Baseball Picks
Baseball Picks (May 1-5): 3-3 (+$55)
Baseball Picks (May 6-12): 1-1 (+$75)
2013 Season Winnings: 4-4 (+$130)
2012 Season Winnings: 19-19 (+$215)
2011 Season Winnings: 55-53 (-$940)
Follow @walterfootball for updates.
Baseball Picks (May 6-12): 1-1 (+$75)
2013 Season Winnings: 4-4 (+$130)
2012 Season Winnings: 19-19 (+$215)
2011 Season Winnings: 55-53 (-$940)
Follow @walterfootball for updates.
Kansas City Royals at Los Angeles Angels.
Line: Royals +115; Angels -125.
8:10 PM ET (Game 971-972)
I don't understand this line at all. The Royals have the superior hitting, starting pitching and bullpen. The Angels are trash.
I may post another pick later. If so, I'll tweet it out. I'll have updates on Twitter - @walterfootball.
Prediction: Royals +115 (1 Unit)
|
GStar
06-02-2011
01:21 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx6.12
(total posts: 509)
 13
 16
"that should have been offsides."
- Actually he was onside. He dragged his pick on his left skate and kept it on the blue line to BARELY avoid the offside. Now THAT'S a quality player.
Dr Phil
06-02-2011
01:19 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx3.30
(total posts: 14)
11
11
GStart + Anthony,
Both of you: CHILL OUT!! Last thing we want on here is 2 of the best cappers fighting, really! Let's help each other. Both of u are good! Work together. And yes GStar, he's 21-5, almost as good as u. take it easy boys
GStar
06-02-2011
01:18 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx6.12
(total posts: 509)
11
15
A LUCKY goal? Did you even watch the game?
- Vancouver was CREATING break away changes because the Bs d-men were dragging their as$es. Hence the breakway chance that Hanson and Torres CREATED. - Vancouver was also taking huge risks bringing their D-men up and forcing the play deep in the zone. -
dirk
06-02-2011
01:17 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx3.74
(total posts: 13)
11
15
@gstar--- you are my hero. go nucks
@ GStar
06-02-2011
01:16 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx.212
(total posts: 248)
11
10
AMEN TO THAT!
The asshat comes in, says he's 35-5 or something, then the FIRST 2 DAYS he posts his card he's 7-7. Anyone who sends him money is a fool, and I bet his 'three customers' regret it.
Anthony
06-02-2011
01:15 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx.111
(total posts: 20)
13
12
@Gstar
Yes, Vancouver won on a lucky goal with 19 seconds left in last period that should have been offsides. I don't deny that. Game 2 I pick Boston to win it. I'm sticking to my guns.
21-5?
06-02-2011
01:14 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx.212
(total posts: 248)
13
11
My ass
GStar
06-02-2011
01:13 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx6.12
(total posts: 509)
11
11
Actually, WHO THE FSCK ARE YOU TO TELL SOMEONE NOT TO GLOAT YOU A$$HOLE?
You're on here EVERY DAY telling us how great your picks are and how we should pay you for them.
Anthony
06-02-2011
01:12 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx.111
(total posts: 20)
13
14
With that being said. I hit the Under 5 yesterday for Bruins/nucks and I see no reason why the Under will be in danger in any game this series. Maybe 1 Over will hit in Boston. But I doubt it. Tim Thomas and Lou put on a hellavu show last night. Especially Thomas.
GStar
06-02-2011
01:11 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx6.12
(total posts: 509)
11
11
First off it's not gloating Anthony I'm just giving you a hard time.
- Second they didn't outplay Vancouver. It was a very evenly matched game; hence the 1-0 final score. If they outplaying Vancouver in "every aspect of the game" they would've won. Pretty simple. - Third of all I very much doubt you are 21-5 picking NHL winners. - Also "should haves" dont put money in your pocket.
Anthony
06-02-2011
01:02 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx.111
(total posts: 20)
16
11
@Gstar
Please dont gloat. Boston Bruins outplayed Vancouver in every aspect of game last night. Boston outshot Canucks 36-34 and outhit Canucks 31-30. Even Barry Melrose on Espn who picked Canucks to win Stanley cup said yesterday that Boston outplayed Vancouver and the Bruins should have won. That last goal from Vancouver was offsides and should not have counted anyways. I was 21-4 in NHL picks before Bruins lost last night. Now I'm 21-5.
BC
06-02-2011
01:00 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx3.21
(total posts: 80)
11
12
it may hit but i dont like it
im playing NYM to score first for 1x Pitt/NYM -P. Maholm 5yes 6no WHIP=1.17 M. Pelfrey 3yes 8no WHIP=1.46 Pitt is ranked 11 in scoring in 1st inning with a .65 avg when away. NYM ranks 7 in scoring in 1st inning with a .79 avg when Home
Vonnyb
06-02-2011
12:48 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx46.3
(total posts: 196)
11
10
Do anybody like the no score 1st inn pit/nym game at 1pm?
mike
06-02-2011
12:33 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx.206
(total posts: 17)
9
10
I like the over 9 in the Nats/Dbacks game too. I'm gonna parlay that with the Dbacks straight up. Also taking M's/Rays under 6.5, and will likely take the no score 1st inning in that game when it becomes available to me.
overworked bullpen
06-02-2011
12:25 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx.206
(total posts: 17)
11
10
I'm the rationale for all of walt's picks!!!!
|
Los Angeles Angels at Houston Astros.
Line: Angels -135; Astros +125.
8:10 PM ET (Game 969-970)
Joe Blanton is an absolutely terrible pitcher and should not be favored on the road against anyone. I know the Astros stink, but so do the Angels. They've been overrated for years.
I may post another pick later. If so, I'll tweet it out. I'll have updates on Twitter - @walterfootball.
Prediction: Astros +125 (1 Unit) -- Correct; +$125
Minnesota Twins at Boston Red Sox.
Line: Twins +185; Red Sox -200.
7:10 PM ET (Game 961-962)
It's no surprise that the Red Sox were swept in Texas. Their hot start was pretty unrealistic, and they're bound to regress to the norm. Considering they have no available bullpen tonight, the Twins at +185 looks like a decent deal. This line should probably be -170/+160.
I may post another pick later. If so, I'll tweet it out. I'll have updates on Twitter - @walterfootball.
Prediction: Twins +185 (0.5 Units) -- Incorrect; -$50
Baltimore Orioles at Los Angeles Angels.
Line: Orioles +125; Angels -135.
3:35 PM ET (Game 925-926)
Copy-paste action again here: I once again don't understand why the Orioles are underdog. They have the superior hitters and bullpen.
Prediction: Orioles +125 (1 Unit) -- Correct; +$125
Baltimore Orioles at Los Angeles Angels.
Line: Orioles +135; Angels -145.
4:05 PM ET (Game 971-972)
Copy-paste action here: I once again don't understand why the Orioles are underdog. They have the superior hitters and bullpen.
Prediction: Orioles +135 (1 Unit) -- Correct; +$135
Baltimore Orioles at Los Angeles Angels.
Line: Orioles +120; Angels -130.
10:05 PM ET (Game 927-928)
I once again don't understand why the Orioles are underdog. They have the superior hitters and bullpen. The starting pitching is about the same tonight, so Baltimore should be favored by about -120.
Prediction: Orioles +120 (1 Unit) -- Incorrect; -$120
Miami Marlins at Philadelphia Phillies.
Line: Marlins +195; Phillies -220.
7:05 PM ET (Game 953-954)
The Phillies and Marlins stink, but the latter is hotter, having won three of four. I feel like Philadelphia should be -155 or so, which means there's tons of value with Miami.
I may post another pick later. If so, I'll tweet it out. I'll have updates on Twitter - @walterfootball.
Prediction: Marlins +195 (1 Unit) -- Incorrect; -$100
Baltimore Orioles at Los Angeles Angels.
Line: Orioles +110; Angels -120.
7:05 PM ET (Game 953-954)
I don't understand why the Orioles are underdog. They have the better startng pitcher and bullpen, and they're the superior squad overall.
Prediction: Orioles +110 (1 Unit) -- Correct; +$110
Chicago White Sox at Texas Rangers.
Line: White Sox +105; Rangers -115.
8:05 PM ET (Game 923-924)
The NFL Draft is over, so I'm now ready to lose money betting baseball. The Rangers look like a solid play today, as my projected line for them was -125. Texas has been the hotter team, while Chris Sale has not pitched as well on the road.
Prediction: Rangers -115 (1 Unit) -- Incorrect; -$115
Note: For legality purposes, this Web site does not promote or advocate gambling. This is solely for entertainment purposes only.
2013 Fantasy Football Rankings - June 19
2014 NFL Mock Draft - June 18
Charlie's 2014 NFL Mock Draft - June 17
2013 NBA Mock Draft - May 22
NFL Picks - Feb. 3
© 1999-2013 Walter Cherepinsky : all rights reserved
Privacy Policy
2 5 9
Leave a comment