This is Matt McGuire's NFL Draft blog, where he'll talk about the NFL Draft, anything that has to do with football and whatever else is on his mind. Send Matt an e-mail here: [email protected].
All other e-mail, including advertising and link proposals, send to: [email protected]
Posted Sept. 14, 2009
Jay Cutler Trade Evaluation
I am not one to have a knee-jerk opinion. I think people who knee jerk (or completely change their opinion in a short period of time also known as "fair-weathered") are amateurs. It shows that your opinion isn't strong and you are admitting you didn't do adequate analysis in foresight. There is nothing wrong with admitting you are wrong because if you never admit your are wrong, then you can never learn anything.
Get to your point, McGuire: The Jay Cutler trade is still in the Bears favor.
Kyle Orton is not a good quarterback. He isn't even an average quarterback. Josh McDaniels' gimmick shotgun offense will fluff his stats, but Orton doesn't have the arm to beat a defense on throws that require velocity, and he is a horrible decision-maker (i.e. left-handed goal line pass versus Seattle in preseason).
Let's examine Chicago's options. One option was to give up two first-round picks for a quarterback with a career 7.4 yards per pass attempt and 45 touchdowns in the past two seasons at the ripe age of 25 (when the trade was made) with elite arm strength (this is unbelievably rare).
Their other option was to draft a quarterback. At No. 18 overall, the only quarterback that potentially could have been on the board is Josh Freeman.
Either way, Chicago was going to have to invest their 2009 first-round draft pick in a quarterback.
The question remains: Jay Cutler and your 2010 first-round pick, or Josh Freeman?
Josh Freeman is the No. 3 quarterback in Tampa. He is 21 years old and it will take him a while to develop. He was highly inconsistent at Kansas State and you don't get immediate production out of him.
Clearly, Chicago made the right decision trading for Cutler.
If you think Chicago made the wrong trade, then you think Orton is a better quarterback than Cutler.
If you previously thought Chicago made the right trade but now you take that statement back, then that makes you an amateur because you think Cutler isn't as good as Josh Freeman, which is to say absolutely ridiculous.
No point in trading for Cousins, there's almost no chance he succeeds. 0 WRs and TEs to throw it to, so it would just be a waste of his prime years. If Shanahan reealllly wants him, wait until next year since he seems to have a rift with the Redskins. Besides, next year's quarterback class is much better if they fail to sign Cousins in FA.
I don't agree on a lot. They have so many cuts on the OL you didn't mention including Dunlap and Franklin which will save them 12+ million. Stuckey is not worth 3 million. They can make on very solid move or a couple with draft help to protect Phillip. Cruz could be an interesting pair with Allen if he can return to prior form though.