They addressed a lot of needs. Pass rush, depth, center and a replacement for gates. People get caught up in protecting Rivers. Pass blocking wasn't the problem, it was run blocking due to a massive injury bug that plagued the whole season. Tuerk had an ACL tear... its very possible today to come back from such an injury. I like that we focused on depth at linebacker. Teo isn't the answer. Bosa WILL fit in our defense. we ran a nickel 70% of the time. He opens things up for the linebackers which allows the secondary to make plays. Talesco did a good job. They deserve a B at least.
I'm more optimistic but the grade is about right. If Zeke has a good year, we get through the first four games and our key players stay healthy it's a good step. I think Smith will work out. The cowboys team doctor performed the surgery, he's probably the most capable member of the cowboys. If we go into next year having won ten games, turned out with four starters from this draft with a top five potential rb, a 90 percent smith, improved byron, Lawrence, Gregory and two of our later picks pan out we should be Happy. We'll bring in more pass rushers and corners by next year. I really believe most of those things could happen and we can make a run in the second and third year of this window. Obviously a disaster has a 50 percent chance of happening with the cowboys but that would doom the season anyways. Ramsey wasn't all we needed to get to the promise land, and I don't think he was the piece that was taking us to a Superbowl. We're still close to being close. Would have preferred Payton Lynch, but not enough to be tied to him. Also, not trading with Baltimore was just stupid. We'd have another 4th round DE coming into camp.
This is Matt McGuire's NFL Draft blog, where he'll talk about the NFL Draft, anything that has to do with football and whatever else is on his mind. Send Matt an e-mail here: [email protected].
All other e-mail, including advertising and link proposals, send to: [email protected]
Posted Nov. 5, 2008
Matt Stafford - a Top-Five NFL Draft Pick?
Matt Stafford came into the 2008 season with the Dark Knight-esque hype. He was the second coming of Carson Palmer and JaMarcus Russell with his jaw-dropping arm strength. The Georgia Bulldogs finished the 2007 season 11-2 with a dominating Sugar Bowl victory. Many thought they were the best team in the country even after LSU's championship victory.
I was not sold on Stafford. I saw a quarterback on game film with mediocre accuracy and decision-making. I did not see a great leader or any signs of urgency from him to win a game.
In only four games did Stafford complete more than 61 percent of his passes. He only averaged 7.4 yards per pass attempt (YPA). His touchdown to interception ratio was 19:10 - not impressive. He ranked 61st in the country for pass attempts, relying on the Georgia defense and Knowshon Moreno to win games for him.
I knew how high his potential was; I just wanted him to step up his game and play like a quarterback worthy of a No. 1 pick.
Well, from time to time, every draftnik changes his mind.
I am now a believer that Matt Stafford is a top-five pick next April in the 2009 NFL Draft. Let me go over the reasons to explain myself:
1. Through his first eight games in 2007, Stafford averaged 6.06 YPA. This season, he has raised that to 8.5 YPA. He is making more plays in the passing game and being more of a reason for Georgia winning games. Georgia is ranked 39th in the country in rushing offense. Stafford has led this team to some big wins over South Carolina, Arizona State, Vanderbilt and LSU.
2. Franchise quarterbacks are viewed as extremely valuable on Draft Day, especially by new coaching regimes. If Joe Flacco out of Delaware is traded up for in the first round, then I cannot deny that some team is going to take Stafford in the top five, but more likely the top three picks. Despite Stafford's weaknesses, in the end I believe they will be overlooked because of his extremely high upside and ...
3. ...the lack of quarterback talent in the 2009 NFL Draft. There is no one in the senior class worth mentioning. I currently do not have a grade on any senior higher than the fourth round. It's pathetic.
I do not see Sam Bradford, Tim Tebow, Colt McCoy, Josh Freeman or Mark Sanchez declaring for 2009. I will blog about that soon. With no projected starter outside of Stafford in 2008, his draft value becomes even higher.
4. More teams than usual drafting high are in need of a franchise quarterback. In the 2008 NFL Draft, only Baltimore and Atlanta were desperately lacking a future at the position. Detroit, Kansas City and San Francisco have nothing at quarterback. Seattle might even consider drafting Stafford with Matt Hasselbeck turning 34 soon. With three definite teams desperate for a franchise signal caller that will be drafting in the top six, Stafford is highly unlikely to fall. Also, the fact that there are no other quarterbacks in this draft, as I previously mentioned, means that Stafford's value goes up even more. It is a matter of supply and demand. There is a low supply of quarterbacks, and a very strong demand for franchise signal callers.
The college football insiders are saying that Stafford is a sure thing to bolt for the draft this year so there goes my theory of him staying for his senior year like Brady Quinn and Matt Leinart.
I know he just had a three-interception performance against Florida, but I do not think this will affect his stock much for reasons previously stated.
This does not have anything to do really with my opinion or grade on Stafford. Granted, I grade him higher than I did in the preseason because he has been more productive, but I still want to see a monster game (300-plus yards, three-plus touchdowns, one or less interceptions) and more urgency with his leadership like Matt Ryan at B.C.
Currently, I am giving Stafford my first-round/4-star grade.