NFL Picks Against the Spread: Week 19, 2011

NFL Picks (Preseason 2011): 11-4 (+$1,340)
NFL Picks (Week 1, 2011): 5-9-2 (-$575)
NFL Picks (Week 2, 2011): 6-8-2 (-$1,030)
NFL Picks (Week 3, 2011): 10-5-1 (+$610)
NFL Picks (Week 4, 2011): 7-9 (-$970)
NFL Picks (Week 5, 2011): 9-4 (-$270)
NFL Picks (Week 6, 2011): 5-7-1 (-$1,290)
NFL Picks (Week 7, 2011): 4-8-1 (-$820)
NFL Picks (Week 8, 2011): 3-10 (-$1,145)
NFL Picks (Week 9, 2011): 7-7 (+$695)
NFL Picks (Week 10, 2011): 9-7 (+$490)
NFL Picks (Week 11, 2011): 6-7-1 (-$1,060)
NFL Picks (Week 12, 2011): 7-9 (-$435)
NFL Picks (Week 13, 2011): 11-5 (+$1,000)
NFL Picks (Week 14, 2011): 7-7-2 (-$220)
NFL Picks (Week 15, 2011): 9-6-1 (+$640)
NFL Picks (Week 16, 2011): 7-9 (-$550)
NFL Picks (Week 17, 2011): 7-8-1 (+$315)
NFL Picks (Week 18, 2011): 3-1 (+$1,100)

NFL Picks (2011): 133-130-12 (-$2,175)
NFL Picks (2010): 144-131-8 (+$6,080)
NFL Picks (2009): 151-124-9 (+$3,370)
NFL Picks (2008): 136-125-6 (+$4,330)
If you don't quite understand the line, total or anything else, go to my Sports Betting FAQ.

Vegas betting action updated Jan. 15, 11:15 a.m. ET. Follow @walterfootball for updates.


Go to Week 19 NFL Picks - Saturday Games



Houston Texans (11-6) at Baltimore Ravens (12-4)
Line: Ravens by 7.5. Total: 37.
Walt's Projected Line: Ravens -9.
Sunday, Jan. 15, 1:00 ET

The Game. Edge: Ravens.

A friendly reminder that Jerks of the Week for Jan. 9, 2012 are up, so just click the link. This week's jerks are Russian Cleavage Pharmacist, Horny Teens, Soap Scuz Man.

Also, I've been posting some comments from perverted users directed at hot chicks on NFL.com's GameCenter, most of which came from a creeper named Aaron3619.

If you recall from last week, Aaron has been having issues with a user named SuckOnMyFootball. My friend Emily sent me a series of comments that SuckOnMyFootball posted on Aaron's profile:




It took Aaron several days to hop onto GameCenter, but he responded with:



Did SuckOnMyFootball ever say that he/she is a girl? I don't think so, meaning Aaron's a bit delusional. I know, I know, a huge shock.

Other developments in the Aaron3619 saga this week:

1. I have to apologize to FalconsSuck. Here were FalconsSuck's posts last week:



I wrote, "FalconsSuck is my hero for the dog rapist comment. His posts were funny..."

Well, FalconsSuck is a girl. My bad. At least Aaron made the same mistake too, as FalconsSuck let him know:



I can only imagine what Aaron is thinking. "FalconsSuck is a girl? Does that mean she will send me nacked pic and bikini pic!?!?!?"

Aaron replied:



FalconsSuck didn't waste any time responding to Aaron:



Aaron just got served. No nacked and bikini pic from FalconsSuck. Luckily, there are other female GameCenter users to harass...

2. Remember StrikerSarah? If not, here's a quick reminder:



It took StrikerSarah a few weeks to reply, but she finally got back to Aaron.

So, what's the verdict? Is she going to send him nacked and bikini pic?

Drum roll...

Drum roll......

DRUM ROLL.........



REJECTED!!!



Riiiight. Because all "friends" demand nacked pic and bikini pic from each other.

Poor Aaron. How can he possibly recover from all of this rejection? Better yet, I wonder what would happen if someone asked Aaron for his nacked and/or bikini (Speedo) pic?

HOUSTON OFFENSE: T.J. Yates versus Ray Lewis, Terrell Suggs and Ed Reed. Yeah, this is going to be tough.

The Texans scored 24 points on offense against the Bengals. They were able to do this because Arian Foster rushed for 153 yards and two touchdowns on 24 carries. Cincinnati went into the contest pretty weak versus the run. The Ravens don't have that problem.

Baltimore ranks second versus the rush. The team has had some issues against it in the final few weeks of the season, but that can be attributed to Ray Lewis' struggles. Lewis wasn't close to 100 percent because he was coming off a toe injury. The bye was exactly what he needed, however, as he reportedly is close to full strength.

Yates will have to make some plays to win this game. Even with Andre Johnson a week healthier, that'll be extremely difficult with Baltimore's ferocious pass rush breathing down his neck. Yates was a bit lucky this past Saturday that the Bengals failed to take advantage of some mistakes, including two Foster fumbles and Yates' potential interception fired right at Chris Crocker. The Ravens will capitalize.

BALTIMORE OFFENSE: Following his overtime victory over the Steelers, John Fox said that it's "all about the players" when asked about the battle between his offensive coordinator and Dick LeBeau. Well, it's not all about the players in this contest - not when one of the coaches is Cam Cameron.

It sounds simple to give Ray Rice as many touches as possible, but Cameron has a habit of deviating from this strategy at the worst moment. If Rice isn't involved early and often, the Ravens will struggle to score. There's no question about that.

The Texans have a great defense. They're ninth versus the rush (4.01 YPC), second against the pass (6.2 YPA) and tied for fourth in sacks (48). Despite this, the Ravens were able to score 29 points in the prior meeting because of Rice, who rushed for 101 yards on 23 carries and caught five balls for 60 receiving yards. As dominant as Houston's stop unit can be, Rice is just way too talented to contain for 60 minutes.

You can see why Cameron needs to lean on Rice. Of course, there's also the issue of Joe Flacco, who is incredibly inconsistent. He can look great one quarter, but completely dreadful the next. Flacco will have Anquan Boldin back from minor knee surgery, but it's hard to trust Flacco against Wade Phillips' defense, though it should be noted that he went 20-of-33 for 305 yards, a rushing touchdown and an interception the last time these teams clashed.

RECAP: I'm leaning toward the Ravens. I don't like Yates' chances in Baltimore. If the Ravens go up 10-0 or 17-3, I can't imagine Yates leading his team back.

I won't be betting on the host though. Laying more than a touchdown with Flacco doesn't sound like a good time - the Ravens were 2-6 against the spread as favorites of six or more this year - and Baltimore has had a habit of crapping the bed versus inferior competition. I know this contest is at home, where they've been better, but the Ravens barely beat the Cardinals and Browns as hosts. Even Dan Orlovsky had a cheap backdoor cover against them.





The Psychology. Edge: None.
No psychological edge found.


The Vegas. Edge: Texans.
Slight lean on the host.

Percentage of money on Baltimore: 60% (122,000 bets)


The Trends. Edge: Ravens.

Big Winner: Teams coming off wins of 21-plus at home in the playoffs are 3-8 ATS the following week since 2002.

Worst Bye: Playoff teams coming off byes are 12-20 ATS since 2003 (9-15 since 2005).

Opening Line: Ravens -7.5.

Opening Total: 38.

Weather: Sunny, 32 degrees. Light wind.


Week 19 NFL Pick: Ravens 24, Texans 6
Ravens -7.5 (0 Units) -- Incorrect; $0
Under 37 (0 Units) -- Correct; $0
Ravens 20, Texans 13

---

New York Giants (10-7) at Green Bay Packers (15-1)
Line: Packers by 7.5. Total: 53.
Walt's Projected Line: Packers -10.
Sunday, Jan. 15, 4:30 ET

The Game. Edge: Packers.

It's the final game of the second round of the playoffs, but we're going to have Joe Buck and Troy Aikman calling the shots instead of the great preseason homers like Kevin Reilly, Don Tollefson and Herm Edwards, and inept ESPN guys Emmitt and Matt Millen. Here's what it would sound like if those five clowns were calling this game:

Kevin Reilly: Welcome to Green Bay! Tonight, the Packers play the stupid Giants. But I can tell you right now, guys. The Packers are losing. Lock it in. Call your bookie before it's too late!

Emmitt: Mike, what you say do not make any senses. How can somebody call a book? The five book I have in my house do not have any hand nor arm to pick up the telephone. And how can you know the Packer will win for sure? Do you have a diamond ball in your pocket that nobody know about?

Reilly: Emmitt, I said bookies; not books. The guys who can take your bets. Green Bay will lose. Mark my words. Gamble all your life savings on the Giants!

Herm: No gamblin! No betting! No wagering! No money spending! No bookies! Gamblin's bad! If you gamble, you're bad! So don't gamble, cuz you'll be bad! Because it's bad to gamble! And gamblin's bad! Uhh... gamblin... uhh...

Reilly: Hey Herm, I was just lying to everyone. Bet everything you have on the Packers! Go do it now! Ha, look, stupid Herm is thinking about betting the Packers!

Tollefson: Now, Kevin, I have a question. How can you possibly know that betting against the Packers is a sure thing? I'd love to pound the Giants and win lots of money so I can buy more concubines who will cook and clean for me, and then pleasure me sexually while I eat my meal, but I need to know for sure.

Kevin Reilly: That's privileged information, Don. Just know that the Packers will win. Mark my words.

Emmitt: Mike, what color marker do you think we should write on your word?

Reilly: Mark; not marker, Emmitt. OK, fine. I'll tell you. You know how Aaron Rodgers always wears those stupid hats? Well, I bought some lice and put it into his hat when he wasn't looking. I also put some lice into Herm's dinner yesterday. That's why he had diarrhea all night! Ha!

Millen: That intrigues me, Kevin. Let's see if you can follow me here. What if a person were to take some lice with his meal and then shove some kielbasa up his backside later on? How much would go in, and how much would go out? Something's gotta give, Kevin!

Reilly: Millen, you disgust me. Go bet on the stupid Packers with Herm. We'll be back after a word from our local sponsors!

GREEN BAY OFFENSE: The Packers seemed pretty invincible until they battled the Chiefs. Romeo Crennel had his defense put immense pressure on Aaron Rodgers, which made life extremely difficult for him because the elite Kansas City corners took away his receivers - a group that was missing Greg Jennings.

Well, Jennings is back. That's one difference between this contest and the Chief game. The other is that the Giants don't exactly have unbelievable talents like Brandon Flowers, bastard of Highgarden, and Brandon Carr in their secondary. Their secondary has been known to blow coverage from time to time.

New York's pass rush is terrific though. With everyone healthy and Jason Pierre-Paul emerging as one of the top defensive talents in the NFL, the Giants can get to the quarterback as well as anyone. As I wrote in the Saints-49ers capsule, the only way to beat an elite quarterback - aside from kidnapping him and drugging him - is to apply immense pressure without blitzing. New York can certainly do that.

The Giants can also stop the run well now - they've allowed 3.5 YPC to opposing backs the past four weeks - so don't expect Ryan Grant or James Starks to do anything in the ground. Thus, Green Bay's offense will at least be somewhat limited, opening the door for Eli Manning and company to pull out a victory.

NEW YORK OFFENSE: And Manning certainly won't face much of a challenge. By now, you know how bad Green Bay's defense is, but as a reminder, the team has five sacks in its previous six games, and just surrendered 520 passing yards to Matthew Stafford in Week 17.

Manning threw all over the Packers as well. He went 23-of-40 for 347 yards, three touchdowns and an interception in a last-second loss to Green Bay back in Week 13. He threw a game-tying score with about a minute remaining, but left too much time on the clock for Rodgers.

The one bit of good news for Green Bay's defense is that it'll have Ryan Pickett back from a concussion. Pickett is a force versus the run, and he was certainly missed in Weeks 15 and 16. However, it should be noted that Pickett played in the first meeting versus the Giants, who were able to rack up 100 rushing yards on just 20 carries.

With Victor Cruz emerging as a potent weapon, the Packers will be too focused on containing him, Hakeem Nicks and Mario Manningham, so Ahmad Bradshaw and Brandon Jacobs will be able to pick up where they left off last week. They'll be able to help the Giants control the clock, and they'll give Manning favorable down-and-distance situations.

RECAP: Some people think this spread is too high, but I think it's way too low. Think about it this way: The Packers were -6.5 at the Giants. You have to move the spread over six points (three to neutral, three to other site) to go from away to home, so this line would have been -12.5 back in Week 13. Of course, New York has played much better since, but four points better? That seems like a lot.

I thought this line would be -10, so there's no value with the Giants. I'm still taking them, however, because I think these teams are pretty even. Sure, Rodgers is on the other side, but New York has a much better running game and defense. That has to count for something, right?

I also regrettably have to factor in the death of offensive coordinator Joe Philbin's son. If you haven't heard, the body of Philbin's son was found in a river Monday evening after he went missing Sunday morning. I can't even imagine what Philbin is going through right now. I don't see how he can possibly be focused on game planning for the Giants' improved defense.

TEASER HEDGE: The first leg of my teaser won, so I'm going to hedge with a unit on the Giants moneyline (+310). The only way I'm screwed is if the Packers win by one, so fingers crossed.





The Psychology. Edge: None.
The Giants are a popular upset pick this week, which can't sit well with Aaron Rodgers. On the other hand, offensive coordinator Joe Philbin's son has been missing since Sunday morning, so I doubt he's 100-percent focused.


The Vegas. Edge: Packers.
The Giants are a major public dog.

Percentage of money on New York: 64% (121,000 bets)


The Trends. Edge: Packers.

Big Winner: Teams coming off wins of 21-plus at home in the playoffs are 3-8 ATS the following week since 2002.

Worst Bye: Playoff teams coming off byes are 12-20 ATS since 2003 (9-15 since 2005).

Giants are 31-17 ATS on the road since 2006.

Aaron Rodgers is 33-17 ATS since 2009.

Opening Line: Packers -9.

Opening Total: 51.

Weather: Cloudy, 26 degrees. Mild wind, 15 mph.


Week 19 NFL Pick: Packers 34, Giants 31
Giants +7.5 (1 Unit) -- Correct; +$100
Over 53 (0 Units) -- Correct; $0
Giants 37, Packers 20




Week 19 NFL Picks - Saturday Games
Saints at 49ers, Broncos at Patriots


Prop/Teaser/Parlay Picks
A list of some of my favorite team/player prop picks this week
(Offense & defensive ROY picks to be counted whenver winners are announced.) Picks carried over on a week-to-week basis will be in black.

Moneyline Underdog: 49ers +160 (0.5 Units) -- Correct; +$80

Moneyline Underdog: Broncos +525 (0.5 Units) -- Incorrect; -$50

Teaser: Ravens -1.5, Packers -1.5 (3 Units) -- Incorrect; -$330

Teaser Hedge: Giants +310 (1 Unit) -- Correct; +$310

Leave a comment Name Comment Verification: click on image to refresh it   Pharma448 03-02-2013 05:41 am xxx.xxx.xxx1.43 (total posts: 1) 3     3 Very nice site! cheap cialis http://aieopxy.com/osoasvv/4.html Pharmb85 03-02-2013 05:41 am xxx.xxx.xxx03.1 (total posts: 1) 2     2 Hello! ccdbbdf interesting ccdbbdf site! I'm really like it! Very, very ccdbbdf good! BIG TIME BRO!!! 03-01-2013 07:22 pm xxx.xxx.xxx8.24 (total posts: 1) 2     2 FINGER-A-FRIEND FRIDAY (or a stranger is fine. Totally acceptable for the 1st day of the new month) 1. WIZ +3 (KNICKS are overrated and the WIZ are great as a DOG, especially at HOME. I like them......wait for it......wait for it.... 2. WIZ ML +140 ("THE WRINKLE and THE SPRINKLE" or if you like another term i am "DOUBLE DIPPIN" like i banged a chick in the afternoon and treated myself to a different woman later in the evening. Or if u are into that kinky stuff....screwin your girlfriend, and then gaping her mom. I am making the NY KNICKS my B!TCHES tonight) 3. HAWKS/SUNS OVER 195 (i like the way the HAWKS are playing but do not like this as a FAV -4. Points please, on the total that is. This thing should flirt with 200) 4. CRAPTORS/PACERS UNDER 186 (i like the MILKY WAY here. Only 1 team should get to the 90's and T-DOT's has been playing pretty well. HIBBERT is back for INDY tonight so that should keep the scoring down with that big MULE patrolimg the paint) 4-PACK of PORK tonight boys. NO NHL for me even though instill like the OVER 5 in STL/EDM but too small of a board with big juice. Best of luck on this FINGER-ANYONE-FRIDAY fellas. Lets make a FINGER or 2 disappear. GL chuckster 03-01-2013 04:59 pm xxx.xxx.xxx8.76 (total posts: 44) 3     2 Gotta say this NFL site is beginning to get cobwebs! If it wasn't for BTB and maybe one or two others that I occasionally recognize, I believe I'd just post on Walters NBA site. Where have all the Veterans of long ago gone?? Anyway: Three team Par in NHL tonight with: Chicago and Anaheim one open spot. NBA: Three team eight point teaser with: Pacers +6.5, Clippers plus a half, Heat at Pick. Another three team teaser with: Indy/Tor game Under 193.5, Mavericks +11.5, Thunder +6.5. Good luck to all tonight. chuckster 03-01-2013 02:51 pm xxx.xxx.xxx8.76 (total posts: 44) 2     2 Decent enough outcome last night as I get my teaser win with the Lakers, taking care of Minnesota. I win a NHL parlay with Chicago and Boston coming through. I did mess up for a second consecutive night and picked another start up NHL par with Dallas, that did not come close to meeting my wagering requirements.... and paid the price for a second consecutive night. Got to stop doing that. Congrats to winners and GLTA. BIG TIME BRO!!! 03-01-2013 02:09 am xxx.xxx.xxx0.67 (total posts: 105) 2     2 T!TT! MILK THURSDAY re-cap WIN - VIRGINIA PICK EM (these guys played strong again at HOME and simply do not lose there often. LIGHT SKIN JOEY HARRIS went APE $HIT scoring 36. Kid has a good all-around game. 73-68 CAVS. Look for DUKE to bounce back at HOME against MIAMI this wkd) WIN - CAL -10.5 (these BAY AREA BEARS are rollin baby. Got off to another sluggish start, but started rolling towards the end of the 1st half and dropped the DONKEY D!CK in the 2nd HALF winning 64-46) LOSS - SOUTH CAROLINA +9.5 (they were playing with MIZZU for the 1st half, but theres a reason why SC is so terrible, because they are! This is exactly what i was talking about not liking to back bad teams no matter what the spread is. I should take my own advice. MIZZU destroys SC 90-68) 2-1 on my posted plays tonight, but again hitting my TOP 2 and the record for the week is 7-4-1 hope all did well tonight fellas speedy 03-01-2013 12:01 am xxx.xxx.xxx8.55 (total posts: 3) 2     2 i'm late! Lakers over 205 lakers minus 10 and over 205 in a parlay as well Gonzaga / BYU - why has the line stayed at 5...71% of the money on the zags...byu was blown out in january by 20 on the road. If vegas set a hook its deep in my belly! buying a point and taking the stormin mormons at plus 6 GL Playas BIG TIME BRO!!! 02-28-2013 09:00 pm xxx.xxx.xxx0.67 (total posts: 105) 3     2 Sorry i am late. Played around in the NCAA forum too much today. I am on UNC ML and PACERS PICK EM so far but those games are well underway. Here cimes the squirt T!TT! MILK THURSDAY 1. VIRGINIA PICK EM (i wrote up about this game all day in the NCAA forum if u want my reasoning) 2. CAL -10.5 (i will buy the hook to get it at -10. CAL is rolling and avoided any hiccups on the ROAD trip in OREGON winning both games by a CUN+ hair. and i believe thats why this line isnt -13 or so. CAL should win by a bakers dozen. UTAH is not a good team and lose consistently on the road by double digits, or close to it. CAL is making a BIG TIME push to win the PAC-12. They cant take the UTES lightly. Did you say "UTES?". Yeah, UTES!!! Youths or UTES? UTES, the 2 UTES your honor! A little MY COUSIN VINNY and JOE PESCI for all you diry pricks out there!) SOUTH CAROLINA +9.5 (MIZZU is terrible on the ROAD and i know how bad SC is but i see this game like yesterdays PENN ST/MICH game. Too many points are being layed by a ROAD squad that is terrible away from HOME. MIZZU is 1-7 SU In last 8 ROAD games and 1-6 ATS in last 7 on the ROAD. Watch out fir the uspet again baby!!!!) I am just posing those 3 since i missed out in the early 2 plays. I do like ZAGA/BYU OVER 145 and STL ML in NHL to finally beat CHI. 76ers to cover 7.5 and MINNI +10 but not confident enough in them and didnt have time to do research. So just the 3 plays tonight GL fellas coalcracker 02-28-2013 07:32 pm xxx.xxx.xxx.131 (total posts: 42) 3     54 1 BIG PLAY TONIGHT....... MURRAY STATE -10 100000 units chuckster 02-28-2013 02:07 pm xxx.xxx.xxx8.76 (total posts: 44) 2     5 Much to my disgust (as a FAN of the NBA), I have to swallow down my own BILE and take the "Fakers" tonight at -2, on my ending three team teaser. This might be only the second or third time I've taken the "Fakers" all season, but the stats, trends, injuries are just to much in the favor of the Fakers tonight. I have a longer RANT on the Fakers on Walters NBA site. Good luck to all tonight. chuckster 02-28-2013 01:29 pm xxx.xxx.xxx8.76 (total posts: 44) 2     4 Yesterday: Lost a NHL par, (broke one of my wagering rules and paid the price.) Have an ongoing NBA teaser with first two spots coming in last night GS and Memphis...Now got to get the third. NHL today: Boston, Chicago, one open spot. Congrats to winners and GLTA. BIG TIME BRO!!! 02-28-2013 01:48 am xxx.xxx.xxx0.67 (total posts: 105) 3     2 Quick recap of WET MY WHISTLE WEDNESDAY WIN- PENN ST +13 (the FIGHTIN SANDUSKY'S were not only able to cover but these pricks won SU. They have really been playing hard the last few games. They deserved this win and got it. Good for these guys as they win on senior night. Michigan is serverly overrated btw) WIN - PISTONS +7 (they nearly turned back into the PISS-ONS as they flooded the DC area with piss beggin to give the game to the WIZ. I had the "wrinkle and the sprinkle" meaning i had ATS and ML for DETROIT so i had to seriously sweat it out down the stretch even though my BIG TIME play was on +7) WIN - GRIZZ/MAVS (did i see this right.....the MAVS score 5 3rd qtr points? And bkow a 25 pt lead??? LMDO! Ohhhhh they flooded the FED EX froum with all that $H!T that came down their legs. Total BJ (BOMB JOB) by DALLAS. My appologies to anyone on the MAVS tonight) LOSS - GEORGIA/VANDY UNDER 111 (this thing was 15-5 with under 8 mins left in the 1st half. How the hell did it end 34-22 going into half??? And then VANDY puts up 41 in the 2nd Half??? No comprende. VANDY killed it at the FT line tonight and when totals are this low, that kinda stuff cant happen. Neither can 34 (UGA) and 41 (VANDY) pts get scored in a half) LOSS - NEW MEXICO/SDSU OVER 131 (ahhhhh......i had UNM -5.5 as a personal pkay, but man this thing fell 1 pt shy as SDSU missed their last shot with 8 secs left and the game ends 70-60 LOBOS. Really awful shooting in this game by both teams. Especially SDSU from 3 pt range. 4-22? Ewwwwf. And shot under 70% from the FT line. And all we needed was 1 more pt for a push, or 1 more fg for a win. So rough) I am happy with a 3-2 night hitting my TOP 2 plays, but more angry than a 3-LEGGED NEUTERED DOG WITH PARKINSON'S DISEASE that i couldnt go 5-0 for the good peeps here in the forum. As i felt they were all solid plays and all looked promising as the games were unfolding. Anyways, hope all did well. The T!TTI MILK THURSDAY awaits in the ON-DECK CIRCLE. Hope you boys come thirsty 2morrow!!! @GMAN You are welcome fella. Glad you are outta the hole. Now STAY THE F OUTTA THERE! :) GL the rest of the way Gman 02-27-2013 10:45 pm xxx.xxx.xxx5.42 (total posts: 5) 3     2 Big time nice thank u . U got me out of the hole. Keep em comin Callme dude thanks for picks dont get sensitive this is usa I couldn't bet them either be nice Maybe let us know how we can bet them callmethan 02-27-2013 10:04 pm xxx.xxx.xxx.186 (total posts: 2) 2     52 okay! I'll stop posting them F*** this forum @callmethan 02-27-2013 09:52 pm xxx.xxx.xxx.146 (total posts: 1) 3     2 How many thanks have you gotten,.....NOBODY CAN PLAY THEM Pages: 1 2 3 45 6 7 ...1475 1476

2013 Fantasy Football Rankings - May 24


2013 NBA Mock Draft - May 22


2014 NFL Mock Draft - May 21


Charlie's 2014 NFL Mock Draft - May 20


NFL Picks - Feb. 3

Note: For legality purposes, this Web site does not promote or advocate gambling. This is solely for entertainment purposes only.

Last Week's NFL Picks Against The Spread (Week 21, 2012): 1-0 (+$100)
Last Week's 2-3 Unit NFL Picks (Week 21, 2012): 0-0 ($0)
Last Week's 4-5 Unit NFL Picks (Week 21, 2012): 0-0 ($0)
Last Week Over-Under (Week 21, 2012): 0-1 ($0)
Last Week's Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks (Week 21, 2012): -$400

2012 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-2, 60.0% (+$560)

2012 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 130-145-8, 47.3% (-$5,760)
2012 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 45-50-2, 47.4% (-$2,130)
2012 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 14-21, 40.0% (-$3,650)
2012 Season Over-Under: 125-121-5, 50.8% (+$30)
2012 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$1,685

1999 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 27-41-3 (39.7%)
2000 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 128-123-8 (51.0%)
2001 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 127-122-7 (51.0%)
2002 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 123-136-7 (47.5%)
2003 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 146-126-8 (53.7%)
2004 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 157-123-8 (56.1%)
2005 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 156-126-11 (55.3%)
2006 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 151-135-9 (52.8%)
2007 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 162-135-10, 54.5% (+$2,550)
2008 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 148-140-7, 51.4% (+$2,620)
2009 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 151-124-9, 54.9% (+$3,370)
2010 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 144-131-8, 52.4% (+$6,080)
2011 Season NFL Picks Against The Spread: 137-133-12, 50.7% (-$1,925)

2002 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 41-49-2 (45.6%)
2003 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 52-51-2 (50.5%)
2004 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 65-44-3 (59.6%)
2005 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 77-61-1 (55.8%)
2006 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 65-61-4 (51.6%)
2007 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 83-59-5, 58.5% (+$4,110)
2008 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 44-57-3, 43.6% (-$3,510)
2009 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 49-35-3, 58.3% (+$2,260)
2010 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 51-38-4, 57.3% (+$3,180)
2011 Season 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 44-51-3, 46.3% (-$2,715)

2002 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 11-12 (47.8%)
2003 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 16-13-1 (55.2%)
2004 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 18-11 (62.1%)
2005 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 25-22-1 (53.2%)
2006 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 21-29-1 (42.0%)
2007 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 35-30-2, 53.8% (+$420)
2008 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 39-26-2, 60.0% (+$4,055)
2009 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 29-26, 52.7% (+$330)
2010 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 32-22, 59.3% (+$4,790)
2011 Season 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 14-14, 50.0% (-$1,260)

2001 Season Over-Under: 3-2 (60.0%)
2002 Season Over-Under: 121-91-3 (57.1%)
2003 Season Over-Under: 126-132-2 (48.8%)
2004 Season Over-Under: 139-124-4 (52.9%)
2005 Season Over-Under: 117-145-4 (44.7%)
2006 Season Over-Under: 129-132-5 (49.4%)
2007 Season Over-Under: 136-145-3, 48.4% (-$1,900)
2008 Season Over-Under: 137-125-6, 52.3% (+$860)
2009 Season Over-Under: 128-135-4, 48.7% (-$3,195)
2010 Season Over-Under: 128-135-5, 48.7% (-$5)
2011 Season Over-Under: 131-131-5, 50.0% (+$135)

2007 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$1,035
2008 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$1,775
2009 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$865
2010 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: -$200
2011 Season Prop/ML/Teaser/Parlay Picks: +$590

2006 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-3 (50%)
2007 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-3, 50.0% (-$400)
2008 NFL Picks of the Month: 6-1, 85.7% (+$3,720)
2009 NFL Picks of the Month: 3-2, 60.0% (+$640)
2010 NFL Picks of the Month: 2-4, 33.3% (-$1,810)
2011 NFL Picks of the Month: 5-2, 71.4% (+$1,870)

Career NFL Picks Against The Spread: 1,876-1,720-106, 52.2% (+$6,915)
Career 2-3 Unit NFL Picks: 611-545-31 (52.9%)
Career 4-5 Unit NFL Picks: 253-225-7 (52.9%)
Career Over-Under: 1409-1408-42 (50.0%)
Career Second-Half NFL Picks: 22-14-1 (61.1%)
Career NFL Picks of the Month: 24-16 (60.0%)