garrett, DE, Browns
<br /> 19. George Kittle, TE, 49ers
<br /> 18. Minkah Fitzpatrick, S, Steelers
<br /> 17. Maxx Crosby, DE, Raiders
<br /> 16. Stefon Diggs, WR, Bills
<br /> 15. Fred Warner, LB, 49ers
<br /> 14. Trent Williams, OT, 49ers
<br /> 13. Davante Adams, WR, Raiders
<br /> 12. Josh Jacobs, RB, Raiders
<br /> 11. Aaron Donald, DT, Rams
<br /> <br />

 
 
I have no significant issues with this group. Maybe Josh Jacobs, but he&#8217;s the reigning rushing champion.   <br /> <br /> 

 


<br /> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2021: 10-1: </b> </font> 
<br /> <br /> 
 

10. Chris Jones, DT, Chiefs
<br /> 9. Micah Parsons, DE, Cowboys
<br /> 8. Josh Allen, QB, Bills
<br /> 7. Tyreek Hill, WR, Dolphins
<br /> 6. Joe Burrow, QB, Bengals
<br /> 5. Travis Kelce, TE, Chiefs
<br /> 4. Nick Bosa, DE, 49ers
<br /> 3. Jalen Hurts, QB, Eagles
<br /> 2. Justin Jefferson, WR, Vikings
<br /> 1. Patrick Mahomes, QB, Chiefs
<br /> <br />



I don&#8217;t hate anything in the top 10. At least the NFL players got this segment right.


<br /> <br /> <br /> 





<br /> <font size = 3> <b> NFL Top 100 Players of 2023 &#8211; Snubs: </b> </font> 
<br /> <br /> 


 

<b> Christian Darrisaw, OT, Vikings </b> &#8211; If you want to see the sort of impact that Christian Darrisaw had for the Vikings, check out the games in which he was sidelined. Minnesota&#8217;s offense was not functional without Darrisaw.   <br /> <br />




<b> Creed Humphrey, C, Chiefs  </b> &#8211; Jason Kelce was the top center in the NFL for years. You could make the case that Creed Humphrey deserves that distinction now, so why wasn&#8217;t he listed in the top 100?    <br /> <br />

 
<b> Drake London, WR, Falcons </b> &#8211;  Drake London was incredible this year, and he should play even better with some experience. He should have been in the 100-75 range. <br /> <br />






<b> D.K. Metcalf, WR, Seahawks  </b> &#8211; D.K. Metcalf wasn&#8217;t on this list last year either. He&#8217;s a terrific receiver who should .    <br /> <br />


<b> Von Miller, DE, Bills </b> &#8211;  Look at the 2022 Bills&#8217; defense before and after Von Miller&#8217;s Thanksgiving injury. Buffalo may have won the Super Bowl with Miller, but completely fell apart in the wake of his departure..   <br /> <br />


<b> Penei Sewell, OT, Lions  </b> &#8211;  Penei Sewell is one of the reasons why Detroit maintained an elite offensive line last year. He has helped open up the offense, so he should have been listed in the top 60 or so.     <br /> <br />

 


<b> Preston Smith, DE, Packers </b> &#8211; Preston Smith was rewarded with a $52 million contract last offseason because of his great play with the Packers. He has 33.5 sacks in four years with Green Bay.  <br /> <br />

 

<b> A.J. Terrell, CB, Falcons </b> &#8211;  A.J. Terrell is coming off a bit of a down year, but he&#8217;s still one of the most talented cornerbacks in the NFL. <br /> <br />







<br /> <br /> <br /> 

 


<br />
<div id="comments"><span style="font-weight:bold; font-size:16pt;"></span></div>

<br />





<br /> <br />





<font size = 4>



<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/draft2027.php"> 2027 NFL Mock Draft</a> </b> - April 30 <br> <br> <br>



<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/fantasy2026runningbacks.php"> Fantasy Football Rankings</a> </b>  - April 5 <br> <br> <br>









<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/picks.php"> NFL Picks</a> </b>  -  Feb. 9 <br> <br> <br>








<b> <a href = "http://walterfootball.com/nflpowerrankings.php"> NFL Power Rankings</a> </b> - Jan. 26 <br>  <br> <br>






























































 





















































































 




 














































 





 



























































  





 













































































































 





 


 





















 

































  

















 






















 




 
 

</font>






<br /> <br />








<center>
<br />
<br />







<center></TD> </TR>
<TR> <TD VALIGN = "top" COLSPAN = "2">
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD COLSPAN = "5">


]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://walterfootball.com/nfltop100_2023.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 27/76 objects using Disk
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: walterfootball.com @ 2026-04-30 18:59:14 by W3 Total Cache
-->