2010 NFL Power Rankings: Playoffs
Week 21 Fantasy Performers, Defenses, League Leaders
Top Fantasy Quarterbacks:
Top Fantasy Running Backs:
Top Fantasy Receivers:
Top Fantasy IDP:
Fantasy Scrubs of the Week:
2010 NFL Power Rankings: Playoffs
-
Green Bay Packers (14-6) - Previously: #1 - To all of you haters who criticized my ranking the Packers No. 1 all year - HA! SUCK IT! No one believed in me, but I had the last laugh!!! Muhahahahahahaha!!!!
Sorry. I thought I was an insecure football player there for a second.
You can check out my Super Bowl thoughts and observations in my Super Bowl XLV Live Blog. I've eaten too much to write anything else.
-
Pittsburgh Steelers (14-5) - Previously: #2 - I'm pissed off that the Packers kicked the covering field goal that cost me $210, so let's go to Notes from NFL.com GameCenter - a list of a few stupid comments I read on NFL.com's GameCenter during the Super Bowl and my thoughts on them:
1. "RESPECT THE PACK,THY ARE NOT THE REAL AMERICAS TEAM FOR NOTHING. GREEN BAY WON 9 CHAMPIONSHIPS BEFORE THY CALLED IT THE SUPER-BOWL AND THEN WHEN THY DID CALL IT THE SUPER-BOWL THY WON THE FIRST 2 AND THEN AGAIN IN 97, WHICH MEANS TECHNICALLY GREEN BAY HAS WON 12, SO JUST BECAUSE THY DIDENT CALL IT THAT UNTELL 66-67 IT STILL WAS FOR ALL THE MARBLES!!!!!!!!!"
What's with all the "Thy's?" I guess this person is a William Shakespeare buff.
2. "all i know is that clay and co,going to ring ili bens bell!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and put a crack in it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Ah, if only the Liberty Bell could be charged with sexual assault - then it and Big Ben would have so much in common.
3. "i think people only call it the best becouse it was the most recent they have VERY short memorys what about the superbowl with NY and NE ? WAY better then cards vs Steelers superbowl ..."
Do you think the people with short "memorys" can spell the word "memories" better than this guy? That would be kind of ironic.
4. "RECOMEND IF YOU TINK THAT TOMPSON DOES OR shouldD DO ANGER MANAGMENT"
RECOMEND IF YOU TINK THAT THIS PERSON'S PARENTS DOES OR shoulD BUY HIM A DICTIONARY
|
Garrett
05-03-2013
12:17 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx.198
(total posts: 1)
4
1
One thing you continue to fail to mention about the Bills is that we got an extra 2nd round pick for the trade so we couldn't of had Austin and Manuel. We did hoever get Manuel, Robert Woods and Kiko Alonso in the first two rounds instead. We we're one pick from getting Minter which then would've been a lights out deal but oh well
@no.
05-03-2013
11:03 am
xxx.xxx.xxx0.33
(total posts: 2)
7
1
You are crazy dude. You contradict yourself in your own rant.
"The championship team, shall remain the championship team, until said team is removed from its pedestal" Where you imply the 49ers should be #1 because they won the division. You then later say "The best team in the NFL? On paper, maybe. But it's all about wins. And frankly, the Denver Broncos hold that title. Or Atlanta, if you feel inclined. I'm not going to be the guy that says "MY TEAM (49ers) WERE THE BEST NOT THE HAWKS" because they didn't have enough W's to earn that title. So once again, you are wrong." Where it seems you are stating that Denver or Atlanta should be #1 because they won more games. Also, if the Ravens won the title, should they not be #1?? So please grace us with your genius. Who should be #1? Denver or Atlanta for having 13 wins? SF for winning their division? or Baltimore for winning the Super Bowl? You make arguments that all 4 teams should be #1 with your statements. Also, remember power rankings are a like a Balance Sheet in accounting. It's a look at right now. Power Rankings rank the teams based on current rosters, recent success and future schedule. Seahawks have "The best team in the NFL? On paper, maybe" (That's your words) which means if they currently have a better roster, have an easier schedule than SF this coming season and have had very good recent success, they should be ranked quite high. Get over your blinding homer-ism for once.
Wrong...again
05-03-2013
11:03 am
xxx.xxx.xxx2.76
(total posts: 1)
1
2
Maybe Bushrod was overpaid, maybe Long is 'raw' however neither are the main reason for believing Cutler will no longer be 'running for his life'... Marc Trestman/Aaron Kromers offense/zone blocking scheme are the real reason. West coast based, throw the ball to a spot not a player system will have Cutler upright moreso than at anytime during his career.
tyler
05-03-2013
10:59 am
xxx.xxx.xxx.238
(total posts: 1)
1
1
Never doubt ozzie or ray rice will f*** up ur bets that 4th and 29 was b.s ns I'm a ravens fan.. go bad refs wooooo
Halsey
05-03-2013
10:40 am
xxx.xxx.xxx.150
(total posts: 1)
4
1
Seems like you're putting all the focus on who the Falcons lost. The Falcons replaced the guys they lost. Steven Jackson is not the only player they added...And Brent Grimes didn't even play last year.
Bob T
05-03-2013
10:20 am
xxx.xxx.xxx.229
(total posts: 1)
20
4
The Ravens were a 10-6 team last year. They needed two miracles last year. 4th and 29 and that horrible play by the safety in that Denver game. Denver should have been in three deep anyway, bad coaching as well.
Ravens played the Steelers twice without Roethlisberger and lost at home to Charlie Batch. The 4th down call at the 2 yard line was pass interference in today's rules and the official swallowed the whistle. Cincinnati or Pittsburgh will win the AFC North in 2013.
Weak Sauce
05-03-2013
10:12 am
xxx.xxx.xxx.186
(total posts: 1)
2
1
You're getting to hung up on the Matt Barkley pick. It doesn't preclude them from taking a more "Chip Kelly" QB next year.
Riley Reiff does not have short arms
05-03-2013
09:57 am
xxx.xxx.xxx54.3
(total posts: 1)
6
1
Reiff's arms are longer than those of Joe Thomas and Jake Long, and are just as long as Joe Staley's.
If you have a valid reason why Reiff can't play left tackle, let us know, but this whole arm length thing is lazy.
Amc
05-03-2013
09:50 am
xxx.xxx.xxx.154
(total posts: 1)
10
1
Man, is it me or does it seem like Walt knows less about football now then he did 4-5 years ago. Sometimes I wonder if it's the same guy running this site because for the past few years the Mock Drafts, Roster Analysis and Power rankings have slowly been getting worse.
Jay Smith
05-03-2013
09:47 am
xxx.xxx.xxx.187
(total posts: 1)
5
1
Riley Reiff will be fine
hahahah
05-03-2013
09:22 am
xxx.xxx.xxx1.18
(total posts: 1)
1
1
what a joke, lol. These are crazy and you criticize every single team. Who are you? prolly werent even good at sports in school.
TC
05-03-2013
09:08 am
xxx.xxx.xxx.145
(total posts: 1)
1
106
1 P.M. east coast games are a perk of having home field advantage. I feel bad for real fans that have to watch morning football, but if west coast teams want later games, all they need to do is seed higher than east coast teams.
Macout247
05-03-2013
08:33 am
xxx.xxx.xxx8.17
(total posts: 1)
6
1
Mark Dominik has literally explained every single thing you listed above. Saints 6? Must be your girlfriend...no freaking way they are that high. You sir, are a joke.
Zach
05-03-2013
08:28 am
xxx.xxx.xxx9.30
(total posts: 1)
2
1
Walt, your man crush on Tebow is really starting to become a bit of a nusiance.
Fault Walt
05-03-2013
07:40 am
xxx.xxx.xxx.215
(total posts: 1)
46
13
good analysis on the Colts... mentioning one players contract in an article on team power rankings? Stop trying to be a comedian and provide actual information instead of your fantasies
|
Run Defenses, Pass Defense, Pass Protection:
Something new this year - I'm keeping track of precise run defense, pass defense and pass protection rankings in Excel. The benefit to this is that it'll be broken down by week. Here are the download links:
2010 NFL Defensive Rankings Spreadsheet (2007 Excel)
2010 NFL Defensive Rankings Spreadsheet - (1999-2003 Excel)
2010 NFL Playoff Leaders: Passing Yards
2010 NFL Playoff Leaders: Rushing Yards
2010 NFL Playoff Leaders: Receiving Yards
2010 NFL Playoff Leaders: Sacks
2010 NFL Playoff Leaders: Interceptions
2013 NBA Mock Draft - May 22
2013 Fantasy Football Rankings - May 22
2014 NFL Mock Draft - May 21
Charlie's 2014 NFL Mock Draft - May 20
NFL Picks - Feb. 3
2012 NFL Power Rankings. Week:
Offseason Power Rankings | Final Preseason 2012 NFL Power Rankings |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
Final Reg. Season |
19 |
20 |
21 |
Final |
2011 NFL Power Rankings. Week: Offseason Power Rankings | Final Preseason 2011 NFL Power Rankings | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | Final Reg. Season | 19 | 20 | 21 | Final
2010 NFL Power Rankings. Week: Offseason Power Rankings | Final Preseason 2010 NFL Power Rankings | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | Final Reg. Season | 19 | 20 | 21 | Final
2009 NFL Power Rankings. Week: Preseason Power Rankings | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | Final Reg. Season | 19 | 20 | 21 | Final |
2008 NFL Power Rankings. Week: Preseason Power Rankings | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | Final Reg. Season | 19 | 20 | 21 | Final |
2007 NFL Power Rankings. Week: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21
2011 NFL Power Rankings. Week: Offseason Power Rankings | Final Preseason 2011 NFL Power Rankings | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | Final Reg. Season | 19 | 20 | 21 | Final
2010 NFL Power Rankings. Week: Offseason Power Rankings | Final Preseason 2010 NFL Power Rankings | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | Final Reg. Season | 19 | 20 | 21 | Final
2009 NFL Power Rankings. Week: Preseason Power Rankings | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | Final Reg. Season | 19 | 20 | 21 | Final |
2008 NFL Power Rankings. Week: Preseason Power Rankings | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | Final Reg. Season | 19 | 20 | 21 | Final |
2007 NFL Power Rankings. Week: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21
© 1999-2013 Walter Cherepinsky : all rights reserved
Privacy Policy
2 5 9


Leave a comment